Bitcoin Forum

Sometime we found bm not fair about token allocation. All bounty hunter must have felt this and if our protests are certainly not a lot of things we can do. As a bounty hunter we should also be careful. Do you have this experience also ? and what are you doing after that ?


-Edited-
The problem may be not only in the bounty manager but also in ICO team reduces the allocation of tokens. I will explain more clearly so there is no misunderstanding. What I mean not fair here is about the token allocation changes as at the end of the bounty and not in accordance with the time of the first thread posted. Even if it is because wrong bounty manager in writing or indeed the ICO team cheat would be better if the bounty manager speak up and explain the details of the problem instead of letting all the questions without any answers and make bounty think negatively. The main thing is more speak up and explain.

Some bounty managers are changing the allocation after the ICO. But we cannot get an action to them. Because the bounties threads are saying bounty manager can change the allocation anytime. The allocation is not the only reason to hunters getting a low amount of rewards. Because the bounties are popular right now. Then all bounties are getting a large number of participants that's why.

We are very important people in a successful or failed ICO project. But we are considered beggars and are constantly being trampled and cursed by stupid managers.
Because the law does not protect us, because the market is a decentralized market, they have the right to treat us as beggars. I hate that but I can not do anything else.

 
This really sad fact. We cant do anything. If anger the bounty manager maybe ban us. The worst also could be the results of our work are not distributed. Big dilemma,we worked hard but in the end can be considered as trash.

You forget the fact bounty manager can change the rules whenever they want because the thread not locked. Sometimes there are a lot of bounty hunter who does not pay attention with allocations and they not really care about how bounty manager total token alocation per stakes of the partisipant.

By what do you mean unfair allocation? Is it going to be the allocation of the campaigns or the bounty, the allocation vs the altcoins that the bounty managers will get, or the changing of allocations of the bounty after the ICO ends? As you see the allocation of the bounty is well said in the bounty post of the ICO and its reward will depend on how many the participants is, the status of the crowdfunding of the ICO, and the work that you have done. And we could never compare the work of a bounty manager from us bounty hunters to the altcoins that they are getting after the ICO ends as its too much work if managing hundreds to thousands of bounty hunters every project that they have so it is their right to have that but if it is changing of allocation in the bounty after the ICO ends then that is debatable.

We try to choose promising projects with a good idea and team. Preferably with your blockchain.

I don't think the bounty hunters have a choice when it comes to the amount of tokens allocated for a campaign. If you are not okay with the allocation, it is best you don't participate at all

First of all, no choice. The most important thing is to at least enter the market and was the distribution of tokens. For if you have not been given them, then there is nothing to say

Yes sometimes that happens, but we can't do much and therefore it is also highly recommended that bounty hunters be able to choose a bounty or bounty manager properly.

For bounty of course. Allocation in the beginning change when the bounty is already completed and they do nota explain about it. That's the problem. When we know from the beginning of course we will not follow their bounty but the pro blem  when the bounty mnager change at the end. As a bounty hunter we can't do something because rules in thread can be changed any time. Really a sad reality.Its not only about bounty manager hard work. Bounty hunter also hard work. Maybe you never have this experience or you as bounty manager too. i dont know. The fact is about unfair not hard work..

In a situation like this, protest is not what one should result to, else it will not be effective. You know, bounty managers do not force participants to join their bounty. Although, you might be persuaded to join their campaigns. Which is why one has to do one's research before joining any.
Some managers cannot just be truthful with their dealings, which is more reason one has to know the manager to work with.

Yes of course, I think almost everyone who has experience like this. When the campaign ended and after the stake calculation was completed, it was far different from the expectation when calculating the tokens, which budget for the campaign turned out to be reduced by ICO team. There is not much that can be done, because protest is only useless, they will block or close the bounty group.

I agree with you, because from my experience participating in bounty for 5 months, but BM only counted me to participate in bounty for 3 months and when I protested, then gave proof to BM, it was just useless and spent my time, because BM only told me if he had calculated it and could not be changed, or if you want to protest then all the stakes that you have will be lost, so I only got an allocation from the bounty that was not according to what I should get and of course this is not fair to me, because 2 months I followed the bounty was just useless and only spent my time.

Although, i have not experienced this, but if such should happen, i think bounty hunters should have one voice and refuse to participate in other bounties managed by such person. With this, the manager might be forced to change.

Token allocation is always written at the beginning including the rules so if you felt not enough and not worth for your effort so you just simply not to join unless they changing after bounty , though they have all the rights but its unfair , then that is the time to protest .

As a bounty hunter I think I don't have something can do with regard to this situation, at the moment I am experiencing this kind of thing like the bounty allocation is reduced by 80 percent for their reason that is I think unreasonable.

