Bitcoin Forum

at this time I receive the distribution of tokens for one of the projects in stages, the distribution is done every month at 10% of the number of tokens that I get, what is the purpose of all this?
is this one way to stabilize prices?

Yes, I think so. Some projects tried to distribute the tokens to their contributors and bounty hunters in stages, to avoid dumping the price, especially with this red crypto market. There are even some ICO projects deciding to lock their tokens for some amount of time, for the same reason.

I think that most likely in order to stabilize the prices. They will now try all possible options to make something with the prices

Yes, most likely, they do not want to allow a substantial dump. I am also waiting for quarterly payments from a project. However, even in this case, they delay payments.

I bet you are talking about LYFE project, based on the data that I gathered from the team and the participant. They did that in order to avoid any dumpage from the bounty hunters. but from the other side(bounty hunter point of view), they did this because they wanted to minimize the cost.
there are so many reasons why would they do that, logically speaking. If they wanted to stabilize the price, they could pay them(the hunters) with BTC or ETH directly. But they did not, does not that mean they did it on purpose?

Yeah, this is a way to raise prices if the value of the project is good, and can help you be more profitable. Because if the token value of each month increases gradually, you will profit more than they distribute it all in one go

yes, to avoid bounty hunters selling their tokens in large quantities. I like this method rather than locking the token. this is more realistic than all the methods available. with so many investors who are more confident to hold and they are not afraid of a dump carried out by bounty hunters

I feel you are talking about the same project I am in and if not then let me explain because I was in a project that did the same with their participants and, to be honest, I 100% respect them and their decision because instead of just keep delay paying us they  decided to be fair as much as they can, and they decided to give us our full payments but in 10% monthly installment instead of just cutting it down to 20% and pay it all at once like most of the other projects do, now and since most of the projects are trying hard to rip their bounty participants one way or another I think what these guys did was not bad at all at least they are paying us in time without even ask them twice I have been receiving my payments from them monthly in time and even sometimes before the due date without any problems.

yes you are right to distribute reward bounties in several stages every month can be one way to avoid a bounty hunter dump. this is a good way and might be applicable to other projects.

it could be, that is the strategy that the team did to stabilize prices in the market.
I also participated in projects that did the same thing. I hope that the price of the project coins will continue and even go up even further.

This is their way of how to avoid the price dumping and I think it will work. Anyway it is a much better decision for hunters, because almost all projects are simply cutting the budget of a campaign and reducing it almost by 90 percent.

it is usually for stabilisation of price, since most of bounty hunters dump their tokens after receiving, and price is going down very quickly, which undermines the trust in coin and the spiral to the bottom is in full speed

I think this is done only for one purpose, so that the holders of tokens are not in a hurry to sell them.I see no other explanation for these actions.

The budget for the bounty program is determined before it begins. If it is determined that the reward is in tokens, it should be paid in tokens. The project does not really have any costs by paying tokens to bounty hunters. In this case, the payment of 10% every month is only to secure the price against the dump of tokens earned by bounty hunters.

I think this is a measure to stabilize the price of the project token, as investors and bounty hunters can arrange a dump for any project.

I don't see anything wrong paying bounty hunters in installment as long as they fulfilled their obligation. 10% every month is not bad and this is part of the developers strategy to avoid a massive dump of tokens in the exchanges. You should bear with the developer as they are doing what is best for the project.

i think the reason is to prevent the dumping of tokens.. i think its better to do like that than sending it at once and dump it to exchange

Is that coin Vena I read that they are distributing their bounty hunters that way, it is good for participants as long as they can keep up with their project and make sure that they are setting up their platform so holders can expect good price when the token is release.

Some of bounty now is give a installment their reason is to not dump their token in exchanges they listed because they want to maintain their coin in good price. But I think if the reason is like that I think it's for the better of all who have that token.

