Bitcoin Forum

https://i2.wp.com/1stminingrig.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Gigabyte-RTX-2080-Mining-Performance-Review-Benchmarks-and-Unboxing.jpg?w=620&ssl=1

Here it is guys, i tried to benchmark most of the algos with the new RTX 2080 and here are my results so far, still playing with the card btw. Let me know if you want me to test any specific algo with it.

Some quick results are listed below compared with two different models of GTX 1080 Ti, you can find more here: https://1stminingrig.com/gigabyte-rtx-2080-mining-performance-review-new-top-gpu/

RTX 2080 VS GTX 1080 Ti

Ethereum - Ethash

GPU Model	Hashrate & Power Draw	Mh/s per 1watt
Gigabyte RTX 2080	41.1 Mh/s ; 105w	0.391 mh/s per watt
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti	36.5 Mh/s ; 150w	0.243 mh/s per watt
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti (with pill)	54.0 Mh/s ; 175w	0.308 mh/s per watt
MSI GTX 1080 Ti	37.6 Mh/s ; 130w	0.289 mh/s per watt
MSI GTX 1080 Ti (with pill)	51.3 Mh/s ; 165w	0.310 mh/s per watt

ZCash - Equihash

GPU Model	Hashrate & Power Draw	Mh/s per 1watt
Gigabyte RTX 2080	680 Sol/s ; 145w	4.689 Sol/s per watt
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti	645 Sol/s ; 175w	3.685 Sol/s per watt
MSI GTX 1080 Ti	690 Sol/s ; 160w	4.312 Sol/s per watt

Monero - CryptoNight V7

GPU Model	Hashrate & Power Draw	Mh/s per 1watt
Gigabyte RTX 2080	893 Sol/s ; 120w	7.441 H/s per watt
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti	895 Sol/s ; 140w	6.392 H/s per watt
MSI GTX 1080 Ti	890 Sol/s ; 135w	6.592 Sol/s per watt

Ravencoin - X16R

GPU Model	Hashrate & Power Draw	Mh/s per 1watt
Gigabyte RTX 2080	26 Mh/s ; 155w	0.167 Mh/s per watt
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti	16 Mh/s ; 150w	0.106 Mh/s per watt
MSI GTX 1080 Ti	-	-

Nexus - SHA3

GPU Model	Hashrate & Power Draw	Mh/s per 1watt
Gigabyte RTX 2080	255 Mh/s ; 125w	2.040 Mh/s per watt
Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti	212 Mh/s ; 150w	1.413 Mh/s per watt
MSI GTX 1080 Ti	250 Mh/s ; 130w	1.923 Mh/s per watt

Thanks! :)

Could you try bitcoininterest ?

cu  17:09:18|cuda-0  |  Using device: GeForce RTX 2080  (Compute 7.5)
 cu  17:09:18|cuda-0  |  Set Device to current
 cu  17:09:18|cuda-0  |  Resetting device
 cu  17:09:18|cuda-0  |  Compile log: nvrtc: error: invalid value for --gpu-architecture (-arch)

  X  17:09:18|cuda-0  |  Fatal GPU error: CUDA NVRTC error in func dev::eth::CUDAMiner::compileKernel at line 509 calling compileResult failed with error NVRTC_ERROR_INVALID_OPTION

  X  17:09:18|cuda-0  |  Terminating.

be careful with that link :) if you are using chrome :) you might get a " your browser outdated , update now " msg :) dont update your chrome :)

What miner and OS are you using?

From the error at "dev::eth::CUDAMiner::compileKernel" it looks like you're using the main ethminer progpow implementation from IfDefElse (OhGodACompany).

That implementation programatically determines the CUDA compute capability of the device to pass to the runtime compiler ("nvrtc") as the value for the "--gpu-architecture" option when it builds the kernel on-the-fly.

The new RTX cards are compute capability 7.5 which needs the CUDA 10 SDK. I am guessing you have an older version of the CUDA SDK which is why it can't compile to compute capability 7.5.

Try updating to the CUDA 10 SDK: https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-downloads

I can assure you the website is fine, can you send me a screenshot ?

with tradetec miner, it works : around 25Mh/s with the first version of the miner, the last one hashes lower.

Thank you, it worked.. i also had to change the miner..


