Bitcoin Forum

I'm ready to resume functionality so that people can withdraw. Before I do, I wanted to make sure people wouldn't prefer a different option for recovering funds, namely #3. The reason why this might be desirable is that it allows for everyone to have all of their balances right away. People who want their funds quickly can covert to an altcoin and withdraw the altcoin. This would have a side effect of pumping altcoins and probably increasing trading volume, which would bring in more exchange fees to cover the debt.

Hot fixes are in place and withdrawals are safe now. As soon as withdrawals are opened, I will start right away on converting withdrawal queuing to a sequential method. This may take a few hours--please post below if you would prefer I do this before opening withdrawals.

(Sorry I didn't post the message on the Balances page until so late . . . been working hard to sort out the mess and get withdrawals going as quickly as possible.)

I have decided NOT to raise exchange fees, as that is essentially making the users pay for this out of pocket.

I think you should just open up the withdrawls.  You're passing on the risk to us if we choose to withdraw, which is fine.  A lot of us are losing quite a bit of money in this standstill as multiple coins are moving a LOT, and I know a lot of us would like to be able to withdraw right now instead of sitting with our thumbs up our asses as we watch the market sway back and forth on other exchanges.

Sell shares until you can refund the full btc amount.  :)

I would really like to be able to withdraw the coins now - there is money to be made. I don't care about the 12,3% - You are honest, which is really a trait now in these days. Take the missing balance off, and let us trade and withdraw as normal. If You are able to pay over time - fine. If not - I'm sure that we all traders know the risk of loosing our BTC - both in trades that are bad as well as theft and other issues. That is the part of the game. 12,3% is just one good trade done as profit and one bad trade as loss. I would gladly accept the shares as compensation, since I really admire Your work and like the exchange a lot.

Are you saying that if you open withdrawals, that the bug is still there? And what if the hacker is just waiting for you to do that?

The poll is a great idea!
I've already placed mine.

Kudos,

Ron.

The bug can no longer be used to withdraw due to hot fixes. The bug will be squashed entirely via a functionality redesign in a few hours.

That's pretty dangerous. People will sell BTC and transfer Altcoin away without loss. The BTC will stay of course, but you harm also future BTC withdrawals (f .ex. for new members and later trades). I'm afraid it will lead to a huge drop in Volume = Trade Fees.

If only coinmarket.io could learn from this OP.

When markets get open ?

Go public for sure. You've shown that you are ready to accept fault for your own mistakes and I think you have a bright future ahead of you.

I would be interested in buying a % of the company.

Looks like people agree. BTC will be unfrozen relatively soon, then.

PLease vote 2  ;D

I'm surprised #1 was even leading in the beginning.
Go #2!
This is a forum om miners, traders and investors, of course we want more options for investment! :D

ain't that the truth!!

Taxing withdrawals needs to be all coins or none. Doing just BTC, will result in a run on your exchange, guaranteed.  Just tax the alts as well, and sell them for BTC yourself.

But, need to admit, the tax method will be very confusing for new deposits.

shouldnt option # 2 be give all the users shares of poloniex proportionate to their loss? i don't see how us having to shell out more capital to buy shares makes this better or am i missing something?

even so its winning so if u sell shares, how is that process gonna work? the exchange will open before thats resolved right?

when i can withdrawal my btc who was deposite after hacker atack?????????????????????

Nicely done mate!

The way you are handling things made sure you gained alot of faithful followers, once word gets out that you didnt bail, feck, Poloniex is gonna be booming mate.

I definitly want a share :)

Kudos!

TheDutch!

#2 needs clarification and more details.  (Eg. Market Cap you would assigned? Are you giving shares to customers to cover loss - if so, the market cap you give shares in exchange for the loss is key. Or are you selling other people shares and giving customers BTC from the raise?

If you go with #2, you need to deduct the balances now, but then repay after stock issuance is decided.  Keeping balances at 100%, but saying "I'll pay back once I IPO", will be highly likely to result in run on the exchange.