It us believed that most bounty hunters dump, which might be true to an extent, but not always the case.
I have seem a project that does the same and yet the tokens dumped.
If they feel that will be effective, well they can.
The rate at which projects dump these days is sometimes quite alarming. So it seems most projects that are aware of the strategy, are the ones doing it.

it might be because to avoid jumpers maybe because if it is directly distributed all then most bounty hunters will as soon as possible sell tokens that he can with prices on the existing market.

Yes, this is one way to stabilize the price of the coin. I think it's a good tool for that.

I never experienced the distribution like this project. But I am quite surprised that they only distributed 10% of the number of tokens /month. Have you tried to ask the team why they do distribution in this way? I think the bounty manager or the team project can answer your question accurately. We only guess the reasons here by speculation. And I want to know, have the tokens listed on exchanges?   

I think it's a good way to save the price without dumping. Bountyhunters like selling tokens after recieving immediatly. As for me, I always hodl bounty tokens of successful projects.

Yeah, I think it's a way to keep your coin safe from failing. After all, those bounty hunters who do not care how the project will develop in the future usually sell their coins at once. Therefore, the team probably expects that in the end there will be only those who are interested in the project and they will not sell their tokens at once.

I agree with many people. This is also an unusual solution for the project. After all, this method of distribution will really work. It's good for bounty hunters, too, because they get paid for the actual work.

I have being monitoring some of the tokens with big words preaching certain  solution and as soon as they hit the market the initial price they sold gets a big hit and end up in big loss for the initial investors and that may be the reason everyone is dumping the coins as soon as they hit the market.

yes maybe team thinks if this is one way to stabilize prices in market but in this way not all projects will succeed because everything depends on development and interest of traders on coin

Devs from an ICO project want to keep their altcoin prices stable. All we know, the culture of bounty hunter in this forum, they will sell tokens when the tokens they expected are already in their wallets. I do believe this is a start to avoid dumps, and some projects ICO have used various methods like this.

There are bounty that really distribute their tokens in installments basis, some distribute it by 50% , 25% , then last 25%, others also distribute it by three months equally, I really experienced this kind of bounty distribution for installments scheme.

It's not Vena network they have the same type of distribution but the percentage is higher than 10%. Approximately it's about 33% for vena's bounty campaign since they'll distribute 1/3 of the allocated token per month.

The answer is already obvious if you're a bounty hunter you already know that prices of these tokens will go down after it gets listed to an exchange. Different bounty campaigns have their own way of distributing their tokens sometimes it's fixed % per month others distribute it slowly then it gradually increases month after month.

This is the way that new projects lock their tokens to avoid the situation big investors who bought with big amount sell off immediately when it is listed in market

As many of you already says that it's help to stabilized the token prize once it's list on the exchanges and it's true too also its help you to see real price of token. Also It could be increase holding of token and then nobody can blame that bounty hunters dump the token. So I can say it's a good strategy of distribution process and it's favour with investors and bounty hunters both.

In my view, tokens that are distributed every 10% of the total token every month are very good steps. Because I also believe that this can make the price of tokens stable. But everyone also has a different opinion.

I don't understand why they allocate tokens to contributors and bounty hunters to stabilize prices? If the bounty hunters they sell token mean the price will fall?

Yeah, it might be so. They doing that because they don't want to expect any dumps, they just wanted to the bounty users to hold the token first rather than selling it off.

Yes, it could be.

Remember we're in the bear market and every time bounty hunters got their tokens, it's a immediate dump and obviously the price of that project will go down hard.

I'm not sure of the net positive though, it's first time I heard this kind of payment arrangement. So it's early to say if this will be effective and efficient in the long run.

I believe it's a way to prevent on the dumping that been done by some of the bounty participant who are willing to have a quick money form the bounty reward that they get, without even thinking about the future of the coins itself.

most likely it is done to avoid such big dump from mostly bounty hunters, usually when bounty hunters recieved their tokens from campaign they will dump it on exchanges in no time, resulting to price dropped

It pretty sounds cool of their strategy to make such preventions on the dump once they hitting an exchange.

