Bitcoin Forum

hi guys

There is an awareness role played by the hunters in bounty campaigns
I see that when they participate in any campaign
It means that the project is trustworthy
This holds hunters a great responsibility in fighting scam project
So I advise any hunters to read well about the project before participating in it campaign.

How do you see the story?

You are very correct. Generally, before I take over a bounty event, I will conduct a detailed investigation of this ICO project until I have no problem.

I definitely agree with OP wherein bounty hunters should have to screen the ICO project thoroughly prior to participation as this is the best strategy in choosing dependable and legit ICO's for your signature campaign participation. I believe that there are many scam ICO's in the crypto market and if you wish not to be scam, then you need to do the right thing aside from screening but you need also to make a depth research. With this, you can ensure that it is a good and reliable ICO that will give good pay out in the end.

Though I do admit honestly that bounty campaign using this forum, the social media including YouTube and even publishing articles has already diminishing effect still there is no question that if played and managed well this can still have a good impact on the success of any project. Bounties are still suggested especially to a big project though there is no guarantee for success here as there can be other factors in play for an ICO project to be truly successful. So how we make sure that we are only joining genuine and scam-free projects? I just look at the reviews of the project, their published content and the leaders of the project if they are genuine and active.

I agree, but not just role they should be responsible and open a topic regarding the project and members can give feedback about project.

I don't see it like that, bounty hunters are only looking for luck while the reality is that many of the projects they follow have failed. Maybe only certain people are carefully following the ICO project. In a position like this, investors must really look at the project they are following from the team , dev and project objectives

This statements of yours are correct. Bounty hunters really play an important role in an ICO progress. They are the ones who promotes and help the community grow, in this case, ICOs can attract investor's attention if the bounty hunters really active on promoting it's project/s. That's why the management team gives the bounty hunters the rewards to their efforts on working.

It's not good to chose bounties randomly, bounty hunters have to select bounty to participate after carefully reading about it from the whitepaper to the roadmap and analyse every bit after which you decide either it's good one or not, in that way, we will not promote fake ICOs and they'll gradually be phased out by conscious actions of bounty hunters dumping

I've already created a topic from that where in I stated there that the bounty participants has a big  responsibility in promoting projects because it may give harm to investors and harm to their accounts that's why it's important to review not just the whitepaper but also the team behind it, how does it work and the pros and cons of the project.

Here's the topic I created: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5055959.msg47194697#msg47194697

Bounty campaigning is a serious  job because on one side you are promoting the token and its utility  to others and on other side you have to be sure about that the project is real and don't just prove scam. Bounty campaigning also create awareness about crypto world and its utility to world

I totally agree with this point of view, indeed there is more than one reason to be responsible on promoting some ico: for yourself, the others and definitively the whole system.

Failure of ICO projects is the current condition of market, as market is down so people afraid to invest and due to less investment ICO projects failed to achieved their goals so bounty hunters will also not get paid or paid with less amount. Do a survey before joining any campaign because if you haven't go through the profile of company you may not get bounty reward and all your hard work is of no use.

Bounty campaigns with all the options (content creation, signature campaign, twitter youtube etc.) can create huge awareness, bounty's main idea is this actually.

I totally agree with you. I think almost every bounty hunter knows that before participating in a bounty campaign it is necessary to study the project very well. Analyze all aspects and if everything suits him, then only participate in this campaign.

That's how I see it too buddy, Once I saw the project bounty a lot of people are participating it means it's really a good project. That's why I think bounty hunters are have a big role on project.

You are right. Surely, bounty participants are aware of this. Because if they participate in a campaign which is scam, they waste their time too. If you check the spreadsheet of the campaigns, you will see, more the project is promising, more bounty hunters are attracted.

