Bitcoin Forum

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

i totally agree with you. i always participate in content creation and signature campaigns, but lately my status was stripped from junior member to newbie, and i have been making all contributions so as to earn merit but to no avail. Since then i have focused on content creation campaigns and there a hundreds of thousands of people participating which is always giving us low rewards. if bounty managers adhere to your advise i believe hunters will be receiving high quality rewards. Thank you

yeah its a good idea, but there is a problem (just my opinion) , if the participant of a bounty campaign is not so many, I think many people or cryto person will not know about they want to share, also it will not spread in a huge way because of the numbers of my participant.

You have right thoughts and some of the bounty managers are doing so. The limit for Facebook and Twitter campaigns is 1k hunters for the signature it is usually 100 participants. Just try to participate in campaigns with less participants and higher rewards, like signature or content.

I think everyone may have made a mistake.
The main purpose of the bounty is to promote the project and not to do charity.
So how is the number of participants limited?

Some bounty campaign already implements that kind of rule. You just need to choose a very good bounty manager and a bounty campaign.
If anyone wants to earn high rewards on bounty better rank up their account first or join many campaign that includes social media and blog campaign.

This was posted here many times.
But really ICOs care about bounty hunters? No! They need as many marketers as possible and for the lowest price.
Why they should pay only few bounty hunters? Will less bounty hunters do more work than more bounty hunters? So?

When there are limited number of participants the advantage goes for bounty hunters, the reputation of the Bounty manager and the project..

with limited number of participants in each campaign, this will attract quality and committed bounty hunters because they would all do their best to give complete all tasks required of them..


I just want you to understand where i am coming from sir
But an unlimited campaign attracts cheats who plagiarize, try to steal the work of others and so many more.

Every ICO needs a the assistance of bounty hunters to reach potential investors in diaspora.. And yes, less bounty hunters, greater hardwork. because when you know you are going to earn huge rewards, you will work harder..With limited number of participants, Bounty managers can monitor every activity of hunters

I think this is important and a key to bounty hunters earning more. Bounty platforms like bountyhive tend to limit the number of participants on each campaign by having a cap. Once it's reached, new entrants aren't accepted.

Again, for projects, the more people that help spread the word about their ICO, the better for them. So while capping the number of participants benefits the bounty hunter, it's a disadvantage to the project.

This condition is beneficial for bounty hunters, but not for managers. Managers need as many participants as possible.

There are campaigns that limit number of participants but most of the users they accept are the higher ranks that means those members below can't join.  You OP wouldn't be able to do so unless the team allows any rank joining on different campaign like social media a blog bounties.

ICO bounties are profitable unless you trade your tokens and get from through it. If you just sell after the campaign, you just earn less. Unless you wait til the project is launched.

mate, you are talking from point of view of bounty hunter ( gaining more reward) and bounty manager( less work) , but you don't think as CEO. They don't care about community, they have fixed budget on bounty and more hunters there will participate , bigger impact they receive! moreover sometimes they postpone bounty to make you work harder for the same payment

Yes, you are right, if you limit the number of participants, then payments from those who will take part will become more, but in this case, the projects themselves may try to cut the bounty pool!

Lol do you think mangers and developers of ico cares about the bounty hunters?do you believe that they even care if how much you would get?ofcourse not because all they want is exposure and this will be achieved if they spam the forum so many cryptonians might see their signature or their projects.though there are some or only few manager that follow your idea ,still many of them has no concern about hunters,admit that reality and just do your bounty works.you are lucky if getting paid because most of the ico are scammers

On my side view I will say by participating in reputable bounty campaigns. Honestly there are some bounties that will earn you almost nothing, maybe because the project turn out a scam or too many participants.

I agree with that, with the limitations of participants, the prizes distributed will also be higher, but to enter into such projects, there are many conditions that must be met, and we, as participants, often cannot fulfill the bounty requirements and regulations.

This is good for the reward manager because quantity control can be well managed. For the bounty hunters involved. The less people involved.The more reward they get. But for the project side. This is not necessarily good. Because there are fewer promotions. The advertising effect is correspondingly less. From their point of view. The more people who are involved in bounty, the better. I don't think they will care about this.

