Title: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 21, 2014, 08:35:41 PM About time one might think, the law against it was removed during the 80's IIRC, at the same time homosexuality became legal.
Having sex with animals will become illegal in Sweden the first of April. Today it's only illegal if the animal takes damage from it in any way. The penatly will be fine or prison up to 2 years (which in Sweden usually is 1 year with good behaviour). Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: progamerbet.com on February 21, 2014, 08:42:04 PM Guess I'll have to divorce my wife then ;D
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Jacko on February 21, 2014, 08:43:07 PM Guess I'll have to divorce my wife then ;D Just sprayed my tea on my screen LOL. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Localbtcbuyer on February 21, 2014, 08:44:41 PM Guess I'll have to divorce my wife then ;D Bahahahha, thats great. Made me laugh while at work, good job. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: ElectricMucus on February 21, 2014, 08:57:12 PM Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 21, 2014, 09:57:36 PM Guess I'll have to divorce my wife then ;D Hahhahaha, that made my evening!Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: fatguyyyyy on February 21, 2014, 10:28:29 PM Thats just some next level shit.
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Sheldor333 on February 21, 2014, 11:29:49 PM I always thought of them as strange, now I have more proof for that...hehe
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: jarhed on February 22, 2014, 12:54:21 AM What if the animal is doing the humping?
What if an unsuspecting drunk person is getting rammed from behind by man's best friend? ??? Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Slark on February 22, 2014, 01:31:03 AM Have you ever met someone IRL who likes to make love to animals? O_O I have never men someone like that... I think there are not many people like that.
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 01:46:17 AM What if the animal is doing the humping? Yeah, been thinking about this myself - I've been to the weird site of the internet and the vid I saw the dog didn't really seem to suffer from it... On the other hand it could have been pumped with sexual enchancement drugs, who knows. But if it isn't drugged I see no harm, however it's pretty backwards to have it legalized either way.What if an unsuspecting drunk person is getting rammed from behind by man's best friend? ??? Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 01:50:50 AM Have you ever met someone IRL who likes to make love to animals? O_O I have never men someone like that... I think there are not many people like that. Not that I know off, it is really rare. The animal protection thingy has gained 227 reports in 35 years.. So the law didn't really matter much either.Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: TheButterZone on February 22, 2014, 02:00:49 AM Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from?
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 22, 2014, 02:03:21 AM I personally don't think the law will change anything, those who didn't
have sex with animals ( the majority, the normal people ) will still not have sex with animals, and the people who used to will most likely continue. It's nothing you do in public anyways I would guess, and if you're molesting your dog in your home a law won't change that. Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 02:52:58 AM I personally don't think the law will change anything, those who didn't Yup, it's like when they outlawed illegal downloading. Like 90% between the ages 13-50 still download illegally because the chances of getting caught are sooo slim. They have made a few examples taking down 3-4 hard working people or so with insane fine amounts. And they have spent millions and millions on anti piracy bureaucracy... Shit's so corrupt..have sex with animals ( the majority, the normal people ) will still not have sex with animals, and the people who used to will most likely continue. It's nothing you do in public anyways I would guess, and if you're molesting your dog in your home a law won't change that. Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 02:53:31 AM Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from? I don't understand what you mean by slippery slope BS come from.Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 22, 2014, 03:25:41 AM I personally don't think the law will change anything, those who didn't Yup, it's like when they outlawed illegal downloading. Like 90% between the ages 13-50 still download illegally because the chances of getting caught are sooo slim. They have made a few examples taking down 3-4 hard working people or so with insane fine amounts. And they have spent millions and millions on anti piracy bureaucracy... Shit's so corrupt..have sex with animals ( the majority, the normal people ) will still not have sex with animals, and the people who used to will most likely continue. It's nothing you do in public anyways I would guess, and if you're molesting your dog in your home a law won't change that. Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong. Make a law against something like robbery where you it's a matter of a public act - less robberies are committed. It's an excellent example the law against downloading. People won't get caught - people don't stop downloading. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: BotwinBG on February 22, 2014, 03:27:56 AM Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong. So disgusting, sickening and plain wrong should be illegal ? By who's definition ? Someone might find two guys fucking each other just as disgusting, sickening and plain wrong as a woman fucking with a dog. Also, I suspect not every animal sex act is animal abuse, probably a world of difference between using a hamster as a fleshlight and having a dog mount some girl. Basically a bullshit law by bullshit "politicians" who got nothing else to do. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: RGBKey on February 22, 2014, 03:32:28 AM Pretty much this.
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 22, 2014, 03:41:15 AM Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong. So disgusting, sickening and plain wrong should be illegal ? By who's definition ? Someone might find two guys fucking each other just as disgusting, sickening and plain wrong as a woman fucking with a dog. Also, I suspect not every animal sex act is animal abuse, probably a world of difference between using a hamster as a fleshlight and having a dog mount some girl. Basically a bullshit law by bullshit "politicians" who got nothing else to do. Sickening, disgusting and plain wrong are my own words that represent my own view of the matter. So what you're basically saying is "If you ban sex with animals you might as well ban sex between 2 men"? How about the abuse of children? Should that also be legal, because after all, hey, it's just "someone who thought it was wrong" that had made a law against it. Hope mods delete your post, it's fucking distasteful to be honest. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: TheButterZone on February 22, 2014, 05:14:58 AM Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from? I don't understand what you mean by slippery slope BS come from.That "if you allow gays to marry, what next, animals and humans" et cetera BS. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 07:48:29 AM Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong. So disgusting, sickening and plain wrong should be illegal ? By who's definition ? Someone might find two guys fucking each other just as disgusting, sickening and plain wrong as a woman fucking with a dog. Also, I suspect not every animal sex act is animal abuse, probably a world of difference between using a hamster as a fleshlight and having a dog mount some girl. Basically a bullshit law by bullshit "politicians" who got nothing else to do. Sickening, disgusting and plain wrong are my own words that represent my own view of the matter. So what you're basically saying is "If you ban sex with animals you might as well ban sex between 2 men"? How about the abuse of children? Should that also be legal, because after all, hey, it's just "someone who thought it was wrong" that had made a law against it. Hope mods delete your post, it's fucking distasteful to be honest. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 07:49:17 AM Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from? I don't understand what you mean by slippery slope BS come from.That "if you allow gays to marry, what next, animals and humans" et cetera BS. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: jarhed on February 22, 2014, 10:49:19 AM Sweden and neighboring states should be monitored closely for any species hopping viruses.