Could just open up a donation fund/account? ( all coins) If everyone gives a little bit it could get ya there quicker.... of course, I'm not real clear on how much BTC you are needing to come up to par again? I read 50,000.00 worth

I like Poloniex and want to see it succeed. Busoni is a rare find in this wild west of cryptos. I'm confident he will find a way to make his customers whole.
I think option #2 is the most friendly way to deal with the shortfall.  

There is also option #4. Launch BusoniCoin! Use BusoniCoin as a ProtoShares style asset to issue shares of Poloniex!
If you launch it, I will mine it.

Sell shares of Poloniex, dividends paid from exchange fees    65 (53.3%)

^^^This^^^

I would be happy to invest in your exchange assuming there is a good chance of a reasonable ROI. I think Poloniex has a bright future ahead, despite this security breach and theft.

I kinda like the idea of shares as well as BusoniCoin, interesting. and yes I would mine it for a while maybe longer! :)

I agree with this. :)

Launching a coin with an underlying asset of value is something I am currently working on and if you could pull this off it would be awesome, but there are quite a few technical challenges involved with creating a coin like that. It "should" be possible now or soon with either NXT, Counterparty, Mastercoin or Etherum, but I don't think it has been done successfully yet in the real world?

If it's just another Altcoin clone with no underlying value and no dividends attached to it I think there will be less interest.

One benefit of getting external investors as shareholders in your business is that there will be a lot more people rooting for your success.

You will likely get help from people with a vested in interest in your success in all sorts of ways, apart from the fact that the shareholders will help drive new customers to the exchange.

It seems my btc balance has dropped by 12.3%. Could you please post somewhere on my account balances page the amount taken and like some sort of accounting function showing how much has been earned back? As of now it's just vaporized as far as i  concerned. We basically need a receipt showing we loaned the site operator 12.3% of our balance.

+1

I think you could easily sell shares by creating a company selling assets in xcp/counterparty protocol?

+2

I agree. I did not loose very much BTC, but I still think you should announce some kind of plan to your users. One step could be (or should be) to email the users that you have reduced their BTC balance at your site and explain why their coins are missing and what you are going to do about it. I have not yet lost confidence in your site, and I understand that you are under a lot of pressure right now and have to work hard. But I think it is in your best interest to continue to communicate with your customers. Not only trough bitcointalk, take some time to think about the situation and some time to sleep, but I still think you should email your customers with an explanation of why some of their BTC has dissapeared from their accounts, and what your future actions will be. Ill be expecting an explanation in your site or in an email within 48 hours. That sounds reasonable to me, what do you other guys think?

+1
We would be glad to have Poloneix Shares on the XCP distributed exchange.

+3 (+4 for my brother who is still sleeping).

+1
+1
agree
a very good suggestion

+5

so i guess "Sell shares of Poloniex, dividends paid from exchange fees" option will be chosen!
anyone care to explain when and how exactly will we get back our btc?

thanks!

nice idea!

Shares would have my preference by far.

Why? crypto exchanges are risk for all parties, but currently while the risks are on the users, the benefits are not.

Having shares allows sharing risks AND benefits.

Ideally a model like mcxnow (https://mcxnow.com/?r=fairglu) where fees are spread between owner, shareholders and users would be best. This way everyone gets a portion of benefits (they already all bear a portion of the risks)

Hi Busoni,

Where is my missing XCP?


i bought 6xcp at 2014-02-18 04:25:28, 
 i bought another 1xcp at 2014-02-28 05:46:40

Market   Type   Price   Amount   Total   Date
BTC/XCP   Buy   0.0086   1   0.0086 BTC   2014-02-28 05:46:40
BTC/XCP   Buy   0.00822   6   0.04932 BTC   2014-02-18 04:25:28

i withdraw 5.85XCP  at XCP   
5.825   1HgDX48ypZo5sFncGyCrwT4pp1BBDA8unZ   2014-02-28 06:50:49   COMPLETE: 8719daeafcee00e80f7bc37a518ac7882e2bd89fedb9dd566c778a56d661fa9b

now my balance is 0 XCP. 

where is the missing 1.1xcp? 

