Bitcoin Forum

For me the best form of government is democratic government because of all forms of government that have been utilized by human societies throughout history to organize and protect our kind. Democracy is the only one that operates on consensus to create solutions to the problems society faces.  And by saying, democracy is the best system of government; it does not mean it is perfect, just that it is better than all others. There is no better substitute for it. Democracy has its faults because people have their fault. So whatever fault we find to malign democracy is not because of the system, but those running it. Thus, the efficacy of democracy may be got only from the sincerity of humanity.

there are many forms of government in the world, there are an autocracy, anarchy, anarchism, socialism, democracy, and republic. I am now in a country that adheres to the republic and in my opinion, this is also good and ideal. but if there is another opinion please give another reason, so that I understand better!

It depends on the people. It depends on their values, history and culture. For most countries, democracy seems to be the most perfect fit. But in my little studies, I have come to know that the case is not the same for some others. Some countries have functioned better under autocratic rule. But the West will rather have everyone believe that democracy is the only possible option. Whichever system of governance, the basic pillars of progressiveness should be kept. These I believe are justice and a right system of values.

First of all. There is one nexus between all system of government, that thing is called "Justice" to some it is called "Equity" any system of government that lacks Justice or Equity is nothing but a conjecture of  hypocrisy and cruelties. There is no system of government that is perfect or without defect, be it socialism, capitalism, feudalism, autocracy, Aristocracy, theocracy, to mentioned but view. Each of all these system of government has been tested by one country or the others and non has guaranteed peace and harmony. However, the perspective of the people being governed and the ideology of the governing powers will determine which system of government is better. Also, the cultural background of the people whether such country can be called a nation or a state. The numbers of ethnic groups be it minority or majority. To cut it short, the best system of government is the one operated with fairness, equity and justice. Thank you.

in the west we had a pretty good form of government in some regions,

but there is no ideal form as each government systematically creates winners and losers.

regards

If we define ideal as in perfect, then NONE. there is no ideal form of government starting from authoritarian to democracy. democracy has proven to be less damaging than others but this means not that its the most ideal. But if we mean ideal as in suitable, then you can say democracy.

When i think of the best government system, Switzerland comes to mind. But that's all possible beacause they have a very well educated society. Not everything that works in Europe would work in Asia/Africa etc tho.

Winston got it right then, and it's still correct to this day. Democracy is the only form of government which has been able to put millions upon millions of people in well-paying jobs, lift them out of poverty, push them into the middle class and continues to push them into higher classes. I haven't seen ANY other form of government which has been able to succeed when comparing it to Democracy.

Democracy is the most ideal form, arguing otherwise is idiotic.

Re: What is the most ideal form of government?

One that stays out of folks lives as much as possible.
I'll pay my taxes, now leave me alone and if I need you I'll call you.

The important fact on the govenment use the which type. It's should be suitable the local place Cultural, economic and social factors. the Democracy type for government is better type for now. But I think which type govement can develop the local place and can make the people life more and more better is the keys.

‘Democracy’ is observed as an ideal form of government and governmental system and many nations have embraced it. The average man on the street can easily define it as the government of the people, by the people and for the people. It specifies ultimate power that is conferred in the hands of the citizens. They have the right to elect their representatives and it is “believed” that the economic, social and governmental interests of the individuals are best met under this form of governance. Power decentralization just like we preach in Blockchain network is the strength of democracy. But one thing common in a democratic setting is misuse of public funds and time because it always takes time for law formulation and elections consumes huge money. There is manipulation present in this setting.
Autocracy form is better in terms of economic growth compared to democracy. Government can adopt other ideas associated with other forms to enable them lead and succeed well. One form of governance cannot solve the entire problem in government and the masses.

In all of the forms of government, we can see that the most ideal as most of the countries are into it is the Democratic form of government. It is dubbed to be as an ideal as everyone wants to enjoy their own freedom which that form of government can give. Although it is indeed good for everyone, but if the system of government would fail, that form of government would not be ideal. There are many instances of this. I believe that we can really experience an ideal government if the government would continue to it which is to have a good system of it.

Right-wing conservative has been and always will be the best form of government in a world where terrorism and corruption thrive in the absence of rigid rules that punish it.