As much as we care for animals, most really don't like us at all and the 1348–50 European black-plague was a biological statement from the animal kingdom. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 22, 2014, 01:17:17 PM Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong. So disgusting, sickening and plain wrong should be illegal ? By who's definition ? Someone might find two guys fucking each other just as disgusting, sickening and plain wrong as a woman fucking with a dog. Also, I suspect not every animal sex act is animal abuse, probably a world of difference between using a hamster as a fleshlight and having a dog mount some girl. Basically a bullshit law by bullshit "politicians" who got nothing else to do. Sickening, disgusting and plain wrong are my own words that represent my own view of the matter. So what you're basically saying is "If you ban sex with animals you might as well ban sex between 2 men"? How about the abuse of children? Should that also be legal, because after all, hey, it's just "someone who thought it was wrong" that had made a law against it. Hope mods delete your post, it's fucking distasteful to be honest. point against his logic sounding something like this "durr there shouldn't be laws against something just because people think it's wrong". Every coin has 2 sides? Sure, I'm sure there are people enjoying sexual relations with animals that take no harm from it, and if you think that should be legal, feel free to petition it. You might get support from some of society's other outcasts. Also, who is to judge if the animal took damage? You can't 'measure' psychological damage per say ( yes, this also applies to animals ), and even if there is no visible impact or wounds, would you just assume the animal took no damage? But once again, please do make a public petition about it, and see for yourself if anyone is willing to support you. Freak. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 03:01:36 PM The law against pedophilia was an example to prove my You are the one with flawed logic. "durr there shouldn't be laws just because people think it's wrong???" - when did either of us say that?. Also you are mixing me up with the guy you originally quoted but guess your pig eyes are too lazy to read who's posting what. Sure we don't know about wether the dog take psychological damage from having an awesome time, but the odds are against it.point against his logic sounding something like this "durr there shouldn't be laws against something just because people think it's wrong". Every coin has 2 sides? Sure, I'm sure there are people enjoying sexual relations with animals that take no harm from it, and if you think that should be legal, feel free to petition it. You might get support from some of society's other outcasts. Also, who is to judge if the animal took damage? You can't 'measure' psychological damage per say ( yes, this also applies to animals ), and even if there is no visible impact or wounds, would you just assume the animal took no damage? But once again, please do make a public petition about it, and see for yourself if anyone is willing to support you. Freak. I am the OP btw who said it was about time and explained that it was removed at the same time homolaws were removed. I dont really give a shit if it's legal or not, as me and some other guy stated earlier this will be like torrenting... It's not like you take your dog out on the town square and let it bang you for all to see? The risk you run of getting caught is if you make a movie of it and show your face, which is a bit darwin-ish. Also calling someone freak for having a fetish is wrong, people are born drawn to animals just as people are drawn to same sex or to kids - sure it's not the most tasteful things around but the people who have them can rarely help it. I am sure you have no fetish mr perfect :) I'd like to see you come back from this, look at the letters piggy. EDIT: And since you wanted the mod to delete his post you are also against free speach. Shame on you. Crawl back into your mothers basement and watch your loliporn (C WUT I DID THAR)? Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Lethn on February 22, 2014, 03:09:39 PM Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from? I don't understand what you mean by slippery slope BS come from.That "if you allow gays to marry, what next, animals and humans" et cetera BS. People who say that kind of bullshit are just revealing what kind of homophobic, ignorant and hateful morons they are so they're not worth even paying attention to. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 22, 2014, 03:22:50 PM The law against pedophilia was an example to prove my You are the one with flawed logic. "durr there shouldn't be laws just because people think it's wrong???" - when did either of us say that?. Also you are mixing me up with the guy you originally quoted but guess your pig eyes are too lazy to read who's posting what. Sure we don't know about wether the dog take psychological damage from having an awesome time, but the odds are against it.point against his logic sounding something like this "durr there shouldn't be laws against something just because people think it's wrong". Every coin has 2 sides? Sure, I'm sure there are people enjoying sexual relations with animals that take no harm from it, and if you think that should be legal, feel free to petition it. You might get support from some of society's other outcasts. Also, who is to judge if the animal took damage? You can't 'measure' psychological damage per say ( yes, this also applies to animals ), and even if there is no visible impact or wounds, would you just assume the animal took no damage? But once again, please do make a public petition about it, and see for yourself if anyone is willing to support you. Freak. I am the OP btw who said it was about time and explained that it was removed at the same time homolaws were removed. I dont really give a shit if it's legal or not, as me and some other guy stated earlier this will be like torrenting... It's not like you take your dog out on the town square and let it bang you for all to see? The risk you run of getting caught is if you make a movie of it and show your face, which is a bit darwin-ish. Also calling someone freak for having a fetish is wrong, people are born drawn to animals just as people are drawn to same sex or to kids - sure it's not the most tasteful things around but the people who have them can rarely help it. I am sure you have no fetish mr perfect :) I'd like to see you come back from this, look at the letters piggy. The quote about his flawed logic was in fact not an actual quote which you may have guessed, but if you look up his original response you'll find that reasoning after quoting me saying "then again why would it be legal". It's one thing to have a fetish for something, abusing children and animals is another. I don't mind that people are sexually attracted to either babies or animals, but if they abuse them sexually that is a problem. 'They can rarely help it' is a really bad excuse and wouldn't hold up in court if caught abusing someone. "As me and some other guy" - The 'other guy' responded to one of -my- posts agreeing with -me-, somehow you're implying he is right and I am wrong? My ground statement was that the law won't in fact change anything, but that being said I think it's right to actually make that law. Even if the animal itself doesn't take any harm, it has no possibility to show consent to the act. Isn't that classified as rape? You pretty much got your back against the wall here. And I did not call anyone a freak based on their 'fetish', but rather on the fact that he/she/they happens to think animal abuse should be legal. You might have confused yourself a little too much fantasizing about dogs humping women. :) Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Luno on February 22, 2014, 03:33:34 PM Depiction of sex with animals (as children pornography) would have to be outlawed too. No more national Geographic Channel for Sweden then.