I thought it was a new and exact method that the dev had done, it was anticipated that there would be no big sales, so the dev would be easier to stabilize prices, but I see the method only done on a few projects, I hope that done on all projects.

With the condition of the Crypto market currently still very low. So that it can be a good solution to keep the price of tokens stable. Previously there was an ATLANT project that was distributed every month and is currently still running.

The staggered distribution of the tokens that you earned is done of course in order to control the sale of the same with different exchanges (am assuming it is already available in the exchange) and can be because in our experience there is a strong possibility of dumping once the tokens are already in our hands. Though bounty hunters' holdings just comprise not more than 5% of the total available tokens still people behind a project can be afraid of strong dumping. Nowadays, the market is not getting very good for many ICO projects especially the new ones...and this is the reason why people are looking for something much better like the STO which many are demanding to replace the usual ICO.

I have ever met, such a thing is done to measure the time, besides that the team did it to avoid a dramatic drop in prices.

if what you mean is a bounty distribution, I think that is one of the efforts of the dev to stabilize prices in the market
I also got a project like that, he distributed tokens every month for 18 months, but it cannot be relied upon to stabilize the price of tokens, because inevitably the price of tokens always goes down, especially in the current market conditions

Maybe it could be a solution so that the price of tokens does not go down. But it's better to just ask the project team what the purpose of the distribution is in stages. Maybe that includes the project team's plans or goals.

it's better than a coin whoever make the distribution in 4 months because they really wanted to make sure there will be no dumps on their tokens. You have to be grateful.

I have not heard of such a new knowledge on the part of the ICO team. Of course, this may be logical in order not to devalue the new token. I even better agree that the ICO team immediately pays out all the tokens and then blocks it for 6-8 months. I would know that the tokens are in my wallet. And this is how much work, the number of transactions increases exactly ten times. Here they will surely confuse something, there will be many complaints. No, this is a bad way to depreciate the token, it is unlikely to take root.

It's clearly decided for that reason.  But 10% or not, I don't think you can trade them for a lot of profit because almost the new listed coins has no volume at all and sellers dominate it and it just get dumped harder.

It is probably to prevent the bounty hunters from dumping. Many projects believe that hunters are responsible for selling at cheap prices and this method of paying in installment is their way to prevent that from happening. The team may have other reasons, you should ask them directly.

Its one of the way for the developers to prevent a sudden huge drop, it's important to keep the value high especially when just launched on the exchanges, usually the developers will distribute the token in several waves, but this seems like a better way, but the developers need to pay attention to the length, if its too long I am sure the bounty hunters will complain

It seems to me that projects are trying to test their tokens in action and see how they behave in the market!

I have also experienced this, the project was canceled not once a month but every 3 months it was distributed. This is actually the purpose of the project. But with this method actually I also do not agree because the bounty hunter also doesn't get much tokens from the project.

Well,  i don't see this as any huge difference,  however,  i think the only thing/opportunity this offers is an assurance of getting the due rewards after doing the work expected.

In that case, we really do nothing about it. But to accept, unlike they never give the payments, isn't right?
The reason of course why they made that decision is really to avoid dumping the price value of their token, probably they are afraid for that.
But even they don't apply it, the price will still get dump whether they like it or not, because this is trading business industry.

I think it's a good way to distribute coins. Just as Deeponion did during the period they conducted their bounty campaign / airdrop distribution. Every week Only 10% of the coins you can sell, when you exceed the limit, you will be removed from the whole campaign. In this way the extreme dump of their coins was avoided and the price went on high stage

Yes, it is also their way to stabilize the prices. It is still fine as long as you receive all your payment even if you receive it every month but of course we all know that it is still better to get all hard work at one-time payment, but we just need to just accept their rules.

