Bitcoin Forum

hello friends,

i think bounty hunters are 1 reason for DUMPs, becouse when they will god tokens, they will selling all tokens, and marketcap are going down.

if payment will be in USDT, if bounty hunter will sell USDT - its not bad order for Tokens and ICO.

what is the best WAY?

lets do it, speculation.

You don't know on what you are talking about and you are also included to those people who do have that kind of mentality on blaming bounty hunters
for the reason of dumps. Why not consider or tell yourself on whats the position of investors itself on such scenario? For sure you would realize that they are the
ones give out that major impact on a projects price. Talking about payment on USDT I don't think this thing will happen. Projects would definitely pay up with their own trash tokens.

its different. if they willnot pay in USDT, but this is speculation.
i think it will be best, for market to,

becouse if you buy tokens in ICO - with price 0.5$ per token, you will not make Order with 0.4 - 0.3 - 0.2 -0.1 0.05 .
and if you earn token with bounty or airdrop. you can sell it fast, with small price - small then ICO.

and if on exchange - are orders with small price (ordered by bounty hunter), no1 willnot buy your token wih ICO price.
if people stis selling tokens with small price, thets mean small marketcap.  becouse of - marketcap = price X circulation suply.

this is way for solve risk for ICO and after ICO shoks.


i think this way is good for bounty hunters to, becouse they will got really benefits, if you like project, you can buy token with your bounty usdt. its good  for ICO. and if you dont like, you cant Dump price, becouse you have only USDT.

Most of the ICOs aren't fluid enough to pay bounty hunters in any other coin other than their tokens, so it's easier for them to make payments with their native tokens. Moreso, paying in their tokens is also a subtle way of promoting their tokens. This is why scam ICOs get away with anything, because all they do is issue thrash tokens in exchange for the real coins

This is very true, simple but yet it is hard to understand.
as a company, other than having a working product to back them up. They also need to distribute it to many people aka distribution to increase their popularity, the reason why some projects are paying them(bounty hunters) in form of their token due to this. And do not forget the fact that Investor can do anything to the project from a good on to a bad one if they are the only one who have it, and the company does not wish to see that happen.

Well thats a possibility but not solely. The bounty is just a small portion of tye market or the market cap in that  matter. The market already hold before this decline and A the consolidation of all bounty is online a portion of it. And bounty often has a very low value once paid.

Tether company has ability to frezee your money whatever where your money is. I will not have interested to receive my money on USDT form. Tether is really suspicious coin and TUSD is much better than it

A few bounties pay sometimes in BTC or ETH but paying in the ICO tokens is the most prevalent. Do not think any bounty has paid in stable coins. Tether is not too trustworthy anyway.

For bounty hunters, a USDT payout will be very good, there’s more that the USDT has even appeared in the MyEtherWallet wallet. However, for ICO teams, such a payment will be very difficult to use in practice. At this time they are trying to distribute their tokens and accumulate funds in Bitcoin and other well-known cryptocurrencies. However, some ICO teams pay bounty hunters for their work with Bitcoin or ethereum and they can do it in USDT.

often there is a bounty that pays using btc, but when it is listed on the exchange the token price remains a dump. you should know that the average token allocation for bounty is only around 1% - 2% and this allocation is much smaller than the bonus given to investors.

You have the point, but the main thing is that tokens and ICO are created in order to spread the tokens in order to have a large number of participants and users, so i dont think that paying with usd is not a good idea.

Well I think most of us would agree to that idea but,
They are paying you token in order to promote their project and also they are paying with their own token because they want to save money.

Some projects do pay in BTC or USD so that the payment is fixed but it's often not a good idea for ICO's to do so.

The bounty model works because it fits for both sides. The success of the ICO is the bounty hunters success. If they market the project well and help investment to flow in to the ICO then they'll receive more tokens. The only bounties where this is not the case are ones with fixed rewards, in that scenario you may receive too much or more often too few tokens.