You are absolutely right, participation in the bounty company shows the degree of confidence in the project from bounty hunters. Therefore, each bounty hunter should be very careful and carefully choose the company, learn as much as possible about the project before providing support and advertise the project. Because in the case of scam bounty hunters lose their reputation and the trust of readers and friends.

when I join bounty campaign sometimes I look at list of signature bounty participants. if there are many heroes/legendaries, I look closer at the project.

Although I am a bounty hunter and like to participate on projects that interest me... I think you are totally wrong...
The whole legion of bounty hunters participate in almost everything on sight and they end up earning nothing due to failed projects or scam in most of the times (during this year a whole lot of the icos failed or never hit exchange)...
Honnestly I would like you to be right, but in that case we would need a different behaviour and seriousness from the hunters.... this would also bring respect from the projects...
cheers

This doesn't mean that all these projects are trustworthy. I mean hunters just do their thing - complete bounties' tasks. And not all of them think about the future of the project, they don't feel themselves responsible for others' investments provided by their advertisement -
But talking about responsibility - if hunter will choose scam bounty he will not receive any reward for spent time. And this important moments regulates the ratio of good and bad projects. A little bit.

a very hypocritical statement, if you think that "if a campaign has been followed by many other people then the project is trustworthy and you don't need to analyze it" what if everyone thinks like you do. then actually no project is truly analyzed by the bounty hunter.

indeed, you have to do a minimum of small research, so that bounty hunters know what kind of project has progressed every week. if it is done at least the bounty hunter is not trapped in a scam project

Even if you choose a company of generosity very seriously and meticulously,there is not always a guarantee of the success of this company,now a lot of companies simply refuse projects based on the state of today's market and not reaching the goal.And in the end, bounty hunters get nothing.

We do not need to spend too much time reading about project ideas or team information. In my experience, we should choose projects that can offer true and real products to the needs of society. That is a way to let me know if the project is fraudulent. In addition, you should look at the roadmap of the project, if it is not reasonable, it is certainly a scam.

I agree with you. Before joining the company, I look at the ico rating and product as well as how many participants are participating. After analyzing, I’m just starting to work, but unfortunately even projects with a good rating are sometimes scam.

If there are a lot of participants it is not a sign that the project is legit. You should always check them on your own, only in that way you can avoid scam bounties and scam ICOs. Be advised and always research everything before putting your time or money into it.

Every day we see many bounty hunters saying that there are too many scam campaigns and they do not get anything working hard. This is the result of not reading through the project and selecting it. They do all the campaigns that appear here without knowing that over 80% of the campaigns are scam

An initiative to perform an investigation before participating in a project is the most important thing to do so, it is our prerogative to check every detail in a certain project if not might be a 100% but at least having a probability ratio of 7 out 10 I guess.

OP emphasized that to be selectively participating in a project is one way to lessen the numbers of failed ICOs participated, and there is nothing wrong with that, it just a sort of advice or take as a reminder because of sometimes we are blinded by a huge reward offered by a certain project without determining the capability to do so.

I have never said that an investor should not analyze the project
What I mean is that the hunters give the project momentum and this is one of the factors of investor interest
Therefore, they (must) choose good projects based on a study
Even a brief study.

Yes bounty hunters should be picky in participating campaigns meaning you should study it first and make sure that it is legit. Currently there are so many bogus campaigns and it is very difficult to review the legit ones.  I hope that this will also be regulated.

For me those who buy coins and become the investors and who invest time and become bounty hunters both are investors. One invest coins where second invest time. Both don't want they invest in scam project. Every bounty hunters try to evaluate the project. But many hunters due to laziness don't go for the backdoor of project. That's why I never take a look in any ICO just from the starting. Used to say half way ICO and take a look for investment.

Bounty hunters go a long way into advertising a project to investors but it doesn't stop investors from doing their own research about the project. The bounty campaign generally help the project to gain some visibility.