I feel like as a bounty hunter, we don't have much power if the token decides to change the rules. I mean they kind of figure many of us are going to dump our tokens anyway.

Indeed, the rules are made and changed according to the prevailing ones, this is where we can choose which bounty campaign is in accordance with our will, we have done maximum effort and if the tokens have been distributed then we are also difficult to protest, especially sometimes the token sales are not up to the maximum target. Thanking you would be better than complaining a lot.

In what thing you should be careful?

I think this type of concern, you should discuss this to bounty managers so they are going to be aware of what you are complaining. But its hard to address this issue if your bounty manager doesn't really care and just counts the posts that you are doing.

It is our responsibility to take care our own belongings. Managers are not all the same some are evil motives to cheat the allocation but some are trustworthy and reliable to work with. So if you don't want to experience to be with those unfaithful managers, then, seek those reliable ones to work faithfully with those trustworthy managers.

Perhaps i would like to suggest, when ever you feel that the bounty manager isn't fair on the bounty allocation, then it should be better if you stay away from that bounty manager or at least from the bounty program itself.

Long before you have researched and studied the projects that you are following, so make sure you choose a bounty manager who is both honest and reliable, but it is difficult to determine if you are not careful. Your concern will not be responded to without proof, so this should be addressed wisely and discuss with the bounty manager.

of course, this can be said to be an absolute thing by the team that has the right to change anything that happened. so when the bounty hunter too busy fuss this then there will be no need to change the conditions. It is indeed unfair allocation changes noticeably, but this rule has become the rights of developers and free when would want to change.

he allocation is unfair, before reading the rules, if it's not pleasing, just leave it.
But sometimes this injustice occurs after the tokens are distributed, and we also cannot do much, so our protests are sometimes ignored.

yeah, things like that i often find.
but i don't want to protest, because some bounty managers will not respond well to my words. if the manager bounty is unfair, i just leave the project and look for other better projects.

i don't want to worry about things like that.

This is the reality. There is no fairness in the world. The existence of law is to maintain fairness, but there is no law here, so there is no fairness. The same problem with social distribution, most of the money is in the hands of a few people, this is capitalism.

Every day we feel the unfair treatment of crypto, such as trading, bounty rewards, but unless we have a strong team, we can't do anything!

I have took part in some bounties and 50 percent of them have reduced the budget. It is very unfair because it is not our problem, that the ICO was not able to achieve their goals, but we cannot do something about it.

This issue of bounty allocation is a serious issue but I think it's hard to fight because by default every bounty hunters agree to the rules stated by bounty manager on the bounty thread once you sign up for any of the bounty campaigns, the only way I think this can be revolted against is by boycotting some bounties with ridiculous bounty allocation and also the clause in the rules of the bounty stating that the bounty manager reserve the right to change the rules at any time

Recently, quite a small number of projects have been paid normally and on time(

That is one of the risks that we get as long as we become bounty participants, we must obey the rules that exist in a bounty managed by the manager. Such changes in rules will harm the participants, and sometimes there is elimination of participants without explanation. That is an injustice from the rules. Rules should not change from start to finish.

Bounty allocation maybe unfair,but the blame should go to project devs
There’s a profit chase for everyone including the bounty manager, and moreover 1% total supply is too few for bounty and airdrop workers

There needs to be an improvement

bounty program before was way way more different nowadays. I remember that applying for bounties are like job interview. Your profile is being reviewed and being accepted to a bounty program is a privilege to be a port of a project. In my experience, bounty allocations are just copy and paste Technic, traditionally they are only following what was done before. The main difference is, most of the projects now are turning into a scam project.

I've got a token, I'm grateful, I've actually experienced it, but I always let it. my friend suggested asking the telegram, but I didn't want to bother, what was important was that the tokens were good.

Nothing can be done about it. The team changes the conditions as they please. Here and the number of coins to be first one, and then another. And it can not be challenged.

Its very annoying and depressing after working for months and do not get the right stakes it becomes very difficult to even contact them and when you do you get different reasons but i hope they change the attitude

i have experienced that not just once. it's not just about token allocation but also distribution reward.
the most hurt one was a project that succesfully reached softcap but the ICO project stated if bounty hunter not that helpfull so they decide to cut the reward from 10% to less than 1 %. BM can't do anything about it since their job was calculate stake and the one responsible for paying was the project itself. so we can't blame BM cause they do their job properly.

from here i learn that we should carefully choose not just good BM but also a good project to promote.

