Bitcoin Forum

The Pharmacist is well known for fighting against the account buyer and seller. I'm one of the victim.
Recently, I was going through a thread in auction where OP tried to auction a bitcointalk account.
All the people got negative trust from The Pharmacist while only one didn't get. It's not like that Pharmacist didn't notice. He even gave red trust to the people who replied after the comment from that guy (Who was not tagged)
So, what's that actually? Why Pharmacist didn't give red tag that guy while he tried to buy account.?Because he is someone from his circle?

You two deserve each other.

The thread's title is not relevant to what your thread contains. Anyway, can you provide the link to that thread you were talking about where this auction happened? Account sellers and buyers are not to be trusted and both of them will receive Negative Trust that's why I'm sure that that buyer already got his/her Red Paint in his/her profile.

Oh by the way, this topic belongs to Reputation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0).

Edit.
Are you talking about this thread?  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3295005.0

Were you a victim of an account buyer or victim of an account seller ?

I don't know how to archive a post and that's why I can't share the link. I will share after having the concentration from The Pharmacist

To archive a post/thread/page
https://i.imgur.com/YQL3brh.png
1. just go to Archive.fo then copy the link of the page that you're going to archive and
2. paste it in the textbox then
3. click "save the page".
Why do you need to archive it anyway? I'm just asking for the link of that thread.

So you already know how to archive a post maybe you can share the link now?  ::)

Sure.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1432650.msg14496440#msg14496440

http://archive.is/zQwfZ

I assume you're referring to the above thread from 2016.  Looks like there are a few members in it who aren't tagged, so I don't know exactly who you're talking about.

Also keep in mind that if someone PMs me asking me to remove old feedback from account sales AND if they haven't engaged in it since the feedback, I'll usually remove the negative.  Having some positive trust since the account buying/selling episode helps, too.  I've removed quite a number of negs from 2016, but I couldn't tell you exactly how many or who they were.  Just because you see a selling thread where one poster (or even multiple) don't have a neg from me doesn't mean one was never given.  Especially when the thread is over 2 years old.

Why is it OP dredged up a thread from 2016, trying to showcase some sort of corruption on my part?  I don't know anyone in that thread personally or even on a forum-level.  I'm not part of an inner circle, unless you mean being a member of DT--and that's a precarious position anyway.

Edit:
I'm sure there are a lot I've missed, but I'm not shooting for a 100% hit rate anyway.  That's an unreasonable goal for me and an unreasonable expectation for anyone else.  Nor am I going to go back to a 2016 thread and start giving out negs for users I missed.

Regardless of TP's policy on old account trading, I think it's important to identify the fact that the member jacee had posted in the thread after TP had sent out the negs to the other members.

Obviously, since he can't monitor every single thread 24/7 then there will be some users that are missed.

I mentioned why it's logical to give a negative trust. Everyone on that thread got a red tag without jacee. C'mon.