Why people think that bounty participants is the ones that dump the price . I can name so many projects where bounty distribution was made same time with ICO participants and price didn't even dump . And there is projects out there like Elysian who still didn't distribute bounty tokens , but price is already down 99% from ICO price =D

This a myth that bounty hunters can dump the price) IMHO great projects will nly grow after reaching the market, because of demand of people who couldn't buy on the ICO. If project is bad, and ICO team doing strange things and late with the development this wouldn't help at all)

;D ;D
finally, someone can guess it, yes I still think positively until now, I hope they make the right strategy to prevent falling prices at the current market situation.

Thank you for strengthening my confidence in the project.

As if the developers did not try to preserve the value and value of their tokens, but this is the worst thing that could be done in the bounty. Considering that the earnings from the bounty campaigns today are minimal, they still break it up into several parts. That's just terrible. Until then, until you all pay, these tokens can significantly fall in price.

I'm ok with installment as long as they will distribute 50% of the earned bounty and 50% after a month but 10% every month will take bounty hunters 10 months to receive the total bounty which is not good, I hope no other ICO will follow this method.

Hmm ... I don't understand what's the point. Here, you probably need to talk only about the credit component and only for this reason people here should definitely perceive everything that is happening in this way.

It really looks weird but also experience such, to them they are protecting the price from dumping by the bounty hunters, but to be sincere about all this a good project does not look on all this as long as their project worth it nothing to be scared about. As far as they still pay you is fine.

Most of the ICO people think that bounty hunters will dump their tokens together which will lead their token price to south which is true to some extent.
I think distribution in stages is one good method of token distribution. I have joined a bounty campaign which is distributing reward weekly.
Good ICOs are making everything clear in the beginning and thats good, just read everything before joining any campaign you will have better idea.

indirectly, they want people to hold the tokens they hold forcibly, so that prices don't go down too deep after distribution, i think that's the wrong way, because many bounters ask when the distribution is, and keep asking questions so that it makes the forum murky.
 Developers should still share their tokens completely so that the atmosphere is conducive, and they simply freeze their tokens regularly to keep prices stable.

It quite understandable that some projects are choosing this type of model at this time seeing that, the market conditions are unfavourable. Distributing all at once could be devastating at this time knowing that people will surely dump at the first chance of getting their rewards leading to massive price slumps and crashes which may be too difficult to recover thus, leading to loss of confidence on the part of the investors ultimately leading the death of the project. Project teams need to be careful with their policies at this point in time.

Yes, that is the wrong way. Why they have minimal the cost of possible dumping price that they all know after listing from the exchange it will dump. Bounty hunters helped to show up the project and they want profit, a company must have buyback implementation for the sake of their project and the bounty hunters. I also noticed that some projects are doing those strategies.

The distribution of tokens in phases play a lot of role but one of the prominent ones is anti-dump, it would be hard to resist dumping your tokens once it exceeds your expenses and this might contribute in pushing down the price. So this method prevents that from happening.

Yeah, it is. Most of the people are trying to sell their tokens as fast as they can now, when the market is so dumped. Silly behaviour but everybody is frightened and this leads to dramatic price dumps after almost every ICO now. So, devs have to do something with this situation.

Does that just make the distribution process complicated? Like I see it can be an additional job for the bounty managers to do some installments for the payments for the bounty hunters.

Apparently it was made just to settle price in a range and it means stability.
New project need to be regulated and it is required to waste time in order to allow ecosystem to grow!

Transferring ten percent to the bounty hunters wallets every month soon, I think, will get bored by the ICO team itself and in a few months they will transfer the entire amount of tokens or they will transfer several tens of percent every few months. In general, this is not a good idea, however, such measures during the bear market are forced. I would rather agree to a one-time transfer of the entire amount of tokens with the subsequent blocking of tokens in the wallet.