Yes i agree with OP and i also do it when i would join some bounty because so many ICO that are scammed many people. But i also see for bounty like social media there are many bounty hunter maybe does not do some investigation the join as many as they can and in the end they don't now if their work does have paid. So we must carefully when join bounty do your own research, choose trusted BM , reading carefully whitepaper and roadmap hope this can help to avoid scam project

You're right. The bounty hunter should choose the project carefully so as not to promote the scammers. Now give negative trust to those who promote such projects.  I think it's the right thing to do. In this case, bounty hunters will be more responsible for the choice of the project.

Yeah, many bounties participate don't know about project that they're promoted. Just do it for money and don't care what's the project. So they don't know if get scammed and screaming on the group or forum.

Exactly bounty hunters need to choose the projects to promote wisely as there have been lot of scams. The role of bounty Hunter is to pass the content of the project on social media and transalte their important documents. By passing contents on the social media hunters also become the channel partner of the project for this they get rewards at the end of the campaign and their role can attract investors too. If the project turned out to be scam than bounty hunters will loose their precious energy as well as time and investors too can loose their hard earned money.

You're about some bounty managers doing research about project before they manage it mind you there are still some which are yet to have right experience in confirming the genuinely of an ICO and concerning Madam Lauda she does do research about ICO before she manage it but I don't think she does the job of fishing out fake ICOs posted on here. However, ICO ethics  (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2204241) was the only one that does fishing of fake ICOs.

It should be like that. But there are many bounty hunters who are lazy to act subjectively, they follow the entire bounty without looking and checking whether it's good or not. And one more thing, they sometimes don't read the rules carefully.

Yap i agree with you. Promoting fake ico is meaning less work to everyone. The time that we spend is completely waste. The promoting fake ico is destroying confidence of crypto community also. So as bounty hunters they have to do huge part to keep clean crypto community from fake icos.

Of course, bounty hunters are responsible for the project that they advertise. But do not forget that among them there are inexperienced who do not know how to distinguish fraud from a good project. Perhaps you need to take any action about that bounty hunter were more responsible.

Well you’re right. Being a bounty hunter is unlike being a Airdropee. You could spend months on campaigning for a project. Even if the reward is little but we campaign on good projects knowing the reward are real and going to be worth it. When you campaign for a shitty project or a scam, you’ll lose both ways and also get scammed.
When you see bounty hunters on a perticular project then it gives you some confidence that this project isn’t going to be a scam because they’ve done a bit of research on it.

Reading might be deceiving, white papers can be conjured with lies that never existed giving readers the notion that it is a good projects, kyc is still the best way to confirm scam icos...

saya setuju dengan pendapat anda, berkenaan dengan partisipan kampanye apapun mereka kebanyakan hanya memanfaatkan umpan balik dari sosial media meskipun sebenarnya sama sama di untungkan

it is very obvious that advertisement strategy, marketing and bounty campaigns have a very big role during ico period of a project. because people find and check out the project after they saw it in social media or other platforms.

It is true, bountie hunter should check in advance, but not everyone does it.
But even those who do not realize every scam.
It is not easy to spot every scam and bountie hunter are just human.
If people knew it was a scam, many would certainly not attend.

Sometimes, joining a bounty campaign also lead to the discovery of the fake ones. Bounty hunters plays a very vital role as an advertiser and also an inspector. Whenever you join a campaign, you should be well equipped with the ICO or campaign's plans and goal, if this is not directly related to their whitepaper, you should do your part as a campaign buster, proven it is a SCAM project.

That's why we should have a knowledge about everything we do, so we will not promote a scam project. It's very important to the bounty hunters to know the project that they promote, or many people will get trapped in the project, including her/ himself.

Not all bounty hunters participate in every bounty on this forum. Some of them are wise and investigate the project before taking part in it. It may sound silly, but there are people that are even not reading the whitepapers.

Yes, the last posts of some members and their reports show that they are participating in many bounties. For sure they are wasting their time. They are not able to find good bounties, instead they participate in a lot of bounties and hope some of them make profit for them.  So, they are working for scam projects too.