Perhaps you should look for some of the newer bounties that allow you to sell stakes for eth. That way you can guarantee your income.

good luck convincing the ICO creators to pay you in anything but their own token! the only reason why they create an ICO token is to make money not to spend money and paying you in something else like Tether or bitcoin or fiat,... means spending money while paying in their own useless token which they premine costs them virtually nothing.

This could really have a positive effect on ICO projects and the price of new tokens. One of the reasons for dumps would be solved and it would be easier for participants in bounty campaigns to receive, for example, Bitcoin, Ethereum or USDT. But in this case, the team before launching its ICO should have a certain amount in Bitcoin or other coins in order to be able to pay those who advertise their project, and there are not many of them.

they could use money from their tokensale .i think if they serious to their investor and want give them profit maybe this is they best way.no one dumped their token.as we know , bounty campaign that pay their participants using bitcoin has stable rate in market.and investors like this way.

It is weird, mate. ICos try to save funds for development and marketing, that's why they don't giveway liquid crypto.
Moreover approach of giving out original coin increase number of tokenholders and it is getting easier to be listed on exchange

I participated bounty United Traders long ago. They paid part in BTC, part in UT tokens. BTC they paid every week and tokens after ICO. This was a great scheme.

People still have not get it, people are not being paid of their bounty fee not because they are paid in the token projects or Fiat, it is because the ICO market has dried up. When was the last time an ICO reached it hard cap. I can't remember anyone recently and most are greatly struggling to hit their softcap so how will you expect them to focus on the bounty money if they have no fund to spend on their project development

That will be a disaster, one of the reason why the project developer distribute their coin through airdrop and bounty is because it is one of the simplest way to distribute a coin. Other that they got many people holding their coin, they got more market-cap, got more market value because more coin are in the market flow. They also make some people supporting them without any "real" payment. And if this happend, I doubt that ICO and bounty will be as many as it is now. Many project will have some doubt to do bounty, or even creat ICO.

should all existing campaigns have bounty payment schemes like that. whether payment uses usdt or btc and eth, I think that is a payment that has value. unfortunately, many of the campaigns pay coins ico who do not necessarily have value on the market. therefore most bounty hunters also feel that they are not paid.

There is a big flaw in your assumptions and suggestion, first of all your assumption that bounty hunters are the cause of the dump in the ICO which is very unlikely as the total allocated for the bounty participants are less than 5 to 10 percent at most which if they have sold will have little to no impact to the price of the ICO. Also it is the bounty hunters right to sell the tokens as the have earned it unlike the investors who really put money in the project to make it grow of have benefits from it in which most of the time these investors are the cause of the dump. Second your suggestion to have USDT as a payment for the bounty hunters which cannot be as the managers and developers will have almost no way to have as they are also getting the funds from crowd sales and having to pay bounty hunters other crypto that are not their own will empty their pockets which should have been reserved for the project.

How much is the total holdings allocated for bounties?
Most of them only give 1% from the total supply of that coin.
I don't think that's the reason when a coin starts to dump.
Investors are just taking back their monies.

Why USDT? Some bounties are paying in BTC or ETH, for me better such payments. But i think it won't happen.

Even it is on BTC or ETHEREUM, I will accept it. Developers don't want to lose their money. It is the essential of paying the bounty hunters or managers their native token. If they paid us with USDT, their own token has useless. However, it is also their way to fool their participants specially that most of altcoins are scam or no values.

Your thinking is very narrow it turns out, you should be able to measure and compare it, between:
How much global funds were disbursed by the organizers of the campaign to pay bounty hunters.
How much funds did the ICO collect.
And how much crypto funds does the pope have.
Next please compare, which funds / who will have the possibility to drop market prices.


Not necessarily, because not a few of those whose lives are not yet sufficient, so most likely they will use their USDT, to buy something they need especially for their life needs.


They must still be paid in the cryptocurrency format, because this can make the fluctuations run according to the way they should, and at the same time make the cryptocurrency survive as we expect.