It seems like that and what you say is part of the reality in the bounty program. The bounty program should not be full of fraud, which results in a loss of time and energy from participating participants. This is boring and makes the participants disappointed at the end of the bounty.

If you think it's not fair so you just need to find another bounty campaign which you think is better to join. That's all, you can't do anything to change token allocation for each part in bounty campaign, it decided by bounty manager and they'll not change it just because of a single bounty hunter like you.

Sometimes bounty managers can just make a mistake in the calculations. I think that all we can do is to choose the most reliable and proven managers of bounty companies.

This is not as simple as like you're talking about because the you does not understand what I mean. If we know from the beginning of course we have the choice not to join their bounty but this problem is different, they change the allocation is not according with what is in the thread in the beginning and the rules changed all of a sudden when the bounty is finished.

Do you bounty manager ? it looks like you don't know what I mean. Please read first well and give your comments. If we knew from the beginning they will change the allocation of we will leave the bounty but when they change it when the bounty is over it's like our hard work useless because the allocation is not in according with what they write from the beginning.

Yes you're right but sometimes the problems just not in bounty manager but also the developer. Perhaps the best option is bounty manager more speak up about these things and talk clearly to the bounty hunter because the fault is not from them but from the developer. This would make it more fair due to the presence of a detailed explanation instead of just letting us ask questions without answers.

I don't think that as a bounty hunter, I can do more, the most important thing for me personally is to keep paying according to our work. I think the bounty manager is not cheating but it is wrong to write down the allocation, even as a bounty hunter we have to actively ask also in the official grub that is brought by the bounty manager, so we can remind if the bounty manager miswrites the allocation

Another fact sometimes bounty manager not too open about it. Would be fair if they explain these things openly so there would be not much to ask and think negatively. New project - Bounty Manager - Bounty hunters as part of a mutually bonded and open with each other will certainly be better.

I have ever experienced this kind of not fair allocation. When the bounty or ICO start, they give the big allocation or about 2% from the total token, but, when the ICO has ended, they changed the rules, only 2% from the token sold. This is absolutely not fair. And we, can only protest but it cannot help much because they have the right to change the rule. So sad.

I did not face an unfair reward, only if I broke the rules or did not fulfill the task, as the manager demanded, I also do not like that the rules can change in the company, but what can I do about it. ..

Well, that's the reality that is in the bounty right now. Many projects are more directed at fraud, so that it harms many people here. After working as a bounty participant and hoping to get a token, unfortunately it turns out to be a wasted token. :'(

if you mean reducing the allocation of bounty during distribution, then in my opinion it is indeed unfair, because from the beginning the team has promised the allocation they announced in a thread bounty then they should not reduce it because the allocation for bounty is only a few percent and there is actually no reason right to reduce bounty allocation.
 but unfortunately whatever we say they will always answer that this must be done and finally we can only surrender

There's a lot of reason to this one of the main reason is the number of participants, but if you mean deducting allocation after the campaign i haven't seen that, because you can easily see that in their spreadsheet the computation of the allocation, this is the reason I prefer bounty with spreadsheet for transparency.

I'd even say the bounty Manager had nothing to do with it. He only does his job. Another thing is when he conspires with the project team. Then the Manager is also responsible. But I agree with you that whatever the situation, he has to explain everything. If managers made contact and tried their best to help, there would be no negative to them.

an unfair allocation is indeed often becoming a problem on the bounty. The manager should at least give you an idea clearly to indicate the allocation they provide so that is not the case a misunderstanding. but only a small part of the bounty and a bold manager want to give information when discrepancies occur.

The problem is when they are all not even reading the rules and agreement properly before try to join in any bounty. If they are realizing the agreement that has been putting by the team and they should put their main concern on this word " the team can change the total allocation anytime" To create any protests will be worthless.

there is nothing we can do as a bounty manager, some bounty managers do cheat but some are indeed carried out by the ICO team, this in my opinion is a risk that must be experienced by bounty hunters when there is a change in allocation

You have a point and im sick of it already ,the only way to get this fix is whenever you are ready to join a bounty always go for the ones that doesn't have rules that anything about the bounty campaign might be change by either ICO dev or bounty manager

I think there is a reason behind the change of allocation on the bounty reward, that is perhaps the selling doesn't reach the hardcap, that way there are coins that are not sold, and the team has to make a re-calculation for the allocation of their coins.

Yes, things like this can happen in a project, an uneven allocation may be one of the reasons that the team does not meet the target, but hopefully if this happens the team will be able to handle it so that everything will run normally

It is true that sometimes injustice is not only caused by the manager but the ICO team changes it. I have experienced this several times from several bounty projects that have been followed, can only surrender without being able to resist even though our time is up to follow his bounty