Bitcoin Forum

Tell me what is more profitable? wear a signature and receive tokens or receive bitcoins?

With this question I am suffering for 2 weeks and trying to figure out, please

Well not many Bitcoin paying signature campaigns accept member ranks, so you really don't have much of a choice. Though in any case, signature campaigns are typically better because they are guaranteed payment, but bounties are more regular so might keep you more active. However, I'd say stick with BTC sigs for now if you can get one (unlikely).

First can you tell what  is that suffering of yours? Maybe we could help you. Also sometimes for me it is the tokens (altcoins) because sometimes it fails and it becomes a sucess. Why? Sometimes because it depends on the investors if the ICO gets an win win increase if it fails and the value gets dowm now that is were bitcoin signature is the best a weekly payment and nothing will increase and decrease for you payment so as for that is safe.

My majority of my idea it is the bitcoin signature campaign that pays you every week.

At this point in time, I think it's better to wear the signature of the ICO bounty, as you can get more money in the long run than you get from the bitcoin signature company. Previously, there were coins that makes X10 X20. Which not could make bitcoin for the same period of time. So while I believe that the signature in the tokens is better.

Tokens doesn't have a market value until it was listed. And even it does have established a market value, we don't know what price it will be. You might get a good and decent reward here but at the same time there is also chances that after you worked for months, you don't get any or just a cents.

No one knows what will be profitable to you, so take one and test it on actual.Your choice. Just learned the risks of joining a bounty camp.

Might better if you will moved this thread in Beginners and Help (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=39.0) section. I think this thread might fit there.

Here is and I, too, thought, and decided to try that will better.In any case, I want to benefit from this forum. And maybe if I do write 30-40 useful messages, as required by the conditions of participation in the signature messages for bitcoins I will be able to acquire more knowledge and more beneficial messages bitcointalk. My status on the forum members, would I want to grow. Therefore, thank you to everyone who took part in the discussion, it was important for me to hear your opinion.
p.s.Topic (theme) I moved to another section

Joining bounty camp is really a risky one so if you want to gamble for that then you may considered joining it as long as you understand everything.

We aren't sure if your effort will be paid off in the long run. Others getting good result while others don't. That's why I never to suggested anyone if they must joined a signature campaign with weekly BTC payment or joined a bounty camp because I want them to learned what will be the output of both based on their own experience.

While progressing here in the forum, surely you will understand more things and you will know what will be the best answer to your question. Goodluck.

Escrowed signature generally paid every week in btc, the reward isn't big yet it is ensured that you will gain from it, but this kind of signature is limited slot you can apply and check at services (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=52.0) section, While signature with token payments isn't ensured that you will earn, it relies upon the accomplishment of the project yet you have the opportunity to earn huge amount if you are fortunate and you pick the correct project.

If you wanted guaranteed coins then it would be better to choose bitcoin but then there are some ICO bounties that pays regularly or if not, then choose those in which the tokens are screwed. I am just so fed up will all the scams that I participated that's why I would only join those bounties in which there is a regular payment or the tokens are escrewed because most of those bounties that I participated in which it is up to the team to distribute the tokens then the distribution is delayed or not paid at all.

Profitable is subjective because you don't know which one would turn out for the best in the end its just that the uncertainties that surrounds tokens payment makes bitcoin much more valuable than any of that.

The bold part got my attention in other to understand why you have to suffer for two weeks because of this and it points to the direction that you need to expand your sources of income. Its wrong and frowned upon to focus your activity on the forum on earnings to meet your needs which would likely lead you to making bad decisions. Instead of bothering and worrying about that, invest in learning the art of trading to get decent returns and you won't worry your head on making the perfect decision of fruitful token. You can even get to the point of being part of signature campaigns for leisure purpose and contributory alone.

It's difficult to decide which of the two is more profitable. First, signatures in ICO may help you earn profit but most ICOs are scam that is why we have to choose the correct project by conducting research, while the other one is you can only earn small amount but you will surely earn it.

This question is without straight answer. When you join Bitcoin paying signature campaign you know how much you will earn because their payment rates are fixed. There are long term, high paying signature campaigns like Chipmixer and many short term campaigns with low and average payment rates which runs only for few weeks or months. Also, Bitcoin paying campaigns have bigger requirements for participants - good post quality, Merit and etc.
It's more difficult to determine profit from ICO signature bounty. It depends on many factors like success of ICO, number of participants, number of tokens allocated to bounty. It's more risky to join bounties because you don't know how much you will earn. I suppose that sometimes you can earn better money than from Bitcoin paying campaigns, but in more cases you will earn peanuts only or will be scammed at all after months of participation.