How about your cat or dog walking in on you and GF, is that also a sexual violation of your pets rights? We had this debate in my country some years back about if sex with animals should be outlawed. What came out of it was a lot of right wing politicians stating that government should not interfere with peoples sexual preferences, and then becoming immensely embarrassed, when the journalist as the next question asked if they could come up with any examples... Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 22, 2014, 04:00:54 PM Depiction of sex with animals (as children pornography) would have to be outlawed too. No more national Geographic Channel for Sweden then. Depiction of animal-human sex should be illegal, as part of the law against animal abuse.How about your cat or dog walking in on you and GF, is that also a sexual violation of your pets rights? We had this debate in my country some years back about if sex with animals should be outlawed. What came out of it was a lot of right wing politicians stating that government should not interfere with peoples sexual preferences, and then becoming immensely embarrassed, when the journalist as the next question asked if they could come up with any examples... However showing animals having sex in context of a nature show or whatever has always been ok and should be. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 04:38:11 PM The law against pedophilia was an example to prove my You are the one with flawed logic. "durr there shouldn't be laws just because people think it's wrong???" - when did either of us say that?. Also you are mixing me up with the guy you originally quoted but guess your pig eyes are too lazy to read who's posting what. Sure we don't know about wether the dog take psychological damage from having an awesome time, but the odds are against it.point against his logic sounding something like this "durr there shouldn't be laws against something just because people think it's wrong". Every coin has 2 sides? Sure, I'm sure there are people enjoying sexual relations with animals that take no harm from it, and if you think that should be legal, feel free to petition it. You might get support from some of society's other outcasts. Also, who is to judge if the animal took damage? You can't 'measure' psychological damage per say ( yes, this also applies to animals ), and even if there is no visible impact or wounds, would you just assume the animal took no damage? But once again, please do make a public petition about it, and see for yourself if anyone is willing to support you. Freak. I am the OP btw who said it was about time and explained that it was removed at the same time homolaws were removed. I dont really give a shit if it's legal or not, as me and some other guy stated earlier this will be like torrenting... It's not like you take your dog out on the town square and let it bang you for all to see? The risk you run of getting caught is if you make a movie of it and show your face, which is a bit darwin-ish. Also calling someone freak for having a fetish is wrong, people are born drawn to animals just as people are drawn to same sex or to kids - sure it's not the most tasteful things around but the people who have them can rarely help it. I am sure you have no fetish mr perfect :) I'd like to see you come back from this, look at the letters piggy. The quote about his flawed logic was in fact not an actual quote which you may have guessed, but if you look up his original response you'll find that reasoning after quoting me saying "then again why would it be legal". It's one thing to have a fetish for something, abusing children and animals is another. I don't mind that people are sexually attracted to either babies or animals, but if they abuse them sexually that is a problem. 'They can rarely help it' is a really bad excuse and wouldn't hold up in court if caught abusing someone. "As me and some other guy" - The 'other guy' responded to one of -my- posts agreeing with -me-, somehow you're implying he is right and I am wrong? My ground statement was that the law won't in fact change anything, but that being said I think it's right to actually make that law. Even if the animal itself doesn't take any harm, it has no possibility to show consent to the act. Isn't that classified as rape? You pretty much got your back against the wall here. And I did not call anyone a freak based on their 'fetish', but rather on the fact that he/she/they happens to think animal abuse should be legal. You might have confused yourself a little too much fantasizing about dogs humping women. :) As for you and the other guy, that's very relative and depends on what the outcome is. If the outcome is that a father of 2 gets sued for $200k for downloading ONE movie (example, but the numbers were extremly high in one case) while the rest 99.9% goes unpunished WITH the exception that the tax money gets wasted on nothing (so you could make the argument that everybody who works gets punished for the stupid downloading law (yeah it's stupid now that years has passed and we've seen the outcome of this - millions of tax payers money wasted on Pontén and his... gang? Guess they have it pretty good. That law would be better off gone, people would be richer and do the same things we do anyway, didn't some guy once say if a law would make XX % of the inhabitants into criminals it shouldn't be passed? Well there you have a great example of that (I know it has nothing to do with doggysex being forbidden, but it proves that some laws are stupid even if they in theory should be there). No consent? If it jumps the woman and start banging her isn't that the dogs way of giving consent? It's your back that's turned against the wall, not mine. Nobody has said that animal abuse should be legal? There is a different between abuse and use (NOTE that I still dont think it should be legal as it is very backwards but it's a law that will have absolutley no effect whatsoever, except the pervs who go out and sex other peoples horses, but that's illegal today as well I think..). Even tho I haven't slept for 48 hours you seem more confused than me. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Kiki112 on February 22, 2014, 05:27:01 PM why?