I think this is a good idea, but there is a problem, people continue to work for a small reward and managers are satisfied with it.

i think you cant achieve a higher bounty rewards because of our ranks, and i think the higher rank the higher reward.

The bounty manager of a project or the CEO will be glad to have so many participants, because the more the number of participants, the easier the project will be disseminated and the wider the coverage or the reach. So they are not concerned if their bounty hunters would receive enough each. In fact, it will be their joy, if it's not enough, because they believe bounty hunters always dump.

Yes, it is a good idea to limit the number of participants for every campaigns in bounty program. But it should be adjusted with the promotion target of an ICO project. Limit the number of participants may lessen the possibility to attract investors. However, It can be fixed by improving the requirements for participants to have more quality of campaigns.

      That is very complicated since bounty managers wants many bounty hunters as part of the advertisement and the only thing we have to much higher reward is you must have a higher rank like Senyor member to Legendary .

But the bounty manager does not think like you. The purpose of the bounty is to advertise their ICO project, the more participants as possible, the more popular the project will be and buy ICO. I see very few projects restricting participants to secure income. Therefore, low rewards are a common problem for bounty projects

The problem is managers don't care about bounty hunter earnings. The more people involved, the better for them. A limited number of participants in campaigns is a rarity, but the rewards are much greater. But if all campaigns will impose the restriction, the honest hunter will be hard to get into them , there will be bots , multiaccounts and other.

fully agree, if campaigns will be limited to 300 participants, rewards will be 1.5-2 times higher, but as it said often "these are our problems",
another great way to participate in signature, less people and usually higher reward than in socials (about 40% bounty pool), so the rewards
also good

Your suggestion is sensible overcrowding of bounty campaign affect reward each bounty participants earn, it's rare to find bounty manager who put limited on number of participants, it is free for all.

People usually says luck but its not luck i think. You need to read and research very deeply and find good bounties. Usually its very rare that we cant find good bounties.

The problem is not always with the bounty allocation, neither is it always with the number of participants, but you should be more concerned on the service you can offer, that would fetch you more reward, no matter how small the allocation is.
Also, there are some people who receive higher rewards yet, when it is listed, they sell at ridiculous price. While someone with little can hold and still sell at higher price.

your suggestion is only good to bounty hunters but it is not good to ICOs. the more participants the more publicity is made to ICOs and the more investors will notice and get interested in it. what ICOs needs is publicity but if there is few participants it won't get that much attention and possibly it will fail.

Some bounty managers do set limitations for number of participants for their bounty campaigns, you just have to find those mnagers and follow them when they post new bounty campaign.

With your suggestion like that there are some bounty manager has did but a lot of CEO ICO need to promoted as much as they can about their project. But there was many way to get huge reward for bounty you can join signature campaign but you have high rank or you just joind article,translation but don't joined social media because there too many partcipant

I think it is not possible for bounty managers to limit their participants in a bounty campaign. Participants in a campaign are the advertisers of the project so if the more participants the bigger chance that the ICO would be successful as there are many advertisers on board to promote the project. I think they should increase the allocated funds for bounty if the project is successful after the campaign.

Me im looking for a fix amount like 1 billion to be shared equally to the work of participants

Higher bounty rewards means more responsibility. If you are ready for that responsibility then maybe it's time that you earn bigger rewards. But then if you are ready for responsibility but never happen to prepare, all your ambitions for higher rewards will just remain a dream. So make your ambition a reality by starting to take action.

I agree to receive Higher Bounty Rewards number of participants be restricted to certain limit by the Bounty Managers , but it will defeat the purpose of the bounty to be more popularise and enhancement of the value of the coin at later stage.

This happens in a lot many bounty campaigns, specially the ones who are paying directly in BTC.
However, for low bounties this is never going to happen, more the participants more the promotion of the project, why would some project or bounty manager think to reduce the number of participants?
By keeping a fixed reward function, he can attain more promotion with more participants.
I understand this looks negative on the bounty hunters part, but thinking of business and promotion, the more participants they get is the more target they will acheive.

To achieve a higher bounty rewards I think you must join many campaigns which you are able to complete. Basically you would have to prepare yourself in a much more labor of work.