Distribution of token in installment it very good. Because when all token go on  market than market will go down. In present time market is read. Company or project manager take very good decision to  avoid dumping on token price.

Possibly your manager or the team has a valid reason to do that to avoid dumping because most likely that is going to happen after they receive the stakes. But distributing it every month with only 10% is a bit slow process, can they think something else to just not do it like that because it could take 10 months before you do get your stakes even if it's just too small. They should consider to think that too.

I understand the purpose of installment payment but distributing bounty rewards for a period of ten months is just too long! That's just crazy and it's probably time consuming.

I am interested in the result, is it possible for them to protect the token price from the dump or not ?

I think that the developers of the coin take care to preserve the stability of its exchange rate. In my opinion, this is the right approach, as now many are trying to get rid of the coin immediately and this negatively affects its course. If this is a promising project, then perhaps waiting for the coins will be rewarded with a good profit in the future.

I think that gradual distribution in a 10 month period is too much though, but I think it was done that way because if dumpers, this would force people to hold the tokens for a long period of time.

Yes this is something new and for the stabilizing price. As a bounty hunter i believe that this is the best way for stopping sundden price dumping. Usually after the bounty reward distrubition the bounty hunters would sell their coins and the price goes down so fast. I always try to hodl with my bounty coins and follow the projects milestone times.

Of course, if they distributed all the coins at once, then the bounty hunters would all start selling and because of this the price would have fallen greatly.

I think this is not the best solution, it would be much better to distribute tokens within a month or two, and to do it in equal amounts, the results would not get worse.

It seems like it's their way to try to make the coin stable, but they are wrong, unfortunately this will only worsen the situation of the coin, thus disrupting supply and demand of those markets. If they just want it to be stable, then just make it paired with Tether, it's simple  :D

That might be the reason behind that distribution wave, I believe they are worried if they distribute the coins in one go, then the bounty participant being too hurried to sell all the coins they get without even thought what will happen to the coins if they dump it.

The reason behind that way of distribution is good, but i think it won't change any fact if the project isn't good enough. just like an old project that also distributing the reward in several times. Right now the price of the coins are so low. so it really sad for everyone who are waiting until all the coins distributed, since at that time, the price is so much dropping already.

It could be true to stabilize the conditions that occur at this time, some tokens that initially have high selling value. but with the conditions that occur in exchange almost all go down. and you are still lucky to get distribution even though not at once. Because many projects delay distribution by waiting for stable conditions.

I do not think that this method of payment for the services of bounty hunters will take root in the future. Instead of one transaction, ICO teams will do ten. It is easier to transfer the entire amount of tokens at once and block wallets for some time, as others do.
Yes, ICO teams are very inventive.

    It is very good that the tokens are distributed in tranches. So the price stabilizes and there will be no price drops in the near future. This type of project encourages the holders to keep a certain percentage of the coins for a long period of time for certain benefits. This will increase the price. I encourage this kind of strategy.

Most likely this is an assessment of how the price of coins will behave in such a market!

It is an attempt to stablize prices and it started this year, we have to wait and see if it works out
To me, i see it as a waste of time because as an investor, you do not expect me to make full payment and be sent tokens in percentages

Perhaps, if this new approach will work out and finally the said coin will not suffer after the listing for sure most or all the developers will follow
this lead, but reality wise, this should not be happening as teams allocate small amount of funds for bounty and it should not affect the entire
collected funds for developing and supporting the coins when it's already been listed.

Experimental period for another twist of developers distributions of tokens.

In my opinion the main reason is to prevent sharp dumps made by investors and bounty hunters during this crypto winter. I knew some projects with same distribution model and unfortunately it didn't bring nothing except misunderstanding and discontent of community.