if homosexuality is legal so should bestiality be.. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: DanielVG on February 22, 2014, 05:27:52 PM Aaah shit, now i can scrap my annual trip to Sweden
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 06:26:43 PM Aaah shit, now i can scrap my annual trip to Sweden :D Remember reading a while ago about something that you could call a dog bordello - it could however just be made up as much of our news stories has shown to be pure lies by our big medias.. And they wonder why they lose readers.http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/expressen-avslojar/har-erbjuds-expressens-reporter-att-ha-sex-med-en-hund/ to your scandinavians who wants to see the scoop or pretend scoop - fun stuff anyway. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: OrnateRock on February 22, 2014, 06:30:02 PM Aaah shit, now i can scrap my annual trip to Sweden +1, was looking forward to this ;DTitle: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 22, 2014, 06:39:39 PM The law against pedophilia was an example to prove my You are the one with flawed logic. "durr there shouldn't be laws just because people think it's wrong???" - when did either of us say that?. Also you are mixing me up with the guy you originally quoted but guess your pig eyes are too lazy to read who's posting what. Sure we don't know about wether the dog take psychological damage from having an awesome time, but the odds are against it.point against his logic sounding something like this "durr there shouldn't be laws against something just because people think it's wrong". Every coin has 2 sides? Sure, I'm sure there are people enjoying sexual relations with animals that take no harm from it, and if you think that should be legal, feel free to petition it. You might get support from some of society's other outcasts. Also, who is to judge if the animal took damage? You can't 'measure' psychological damage per say ( yes, this also applies to animals ), and even if there is no visible impact or wounds, would you just assume the animal took no damage? But once again, please do make a public petition about it, and see for yourself if anyone is willing to support you. Freak. I am the OP btw who said it was about time and explained that it was removed at the same time homolaws were removed. I dont really give a shit if it's legal or not, as me and some other guy stated earlier this will be like torrenting... It's not like you take your dog out on the town square and let it bang you for all to see? The risk you run of getting caught is if you make a movie of it and show your face, which is a bit darwin-ish. Also calling someone freak for having a fetish is wrong, people are born drawn to animals just as people are drawn to same sex or to kids - sure it's not the most tasteful things around but the people who have them can rarely help it. I am sure you have no fetish mr perfect :) I'd like to see you come back from this, look at the letters piggy. The quote about his flawed logic was in fact not an actual quote which you may have guessed, but if you look up his original response you'll find that reasoning after quoting me saying "then again why would it be legal". It's one thing to have a fetish for something, abusing children and animals is another. I don't mind that people are sexually attracted to either babies or animals, but if they abuse them sexually that is a problem. 'They can rarely help it' is a really bad excuse and wouldn't hold up in court if caught abusing someone. "As me and some other guy" - The 'other guy' responded to one of -my- posts agreeing with -me-, somehow you're implying he is right and I am wrong? My ground statement was that the law won't in fact change anything, but that being said I think it's right to actually make that law. Even if the animal itself doesn't take any harm, it has no possibility to show consent to the act. Isn't that classified as rape? You pretty much got your back against the wall here. And I did not call anyone a freak based on their 'fetish', but rather on the fact that he/she/they happens to think animal abuse should be legal. You might have confused yourself a little too much fantasizing about dogs humping women. :) As for you and the other guy, that's very relative and depends on what the outcome is. If the outcome is that a father of 2 gets sued for $200k for downloading ONE movie (example, but the numbers were extremly high in one case) while the rest 99.9% goes unpunished WITH the exception that the tax money gets wasted on nothing (so you could make the argument that everybody who works gets punished for the stupid downloading law (yeah it's stupid now that years has passed and we've seen the outcome of this - millions of tax payers money wasted on Pontén and his... gang? Guess they have it pretty good. That law would be better off gone, people would be richer and do the same things we do anyway, didn't some guy once say if a law would make XX % of the inhabitants into criminals it shouldn't be passed? Well there you have a great example of that (I know it has nothing to do with doggysex being forbidden, but it proves that some laws are stupid even if they in theory should be there). No consent? If it jumps the woman and start banging her isn't that the dogs way of giving consent? It's your back that's turned against the wall, not mine. Nobody has said that animal abuse should be legal? There is a different between abuse and use (NOTE that I still dont think it should be legal as it is very backwards but it's a law that will have absolutley no effect whatsoever, except the pervs who go out and sex other peoples horses, but that's illegal today as well I think..). Even tho I haven't slept for 48 hours you seem more confused than me. Also, you fail to understand that a rape isn't a rape if both parts want it to happen, which means if I "wanted it" there is no rape involved and I should if caught be convicted for pedophilia. Also, there sure is a difference between abuse and use, but in that case I'll just change my ground point and say that I'm against 'use' of animals as well. In reality there's no difference of the 2 in this case to me, but I see what you're getting at. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 22, 2014, 06:43:24 PM https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTjmZOOe3SGT0OmU-LP1NfgnQiGiXbM0A_6_JvIk16lqFfXOvr7
"Say it ain't so, Gustav." Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: backtrackit on February 22, 2014, 06:45:57 PM Damn that's this years holiday spoiled then :'(
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: BakaBum on February 22, 2014, 06:57:19 PM Oh no! I will can´t make sex with Merkel? :(
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: MakeBelieve on February 22, 2014, 07:08:05 PM It was legal to have sex with animals? thats disgusting.