+1 on shares, but I'm only a small time trader so I think those that lost more might want to have more weight in the decision.

It would be nice if I can exchange my 12,3% in shares.

And another question: We can trade the shares then, right?

#2, and use Counterparty to issue the shares and dividends. No more centralization than necessary.

Also, consider going to a 2-of-3 signing model where customers must cryptographically sign every movement of their coins, which results in much slower trading but prevents theft. If Poloniex could be the first exchange to do this it could actually be a boon and turn this theft into a positive thing for your company. Imagine if Poloniex became the only exchange where users would have cryptographic proof that their coins could never be stolen, except the actual amount involved in the current trade, which could of course be small-chunked to minimize risk.

I'd trade there myself, because then even with this history of being hacked it wouldn't matter in the slightest - Poloniex would be as secure as Bitcoin itself - and there is a large contingent of people who really don't care about day trading, they just want to make a few trades every couple of days or weeks as new developments arise. This is an unexplored niche and why not have it be Poloniex that pioneers it? A no-trust exchange. I'm sure many people would be happy to provide help with the coding and cryptography side of things as well.

As much as I'd like to get shares of poloniex so we can all share in its rapid growth, you could just make it easy for yourself and consider the money taken from customers as a loan. Pay it back with a good interest rate and timely manner. First priority is to let everyone know how much was taken from their account, and then a clear accounting of how (and when) it will be paid back.

+1

+2

Check out the Asset table of the Counterparty decentralized exchange (DEX), a lot of user assets have already been created and are being traded:
http://blockscan.com/asset.aspx

Like that we were informed and security is being fixed. I don't mind the loan as long as users get paid back what was used at the time, with possible interest. I would prefer the shares myself though.

The transparency on this issue is impressive! (mtGox!!).

Tristan, I support the method that keeps the exchange running.  Remember everyone, we're here specifically because these folks are NOT FDIC insured.  Cryptos only survive because of the communities behind them.  

Edit...name spelling...

Be careful if you decide to go with the majority rules concept and implement shares. By offering shares you are explcitly doing several things you may not have thought out fully.
1. Giving up some amount of control of your company. To do this at, and because of, the first major crisis is not advisable.
2. You're opening yourself up to a --huge-- new regulatory system. Especially with the amounts of money that are flowing through your company, you could easily be looked at by the FTC, SEC. You better make sure all your paperwork is in order, and that the proper corporate setup is in place. The SEC even gives large companies, with significant resources a good hard time when they mess up the paperwork.
3. This is a process that is known in legal circles, to quote a Harvard paper I'm looking at, as "complex and expensive". You have to know that if you mess this up, and try to 'just offer shares' that you're opening yourself up to some pretty decent lawsuits for mishandling things. This doesn't go away either, since you are in essence offering part ownership of your company, all your decisions from then on are open to scrutiny by shareholders.
4. What are the terms of these shares? What percentage of the company are you offering? What if any shareholder board details are there. etc etc etc.

Ok someone stole some money from your baby. ..from reading the threads on this, many people are ok with your basic repayment plan and leaving it at that. There better be a pretty solid reasoning behind making the solution more complex then that.

Also note that its almost a forgone conclusion that shares would win. Thats like offering to pay back whats owed, or pay back whats owed plus give me part ownership of something that will bring me a lot more profit in the future. ..of course any reasonable profit seeking person is going to take the 2nd option.

Some very good ideas above.

I'm with #2 there - shares.

The mcxNOW model seems to be pretty good.

I also like the Counterparty proposal above. But whether it's done using XCP or Ethereum or whatever makes little difference to me.

The BusoniCoin idea has some merit, but I think the XCP idea is much better. Perhaps a blend of the 2?

Regarding regulatory requirements by the FTC/SEC/alphabet soup kleptocrats, perhaps consider re-incorporating overseas in a friendlier jurisdiction if possible.

sorry . but your business was hack , so it should be Ur business that take the lost . Image if paypal lost money from a bad employee. We wouldn't stand for our account to be lock or our balance to be touch. Surly Poloniex has made 10% in profit.