That would be definitely convenient for bounty hunters but it is not going to be convenient for those that organized the bounty campaign for many reasons, one of the reasons to give tokens away is to have many more people holding and using the coins instead of having a few investors controlling the whole supply of the coin, if that were to happen there will not be any reason for anyone to invest in such a coin.

In the start it was thought that the value of ICO coins increased much higher than the payment in the other stable coin so people started to get the ICO coins and they sold them in the market after the end of ICO but right now people are worried as these coins do not get value in the market which may happen in the coming future.

The purpose of bounty projects is to promote the project and most projects expect as many token holders as possible to demonstrate the high level of the project. It will be difficult for projects to pay bounty in USDT, which is not their own token.

That would be great, but i don't think they're going to choose such a payment method. If they were to pay in this way, the projects would give more confidence.

That's a great idea and never comes in my mind. Before, i only prefer bitcoin or ethereum as a payment for bounty hunters but will also cause a dump on both sides. Getting paid by USDT will be a great choice and even if there will be a massive sell in that altcoin, it will not affect the price that much. I hope that all ICOs will realize this type of payment. It will also avoid their token to be dumped.

That would be great for bounty hunters with the current trend of cryptocurrencies. But i don't expect thoses companies to pay us with USDT. It will surely cost them more money. As with tokens, it only cost them the creation of the tokens.

Most bounties are paid in the project token because they can mint them from 0 with minimal cost, only the more serious projects wiould be able to pay in USDT, but they are already paying in BTC

i think this will not bad, for example, if you like Azbit ICO, and Sandra evans will give you USDT, i think you will buy azbit tokens, by USDT.

this way is good, becouse, if you buy with usdt, price will go up (with your order)..
but if you dont buy, price willnot go down (by your order)

if I am paid using USDT, I think that is a very good choice because I am sure it will make bounty and airdrop participants get to buy coins or tokens that are promoted so that the price of ICO and cryptocurrency will increase.

It is not a guarantee of being able to increase the price of a token ico. payment with coins or other such usdt btc and eth is in fact already done some of the campaign, but it's not all like that. most pay with eth. whatever the effect of the payment by the eth or usdt in the campaign participants, but it will be great fun for the participants.

well it's ok for me that they paid us USDT or any stable altcoins that we work in bounties and airdrops, but it is not good for the ICO's their project will not success if they spend more money to promote it is risky for them.

Why would they do this? This would be a cash-out solution that will not benefit the company in any way. Also, by paying out tokens of the project itsself, there is a certain committment-benefit. I don't see any benefits, other than benefits for bounty-hunters.

This is a good suggestion that will favor to the bounty participants as we want a sure money in promoting their projects but those team can't afford to pay their participants in ETH or BTC as they want to pay in their token. Also, I don't think those bounty hunters are the reason of the downfall of their token price. Maybe a little percent but not all hunters are dumpers. Blame this to the team for their failure to plan ahead.

It is not really complex, during the past year people were very happy to get their payment in tokens because the market was skyrocketing and the value of their coins went up almost everyday, but now the market is going down in price and they are complaining that they do not get enough money for their services when it was clear that what was happening during the last year was unsustainable.

Dumps for short term because of bounty hunters yes but dont you think that some of them are investors as well? Some of them invested money and mostly time which is genuine as well. If airdrops and bounty payments will be in eth btc or usdt their tokens will not be utilized.

I don't believe in the argument that bounty hunters will dump their tokens after the release thereof. Why would some bounty hunters believe in the project as wel? Also, often the bounty tokens are only 1% of the total.

Totally agree with that and I believe those cheaters with multiple accounts will only sell their tokens early so that they can move on and cheat another campaign. Personally, I always hodl half of my bounty tokens so for my future expenses and of course I believe in them that I'll get more profit from it.

not all bounty hunters are causing the dump of one token.. the first who dump their token are mostly those investors as they want to get the money fast so they can invest to another project..