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 07:50:59 PM The law against pedophilia was an example to prove my You are the one with flawed logic. "durr there shouldn't be laws just because people think it's wrong???" - when did either of us say that?. Also you are mixing me up with the guy you originally quoted but guess your pig eyes are too lazy to read who's posting what. Sure we don't know about wether the dog take psychological damage from having an awesome time, but the odds are against it.point against his logic sounding something like this "durr there shouldn't be laws against something just because people think it's wrong". Every coin has 2 sides? Sure, I'm sure there are people enjoying sexual relations with animals that take no harm from it, and if you think that should be legal, feel free to petition it. You might get support from some of society's other outcasts. Also, who is to judge if the animal took damage? You can't 'measure' psychological damage per say ( yes, this also applies to animals ), and even if there is no visible impact or wounds, would you just assume the animal took no damage? But once again, please do make a public petition about it, and see for yourself if anyone is willing to support you. Freak. I am the OP btw who said it was about time and explained that it was removed at the same time homolaws were removed. I dont really give a shit if it's legal or not, as me and some other guy stated earlier this will be like torrenting... It's not like you take your dog out on the town square and let it bang you for all to see? The risk you run of getting caught is if you make a movie of it and show your face, which is a bit darwin-ish. Also calling someone freak for having a fetish is wrong, people are born drawn to animals just as people are drawn to same sex or to kids - sure it's not the most tasteful things around but the people who have them can rarely help it. I am sure you have no fetish mr perfect :) I'd like to see you come back from this, look at the letters piggy. The quote about his flawed logic was in fact not an actual quote which you may have guessed, but if you look up his original response you'll find that reasoning after quoting me saying "then again why would it be legal". It's one thing to have a fetish for something, abusing children and animals is another. I don't mind that people are sexually attracted to either babies or animals, but if they abuse them sexually that is a problem. 'They can rarely help it' is a really bad excuse and wouldn't hold up in court if caught abusing someone. "As me and some other guy" - The 'other guy' responded to one of -my- posts agreeing with -me-, somehow you're implying he is right and I am wrong? My ground statement was that the law won't in fact change anything, but that being said I think it's right to actually make that law. Even if the animal itself doesn't take any harm, it has no possibility to show consent to the act. Isn't that classified as rape? You pretty much got your back against the wall here. And I did not call anyone a freak based on their 'fetish', but rather on the fact that he/she/they happens to think animal abuse should be legal. You might have confused yourself a little too much fantasizing about dogs humping women. :) As for you and the other guy, that's very relative and depends on what the outcome is. If the outcome is that a father of 2 gets sued for $200k for downloading ONE movie (example, but the numbers were extremly high in one case) while the rest 99.9% goes unpunished WITH the exception that the tax money gets wasted on nothing (so you could make the argument that everybody who works gets punished for the stupid downloading law (yeah it's stupid now that years has passed and we've seen the outcome of this - millions of tax payers money wasted on Pontén and his... gang? Guess they have it pretty good. That law would be better off gone, people would be richer and do the same things we do anyway, didn't some guy once say if a law would make XX % of the inhabitants into criminals it shouldn't be passed? Well there you have a great example of that (I know it has nothing to do with doggysex being forbidden, but it proves that some laws are stupid even if they in theory should be there). No consent? If it jumps the woman and start banging her isn't that the dogs way of giving consent? It's your back that's turned against the wall, not mine. Nobody has said that animal abuse should be legal? There is a different between abuse and use (NOTE that I still dont think it should be legal as it is very backwards but it's a law that will have absolutley no effect whatsoever, except the pervs who go out and sex other peoples horses, but that's illegal today as well I think..). Even tho I haven't slept for 48 hours you seem more confused than me. I'm not gonna bother, I wasn't referring to your sick example of a dog initiating the act while talking about consent. Also, you fail to understand that a rape isn't a rape if both parts want it to happen, which means if I "wanted it" there is no rape involved and I should if caught be convicted for pedophilia. Also, there sure is a difference between abuse and use, but in that case I'll just change my ground point and say that I'm against 'use' of animals as well. In reality there's no difference of the 2 in this case to me, but I see what you're getting at. I dont fail to understand that, I was making a point - you fail to see the comparison. By societies rules it's wrong yes, but if both wants it why is it wrong? I know you would be convicted for pedophilia, jesus do you look at the world so black and white you can't even discuss stuff in theory? By saying that there is no difference in the 2 "for you" means that you have already made up your mind. People need to be more objective... Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 22, 2014, 08:06:47 PM The law against pedophilia was an example to prove my You are the one with flawed logic. "durr there shouldn't be laws just because people think it's wrong???" - when did either of us say that?. Also you are mixing me up with the guy you originally quoted but guess your pig eyes are too lazy to read who's posting what. Sure we don't know about wether the dog take psychological damage from having an awesome time, but the odds are against it.point against his logic sounding something like this "durr there shouldn't be laws against something just because people think it's wrong". Every coin has 2 sides? Sure, I'm sure there are people enjoying sexual relations with animals that take no harm from it, and if you think that should be legal, feel free to petition it. You might get support from some of society's other outcasts. Also, who is to judge if the animal took damage? You can't 'measure' psychological damage per say ( yes, this also applies to animals ), and even if there is no visible impact or wounds, would you just assume the animal took no damage? But once again, please do make a public petition about it, and see for yourself if anyone is willing to support you. Freak. I am the OP btw who said it was about time and explained that it was removed at the same time homolaws were removed. I dont really give a shit if it's legal or not, as me and some other guy stated earlier this will be like torrenting... It's not like you take your dog out on the town square and let it bang you for all to see? The risk you run of getting caught is if you make a movie of it and show your face, which is a bit darwin-ish. Also calling someone freak for having a fetish is wrong, people are born drawn to animals just as people are drawn to same sex or to kids - sure it's not the most tasteful things around but the people who have them can rarely help it. I am sure you have no fetish mr perfect :) I'd like to see you come back from this, look at the letters piggy. The quote about his flawed logic was in fact not an actual quote which you may have guessed, but if you look up his original response you'll find that reasoning after quoting me saying "then again why would it be legal". It's one thing to have a fetish for something, abusing children and animals is another. I don't mind that people are sexually attracted to either babies or animals, but if they abuse them sexually that is a problem. 