Bitcoin Forum

Hello everyone,

As I mentioned at the title, how does the team prevent the price of the tokens from falling? I want to discuss and brainstorm about it.

It can be as easy as putting a large buy order at a specific point to stop further dumping of price or it can be frequent buybacks by the team like monthly or quarterly buy backs with a certain amount to reduce current sell orders and supply.

Yes, these are nice spots. Thank you for your opinion  ;)

a lot of methods can be tried
gradual distribution of sold tokens on many weeks
freeze the team tokens for many months
freeze bounty tokens for some period to prevent dump

The price depends on the demand and supply in the market so if the team want to bring more demand, they have to make some positive progress to the project that can increase token holder confidence regarding the project. It is one of the reason most ico usually send bounty token later, because bigger supply at the beginning will make the price drop quite hard so they have to wait until there's sufficient demand for the token before releasing the token.

From the fall helps initially a great idea of the project, as well as the timely implementation of the road map. Then no one will want to sell tokens or coins of the project.

a team of a token can only prevent its price from falling if they create something that is actually good. a useful coin will sell itself (look at bitcoin for example) and nobody has to do anything except the team to develop a strong cryptocurrency.

otherwise they would have to be rich pumping whales who know how to manipulate the market, then sign up on major exchanges and start pumping their coin to keep it from getting dumped hard. having control over the majority of the supply also helps with this. but this won't work for long.

I don't think that they can prevent the price because its a free market. Unless they themselves pump it or at least see the price is always on the level where they wanted to be, but eventually this method will back fire on them. This is just the nature of the ecosystem, up and down very volatile and always fluctuates.

I have taken some time to keep track of some token in the crypto space and i realize during this bear market most ICO's token get dip almost immediately after listing in exchange. So after a while i think most dev that mean well for their project usually pump their token to an extent and there after introduce trading competition to sustain the price within a particular value to an extent till whenever they make any major announcement.

the price drops because the coins have no demand so if they don't want it to drop they have to fulfill what they mention in their roadmap and also the project should be useful in the first place. there are many useless project that even it succeed in raising funds it will still fail in the end.

The team has to keep on doing whats on their road map and white paper. There should be a progress on the product which is the token. Through this, the investors are confident of holding the token and they will not think of dumping it.

Otherwise, the team has to spend a lot of money and do massive buying.

That was hard preserve the price on the market against people in there.. people who has dumping the price have a purpose for its own benefit.. i think, surely there is a possibility to fix token prices on the market, but it will go slowly for grow..

If the project is good and investors are interested on it, i am sure your token's price will not go down as many want to have a piece of it. Demand and supply will always play a role on the token's price, the more people that hold the token then the lesser supply it has on the market.

You can't control the market without being really really centralized about it. I think, you can see Ripple as the biggest instigator of this example. They held most of the tokens, locked it so it could only be distributed as they wanted it, and their founders were eventually even brought to court and forced to control their release to not affect market prices when it dumped. Market prices should just be allowed to happen on their own, but yeah, with centralized projects, where most tokens are held by owners and funders, this can't be helped.

Teams cannot prevent or enable price action one way or another, it is the market which dictates this, buying and selling

If a token has a significant price decline (dumping), their team must be prepared for it and the only most effective way to raise the price of the token is to buy back. Creating a useful feature in a project that can get people interested in participating in the project can also make prices rise again. The more people who are interested in joining, the higher the selling price of the token.

Being active and not being a ghost to the community and investors. The team should gain the trust of the investors that they are doing their best and something is brewing up.

Actually the price of tokens cannot be predicted to rise or fall. To prevent a token from falling off, the team from the project must have a product or application. Therefore the rapid development in a project is very important to keep the price of the token from falling from the previous sales price.

There are options for ways to prevent the price of tokens from falling. To start the project should be very promising and popular to a sufficient number of investments significantly raised it . After that, it is possible as an option to freeze the token for some time, during which the project will develop. This will only increase interest and demand. And of course, the exchange on which the token comes out should be in the top ten

At the current state, even how hard the team tries to give positive news & several project updates, it is not helping the situation. So, for me, the team should really use some of their funds to make a large buy order not to further the price drop.

Maybe the team can work with big media to overcome the price of tokens that fall in the crypto market. I mean, leading media provides negative news to attract investors to encourage price increases. In addition, the team also conducted market pumps.

If they want to prevent their token dump, they need a buyback strategy. That's the best way they can stop dumping. But there are very few projects that do that because their projects are not good enough and the team is not legit

There are many things they can do, if it is a new project and part from their distribution method all they need to do is to have many tactics that will continue to maintain investors trust about the project. This may include listing on reputable exchanges, instantly start working on the roadmap of the project, transparency with investors and coming out with good news and relevant partships.

