Bitcoin Forum

I'd like to conduct a survey to see what the preferred initial distribution method is among the community. This is mainly geared toward utility tokens that have an use, not STO that are shares of a business, but I included them anyway as they could evolve. With new projects popping up all the time, I figure this could be useful information in the future.
So say a new project is launching, what  method do you hope to see them use? What method would you use if it was your project launch? Vote for the methods of distribution  you think would be best for a new coin. You may pick up to 3, and comment them in order below, with reasoning.

I think that ICO is one of the best ways to develop cryptocurrency and it has proven itself quite well. However, due to the fraud that has overwhelmed him, he needs to be urgently regulated and regulated by the relevant government agencies. This activity attracts a lot of money, and where there is a lot of money, there will be a lot of scam. We can get rid of them only through government regulation of ICO activities.

The best distribution I guess is when projects choose to escrow their fund first, that ensures that the project will going to deliver the payment directly after the project ends in the market such an ICO.

Can't believe Signature Campaign is winning, you realise this coin would be worthless from day 1, right???
The most successful projects are block-reward-only, maybe with the exception of Ethereum where funding was really needed due to its revolutionary nature.

With the help of airdrop is the distribution of a large number of people who just register. And as a result, no one gets a normal profit. It is better to conduct a bounty campaign and charge tokens to those people who helped to promote the project. Mutually beneficial cooperation!

I am also a little surprised that sig campaign is winning. Block reward is the most secure and fair method. But there only been 5 participates so far, perhaps it will change

ICO might be good, but i am just thinking of such project not to have setbacks, except the investors can be patient enough.
For every real utility token project, with a working product, there us usually organic growth and no pump and dump be allowed, but the problem with so many of these projects, is that thy might begin to tell you, even after the ICO that their product is still under development.
This might delay its growth, so if ICO will be conducted, the product development should be fast tracked, at least to a useful stage.

Bump

for me as bounty hunter the choice is obligatory therefore ico (no sto) then airdrop and sig.campaign

We can not really do anything in the current market price of the crypto until now, so if we have a opportunity and chance now to make an alternative ways to how we can get out the way of this before the crypto price will be back again..

Bearmarket!!

For an ICO project, they may not be necessary to open a bounty campaign. But they will offer an airdrop, airdrop that helps more people know their projects. It is similar to Stellar, although they have developed their projects since 2014, they still distribute a large amount of XLM through blockchain wallet

I don't think airdrop is the safest, most profitable way. Airdrop companies can also request passage of KYC, which in my opinion is definitely not worth doing. Profits from airdrop companies are very small and can take off only once a year or two.

This forum has set some rules and makes everything almost become fixed. This has made the forum better, and the forum's level of activity is more stable, so I hope that Sig campaign / Bounty will always be one of the choices of ICO marketing projects.

the best way was to distribute via ICO, Signature bounty and airdrop.
start with an ICO and made signature bounty program also use airdrop to promote the project.
keep signature even after ICO only for a high ranking member.
40% ICO
2% for signature during ICO
1% airdrop
7% for signature after ICO (monthly reward)