There is no form of government that is not ideal; provided it gives hope to the citizen and it is the function of the people and the society at large.

Each country is peculiar in her system of government, the choice is the mandate of the people be it autocracy, anarchy, democracy etc. as it determine their future and of the country, solving the needs and challenges of the citizens.

it's true that democratic governance is a very fair government because all decisions are in the hands of the people so that whatever happens is all the people's own decisions, if the public denies this means that he has denied what he chose ,,
Hopefully because of a political (presidential election) different opinions or choices will not divide a country, amen

1. there is no ideal form as we humans cant create a perfect just system.

2. it depends on the situation which system is most stable.

regards

Ideal government is one that doesn't take bribes and kickbacks     just goes in power delivers what they promised and gets out with the wages they only earned from being our leaders..<<Ideal government..

that was only the case because the nazis and their mechanise the economy plus the communists (nationalism is there a to o) pushed the democracy towards that,

in ancient greece there was democracy for hundreds of years and there was no deverlopment but constant wars to enslave other nations

just look at europe today especially greece, spain italy technological progress is there basically broken.

Winston  was a bad politician  his policies done nothing for the UK fact the 2 times he was in the country done poo..

Now lets get to the war why Winston Churchill was good..His mother was sleeping with elite political people and she was the one who got the USA into the ww2
because she said do you remember when I slept with you to some high up elite dude..

Winston Churchill's American mother. Pushy mother: Jennie Churchill badgered everyone she thought might advance Winston's career..
So the only thing Churchill was good was in the war  And give me what he had I would of won too NO PROBLEM..

So he was shit in POLITICS  but good at war  and who isn't with all what he had..

What is the most ideal form of government?

Anarchy. Anarchy isn't what you might think. Rather, anarchy properly applied is organized freedom, not majority or minority rule, or some other kind of rule.

8)

It's a government that takes human's corrupt tendencies into consideration. One that isn't swayed by financial gain or more power. This might actually become possible once the world becomes largely virtual in nature thanks to AI and immersive technology. Material possessions won't carry the same sway if digitization and extreme efficiency democratizes everything for everyone in such a post-scarcity world.

In my opinion, the ideal form of government is to protect the interests of the people, to become a country of freedom and happiness.

A so called "No government at all", Still there are people who will be called a leader but no power, no hierarchy, in a state in which people govern there own and minding there own businesses. A democratic style in which people can still voice out, yet have a monarchy style in their own way. Tax regulation will be set there own standard, Laws and Regulation will also be set and enforce by the people.

For me, All forms of government was ideal. It is depends on the one who will lead the government. If the leader was greedy and abusive to its power the country will suffer. If the leader was a good one and prioritize its people it will be better then later on he will be bashed by the opposition. That's the politics and applicable to any form of government.

You are writing the right things but I can't agree with you in one point. There should be no leader meaning the power should be clearly divided between the parliament and the president at least (all other branches should be independent as well). Moreover, There should be at least two parties (US system alike), which confronting each other at any point. This makes any decision be a compromiss of the total majority and not just a decision of a single person. Strong leaders like Russian, North Korean etc, I think this is a very bad idea. Those systems have no future.

Sounds like utopia:) sorry for this comment but its true. However, we (I mean people) need to understand, that we hire all of them (presidents, ministers, other administrative authorities). And each time they fail, we need to remind them that we have hired them and not vice versa. I've been to several countries and had discussions with many human beings. And I can say that people has forgotten this simple idea that we delegate the authorities this work and not vice versa.

I also prefer the government of democracy, because democracy is more effective for society because democracy is a system of government that governs the people themselves, that is, people vote for their own people, and this democracy can reduce problems / reduce the impact of government deviations, because all are chosen by the community itself .

All forms of government has some weaknesses like in Democratic government people are free to voice out their feelings (by doing rally) bashing officials and etc, its a free country but a lot of positive and negative output.

Social democracy in vein of Scandinavian countries. so-called Northern model

The most ideal form of government is whatever type of government where the people involved are not corrupt and not driven by their own desires unless it is desire to make the world a better place. Everything may look good on paper, it all goes down to the implementation.