You say absolutely the right things - the preliminary choice of the project is the key to success. If you do not carefully select the project for which you want to work as a bounty hunter, then with a very high degree of probability you will face a fiasco.

even some projects that are proven to pay bounty hunters now are also not the basis for us to get money. some of the ico tokens that have just been registered on the exchange are definitely losing prices. it also makes the bounty hunter unable to sell the reward they get.

There are even a lot of people joining the bounty without first knowing the project. They just need to see it and sign up, after some time they moan that there are many scam projects. I joined the bounty very carefully, learned everything thoroughly and made a decision. One year I only joined 2-3 bounty, it was enough for me

English plz
I translated your post
((Well it is true a bounty hunter should really be careful on what project he/she would promote.
Because it is his/her name that is on the line when ever he/she promotes a project.))

I have commented on the original post
In short, I am not describing this reality
But I say what should be the case.

Bounty hunters play .a very important role nowadays like bounty managers because they will give a big boost promoting the ICO so it's very important to check before team and if project is not a scam otherwise your reputation can be damaged.

Don't you think this will be difficult because hunters do not care if a project is scam or not most hunters care about what they will make at the end of every bounty campaign.

If there were no bounty hunters, then projects would have to promote themselves in some other way. But I think that the way to promote projects with the help of bounty hunters has many advantages because it does not require immediate payment.

I see that when they participate in any campaign
It means that the project is trustworthy.
No i disagree with you. Alot of projects bounty hunter participate in it and it end with scam so participation of people do not mean that the project is trustworthy. Thier is alot of elements we look at to evaluate projects.

Unfortunately, not all bounty hunters are attentive to the choice of the project. Since many of them are beginners,they may not know how to choose a good project. They can also gain negative trust in the forum if they continue to promote a fraudulent project after such a project has been exposed. In this case, you just need to be careful.

I agree with your points of view,  most times when you read about a project that does not mean the project will not fail.

Not far from the truth,that is why is a bad idea for bounty hunters to jump at every project.As bounty hunters,we need to be selective in order not to promote scam out of ignorance.

Indeed, there are so many bounty hunters in this forum so we will find many differences when we see how they are participating in bounty campaigns. But I only examined when someone taken part in the bounty campaign they looked more at the members in this forum who have good credibility, especially in terms of merit, every bounty hunter will join the project when many accounts have a lot of take part in the project. Their estimates that everyone who has a lot of merit can certainly determine projects that are scam and legitimate projects or potential projects and projects that have no potential.

This is what bounty hunters already know, since it's their work. Then so many bounty hunters would have also known that, if they are not careful in choosing the project to manage, they might end up falling victim of scam.

I take participation only in signature campaigns and cannot participate in more than one campaigns at the same time.
I promote only high potential projects which I am interested to invest  in it as well.

Every participant must be aware and smart in analyzing the project that will be promoted through bounty. It doesn't only to ensure that the project is not scam for the investors. But also for ourselves. I'm sure that nobody want work for free. Therefore, it is very recommended for us to analyze the projects in order to make the trustworthy decision and participation.

Iam not good to if the project is scam to i dont know iam not good at checking. But as far a i bounty i did't experience some scam project. this is just a tip first see the site if they have road map second the telegram if the people there is active not a bots and third the team is some of there is well known

what you say is true,
starting from the hunter's awareness not to follow and spread the project scam, the project scam will gradually decrease. hunters must be better to find good projects, so that good projects have the opportunity to succeed and the project scam will die.

i also strongly agree with the advice you give, whatever our hunter is. before following a project we must first read and investigate the project.

indeed we always have to research thoroughly before participating in any activity whatsoever. but bounty hunters as well as anyone can make mistakes. many of them are being cheated, unfortunately

Another good point for the subject is that
The responsibility of higher-ranks members is greater than junior members
I fully agree with you so the responsibility for these members is doubled
They really have the biggest burden.

