Bitcoin Forum

Old file

"some technical issues"...I think we're going to have to wait a little while to invest

https://i.imgur.com/O8oG9DF.png

Nothing suspicious about it, he just has a 175% bigger head than others...and very poor paint skillz

https://i.imgur.com/xvoNBvy.png

Some additional elements, after having discussed by Telegram with Sorsis
Here is the original photo of Abdul Rehman

https://i.imgur.com/nCEC0Vd.jpg

It's ugly, it's particularly poorly done, but in reality only the background has been removed from the image

Sorsis also provided me some discussion screens with Abdul.
It doesn't prove anything but it is necessary to report it.

On the other hand, this does not change the fact that the identity and image of Rahul Vyas were used without consent

I think this is a good time for the other supposed team members to express themselves...

Thanks mate for creating this thread to give awareness to all of the BTT community, you doing a great job and also great investigation, you save lots of investors in our community. Once again thanks!!

I'm sorry I'm necro-bumping this thread. I'm replying on behalf of betnomi, as I've explained in this post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5241088.msg54257979#msg54257979) from this thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5241088).

I'll mostly copy-paste the explanation that has already been given at the other thread, since it's a more recent one.

---

---

Regarding the Abdul Rehman case:

The owner knew Abdul from past projects, and he was indeed part of the team. He was asked for his ID and a photo to be used in the team tab. There's a contrat signed too. What happened here? The name Abdul Rehman was a nickname; he had another legal name (ID provided). That could have let to a confusion with the linkeding profile; let's note that the OP had found Abdul, rather than getting linked from the website.

Part of the contract and some conversations between Abdul and the owner of betnomi---> PDF at Mega (https://mega.nz/file/5ZtAUa4I#876JJkx5Ufh4VOC0BPKQqvBUuotapkgTab8uvituR7E) (some information has been redacted). The contract itself cannot be made public, since there is some confidential information.

Regarding the Rahul Vyas case:

As with Abdul, there's a part of the conversation between the owner and Rahul at the PDF at Mega (https://mega.nz/file/tEMyiY5a#nKzKdU-VVt-Z-JRsyi-nlVjMNQk8Y42Rwb-APwlgONA).
As we can read, an agreement was reached, unlike what Rahul stated in the scam accusation screenshots. The owner does also say that they did indeed sign a contract. Since that would be some hard to refute evidence, I've instructed him to search for said contract. Should he find it, I'll update this post/reply on the thread. As requested by the owner, some information has been redacted (payments in this case). No payment was made in the end, because in words of the owner, Rahul asked for a higher payment after his information was published on the website (and after signing the contract). That conversation is unfortunately unavailable, and without the contract to back up the version of the owner, it'll be up to each user following the thread to believe one or the other.
I am aware about the fact that the screen names in the conversation I've uploaded on this PDF doesn't match the one the owner of betnomi has provided, but we are not going to ask for KYC, are we? It's the same person, that I can say.

Topic is archived http://archive.is/NUdsW, for "old" information use this link.