Poloniex should declare bankrupt of they cant afford the lost , It time for competent people to start running these type of business.


Your happy when your making huge profits with fees , Making us trust you with our money , then cry when you cant manage your affair.

+1 for Shares...I'll buy some!  :)

PS: I didn't loose anything, I NEVER LEAVE ANYTHING ON EXCHANGES!!!  Trade and REMOVE!!!

Come on dudes! DO IT EVERYTIME!!!

I love the shares with reduced fees idea!

The more shares you own, the lower your trading fees!  Of course, 100% owners MUST have 0% trading fees!!!  Duuuhhhh!!!

If you do sell shares, hopefully you will go the blockchain route as opposed to a traditional government issued corporate charter. Also, those of us who lost btc should be given the option to just convert our loss to shares, especially if discounted.

IPO :)

+1
分布式交易
更牛叉闪闪
and you will Create a new Miracle
because new time you will need new weapon like XCP

Sell shares is a good idea :D

Since there are two threads running but you asked for proposals on how to deal with the issues at hand in this thread I thought I should post my suggestions from the other thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=499580.msg5534025#msg5534025 here as well.

From my personal experience and 25 years of business experience, if I was the owner of Poloniex this is what I would do now:

1. Post the stolen balance on each users account so they know what is owed to them. (He has already said he will do this, before it was even suggested)

2. Post a new document on the website detailing all events regarding the hacking of the site and the resulting theft.

I mean things like:

a) The exact time the attack happened.
b) The IP address of the hacker.
c) The exact amount of BTC stolen and the address it was sent to. I know this information is floating around, but I would like to see it posted on the site from Tristan himself.
d) Any other information pertinent to the attack and outlining his proposals for how he plans to deal with the situation.
e) Link this document from the home page so that all users understand what is going on and what is being proposed and/or done.
f) Keep this document updated with new information as it is decided, rather than relying on all his users to have to go through pages and pages with posts on an external forum...

3. Calculate exactly how much BTC he will need to do all of the following (and then add an extra 15% for safety):

a) Reimburse all the stolen BTC from his customers.

b) Hire 2-3 excellent programmers/security experts to help him do an extensive review of his code and operating procedures and come up with solutions to improve the security of the site. (I would suggest trying to get people like Mike Hearn: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u%3D2700 involved). Judging from some of the comments in this thread it appears as if Poloniex is making some serious mistakes when it comes to security, even in regards to the patches that are currently being implemented.

c) Setup an initial "insurance fund" of let's say 100 BTC (to start with, this will grow, see below) that is kept in cold storage and requires multignatures to release any money from cold storage (Tristan and one more person out of two trusted individuals from the Bitcoin community).

d) Hire a security expert on an ongoing part time basis who will constantly monitor the site and look for any unusual behaviour, as well as keep himself informed of all other hacks and security breaches on other exchanges. This person will setup SMS and email alerts for him and Tristan to immeditaly get informed of anything suspect happening on the site, and constantly monitor and try to improve the security on the site so that Tristan can focus mainly on the building the business.

4. Once he has calculated the funds required to do all of the above, (which I am guessing could be in the 200-300 BTC range), calculate what would be a reasonable percentage of the exchange for Tristan to sell in an IPO, in order for investors to get a decent ROI on their investment.

I don't think this has to be overly generous in order to be successful, assuming that Tristan can show that he is willing to build this business into something big...

Here is a sample calculation of what I mean:

a) Let's say that the average daily turnover on the exchange is currently around 500 BTC and the fees are only bringing in 30 BTC per month. The IPO document may very well state that in order for them to get a good return the exchange has to grow to 2000 BTC turnover and 120 BTC monthly income.