'They can rarely help it' is a really bad excuse and wouldn't hold up in court if caught abusing someone. "As me and some other guy" - The 'other guy' responded to one of -my- posts agreeing with -me-, somehow you're implying he is right and I am wrong? My ground statement was that the law won't in fact change anything, but that being said I think it's right to actually make that law. Even if the animal itself doesn't take any harm, it has no possibility to show consent to the act. Isn't that classified as rape? You pretty much got your back against the wall here. And I did not call anyone a freak based on their 'fetish', but rather on the fact that he/she/they happens to think animal abuse should be legal. You might have confused yourself a little too much fantasizing about dogs humping women. :) As for you and the other guy, that's very relative and depends on what the outcome is. If the outcome is that a father of 2 gets sued for $200k for downloading ONE movie (example, but the numbers were extremly high in one case) while the rest 99.9% goes unpunished WITH the exception that the tax money gets wasted on nothing (so you could make the argument that everybody who works gets punished for the stupid downloading law (yeah it's stupid now that years has passed and we've seen the outcome of this - millions of tax payers money wasted on Pontén and his... gang? Guess they have it pretty good. That law would be better off gone, people would be richer and do the same things we do anyway, didn't some guy once say if a law would make XX % of the inhabitants into criminals it shouldn't be passed? Well there you have a great example of that (I know it has nothing to do with doggysex being forbidden, but it proves that some laws are stupid even if they in theory should be there). No consent? If it jumps the woman and start banging her isn't that the dogs way of giving consent? It's your back that's turned against the wall, not mine. Nobody has said that animal abuse should be legal? There is a different between abuse and use (NOTE that I still dont think it should be legal as it is very backwards but it's a law that will have absolutley no effect whatsoever, except the pervs who go out and sex other peoples horses, but that's illegal today as well I think..). Even tho I haven't slept for 48 hours you seem more confused than me. I'm not gonna bother, I wasn't referring to your sick example of a dog initiating the act while talking about consent. Also, you fail to understand that a rape isn't a rape if both parts want it to happen, which means if I "wanted it" there is no rape involved and I should if caught be convicted for pedophilia. Also, there sure is a difference between abuse and use, but in that case I'll just change my ground point and say that I'm against 'use' of animals as well. In reality there's no difference of the 2 in this case to me, but I see what you're getting at. I dont fail to understand that, I was making a point - you fail to see the comparison. By societies rules it's wrong yes, but if both wants it why is it wrong? I know you would be convicted for pedophilia, jesus do you look at the world so black and white you can't even discuss stuff in theory? By saying that there is no difference in the 2 "for you" means that you have already made up your mind. People need to be more objective... “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” But whatever makes you sleep at night ;) Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 22, 2014, 09:12:53 PM You post short non constructive posts that repeats the same stuff you've already said. We know you think it's disgusting and that people who think rape is ok should die. I call troll..
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 22, 2014, 09:18:54 PM You post short non constructive posts that repeats the same stuff you've already said. We know you think it's disgusting and that people who think rape is ok should die. I call troll.. *Gets roflstomped by arguments* *Puts words and false statements in someone elses mouth* *Calls them troll* :)))))))))))))))))))) Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: KonstantinosM on February 22, 2014, 09:35:59 PM While I find that disgusting, I don't see why I should be concerned in how other people conduct themselves. It's not something that hurts me and most likely it's not something that in most cases hurts the animal.
Not anymore than eating meat does, anyway. ' Just think of all the sick cows, all together, with huge cysts full of pus and on the other end of a spectrum a girl who just likes getting banged by dogs. I am compelled to interfere only on the first case because I don't want to eat low quality meat. The second part doesn't bother me in the least. To be perfectly honest I don't even like the idea of pets that much in the first place. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 22, 2014, 10:49:50 PM While I find that disgusting, I don't see why I should be concerned in how other people conduct themselves. It's not something that hurts me and most likely it's not something that in most cases hurts the animal. Not eating meat won't stop the meat production.Not anymore than eating meat does, anyway. ' Just think of all the sick cows, all together, with huge cysts full of pus and on the other end of a spectrum a girl who just likes getting banged by dogs. I am compelled to interfere only on the first case because I don't want to eat low quality meat. The second part doesn't bother me in the least. To be perfectly honest I don't even like the idea of pets that much in the first place. Not using animals for sex will stop the use of animals for sex. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 22, 2014, 11:56:09 PM It was legal to have sex with animals? thats disgusting. Note to self: MakeBelieve is a critterphobe. It wouldn't surprise me to later learnt that he doesn't own a coffee table either. Open your damn mind, or at least Make Believe that Mt Gox is operating on the up-and-up, speaking of fat, furry, lovable critters (with blue balls). Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 23, 2014, 01:12:38 AM While I find that disgusting, I don't see why I should be concerned in how other people conduct themselves. It's not something that hurts me and most likely it's not something that in most cases hurts the animal. You make an interesting argument. However the animals going to slaughter wouldn't even have been born if it wasn't for meat consumption - that being said it's sad that those animals raised for food are very badly misstreated in a lot of countries, it's only because we are used to eating meat that raising animals to be killed (sometimes they aren't even allowed to move at all to keep their meat tender). In a case like that I'd say that animal sex is less cruel, but because we as a society has grown so used to this way of eating we don't think about it. If the debate was turned around and animal sex somewhat accepted in our world, in comparison to breeding calves without allowing them to move I think most people would argue that's way worse. And who knows how much psychological damage a cow takes from having a machine suck it's milk out of it every day?Not anymore than eating meat does, anyway. ' Just think of all the sick cows, all together, with huge cysts full of pus and on the other end of a spectrum a girl who just likes getting banged by dogs. I am compelled to interfere only on the first case because I don't want to eat low quality meat. The second part doesn't bother me in the least. To be perfectly honest I don't even like the idea of pets that much in the first place. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 23, 2014, 01:15:50 AM It was legal to have sex with animals? thats disgusting. Not really digusting but very retarded by our dear politicians. A law is just a rule, the act however is disgusting.And! Keep in mind that we are also animals, and that we have different races with different intelligence (this was proven during the 60's and 70's and a lot of research was done about it, but lately it's been wiped out everyone's memories it seems. That's also something one can think about ;) Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 23, 2014, 01:18:12 AM While I find that disgusting, I don't see why I should be concerned in how other people conduct themselves. It's not something that hurts me and most likely it's not something that in most cases hurts the animal. Not eating meat won't stop the meat production.Not anymore than eating meat does, anyway. ' Just think of all the sick cows, all together, with huge cysts full of pus and on the other end of a spectrum a girl who just likes getting banged by dogs. I am compelled to interfere only on the first case because I don't want to eat low quality meat. The second part doesn't bother me in the least. To be perfectly honest I don't even like the idea of pets that much in the first place. Not using animals for sex will stop the use of animals for sex. EDIT: I am ashamed we're from the same country. You are a disgrace to our country and indeed to humanity alltogether with your retarded arguments. I stand by my previous statement, troll and I am now going to put you on ignore... Waste of time arguing with people who's sole purpose here is to; you guessed it waste time. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Mike Christ on February 23, 2014, 01:54:58 AM Just as with pedophilia, bestiality isn't going to go away, it's just going to stay on the hush-hush. Only thing the Swedes accomplished is the luxury of paying tens of thousands (in USD anyhow) yearly to care for those prisoners. Illegal, legal, it makes no difference; if people want to do it, they will, as we've seen with every single law passed since the birth of the republic, and nobody who wants to have sex with animals takes their interests so lightly that a fine or a couple years in jail is going to stop them; they're simply not going to let you know about it.
