Bitcoin Forum

.........jnrdtohietp
reht9e-hr0tdfht
ertsr9dyht-er0ydm

I do not understand how are we going to play this. I tried clicking on the item button but there is nothing. Can't we just play by using our money here? And I saw that we need to wait for 8s just to prepare everhthing before starting the bet. This is really long time to wait. Last one, the multiplier is a little bit weird, starting with 1.001? Or 1,001?

Another bustabit game but this one do have problems yet those multipliers arent really exact on whats being shown on the image and on the numbers where counting
and hey check out on what i have observed on what multiplier it bust out and the line is just continues even on the start up.

http://i67.tinypic.com/atujrp.png

8 seconds start up is doubled from 4 seconds of bustabit.

Yeah, I do found those thing a lot on their site and they do not even care when they do not have any players on it. And wondering why they already open it publicaly when there is so many bugs and errors on their site. Crash game is a good place to earn some cash but only if there is smooth on everything.

@OP, you can see many crash games that really works, there is some is based on altcoin too instead of bitcoin. Hope you can fix every errors and bugs on your site

It looks like another bustabit-like website. I love the crash game, but what makes your website better than others that already offer it? What makes it different? I can see that you allow to win a Lamborgini, but what are the terms of this lottery element in the game? I can see that there's something more to it, since there are also price tags and I guess there should be a utility token that's used to exchange money for real goods, but there's definitely not enought info about all of this on the website. Moreover, I don't even see the goods and prices on the website, they are just mentioned in ToS. Please provide more information to receive adequate evaluation of your project.

This is really the mistake had been done which releasing a site to public or live without cleaning up the bugs and errors.Im not discouraging to make an another
busta-like game but if we do try to look at on the current number of similar sites here https://www.bustabit.com/license.txt then this crash game is somehow already saturated.
What do you think?

From the provably fair:


ouch! 5% instant crashes? It seems kind of crazy to try compete against the incumbent bustabit by 5-6x'ing the house edge.


It's also slightly concerning that the only 2 modified lines of the provably fair code from bustabit is done so poorly. parseInt is for, parsing an integer. But here you're feeding in an integer and asking it to parse it  ???   You probably meant:  "if (divisible(hash, 100 / INSTANT_CRASH_PERCENTAGE))"


That said, the rest of the site looks well done and nicely customized. Good luck with your project!

I also realized, you also copied bustabit's seeding event and then removed the protections it offers (either out of malice, or more likely incompetence  ;D)



That only made sense on bustabit because the terminating hash was (well) published (and archived by numerous 3rd party sources) before a client seed was provably fairly (using a bitcoin block hash) picked.  You on the other hand have removed the client seed (why?!!!) which removes protections for players that you picked a bad hash-chain. And in fact you promise to arbitrarily change it:


which betrays a real lack of understanding about security of reversing a cryptographic hash. But if you're worried about some sort of brute forcing, you could always just use sha512 which would take like millions of trillions of times longer to brute force :P   And I find it rather bizarre that you would create a hash-chain of 10M long (from bustabit's original design) and then claim it's insecure because it's too long. Why wouldn't you just create one that's 1M long, and do a reseeding event each 1M games?  (or w/e you want....)


That said, I can't imagine you are intentionally picking a bad hash-chain as the house edge is already so high that all chains are basically bad anyway. I just don't see how you expect to compete against bustabit when you've just massively jacked up the house edge, and massively wrecked the provably fair guarantees.