|
Title: StakXMR Cryptonight v8 performance Post by: Ursul0 on October 18, 2018, 03:26:37 PM Hey guys, how's your v8 performance?
On Polarises (both 8GB and 4GB) I see a drop in hashrate of roughly 10% However Vegas is a diffident story, it seems to be somewhat inconsistent. My optimal v7 threads intensities were 2024 and 1968 and while it seems to be working fine on a single Vega56(18.6.1 driver), producing about 20% lower hash, just above 1600... It gives me trouble on a rig of mixed ones (FE, 64, 56) it will still run on those high intensities, but the GPUs would produce around 1000h/s And after I lower it all to about 1800&1200 some of the GPUs(one 56 and one 64) would not go above 1000h/s, while the rest would hash at around 1300. Any ideas? Just built 2.5.1, yet it seems to make no difference. Title: Re: StakXMR Cryptonight v8 performance Post by: huntingthesnark on October 18, 2018, 04:01:03 PM Hey guys, how's your v8 performance? On Polarises (both 8GB and 4GB) I see a drop in hashrate of roughly 10% However Vegas is a diffident story, it seems to be somewhat inconsistent. My optimal v7 threads intensities were 2024 and 1968 and while it seems to be working fine on a single Vega56(18.6.1 driver), producing about 20% lower hash, just above 1600... It gives me trouble on a rig of mixed ones (FE, 64, 56) it will still run on those high intensities, but the GPU would produce around 1000h/s And after I lower it all to about 1800&1200 some of the GPUs(one 56 and one 64) would not go above 1000h/s, while the rest would hash at around 1300. Any ideas? Just built 2.5.1, yet it seems to make no difference. Not sure if this is a related issue, but I'm getting a similar issue (one 64 and one 56 in a rig will not go above a few hundred h/s). Tried all the usual things, kinda stumped now. Running Cast. Title: Re: StakXMR Cryptonight v8 performance Post by: Fascinat on October 19, 2018, 10:12:47 AM I have the R9 nano, dropped from 710H/s to 540 H/s using the same clock. The V7 uses Claymore and V8 uses XMR Stak.
Title: Re: StakXMR Cryptonight v8 performance Post by: FFI2013 on October 19, 2018, 10:47:10 AM I have the R9 nano, dropped from 710H/s to 540 H/s using the same clock. The V7 uses Claymore and V8 uses XMR Stak. I could never get my older r9 cards to perform on other miner like they would on claymore he's working on the v8 so hopefully will be out soonTitle: Re: StakXMR Cryptonight v8 performance Post by: Divinity666 on October 19, 2018, 02:22:04 PM xmr-stak won't work on my R9 Furies, but xmrig did, I got 840kH\s@130Wt per card using 1920 intensity(tried 2024, 1984, 1952 but it didn't work).
ps all my furies have 60CU(50% unlock) |