Well that is supposed to be true and that is what supposed to be the goal of the bounty campaigns not until last year when the cryptocurrency was at its peak. Right now what you can only see at most are bounty campaigns or ICOs that would only want to get money from investors without real goals and bounty hunter who does not give value to the project that they are promoting that is why the forum gave some new rules to make the bounty hunters put value in their work.

Very good point. Bounty hunters are saviors in some point
They protect investors from choosing wrongly sometimes

If every bounty hunters can vividly figure out the best bounties always
Then scam project will be long gone

You're right when you said if all bounty hunters could figure out good project, the fake bounty will be long gone but with the way I see things this days concerning the bounty aspect most bounty hunter/manager don't do research before joining/managing a project respectively.

je soutiens absolument l'opinion que avant de rejoindre l'entreprise, il est nécessaire d'étudier très bien le projet, afin d'éviter la fraude

I totally agree with you. Before joining the company, I study it. I look at things as the idea of ​​the project (product), the rating of the project, the team and decide on participation.

I do not think so, because you can see that there are bounty hunters who take part even in the most outspoken fraudulent ICO and at the same time take in this kind of bounty companies not only beginners.

Who would want to promote a fraud project, of course we want to know if the project we are in is a good one, but not everyone here is good at analyzing each and every ICO that comes, so if you know in your analysis that is a good one or bad one then share it to the community and let's have a discussion on it.

The points can be analyzed to determine if the project is known and which study
the team
And partners
The idea and the extent of its viability and competitors
Activity on Social and Telegram
The most important thing is to follow the project constantly to learn its news.

well, they can make mistakes too. fighting scam projects is essential task for all of us crypto participants and supporters. we should unite in order to protect ourselves from cheating

I think that this doesn't apply to social bounty campaigns, bounty hunters are involved in everything indiscriminately advertising projects on Twitter and Facebook. But the participants of the signature campaign are always very carefully selecting projects for participation, so we can say that the more the project participants have a signature campaign, then better the project.

I see it as a guide to every bounty hunter an information we need to aware of something delicate and should be very careful with we promote awareness and convince the public as well as seeing reasons why they should invest, so while doing so we should ensure that they are good enough for those we are inviting

When choosing a bounty company, the number of participants, I do not look. I read the white paper of the project, look at the website, communicate with the administration.

You are definitely right. Well, I think it is the prerequisite of what we do. Most of the Bounty Hunters serves as influencers because we influence other people to be aware of the things that they do not know and we have the accountability and responsibility to our followers to give them the most reliable information that will help them on their decisions regarding ICO and investment.

Maybe it can't completely absolute value is true. the bounty being followed by bounty hunter could be a bad thing when those who follow a bounty analysis does not do well. even this case that causes always appeared too many disappointing scams that bounty.

So much agree with what you said. we all need too keep a close eyes and check a project carefully and also make sure that all of the information provided by the project is correct. That way would be able to ensure that we could avoid in joining into a scam project.

Everything with bounties can be hit and miss. You might get into a really good project, but the project has no community support. Then there can be a project that has a lot of support but the Team don't want to spend any money on getting the coin or token listed on exchanges and then, of course, you got your serial scammers, who every time pretend to be someone else, but they come in a new guise with a flashy website to fleece both investors and bounty hunters. It's all a gamble now when you do bounties, but of course, doing your utmost due diligence before you embark on doing bounty work is a MUST, just to see if it is possible to get some reward out of it in the end.

Not every bounty that BH's join are trustworthy.

They just join because they think that its worth to take a shot for those bounties. For those that do research, they won't just join any bounty that doesn't have any assurance that it will pay accordingly base on the effort that hunters done.

Indeed at least do some research first before joining in the bounty. see bounty based on the concept are nice and not. Besides having a good manager when working on the bounty has also become the things to watch out for before joining therein. Bounty without analysis or research will only give bad results like a gamble.

personally im very dissapointed with many bounty campaign, neither because scam one, or its the real one but in the end they cut the original reward, so sad they all cheated on us a bounty hunter.

now it really takes precision in seeing the project because there are also many fraud projects that were born, if I personally look at the team first and the sales they have got after that just see the manager.

