|
Title: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: Bigeyeone on February 27, 2014, 07:16:15 AM We all dont know all the facts yet, but lets see what people think, based on the information that has come out so far, was it deliberate fraud or not ?
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: bomb7 on February 27, 2014, 07:17:48 AM Yes, I agree.
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: h3rlihy on February 27, 2014, 07:21:53 AM Potentially both of the top two really.
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: bbit on February 27, 2014, 07:22:26 AM Hang Him!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: kolev on February 27, 2014, 07:28:06 AM We all dont know all the facts yet, but lets see what people think, based on the information that has come out so far, was it deliberate fraud or not ? Every person has a different dollar equivalent of honestly. I think many of us having access to 750K BTC would feel very tempted, so, that's why I think incompetence charge is what he hopes for, but to me this is most probably theft.Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: Laosai on February 27, 2014, 07:35:28 AM The real thing is mtgox is gone whats the matter with this ?
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: sgk on February 27, 2014, 07:57:17 AM frappuccino
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: Honeypot on February 27, 2014, 08:59:07 AM He has betrayed people's trust, mishandled his job, believed he was above the standards of others, and believed he was too good to play by the rules, and ultimately considered his own ego and misguided, infantile mentality as superior to others ;D
In the end, he did what he wanted, and fuck everyone else. ...wait where did we hear about this before? ;D FREE MARK KARPELES LOL Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: toxicwaltz on February 27, 2014, 09:00:52 AM Fraud disguised as incompetence. >:(
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: yoozef on February 27, 2014, 09:16:31 AM criminal negligence = fraud
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: Sheldor333 on February 27, 2014, 09:44:57 AM Guilty. Sorry but I don't think anyone can be that incompetent. If you already own a million dollar business you can easily hire smart people to work for you and do it all for you, that is unless you are greedy and think some small savings are good in long term. Hint: no they are not.
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: E.exchanger on February 27, 2014, 10:36:08 AM Guilty. Sorry but I don't think anyone can be that incompetent. If you already own a million dollar business you can easily hire smart people to work for you and do it all for you, that is unless you are greedy and think some small savings are good in long term. Hint: no they are not. Actually i don't really care about mark being guilty or not the thing which matters the most is gox owe people their money and no matter whatever had happen its a loss happened from their end so they must payback the millions $$$ they are liable of. Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: Bit_Happy on February 27, 2014, 10:56:05 AM Free market/ unregulated exchange == You've been Goxed.
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: CrashX on February 27, 2014, 08:00:28 PM He should do an old fashion Hanging , who's with me. ;D
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: mcleo on February 28, 2014, 06:31:09 AM Without facts, it's assisine to make assumptions such as guilty or innocent.
Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: CrashX on February 28, 2014, 06:32:09 AM Without facts, it's assisine to make assumptions such as guilty or innocent. I said Old Fashion, we don't needs fact of Guilty or Innocent. ;D Are you IN or OUT? Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: freedomno1 on February 28, 2014, 06:32:44 AM Secretive we need more data in this mock trial aka Kangaroo Court
I say incompetent (In more than one way) (Yes I meant it that way but at this time he kind of deserves it ;)) Actually googled it did not mean the Peter principle but the libido (that said both work) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: dyask on February 28, 2014, 06:33:35 AM Without facts, it's assisine to make assumptions such as guilty or innocent. How about the fact that he isn't telling people anything? Title: Re: Mark Karpeles guilty or not guilty - trial by forum Post by: cdb000 on February 28, 2014, 11:59:58 AM I would say 'Incompetent' with fair certainty.
I have personal experience of Gox f*ckups - fortunately these were resolved and I didn't lose BTC, only some sleep - that strongly suggests gross incompetence. On the question of deliberate fraud, I would say innocent until proven guilty and, in my opinion, probably innocent. On a question of criminal negligence - eg. lost the keys for the cold wallet etc. - we simply don't know enough yet. Perhaps the more serious question, going forward, is how will users of Bitcoin ever come trust any exchange given the apparently continuous string of exchange collapses, closures, hacks etc. that we have seen. |