Correctly here people write that unambiguously it won't turn out to answer this question. Everyone chooses his own path.
Someone decides to wear the signature of ICO companies and receive tokens, for example, as I have more than 11 weeks of wearing a signature, but I know that the project is cool. The team collected a hard cap and I'll get tokens which will bring me profit in the future much more than if I had taken part in the signature of bitcoin.
Here you need to look at the place. If you need real money every week, then of course you need to sign for bitcoins. If for you is a hobby or a secondary source, i.e. you live money is not needed. (There is something to eat every day) then study the sections that I will attach to you and learn what is more profitable for you.
The guy is very properly showed all of the signature bitcoin
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.0

And this guy created a table of all known and best bounty managers
this is topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3051158.0
This table https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B4sMp4rDeYjPn3Lkbxn6Ot5KLQFERPXloIl5lUbTVBg/edit#gid=691200443

And if you want to receive notifications about new bounty company of all and for payment in bitcoins and for payment by tokens join in telegram
https://t.me/smersy_bounties

Choose what you will be easier and better. Whom my post was useful, thank you for merit +1 )))

I like your opinion. I especially want to thank you for the links and tables. I'll be sure to take note.

I understand you perfectly well, too, when I participated in the company, and I was not paid, but I have little experience. I don't want to participate in social media bounty anymore. This is a waste of my time. I better get to writing good articles on the forum. Writing guides that I'm sure many participants will appreciate.

 I realized that I need a signature with real money for payment in bitcoins. I will further explore other sources of income. For example, such as Steam and similar social. platforms.

Thank you all who responded and shared their advice.

You received lots of informations now and I think it's enough now to enlightened your concern.

You may now closed the thread to avoid repeatitive answer. Hope you keep in mind all responses here made by us.

I didn't see any of signature where you receive reward in bitcoins and it will be too much for such activity, little amount of projects will decide to give reward in bitcoins and they should have a big budget.

Bitcoin paying signature campaigns take a very few members in their campaign, so you can't join in those campaigns anytime!  Everybody loves bitcoin paying signature campaign because most of the BTC paying campaigns are pay bounty rewards on a weekly basis! So, Hunter can sell or trade immediately, no need wait for an exchange. And only lucky bounty hunters can participate in BTC paying signature campaigns nowadays. So, Have a try if you get one.

But today the number of bitcoin paying signature campaign has reduced and stagnant. While the number of ICO bounties never stops increasing its number day by day. Every single day there's new one but there's no assurance with them.

Unlike the bitcoin paying one, you'll get assured if the manager is well trusted and popular to secure funds while the ICO one will only distribute your rewards after their ICO.

Of course, Bitcoin has more value for payment, but at present there is almost no use of Bitcoin as a payment item. Even if there is, the possibility of fraud is high!

This is the reason why the BTC campaign is way better. You're sure that you will receive your reward no matter what, unlike other campaigns.
As mentioned above for this you must have a high rank on the forum.

Ico signature depends on the amount raised by the project,if they do no meet the softcap sad to say that ypu wont get anything unlike in signature for.bitcoin your very sure you get the payment everyweek.

Obviously signature campaigns for Bitcoin is far better. I have participated in many campaigns that either failed to even be listed on an exchange. Or when they got listed, the value was ~5% of the ICO price so my expected earning got reduced by a factor of 20.
Anyhow, if you can find a campaign that pays in bitcoin and you sure it is not a scam, go for it

With this current market situation, bounties that pay in coins which are already on the market is better than the ones that pay in their native tokens. The tokens lose their value when they listed and so the actual payment that you are supposed to received end up getting reduced.

I think bitcoin paying signature campaigns are good. Because the payment is guaranteed and most campaigns pay by weekly. But they don't accept lower rank members. We don't know how many time period will run ICO bounties and how much will the token price after list exchanges. That's why ICO bounties have a risk.

It really depends on what is the ICO's worth (or how much it will worth in the future), for BTC paid campaigns we know what the prices it will be as we already have a definitive price for it but for ICOs, you are really taking a big risk as the price of your payment will be dependent on the future value of the token which is hard as it will depend on how promising their project would be. If you are a risk taker and you are willing to hold on their tokens as an investment then taking up token paid sig campaigns is good for you but if you can't then going with BTC paid campaigns is the one for you.

I know Im just a newbie but I think having rewards of btc directly is great. But the thing is, those who will benefit on it are the high ranking members. When it comes to skills I believe there are low ranks with better traits here than other higher ranks. The so called division only get formal during the merit system introduction. I guess the one who will rank up during its introduction are truly the quality poster, Im not saying all old members are just became high rank because there is no merit before but this is quite true most high ranks are just due to that. No offense for those but this is true.