I don't think any team can predict the price of tokens that will appear in the market, except to make the method so that the price of the token is not too far away, holding the token distribution will actually worsen the situation, because many projects have failed after doing that method, maybe, one method is enough to make the price of the token stable, the ICO and bounty distribution periodically without holding the token longer

the developer must have a big partner and the developer must also maintain the price to increase investor confidence and the concept of the project must be real and used by many people

the way to prevent is more buyers and sellers, the more people who buy coins or tokens, the higher the price increases, and vice versa

What is the time period from the question Op? tokens first release to exchange or during the development of the platform/product? - it is more likely that the token got released to numerous exchange and has been actively traded for months, the team can set lockups to their smart contracts for a limited period of time to prevent dumps from bounty hunters or team members, they can do buybacks, staking and a certain benefit from holding the tokens.

It is difficult to tell the truth, but I think that the project team sometimes manipulates its tokens only in order to raise the prices of tokens and immediately sell their tokens, because there is no sense in them today.

I believe the team needs to have a serious plan about the token.  They must step up their development, marketing, and planning.  They also need a huge fund to keep the price from going down while they are building user base and adoption and without a huge fund the price will crumble.  They really need to step in on buy support if they really do not want their token to go down since it will take time for the development to kick in, and empty marketing will only make them lose more.

Well, if the team is interested in the fact that the price was kept,they will redeem tokens for the Price ISO and higher,preventing its fall,and if the price falls down then the team itself or sells tokens allow prices,to then on the cents to redeem at Bautista them,this is a you know,well, then there's Fools Bautista,just got drained and ran,at least in 10 times cheaper prices ISO,the price and falls

I absolutely agree with this opinion.

One proactive method to stop the dump of price after ico is to remain active on social media, keep marketing and motivating the investors and supporters, show them the positive sides of the project then also continuously deliver accorsing to roadmap with quality developments, these steps will keep the investors confidence and there will be less sell orders and no dump in price.

so how to buyback and is it really an effective way to increase the price ?

So buyback or token burning, which one is better for prevent dumping ?

Do you really think that bounty hunters are the biggest reason for dump ?

No team can prevent the price from falling. No matter how legit the project and how many exchanges and partnership they have if the market is down. Surely the price of that tokens will decrease. The market will dictate the price and if the team decides to have a buy back program they should have burned the tokens.

I think the project team should properly manage the process of trading their tokens. I never understand why everyone blames bountyhunters, because they are to blame for the fall in tokens, although they have an average of only 2 percent of tokens. sometimes you can see such large amounts in orders that none of the bountyhunter earned, the team itself merges their tokens, these are fraudsters. The project team should always do so that there is a demand for their coins by any means, even if you have to buy the coins yourself, place orders if necessary.

In my opinion, they can't since it is the market that determines the price of each token. When tokens crash it is due to someone dumping massive bag or the whole market crashes. While the myth of bitcoin whales is true or not, that I do not know, but if the token is "trading" on IDEX exchange only (trading in quotes since 1 buy order per day is definitely not trading for me) and someone sells the majorite of the tokens that are present there, then the overall price will surely drop.

That is clear. For example these days there are too many tokens which lower their ico price. We can call a x ico.
X ico collected 25 m dollar during ico .Their ico price is 1 dollar. and there are 5m circ supply token. So now the market cap is 5m dollar and 5m circ supply now.
If they want to prevent dumping they can prepare some money like 3m dollar. They can put huge buy wall 1 dollar price.
That means if every investor will sell the tokens with 1 dollar. Team will spend 5m dollar and their marktcap will remain 5m dollar and their token price remain 1 dollar.
With only their 20 percentage of ico hardcap. I think i am not wrong :D . Maybe my calculations can be wrong but i believe they are true. So if ico companies want to spend some money
for prevent dumping they can easily do that. Especially if the marketcap is lower than 5x from ico for example it will be very easy for these companies. But surely they will not want to buy back their useless coins :D .

When the tokens are already listed on the exchanges, actually the team cannot control the coin prices maximally. It will depend on how the market situation. But of course, it doesn't mean that the team cannot do anything. The team can still control by upgrading the promotion and making strategy to pump the price.

I agree with that there should be a buyback if these developers do not want to see their tokens dump to it's  lowest price but the one thing that can make the price stabilized is the trust of the investors, they want to see a platform and they want to see more updates.