I have experienced bad things with the current situation where the distribution didn't work because the team turned out to be runaway and everything was not as expected. Nowadays, there are lots of people who die

Distributing tokens or coins on installments after ico is it bad practice in my perspective because it does not really protect the project or the investors and it is only delaying the inevitable especially for projects that fear it done. So for legit projects that have very good they won't be worried about lockup or instrumental release of tokens what they will be more focused about if development of their platform and bringing it to full implementation.
It is better for a project to hold up all in tokens for a period of time and then release it all together than to be releasing it instrumental it's only just the project back.

Ha ha ha. . I know the bounty program that you mean.  ;D ;D ;D

Actually, I don't like gradual distribution like this. Yeah, I know the team's purpose is to keep the price from being dumped because the bounty hunter sells all his tokens. But, I think it still can't make the price of the token stable and pump, even the price of tokens is dump before being distributed to bounty hunters.

Yeah, I think this is not the right way. they better distribute everything and lock tokens for bounty hunter. it will make their work easier and for bounty hunters it will be calmer because bounty hunters have received all tokens.

From a bounty Hunter's perspective, I really do not care for this new style that project owners are using, I have had to hold 4 different tokens against my will because they are locked for as long as 6 months, this is not fair at all, it should be a choice especially for those bounties that do not announce this at the early stage of the bounty.

I think it is not a solution to stabilize their altcoin because it is not a matter of quantity but the quality of the project so that its value increases.
most of the projects will end with a lot of rules made by dev every month in order to reduce the distribution of bounty participants.

Paying in installment mode is a lot better than not being paid at all. Bounty managers are really experimenting on new strategies to avoid dump after payment. Some already tried the KYC that I think most bounty hunters do not want. So, they have tried the installment scheme which I think is good for the token price to be  stable and give the token a chance to increase its price. This I think is a two-way benefits.

I think the only purpose of such a distribution of tokens among the participants is an attempt to stabilize the price of the asset. In order to reduce the risk of a sharp fall in prices due to the sale of a large number of tokens.

yes you're right this way is good for preventing a bounty hunter dump. but still if later they don't have trading volume the price will still fall. so this is only a way to delay large dump.

Yes, it saves the project from a sharp price dump in the event that a significant part of the coin holders decide to sell them. It also simplifies the task of buying back tokens for developers, the strategy is quite popular and helps the price of the token to settle.

The distribution of tokens in installments will stop dumping of coins at the time of listing as everyone have a limited coin to sell and this will stabilize the price of the coin in the market.

Unless tokens want to get funded in installments it makes no sense. There are two ways people get tokens, either they give the ICO money and get the token or they do some bounty type thing to get the name heard by everyone. In both cases people deserve the money right away.

When a bounty hunter goes out and talks about you to everyone in everywhere they know they get your name heard and they deserved to be paid, with that in mind if they get paid in installments then they should work in installments as well. When people pay you money (fund you) then they should get the money right away, if they are going to get paid in installments then they should just pay you in installments as well. It makes no sense to do something now but get paid later with smaller amounts. It is definitely a senseless idea.

ICO wanted to be secure their project and it is a way to prevent dumping of that particular token. It gives the time for the project to settle down till the campaiging going on, but in these bearing days, this is also not preventing the token value, many projects still dumping regardless of this distribution in installments due to such extreme bearish market.

I also felt trapped by this situation, because I did not know about their rules because they did not explain this regulation from the start.
they made this rule after the bounty campaign was completed and a few days before the token was distributed.

Party?
It's definitely a party, but unfortunately it's a party without using fireworks. LOL

2019 has experience like an OP owner, I joined the LYFE campaign from Indonesia, and the payment was paid in installments of 10% for 10 months until the payment was 100% complete. LOL
I feel this is too heavy to accept by heart, but the fact is this has happened. If only 50% is paid for the first month and 50% for the second month then that's fine. But if 10% for 10 months is the same as seeing the light during the day in the middle of the Sahara Desert. LOL

If you don't have proof to see, Okay I will give you the reference link.