I found pools recommend progpowminer-cuda-windows-0.16_final, windows 10, cuda 10


Here it is https://1stminingrig.com/gigabyte-rtx-2080-mining-performance-review-new-top-gpu/#Bitcoin_Interest_ProgPow_Mining_Performance

power draw 145w
power limit 65%
+150/+0

 m 06:36:04 main     Speed 22.65 Mh/s gpu0 22.65 [A31] Time: 00:18
 m 06:36:10 main     Speed 22.64 Mh/s gpu0 22.64 [A31] Time: 00:18
 m 06:36:16 main     Speed 22.61 Mh/s gpu0 22.61 [A31] Time: 00:18
 m 06:36:22 main     Speed 22.64 Mh/s gpu0 22.64 [A31] Time: 00:18
 m 06:36:29 main     Speed 22.58 Mh/s gpu0 22.58 [A31] Time: 00:18
 m 06:36:35 main     Speed 22.64 Mh/s gpu0 22.64 [A31] Time: 00:18
 m 06:36:41 main     Speed 22.66 Mh/s gpu0 22.66 [A31] Time: 00:18

Any recommendations? :)

The results are not glad. Seems GDDR6 memory is not good enough. Titan V with HBM2 memory gives 80-85 Mh/s on Ethash algo at 140-150W power consumption. But maybe GPU drivers for RTX cards are not optimized yet...

need driver and miner software update for RTX

right now only X16R very good hashrate than 1080ti

Have you tried the pill (http://"https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3370685.0")?
It is interesting that Equihash shows a bad result in comparison with the 1080 ti.


ps
With such income, what return will the purchase of this card...

Yes the results aren't earth shattering but its because it needs to be optimised.

When the RX 470 came out the results were horrible, it hashed at like 20MH/s until someone decided to modify the straps and run it at a higher memory clock and achieved almost 30MH/s.

It was also the same with the 1080Ti when it was initially released.

However, in less than 1 month the ETH issuance gets reduced down to 2ETH, so who knows how many of these GPUs will get bought for mining. Might not be worth optimising if nobody will actually use them.

Can you tell us , what was GPU FB usage % at this moment ? if it's around 70% it will give a chance that some "pill" (similar to gddr5x) will be created in the future , but if it's already 100% ... well , this will mean that gddr6 sucks in eth mining  :-\ At least without timings editing, but Nvidia will never allow it , so the only hope is to wait for AMD card with gddr6 onboard.

I just checked now and it is around 88% - 89%

equihash seems a bit underwhelming, can you tweak it maybe?

Could you try Zhash algo with BTG and set the TDP 75% then 50 for cclock and 500 for mclock.

And let me ask, did you try to use the enlargement pill on RTX 2080?

I think you have a typo here. CryptoNight coins are measured by hashes per second (h/s) not Sol/s.

If that number is correct and it refers to h/s, I would have expected it to be a bit higher for CryptoNight. The vegas are still way stronger than this GPU. The Vegas are getting about 1.8 - 2 kH/s and are currently almost 1 year old.

sorry been busy did not check this

try  75%
80 core
200 memory

try 80% power
try 80  core
300  memory


145watts and  22.66 speed  for this is good

a 1080ti  does 20-21 tops at 200 watts

so for bci mining it is clearly a better card then a 1080ti

I get this soon
https://www.evga.com/products/product.aspx?pn=08G-P4-2182-KR

cost was 785

I own this


https://www.amazon.com/EVGA-GeForce-Hybrid-Gaming-Technology/dp/B0713XX64Y/ref=sr_1_sc_1?

cost was 800

at your settings it is saving 55 watts  and doing 1mh better



All below is BCI mining

Edit my evga 2080 came today 1 day early

 on msi 4.6 beta

set it to 83% power
set it to +99 core
set it to +300 ram
set it to 61% fan speed

getting 23.88 mh

my best 1080 ti gets 21 mh set to 83% which is about 205 watts


quick numbers are

2080 evga 80% tdp or 172 watts does 23.30mh
1080ti evga 80% tdp or 200 watts does 20.80 mh

so 172/200 = 86% of the power
23.3/20.8  = 1.12 % of the hash

new 2080 = close to 800
new 1080ti = close to 700

so 130% better with power and hash combined
at 115% the price.

so if you want to mine bci a new 2080 is a little better then a new 1080ti  if you find a new 2080 at 800

Thanks . This means that we can expect a slight increase of Ethash algo mining in the future , when some optimizations in miners/drivers will be made . But in any case gddr6 is not the best option for ethash algorithm  :-\

It looks good for progpow and ETH May make that switch

Everyone keeps thinking you can just apply the pill to whatever random card you want. Do 20 seconds of research and you will know the pill is for GDDR5x memory only......and the 2080 doesnt have GDDR5x memory. Now connect the dots!

shhh bro.
just laugh.
and never reply as they hopelessly keep asking.

That was the sweet spot (i guess), not losing too much hashrate and "low" power draw


TDP to 75% means about 170w


oops.. yeah.. thanks! :)


Yeah, need to wait a bit more for new optimized miners and drivers :)


Let's see :)


true.