A child can someday speak of what happened; there's some chance of discovery even if the pedophile takes every precaution. An animal cannot, making the act simple to hide, assuming Sweden doesn't plan on going full-retard Orwellian state to ensure nobody's doing unapproved acts within their homes. Furthermore, this is entirely between the man who owns the animal property, and the man who makes love to them (without consent, I presume, or we otherwise will have to argue whether animals are people and, if they aren't, whether it should also be illegal to have sex with computers or dildos that someone has permission to have sex with); not only does the man who owns the animals does not get compensation for this act, but the cost of the individual's actions who violated the animals is now being paid for not by he who committed the crime, but by everyone else who pays for his visit to jail. Under this system, you are paying for the crime someone else committed. Silly bluepillers and their emotion-fueled politics; their logo should be a foot with a bullet hole in it. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on February 23, 2014, 04:13:31 AM Seeing that a law was passed because animals don't have a voice, I, too, want to now give another sexual device a voice to protect them from the perils of (insert, no pun intended, list of perils here).
http://committedman.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/blowup_doll.jpeg Please support me by donating to B.U.D.A.P. (Blow Up Dolls Against Perils) and S.T.A.P. (Sexual Toys Against Perils). Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: BotwinBG on February 23, 2014, 04:27:15 AM lol @ apsvinet
what I meant was..oh well, does not matter, you seem to be willing to argue this particular issue to an interesting degree. Basically, while I do not find this fetish particularly arousing , I see it less black and white than the retards behind the law seem to do. The same kind of people who have criminalised paying for sex and who want to criminalise paying for sex outside of Sweden. People in power who are fucking clueless. A majority of politicians in this wonderful country we seem to share. And I do know people who are into it. Being , for me, a kinda weird thing to do, I was intrigued by it all and had several conversations with those people. Can't claim anything but a vague understanding of underlying desires and an understanding that is, as many other things in life, a rather complex subject. Something this law pays no heed to. Again, to make sure you get it - I don't defend them or their lifestyle, they can all die a horrible death tomorrow for all I care , really. But I sure don't want my tax money pay the cops investigating them, pay for the court costs, pay for the their prison meals. And I guess I don't want to support a law that criminalises what I have seen - a strange but rather harmless fetish. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: huarei on February 23, 2014, 09:08:47 AM About time one might think, the law against it was removed during the 80's IIRC, at the same time homosexuality became legal. ::)Having sex with animals will become illegal in Sweden the first of April. Today it's only illegal if the animal takes damage from it in any way. The penatly will be fine or prison up to 2 years (which in Sweden usually is 1 year with good behaviour). Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: apsvinet on February 23, 2014, 12:38:29 PM While I find that disgusting, I don't see why I should be concerned in how other people conduct themselves. It's not something that hurts me and most likely it's not something that in most cases hurts the animal. Not eating meat won't stop the meat production.Not anymore than eating meat does, anyway. ' Just think of all the sick cows, all together, with huge cysts full of pus and on the other end of a spectrum a girl who just likes getting banged by dogs. I am compelled to interfere only on the first case because I don't want to eat low quality meat. The second part doesn't bother me in the least. To be perfectly honest I don't even like the idea of pets that much in the first place. Not using animals for sex will stop the use of animals for sex. EDIT: I am ashamed we're from the same country. You are a disgrace to our country and indeed to humanity alltogether with your retarded arguments. I stand by my previous statement, troll and I am now going to put you on ignore... Waste of time arguing with people who's sole purpose here is to; you guessed it waste time. Last time I checked there were a few more people eating meat than those raping animals :) Bold part translates into: I don't have any more arguments, I'm beaten but I won't admit it. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: bitcoin44me on February 23, 2014, 01:59:15 PM Guess I'll have to divorce my wife then ;D If you have to divorce whenever you stop having sex with your wife, the courts would be overloaded.... Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: ponchoman on February 23, 2014, 06:52:49 PM It was legal previously ?