Let's see how an IPO where 40% of the Poloniex is sold in order to raise 200 BTC could look, (assuming that investors believe the exchange can grow to 2000 BTC per month turnover, which I do):

Monthly income: 120 BTC
Monthly operational costs (with new security measures in place, Cloudflare, part time security expert, secure hosting etc.): 60 BTC/month
Monthly return to owners (including Tristan): 60 BTC, of which 40% or 24 BTC/month in this scenario goes to the investors as dividend.
Monthly dividend on a 1 BTC investment (assuming the site can grow to 2000 BTC/month turnover) would be: 0.12 BTC

It would take less than 9 months for an investor to get the entire investment back in the above scenario. If you also assume that Poloniex is still standing and successfully operating in 9 months the value of the shares might also have increased to 1,5 BTC (or more) by that time.

5. In regards to the "insurance fund" mentioned above I suggest that this is something volountary and only for those users who want to take part in it, since it is not a standard feature on any of the current Crypto exchanges as far as I know.

Each user of the site would have the possibility to opt-in to take part of insurance feature anytime they want to, but there would be certain conditions.

Your entire funds may not be insured for example. The total of the fund kept in cold storage will be shown on the "insurance page" and also the amount of BTC that is currently being insured with a percentage shown. So it may very well be that only 55% of your funds are currently insured, but at least then you know that even in a worst-case-scenario where Poloniex is hacked that is the maximum you could lose, quite different from MtGox for example...

There would be conditions imposed on the insured accounts and every insured user would have to follow certain security procedures in order to take part in the insurance scheme.

I mean things like the following:

a) Insured users would have to pay a 50%-100% premium on all trading fees, (0,3% instead of 0,2%).

b) Or perhaps an average of their BTC holdings would be calculated each night and a small percentage of that would be deducted as an insurance fee? This would help reduce the number of people who hold large balances on their accounts for long periods of time without trading it, which would also reduce liability for the site in case of an attack.

b) Every insured user would be required to use 2-factor authentication and a minimum 12 character password.

c) Perhaps insured users would be required to submit the IPs (or at least the IP ranges) that they wish to use to login to their accounts.

d) Whatever other security measures can be implemented to make it as secure as possible.

It is clear that after two successful attacks against Poloniex it will continue to be a prime target for hackers and thieves. Tristan needs to have security as the #1 concern for Poloniex from here on, because regardless of how honest he is and how much integrity he has Polniex may not survive another attack...user confidence will disappear eventually.  :(

The fact that he has been transparent and forthcoming about the mistakes and what happened, as well as pragmatic in his way of solving it, tells me that there is a good chance this could turn into a great business, but only if he takes the right steps from here and puts security at the forefront of everything from here on...

Tristan, bring in the right people to help you secure the site. You have our confidence that you are honest and trustworthy. Now show that you are also capable of admitting your own weaknesses and bring in the right people to help you.

Just imagine how good we would feel if people like Mike Hearn who said this upthread:


Imagine if he would come back after your have done the improvements to security and reviews the site and says something along the lines of:



Mike is a security specialist at Google so obviously his demands for what is secure and what is not are going to be fairly high... These are the type of people you need to ask for help in securing Poloniex and making it into one of the top Cryptoexchanges.

I believe in you and I think you can do it!

Good luck! :)

Hi Busoni,

Can you reply my question?

Where is my missing XCP?


i bought 6xcp at 2014-02-18 04:25:28, 
 i bought another 1xcp at 2014-02-28 05:46:40

Market   Type   Price   Amount   Total   Date
BTC/XCP   Buy   0.0086   1   0.0086 BTC   2014-02-28 05:46:40
BTC/XCP   Buy   0.00822   6   0.04932 BTC   2014-02-18 04:25:28

i withdraw 5.85XCP  at XCP   
5.825   1HgDX48ypZo5sFncGyCrwT4pp1BBDA8unZ   2014-02-28 06:50:49   COMPLETE: 8719daeafcee00e80f7bc37a518ac7882e2bd89fedb9dd566c778a56d661fa9b

now my balance is 0 XCP. 

where is the missing 1.1xcp? 

just joined your exchange . like the honesty. although i'm not affected. i do support honesty ! i'll be interested if there are shares available.