Don't fall in to the trap, hunters have fall victims of scam project as well, hunters participating in a bounty campaign doesn't guarantee a project is trustworthy sometimes hunters knows the project is scam when they have finished working for the project.

Indeed, in the search for projects already doing research but when in the middle of the road turned out to be a scam, so this is a very disappointing thing. As a bounty hunter, you have tried but nothing can be done and you can just leave it alone. Already a victim of time and energy to help turned out to be a scam.

Every bounty must also know the authenticity of the project, do not just assess in terms of the potentiality of the project. Today, the bounty hunter only looks at the prediction side if the project is completed from the bounty campaign, without looking at the team's credibility in the project. So it's not weird when the bounty is a scam and the bounty hunter blames himself.

Of course, you should always research the project well before taking part in the campaign or investing in it. A large number of participants does not mean that the project is not scammers, because now it is very difficult to identify a real project with serious intentions and those scammers who want to deceive everyone.

It does help when an ICO has a lot of followers, whether that is bounty hunters or generally interested people.

An experienced bounty hunter will not waste their time in a project if they are not going to get a payout. Although do not join just because of this, do your own research into the ICO / team / project.

More than ever it's the duty of every bounty hunters to investigate the ICO that they are promoting, this is to save effort and time wasted on this scam and failed project, I have experienced this several times and this is not good for the community we need to keep the community clean from scammers.

What story? Even with the bounty hunters joining the campaigns, it does not guarantee the legitimacy of the project. However, I would agree that bounty campaigns raise awareness to the community that there is an active project that is worthy of our time.

In order to make a higher chances of getting our earnings we should check or do a research about those project if it's worth our time and effort to promote them. This is also a chance to identify them if they are just a shitcoins that only wants to scam investors money. We should check first before joining those projects.

I guess the main role of us, bounty hunters is to advertise an ICO or project in order to gain investors in the market though, we are also the one who are reporting some SCAM projects in the market and it is very essential to investors as they risk their money into a particular project.

bounty hunter should seek to promote only a trustworthy ICO project, hunter must do a due diligence about the bounty they want to promote, since it's affect many investor that will buy the token.
even though we are not hold responsible if the ICO we promote is a scam, many people will suffer a great loss because of us.
also if we promote a scam project, we will got nothing from it.

So many ICO that stopped suddenly, or maybe scammed some investors. we must carefully when choosing some project to promote them.
bounty hunter usually interested to join some project when they saw a big prize in bounties without checking the project.

Not at all times, Many participants are just joining the bounty not studying the project and the team.
Why are some of them are so greedy even with out assurance of getting paid?

Example: Telegram bounty...
You dont need to do hard jobs! you just need to fill up the form and stay at the telegram group of ICO.

Social media campaign...
You just need to share their post and report.

Campaign that i think participants are very careful are on signature campaign.

the signature campaign could indeed be recognized level of his sincerity, accuracy, and a sense of alert. working with the full totality.

You're absolutely correct but unfortunately not all bounty hunters are like you most of them know  nothing about the project theyre trying to promote.. they'll just join if they think the bounty allocation is high

I think we have role to advertise the project through many ways. Gain investor as much as we can and make the project popular. Also as bounty hunter we need alert everyone if the project turn into scam project.

There are so many deceptive ICOs who capitalized on the non regulations of ICOs and fraudulently walks away after collecting investors funds and non payment of tokens to bounty hunters, personally I had a bad experience with bidium haven't promote them via signature campaign for severa weeks at the end refuses to pay us and went AWOL this is very discouraging and had prompted me to make thorough research before participating or joining any ICO.