I believe there are that kind of rules in some campaign, i saw that kind of rules often in bounty portal. most of project that are manage by bounty portal has that kind of limitation. And I also agree if it applied to all available campaign

with a limited number of participants could certainly be the best solution to increase the amount of the fee. look at the amount of allocation certainly also to watch out for. even increase your rank account to join the signature is certainly an effective way and this will be a real class get paid high enough.

I think you could get higher bounty awards if you join a bounty campaign where there are less people involved or less bounty hunters. Since most of the bounties are stakes it means you could get shares base on the total number of stakes you have and the total stakes all in all.

I think there is no specific amount like higher and lower because of it completely depends upon the rank you have and the budget allocated to the bounty. Still, there is no guarantee how much money we are going to make because every participant will have different level stakes and which we cannot able to guess how much we are going to get.

With limited participants in a bounty does makes it easier to get paid ,this is why i don't like bounties with unlimited participants as the chance of getting paid is so low

Yes, that's right, if you want to reach a higher Bounty you must choose a bounty campaign that has a small number of participants to participate in the bounty campaign. And especially the bounty of the signature campaign category is an option if you have the highest ranking in this forum, it is very good because usually the pay is higher than other categories.

Yeah of course this is one of the way
But it also makes the bounty more skewed on less participants, which means if the bunch of bounty hunters are one who dump coins immediately, it caused market goes crashed
which is why now most bounty make a criteria where if bounty campaign exceed X amount of participants, they will pay more

Well, the most straightforward point to achieve higher bounty rewards is contribute more xd

You can aquire more bounty rewards when you do or joining more bounty campaign. But i can suggest to do signature campaign than social media campaign, dont expect more bounty reward on every social media campaign because its so crowded in social campaign. The more participant the less token allocation.

I agreed to the fact the with a lower numbers of participants in bounty campaigns the higher the rewards however the ICO managers always wanted widely coverage of the advertisement and promotion of their ICOs thus necessitates for more numbers of participants ignoring the fact that lower rewards will paid to the hunters at the end.

Yeah, that's a good idea but also the campaign manager needs to recruit good quality supporters like for example one is based on followers and friends for FB and twitter. And also need for promoters to be legit and active in social media sites.

This is a double edged sword indeed. As a bounty hunter myself, I personally like the idea of limiting the number of participants in order to gain higher rewards at the end of the project which would help decrease the problems being faced by hunters these days.

Never worked on Bountyhive, but some positive and negative stuff about it, but I do like how they are restricting the number of participants which is more likely to benefit them at the end of the day.

Not everyone will change the total number of participants just because you asked with all capital letters.

You can get higher achievement from bounty campaign by joining translation media campaign, first time you have speak english well before you joined translation campaign, participants are limited and you have faster for joining translation campaign.

If you want to get a higher prize, then try it on a video campaign or signature, but if this signature all depends on the rank and also the allocation of funds. But it seems that the video campaign gives more hope to high rewards, especially the participants are few.

Mostly I agree with you but need to understand that bounty manager have their own thinking and decisions, as bounty hunter we only can follow it. Your idea is very good but I'm afraid many bounty hunter can reach many people to replace their money into the project ( marketing method ), that's why most of them never give limit participants. If you want get higher reward, join bounty program and follow every sub program finish it with high quality and time. Just like that.

I think it won't work for the project more profitable to have more people who advertise the project. For them, the costs are the same for 1000's to 10,000 people. I think this is our problem, nobody will come to help, I just don't engage in campaigns where a lot of people.

I fully agree with your proposal . With a limited number of course earnings will be higher. I often pay attention to such companies, many managers often limit the number of participants in the signature and social networks. And it is very attractive to the participants, everyone wants to have time to participate

There are several things about the bounty now

- The quota for campaign participants is increasing, so the calculation of allocations for each participant becomes small
- very long distribution is not comparable to expected

From the internal factors of the project, it may require many bounty participants to maximize promotion

I think there are some bounty managers that put limit to the number of participants, but that sometimes does not guarantee the success of the project. I have seen situations where bounty hunters were many and i was able to get good rewards for my participations, which was about $800, despite being a Jr. Member. So, i would suggest you check the pool and the allocation for each program of yhe bounty before participating.