That explains with Swedish people are so happy. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 23, 2014, 07:09:25 PM It was legal previously ? Lol, we are like the top 10 most depressed people on the earth.That explains with Swedish people are so happy. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 23, 2014, 07:10:46 PM Guess I'll have to divorce my wife then ;D If you have to divorce whenever you stop having sex with your wife, the courts would be overloaded.... Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sawani on February 24, 2014, 02:27:27 AM Guess I'll have to divorce my wife then ;D If you have to divorce whenever you stop having sex with your wife, the courts would be overloaded.... Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Kluge on February 24, 2014, 05:23:11 AM It was legal to have sex with animals? thats disgusting. Note to self: MakeBelieve is a critterphobe. It wouldn't surprise me to later learnt that he doesn't own a coffee table either. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: koplea on February 24, 2014, 05:24:46 AM Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals...wew
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: rustan on February 24, 2014, 06:20:41 AM wtf
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: hostmaster on February 24, 2014, 06:22:36 AM perverts will be sad with this news ;D
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: zigmas on February 24, 2014, 07:39:24 AM About time one might think, the law against it was removed during the 80's IIRC, at the same time homosexuality became legal. what the hell....Having sex with animals will become illegal in Sweden the first of April. Today it's only illegal if the animal takes damage from it in any way. The penatly will be fine or prison up to 2 years (which in Sweden usually is 1 year with good behaviour). Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Kaligulax on February 24, 2014, 08:04:24 AM "Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals"
??? until now it was legal??? I dont understud that.... Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Kluge on February 24, 2014, 08:56:07 AM "Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals" Nords lose virginity faster than anyone else in the world. In Iceland, the AVERAGE age for first time having sex is 15-16 (~16 elsewhere in Nordic countries). In the West, it's generally ~18 years, and ~22 years in the East.??? until now it was legal??? I dont understud that.... Maybe they're low on body heat, have poor school attendance enforcement, they're trying to correct a labor shortage, or rotting fish just really kicks their hormones into overdrive, but they seem to hump everything, everyone, everywhere. Can't guarantee the authenticity of this statement, but I believe Sweden actually made "hump day" a weekly holiday where everyone's excused from work and school to hump each other. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Nathonas on February 24, 2014, 09:21:15 AM Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Lethn on February 24, 2014, 09:24:35 AM "Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals" Nords lose virginity faster than anyone else in the world. In Iceland, the AVERAGE age for first time having sex is 15-16 (~16 elsewhere in Nordic countries). In the West, it's generally ~18 years, and ~22 years in the East.??? until now it was legal??? I dont understud that.... Maybe they're low on body heat, have poor school attendance enforcement, they're trying to correct a labor shortage, or rotting fish just really kicks their hormones into overdrive, but they seem to hump everything, everyone, everywhere. Can't guarantee the authenticity of this statement, but I believe Sweden actually made "hump day" a weekly holiday where everyone's excused from work and school to hump each other. Who can blame them? I'm pretty sure they have a higher percentage of hot girls to hang out with compared to most countries :P Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: bryant.coleman on February 24, 2014, 11:11:11 AM If the current set of anti-male rules and regulations are allowed to continue... then there won't be many males left in Sweden. Once that happens, the females will...... do illegal things.
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Kiki112 on February 24, 2014, 11:17:11 AM If the current set of anti-male rules and regulations are allowed to continue... then there won't be many males left in Sweden. Once that happens, the females will...... do illegal things. or there will be more tourists coming to Sweden just because it's an all female country :D Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: inlovewith on February 24, 2014, 12:26:16 PM How did it became legal in the 1st place?
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: beegatewood on February 24, 2014, 03:54:29 PM oh cmon, do people really do that?
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: backtrackit on February 24, 2014, 04:45:16 PM oh cmon, do people really do that? Hey don't knock it until you tried it ;D Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: MakeBelieve on February 24, 2014, 08:40:57 PM oh cmon, do people really do that? Hey don't knock it until you tried it ;D That's horrible people should be put away in jail if they are fucking animals thats disgusting. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Kiki112 on February 24, 2014, 08:54:39 PM oh cmon, do people really do that? Hey don't knock it until you tried it ;D That's horrible people should be put away in jail if they are fucking animals thats disgusting. no man, it's unfair that gay sex is legal and bestiality isn't if you have one you should have the other one too or have neither Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 25, 2014, 11:27:02 PM How did it became legal in the 1st place? I posted that in OP but it got legalized at the same time homosex got legal. I dno, maybe the politicians here likes to fuck their pets?Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 25, 2014, 11:29:02 PM oh cmon, do people really do that? Hey don't knock it until you tried it ;D That's horrible people should be put away in jail if they are fucking animals thats disgusting. EDIT: beegatewood you should google BSDM pain olympics, animal sex as far from the worst things people do ;) Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 25, 2014, 11:42:45 PM "Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals" Nords lose virginity faster than anyone else in the world. In Iceland, the AVERAGE age for first time having sex is 15-16 (~16 elsewhere in Nordic countries). In the West, it's generally ~18 years, and ~22 years in the East.??? until now it was legal??? I dont understud that.... Maybe they're low on body heat, have poor school attendance enforcement, they're trying to correct a labor shortage, or rotting fish just really kicks their hormones into overdrive, but they seem to hump everything, everyone, everywhere. Can't guarantee the authenticity of this statement, but I believe Sweden actually made "hump day" a weekly holiday where everyone's excused from work and school to hump each other. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Orange_Jam on February 26, 2014, 07:28:20 AM I knew Sweden was really sexually liberal but I never knew it wasn't illegal to have sex with animals in the first place lol.
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Swordsoffreedom on February 26, 2014, 07:29:18 AM About time one might think, the law against it was removed during the 80's IIRC, at the same time homosexuality became legal. Having sex with animals will become illegal in Sweden the first of April. Today it's only illegal if the animal takes damage from it in any way. The penatly will be fine or prison up to 2 years (which in Sweden usually is 1 year with good behaviour). Wait can someone explain to me the backstory of how it got legalized then made illegal again? Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: pioter on February 26, 2014, 07:33:02 AM this is obvious anti-islam law, sweden so untolerance !
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: startselect on February 26, 2014, 07:45:38 AM Congrats.
Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Kiki112 on February 26, 2014, 10:30:08 AM this is obvious anti-islam law, sweden so untolerance ! you racist cunt :D you just said islamic people have sex with animals :D Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: sickhouse on February 26, 2014, 02:32:31 PM this is obvious anti-islam law, sweden so untolerance ! you racist cunt :D you just said islamic people have sex with animals :D Congrats. Constructive post :DDTitle: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: die_hund on February 26, 2014, 06:06:49 PM Guess I'll have to divorce my wife then ;D My sides. Title: Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals Post by: Kiki112 on February 26, 2014, 08:57:34 PM Guess I'll have to divorce my wife then ;D My sides. but what about your mother in law, now she'll be single forever :D |