I have the same opinion and think that every bounty hunter should invest at least several days in investigating a project, because it is always a bad idea to promote a scam project. You will lose your time and make other people buy a scam coin.

So many new ICO has been released and it is possible that there will be many fake ICO projects. So that we as bounty hunters become more selective in determining ICO projects. Because our results are also determined by the ICO that we are working on.

there are a lot of fraudulent projects that occur in ico, we must be really smart in choosing projects that we will follow to know for sure about the vision and mission of the ico.

Not all the bounties you see hunters participating in are legit, some of them are scams too. And by the way you shouldn’t be expecting the hunters to do the work for you by finding coins that are legit to promote. You yourself should also do the job and make thorough research before you invest your money in any coin.

It is now the responsibility of bounty hunters to due diligence research on the project that they are going to promote, or they will be tag as conniving with scammers in promoting their scam project, and bounty hunters should immediately let go of the bounty campaign if there is news that it is a scam one.

It is right.  Before you begin to participate you need to carefully read all the details of this company!

I take my bounty work seriously every day, but I regret that even a seemingly perfect event can become a scam and the fraudster becomes smarter.

I totally agree with you. There are many reasons to make investigations about the projects before to wear avatar or signature. Everyone can make a damage to himself and to the others.

Well said but does that mean that anything can't go wrong? What is going to happen if they failed to meet there target I mean hardcap? I've seen some good projects in the past that failed to meet there hardcap and they refund money back to investors but its always good to do research to avoid wasting time on a crap project

People are working for money so they are ready to promote any projects if they have attractive rewards but when they are promoting scams they are helping the scammers to steal money from the investors and also they are not getting any money for promoting that project so they really need to research before promoting.

I think before joining  any bounty campaign,  bounty hunters need to learn about that project, because now there are many projects are scam , if they choose an unclear project,their effort and time  will be wasted because the project does not pay you!
I think they should learn about the project like they are an investor in that project!

Usually the role of bounty hunters is not to exposing fraudulent projects - they just help to promote projects, although of course there were many cases when bounty hunters could find some distinctive signs of scam projects. It is sad that often no one appreciates the help of bounty hunters.

Yes, i totally agree with you. Of course almost all projects can become scam, but as we see a lot of projects we can recognize better if it is garbage or no. Nobody wants to do work which won't be payed for. So it is like one of the important markers if a lot of bounty hunters join the project.

Of course bounty hunters are not scam exposers because bounty hunters only hunt for available bounties that they will joined in the hopes of earning a crypto but the only problem is the bounty iteslf . they dont pay the bounty hunters and they will only reason unecesary stufs blah blah blah  .



That is their biggest problem so far because it is actually hard to know if a project is a scam or not . nowadays many ico's looks verry legit but in the end in turns out that they were doing a scam exit   .



Yep this is the best way to combat a scam project but for sure not all will lend their precious time because what important for them is the pot money that they can get for joining a bounty  .

Delays in exchanges and payments caused the bounty hunter to start giving up working as a hunter. I listened to many complaints and despair. nothing can be done but waiting for the market situation to improve. and this happened to all projects despite achieving hardcap sales.

Of course, participants in bounty companies play a large role in the development of each project, since they are an effective marketing tool by which projects attract investors and therefore each participant must carefully select a project.

The bounty hunters are the promoters and the aweaness creators.  The roles bounty hunters play is an important one and that is why we should be very careful on the projects we promote because it is what you said about those projects that makes investors to put their hard earned money into those scam projects and icos.  Because most of the projects pay there tokens after icos it makes bounty hunters to face two things,  fakes tokens paying to them after 6 months and you bring people into a scam projects.

Oh yes, bounty hunters are the key to product promotion, and if we end up promoting a scam coin, part of the blames goes to us, so we really should be careful while partaking in bounties

Most of the bounty hunters aren't aware of the project that they advertise.

If a bounty is caught as a scam, participants should start to abandon that project and forget about the efforts that they made with it.