Financial tip: Instead of shares, sell bonds.

In effect you already are selling, but you could easily offer terms that are better for all parties.

Current terms:
- Buying bonds is mandatory, and everyone has to pay for equal amount.
- No interest rate.
- You pay back as soon as possible.

New terms:
- Users will have a choice whether to get more money later or get an immediate access to all their funds.
- You promise to pay back on the account with interest (say 5%) within a time (say 1 year), with a schedule. Given the current interest rates that's a generous offer and should invite some investments.
- When there are enough bonds to cover the the stolen 97 (or so) bitcoins, every account is restored to 100 %. The accounts that sold bonds to the exchange, will be duely reduced. If you think you will need to sell even more bonds (to invest in, say security audit) you may do so, now or at some later time.
- The business runs as usual, but you keep paying the debt by moving bitcoins from the company account to the lenders accounts according to the agreed schedule. No need to make sudden temporary raises to any fees.

This should give:
1) Users, who want to get immediate access to their money just that.
2) Users, who want to simply wait to get more money just that.
3) You a reasonable time to cover your losses.


This is simpler than selling shares because:
1) Selling bonds is faster. You simply need to make a form for the user accounts, where they agree to lend you the money with the given terms (and an apportunity to print a reciept, of course.)
2) Selling bonds is easier. Little paperwork. A simple contract - little legal issues. No bitcoins actually need to be traded make the exchange solvent. It's all in the accounting system of Polonex.
3) Selling shares means a change of ownership, which easily becomes a legal mess. In any case it will take some time and is likely to have overhead expenses. There are also some long term risks for the shareholders. Unless some users are really interested in taking the responsibilities of an owner, like discussing with every other owner on every important decision, and being prepared to making additional investments to secure their assets, this should probably be avoided.

Benefits:
1) Users will soon get what they want and be happy. Polonex will keep a good reputation and stays in business.
2) Users who have bought bonds will actually have an interest to promote the use of the exchange, to increase it's volume and thus make it possible for it to repay the debt.

N.B. Given that the profit of the exchange comes from transaction fees, the interest will be covered by people actually making transactions. This means that people who have bought bonds will not use that money to make any transactions, which in turn means that they will pay relatively less for the total use of the exchange.

How about?

Are dividends in counterparty only payable in XCP or can bitcoin dividends be paid?

Whatever the decision is I applaud Poloniex for their transparency and honesty. (Juxtaposed by what not to do, totally Gox'ing it up. I lost everything) I am in favor of both the buying in route and the repayment through the same level of trade fees. Both inspire rather then deter people from using and or keeping funds in this exchange. I will continue to use Poloniex because of how they are handling this, albeit an error in security, they did not blame 'bitcoin protocol.' A tip of the proverbial hat to you Poloniex! (FYI I am in no way affiliated with  Poloniex other then having a 'bit' of coin on their exchange)

Struggling college student fund:

15VBtLGSRAu5xD3ANy1e73ArPfa9fiUqvL

my lawyer contacted Poloniex today to ask for information but I cannot comment yet.

when give me my coins?

Why today I can transfer coins to you 

Why you can't give me my coins ?

Just paying it back over time with exchange fees would be fine I think.

And I'm not going to pay 12.3% of its balance sheet. I want to receive the Bitcoins in full. In recent years, too many cases of hacking exchangers. This causes a lot of doubts.

Oh. yeah, just great. That will really help move things along. Why don't you haul him to court too. That way in about 5 years we can all hear how it turned out and if we get our money back. You're a big help.

Please just email us when you make a decision, I can't always check this thread.

My vote:

Issue unmined coin (proof of stake).   Like AngelShares

Percentages up to you.

Investors that like the deal buy the coin.  Proceeds cover damaged accounts.

Coinholders receive dividends according.

Technically, you should decide how much your company is worth, then issue coins for the percantage of that number congruent with the amount of money you need to raise.

No need for corporate meetings, etc.  This is the new era.  Just a message-board for coinholders.  All discussion can take place there.

You could also buy the coins back if you would like to someday.