Bounty Telegram          : https://t.me/lyfebountychat
Main Telegram  : https://t.me/lyfehealth
Bounty Link      : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5079892
Success Spreadsheet    : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TbMmZ41hKVVofxYoszBzGXU4yj1WnZ5OzvoTtM6OLsk/edit?usp=sharing



Salaaammm
Youtuber

Managers should announce that regulations can change at any time.
I'm not too worried about this issue, managers know the future of the project and this is good for the future of the coin.
I think I'm saving and one day the coin will fly.

As I know, they can change everything about bounty including distribution. They will do everything possible to protect their project from bounty hunters who intend to dump their tokens

is this a bounty or tokens from an ICO?
it seems like it's a good idea bounty wise, even if it will still cause smaller dumps spread out instead.
but if this is from investing in an ICO, it's pretty common to lock access to funds for a time for those who buys in early..
(but, with that, it means the project has a "cost scale" which isn't very good to begin with)

One of the reason which they need to do protecting their project, avoiding hunters to go along with early stage investors dumping coins and let the
value of the tokens being completely dumped inside the market, doing some changes can be justified if the intentions is clear and it showed from
what the market movement, other than that everything is just another way of holding funds which supposedly for the bounty hunters.

Yes, this is done to help prevent large amounts of tokens being dumped onto the market which can greatly affect the price in the current market conditions when liquidity across the board is low, but this method should also be applied to investors who acquired at huge discounts not only advisors and bounty hunters

But if there is buy orders then where is the problem ? If the project is really great then there always will be traders , buyers and sellers . Lets say they distribute 10% everymonth for everyone . Anyway alot of people will dump if they want . Thats really stupid to think that distributing 10% every month you will secure the ICO level price . Won't happen as its proven already with many projects out there . Communicate with community , follow roadmap and bring updates every week not after months of silence then you will keep your token price tanking . Thats how it is and will be !

There were more and more projects with different distribution process. Everyone make different plans to make their tokens value grow good in the market without steep dumping. Until the tokens were distributed on installment the market Wil have a good volume of circulation. Legitimacy of a project needs to be concerned upon which even when the token distribution delays there won't be any negative impact on the project.

I suppose it is, if the coin is already out in exchange one way it can stop big price fluctuation when most holders are only getting 10% and they are unable to sell a big amount at one time and on the other hand this can act as a control to coin holders that if they sell away the 10% and the price is affected and they still have 90% so they will not sell it right away.

this is a better approach to avoid the all-in-one dumping stage after ico
as long as they are worth to sell, i have no problem with that
most tokens lost their value even before reaching the bounty hunters' wallets
its like cheating those bounty people. promoting their project for free for so many months. and then what??? for nothing. thats totally absurd...  ::)

For how many times of being part of ico/bounty chat groups always the blame goes to the bounty hunters that the price dumped because they had sold the tokens right away just to profit(but thats their right because they worked for the bounty)

So some ico now are making either delaying the bounty or sending each little by little,but the reality is those investors are the one whos dumping the value since they are selling the tokens the moment they got this,since only few investors now are having trust in the project instead almost all of them are only chasing for profit and have no care for the future of each projects

There must be a reason behind all that, of course, the project has the goal that gradually distributed tokens can increase trading volume so that market price movements always change at any time because there are many people doing trading activities in it, of course it can invite many investors if indeed the project developed looks very promising

I think the dev and team are using instalment distribution of token to save the fave of the price which to me is not a bad idea but at times it doesn't work out because if the project is not good enough, it will eventually dump.

This happened to the Lyfe project which they gave tokens every month. And they thought I was afraid if there was a dump, but the price of the token remained very low. And the latest developments for signature campaign participants must do KYC.

Some project are now integrating the method of distributing tokens to most especially bounty hunters in portions, perhaps by percentage. A project known as Bidooh and some others did that. Some projects have also decided to lock the tokens of bounty hunters for good 6 months, some lesser. All these are done to control and avoid unnecessary dump in price.