Bitcoin Forum

Revenue Sharing — gives you a certain percentage of the net gaming revenue generated by the casino from your referred players, usually on a monthly basis throughout your referrals' lifetime in the casino.

CPA Deal — gives you a fixed one-time incentive for every player you refer to the casino.

Hybrid Deal — a combination of the revenue sharing and CPA deal. The revenue share is not that high and so is the CPA — for balance.

It is a general gambling discussion so it should be moved to gambling discussion board. Would be nice if you can give example for each affiliate commission structure. Or at least give advantages and disadvantages of each structure.

Thanks Bitinity. But when I tried deleting this topic, it said "You cannot delete this topic in this thread."
Do you know how I can resolve this?

Revenue sharing would be my pick since I would focus on acquiring regular profits through my referrals over a long period of time rather than a 1-time deal like CPA which the majority would most likely choose.

The Hybrid deal would be my 2nd pick and the CPA deal would be my last choice.

Usually, I only work for revenue sharing because I don't have a good chance to use hybrid or CPA deal. With revenue sharing, I can spread my affiliate links into many websites including to spread it into social media which I believe will work well to gain more referral. That will be nice if we can enter the gambling groups in the Facebook so we could spread the links to them so we can get an additional referral.

Rev Share if you want to have a stable amount of income from all the gamblers that you manage to play and deposit in a gambling site.

Most profitable for who? The casino? Or the paid affiliate?

That said it highly depends on the amount of referrals/the volume of users the casino is targetting.

If the product is bad, nobody will play on it, and the revenue on rev sharing will be 0.

I kind of prefer revenue sharing on casinos, in any other website type CPA is great but when it comes to casinos I prefer revenue sharing because a gambler who loves to gamble could become a member with my affiliate and could play there for a looong loong time.

I have seen people who joined a casino under someones affiliate and played so much and chatted there so much that dude became a mod in the chat, yet he was still basically helping the affiliate dude earn money anytime he plays. That is why I prefer revenue sharing on this.

If you could find a way to stop abusing the register button and just fake volume than I can definitely see CPA working as well but if you tell people "5 bucks for everyone joins under you" than they will either cheat you and affiliate themselves 100's of times or you have to find a way to prevent that.

What is your question? I assume you want to know what is the most lucrative commission structure. If not, please state your exact question!

However, if you want to know what commission structure is most preferred by the players, it is "Hybrid Deal"! It is the most profitable commission structure for the users as well as for me! Who doesn't want some extra cherries on the cake?

I completely agree. One of my friends earned a ton of money in this manner through PTC sites where his referrals used to regularly click on advertisements for years together helping him earn passive income for a long period of time. Revenue sharing all the way.

There is no stable income from any affiliate commissions, it can be a misleading post. The commission you earns depends on how much your referral lose, if your referrals wins or not even playing then you earn nothing.

Sometimes making up some post without having some proper knowledge will lead to nonsense  ;D

Affiliate commissions had never been stable yet as you said it will depend on how much do our referral lost on the site.

It is easy, you just need to do "PM Moderator" or request delete via "Report to moderator" on the bottom right of your thread. Have you tried those options?

By the way, regarding to your post, I think you are better to add your own opinion on the thread. It'll be fair if you ask people, and you also deliver an opinion there.

Its pretty clear that op is trying to understand what different people prefer when it comes to different modes of affiliate commissions which is why he started this poll and which is why many people are stating their opinions.
 
I guess he might state his opinion later sometime.

With the new dApps platforms and solutions like smart contracts affiliate acquisitions - all parties are being paid the affiliate commission upon each bet
Once the player place a bet and lets say wins, the operators is paying the funds imminently to both the player and in case of losing, to the affiliate.
In this case there is no monthly calculation, negative carry over and things like that

I think it is profitable for both the casino and the paid affiliate if their site have lots of players that are playing on their games. If their product is useless or bad as you have said then they won't reach the target they are wanting to achieve by attracting gamblers with yheir games.

I think this discussion is about which one is more profitable for players. When it comes to affiliate program, basically the site is sharing their earning. The advantage of affiliate program for the casino is to advertise the site (marketing strategy) without spending money in advance.

Yes, It is good to.create a structure here for affiliate commissions. This will encourage others who are having a good skills in marketing could be able to earn on this. BTW, there could.be few more structure that coud be added in the option like giving direct commission on rewards and at the same time when the invite could invite another user then there should be something that you can receive even if it is a small amount as an indirect sales commission.

That's not a great example, I thought it was common knowledge that PTC sites are usually just ponzi schemes in disguise.
I mean, the advertising on there is worthless and many of them are selling bots as referrals.

For casino affiliate marketing, I definitely prefer revenue share over CPA, just because it tends to be more lucrative in the long run.

It can be included on revenue share but with leveling system imho.
Actually I'm still wondering with affiliate program that pays us depends on how much our referrals wager on the site. I think it is not a revenue share because revenue share that I know is depending on how much our referrals lose their money which mean it gives an income to the site and we get some percentage from the site's profit.

All of them are good but I think generated revenues sharing in an agree ratio is better. Many affiliate program also prefer this format than others one.  I still believed that more ways to earn with casino or gambling affiliated program are going to come up in future.

the improvement is lot and affricate of gambling is more developed in recent times because the promotion is always decides the development of anything so I think this connection is enough for a person to promote something better than his work.