Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: SirWilliam on March 06, 2014, 09:36:08 PM



Title: "The Newsweek article is probably incorrect, Look at this:" lots of evidence....
Post by: SirWilliam on March 06, 2014, 09:36:08 PM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1zpuer/the_newsweek_article_is_probably_incorrect_look/

THE FOLLOWING IS FROM THE REDDIT LINK ABOVE:

"The Newsweek article is probably incorrect, Look at this: (self.Bitcoin)

submitted 7 hours ago* by PossibleGenius

EDIT again: ShtenDoji is an alias of Dorian Nakamoto, as is stanka dohkji, as is ssshupring, as is Kogen, and he's armed :)

http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/member.php?u=56275
https://ttorg.targettalk.net/~targetta/ttorg/viewtopic.php?t=12935&view=next
http://mrcompletely.blogspot.com/2005/07/ruger-mk-i-ruger-mk-ii-mk-iii-ruger.html#c115277355452644441
http://www.fixya.com/support/t1331745-just_bought_refurbished

Dorian Nakamoto was writing stilted letters to a model train magazine at approximately the same time Satoshi released bitcoin.
http://www.oscalemag.com/docs/ost_45.pdf

Dorian Nakamoto has three amazon reviews. His english is not good (sounds a bit senile tbh):
http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/ATILATX3PEXZ4/ref=cm_cr_rdp_pdp

Also all of this: (search each page for "Dorian Nakamoto")

https://www.national-preservation.com/threads/preserved-barsi-light-railway-india-kitson.38359/

http://media.metro.net/projects_studies/connector/images/Final_EIR/appendix_i_agency_coordination_and_public_involvement_part_20_of_23.pdf#page=11

https://www.mail-archive.com/sslivesteam@colegroup.com/msg09756.html

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:VzJbS3vIpzIJ:www.mylargescale.com/tabid/56/aft/131386/Default.aspx+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:tSe0Ck3nDXsJ:www.rafu.com/2010/07/horses-mouth-mushrooms-at-450-a-pound/+&cd=50&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://www.rafu.com/2009/09/horse-terrance-watanabe-vs-harrah%E2%80%99s-casino/

http://www.dotphoto.com/ViewAlbum.asp?AID=6557679&IID=261245736

https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/OSCALEMODELERS/conversations/topics/2743"


Title: Re: "The Newsweek article is probably incorrect, Look at this:" lots of evidence....
Post by: keithers on March 06, 2014, 09:58:26 PM
you should write a counter article


Title: Re: "The Newsweek article is probably incorrect, Look at this:" lots of evidence....
Post by: exponential on March 06, 2014, 10:00:16 PM
^^ Agree


Title: Re: "The Newsweek article is probably incorrect, Look at this:" lots of evidence....
Post by: SirWilliam on March 06, 2014, 10:04:40 PM
AP is interviewing him now, he told a reporter he was "not involved" in bitcoin and was being interviewed just for the free lunch lol.

I'd say his position is still not clear, nor is is clear whether he's involved. I guess we will know more soon when the AP publishes...

Major media news is ALL OVER this and there will be plenty of info coming soon obviously...

See these reporters' twitter accounts:

https://twitter.com/JoeBelBruno

https://twitter.com/byandreachang


Title: Re: "The Newsweek article is probably incorrect, Look at this:" lots of evidence....
Post by: Lauda on March 06, 2014, 10:10:09 PM
AP is interviewing him now, he told a reporter he was "not involved" in bitcoin and was being interviewed just for the free lunch lol.

I'd say his position is still not clear, nor is is clear whether he's involved. I guess we will know more soon when the AP publishes...

Major media news is ALL OVER this and there will be plenty of info coming soon obviously...

See these reporters' twitter accounts:

https://twitter.com/JoeBelBruno

https://twitter.com/byandreachang
He's not.
Drop it.


Title: Re: "The Newsweek article is probably incorrect, Look at this:" lots of evidence....
Post by: SirWilliam on March 06, 2014, 10:11:54 PM
I agree, I think it's not him (not sure though, how could I be?) and it should be dropped. Guy seems cool though and is handling it in his own cool style  :) Good for him!


Title: Re: "The Newsweek article is probably incorrect, Look at this:" lots of evidence....
Post by: Lauda on March 08, 2014, 03:14:09 PM
That man just wants privacy.