Bitcoin Forum

hello
why my account redtrust

Can I not ask or discuss?

thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5059970.msg47420437#msg47420437

my account redtrus by The Pharmacist

I want to ask why is my account redtrust?

screenshot: http://prntscr.com/lc7w3q

reference not explicit

First: move (lower-left) this thread to Reputation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0).
Then: your screenshot literally shows the reason for your red trust. The Pharmacist thinks you're an alt account of a rule breaker, and he's the only one who can remove that red trust.

Unless you've suffered a stroke or severe traumatic brain injury, there is no way you are the same person that controlled this account in 2011. The account has either been hacked, sold, or both.

Compare:

ok thanks sir

Sir... when these fools realise that sir is one of the giveaways - how we gonna spot the fools so easily?

Im agree sir.

what do you think ?
I see you are always on the thread to comment on something small

I think you are a merit hunter ... jajajaja

I got more merit than you have had hot dinners son.. I wouldn't worry about me Sir..

Your account was created in 2011 and back then, posts coming from the nosacky account were in perfect English like this:


It's quite obvious the account is hacked or purchased, and I'm also convinced that it wasn't your sister's account that got banned, but yours.  Either way you deserve a neg.

And why do you care, if the account is hacked like the Pharmacist claims which I think he is right, your account is already worthless because with that grammar you won't get any merit to rank up, I can assure you, I mean your new grammar not the old one  ;D

it looks like it's just your opinion,

just like that? very absurd,

It's not just The Pharmacist's opinion, I too think the account is hacked. How else did it change from decent English to Indonesian bounty spammer? To top that, I don't think you're the hacker, I think you bought it.
That leaves 2 questions: how did you buy it, and why did you buy a Newbie account instead of creating one yourself?

Indeed...absurd! The horror!  ...................sir!




So, you're not just sharing the btctalk accounts with your sister you're doing the same with twitter?
Weird how your sister is male....but nowadays ....nobody knows.

And who is coiningz? Your cat?

https://bpip.org/profilearchive.aspx?p=treejay

https://i.imgur.com/zt9bJxg.png

it looks like you are a police officer in this forum ..
congratulations you get free merit ... ha ha

back in 2011 it was very different from now on maybe you could have 1000 accounts for this forum ... and when you return in 2017 the forum is getting full, account sales may still be possible ... and for now many police in this forum are looking for twitter links, ?

Quite a lot... have a look here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0

Particularly in this thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0

Twitter, Facebook, ETH addresses, BTC addresses... you name, they'll use it to link all your alt accounts and get them all tagged.


Alt accounts are not "prohibited" per se... but being an alt account of a BANNED account is likely to result in being tagged. Likewise, while account sales are not prohibited, they are frowned upon by a number of "Default Trust" users as they usually lead to spamming and/or scams... and again, are likely to result in being tagged.

I don’t support the leaving of negative trust for these reasons. If the OP is evading a ban, he should get banned if the administration deems appropriate. Evading a ban doesn’t make someone a scammer, which is the purpose of negative ratings.

I haven’t looked into the OPs case at all, but I presume there is decent evidence that he is an alt of someone who is banned for plagiarism. Presumably there is also decent IP/fingerprint evidence to support this as well. Unless the OP has somehow contributed to some portion of the community, he should be banned.

The leaving of these kinds of negative ratings is essentially a soft ban and will likely result in the OPs account getting abandoned. These ratings also essentially cover up inaction by the administration on the issue. If there is evidence the OP is an alt of someone banned for plagiarism, then the fact the OP is not banned should be called out publicly and when enough of these instances are called out, the administration will be forced to make changes.

Well, until this account gets banned, I definitely do think a negative trust rating is appropriate. Many bounty/signature campaigns don't want people with negative trust ratings. Most of them definitely don't want participants who are potential alts of accounts that were banned for plagiarism. I do agree with you that the OP has the option of just abandoning this account and creating another. Perhaps, he will now learn how to cover his/her tracks better.

Well then you're not required to leave any feedback.  Many members here (including myself) know that negative feedback serves a useful purpose in cases where moderators didn't or won't act on an issue like ban evasion. 

That statement "You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer." that appears when you're leaving trust is seriously outdated and really needs to be updated IMO.  And since Theymos hasn't taken a stand on members leaving negs that don't meet the criteria of that statement, I'm going to continue to give negs to alts of banned members and similar cases.  If you think that's misuse of the trust system, I would refer you to my own trust page, which is full of negatives from people I've never even interacted with, much less scammed.  Some of those negs make very specific claims about how I scammed them for X number of bitcoins or abused animals and many other things.

I like to think of it as helping out rather than covering up inaction on the part of the mods.

Reason seems very good: plagiarist who is evading ban with alt account and sending merit to another alt account using old hacked forum account.
Evidence you need is in this >>>thread<<< (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5060006.0) You will be surprised what you can find in it!

At least you don't have family issues (mom is a bitch, wife has AIDS...hm, "if you don't like please go always")

Why not spend some good time by checking DT members feedback ? I did so and now I need a pill which can make me stop laughing after reading what people write at their feedback wall, seriously (little scam bitch seriously ? your mother is a total bitch ? ,etc hahahahahahahhaah )  really come on, this forum is still great according to my views, I can always have a laugh here and that is also good for my health.

Hahahahahah apparently Philippinos who are here only for pennies when they get tagged they write all kind of shit. Man this is hilarious.

Only a fairly small number of people leave trust for reasons that do not match that statement, although they send a very large amount of negative ratings.

If you want that description to be updated, you should advocate for it to be updated in Meta.

I have plenty of those types of ratings myself.

I don't agree with those ratings on your trust profile either, and I will tend to not trust the ratings of those who give those kinds of ratings.

Unless there is some amount of evidence that (specific to you) you stole money from someone, I am not going to believe those ratings.