You need to participate in campaigns with higher rewards and less competitors. It is a pretty easy formula, because the most profitable campaign is the signature, but you can take part only in one project. Than you need to take part in the content campaigns, that are the second most profitable campaigns.

Might this things will be applied immediately, every bounty campaign should be like a signature campaign or twitter campaign that is paid with BTC. This will certainly reduce spammers which are always a problem in this forum, and there are still many positive sides if this idea is applied. And also, the bounty campaign manager can properly oversee the work done by each participant. It seems that their concept refers to the more bounty hunters who are in the project, the greater the chance the project will attract many investors.

A good idea if the manager limits the number of participants in each bounty campaign. Then, the next question that must be anticipated is, what about the ICO who wants to be promoted as much as possible the ICO.

very obviously that if you have more followers you will get more stakes for social media campaigns, but you can participate in numerous campaigns at the same time.

It is not always beneficial to managers and the project too. After all, the more participants in the bounty companies distribute advertising, the greater the number of investors and stakeholders will have the project.

I fully agree that the number of participants in bounty campaigns should be limited to increase the size of their rewards. For example, Bounty Manager can set the cost of one Facebook post in the amount of 1 - 5 dollars. Based on this, calculate the number of posts per participant per week and for the entire period of the bounty campaign. Then determine the number of participants in the received amount. Some bounty campaigns use a similar method of calculation, but so far it has not widely implemented. As a result, for six months of work, you can get a few cents.

You have to know that, the bonus depends on the token sale. If the Token reaches a hardcap, the bounty hunter will definitely get a pretty big amount of money. But if that Token only reaches the softcap, then you can't have more. Markets are very difficult so this bounty time is not a good option to be able to make money

Lol you wont get that, Project needed to be know faster so it's better to give some percentage for the bounty but the participant is unlimited. Bounty hunter job is only spread the news about the project they don't think about how much you got from that, they only want their project know to other faster.

Bounty Hunter is like advertising. More bountyhunter more advertising but with same cost. So it will save some money to them

it is usually written in info about bounty rewards. For example, people, who have a lot of followers on twitter or FB get more rewards and i think that it is ok

This is certainly a good idea, but there is enough bounty where the number of participants is limited, try participating in them!

First of all, you should find a legit bounty campaign, that would give you great rewards, it is not so easy on the falling market. Secondly, try to search for programmes with not so much participants. The last point is, that you should select the most profitable campaigns like Signature and Content.

Some bounty have been doing this.

They are limiting the number of participants so they can manage it well. Some are accepting unlimited participants to maximize their exposure to different channels and platforms that they have been advertising. This depends to the developers on how many they can cater.

Your knowledge of cryptocurrencies determines how much you make in a bounty event! For example, people who are not proficient in foreign languages ​​can never complete translation work!

I believe that that the OP's suggestion was already happening for some other bounty campaigns like limiting the number of participants. With this, bounty managers can handle clearly the bounty campaign and can immediately update the speadsheets within the week. Also, if lesser participants then definitely there will be higher bounties because of lesser people will be dividing the stakes. Lastly, having higher bounties mean depends on the rank of the participants wherein the higher the rank, the higher the stakes you can get.

It is all about skills you have. Usually the participants of creative bounty campaign get much more tokens than other bounty participants cause they deserve it.

There are bounty managers that are doing that but honestly it is not recommendable if i were a bounty manager since it will limit the number of people that will promote the project that i am promoting. One way to motivate bounty participants is to provide a bonus to bounty hunters if ever hard cap would be reached.

Projects will not limit the number of participants in their bounties just because they have to put more tokens in your hands. The real purpose of bounties is publicity and they lure investors to their ICO. If they limit the number of bounty hunters who are doing the job, how then is it supposed to have wider reach? So, you see, while it favors you, it doesn't benefit the project.

There are some bounty that has limited participant but not all bounty campaign that has limited participant have good rewards. I think the participant will depend on the project. If there will be a limited participant in all campaign some people can't join because they are late. If you want a better income from bounty you should choose good project.