|
Title: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: coinlocket$ on March 28, 2019, 04:15:27 PM I was looking on this signature https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125389.0 and my eye noticed this
oegarod u=1006363 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125389.msg50345642#msg50345642 Archive: http://archive.fo/BJSxD#selection-5241.0-5241.7 slackcryptoz u=1006323 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125389.msg50345660#msg50345660 Archive: http://archive.fo/pXSlE#selection-7151.0-7151.12 They both used a new virgin segwit address so we can't find transactions. What we can do is looking on their post history and investigate, this is what I got so far oegarod (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006363) uses on his profile https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006363 Archive: http://archive.fo/l4bT8 Code: 1Pixb29WcPA5BcDQA9jRWVTmrNGd5WXoYB slackcryptoz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006323) uses on his profile https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006323 Code: 1NMFJc1X9BxsQ7NuHyJTPrkWG6CVK19StG We have not so much bet let's investigate more on these bitcoin addresses, one is new but already we have one thing or better 3 things, 2 transactions in common and no cashout for those transaction https://www.blockchain.com/it/btc/address/1Pixb29WcPA5BcDQA9jRWVTmrNGd5WXoYB 1Pixb29WcPA5BcDQA9jRWVTmrNGd5WXoYB https://puu.sh/D6At0/e2f5441309.png https://www.blockchain.com/it/btc/address/1NMFJc1X9BxsQ7NuHyJTPrkWG6CVK19StG 1NMFJc1X9BxsQ7NuHyJTPrkWG6CVK19StG https://puu.sh/D6Atp/e4f5e799d9.png https://etherscan.io/address/0x29ad57dd1c8f7cc4cc2c6f5e6ddc1ab965b2f396 (linked to permabanned account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2181508.msg23626035#msg23626035) https://etherscan.io/address/0x192bd62404a1aab74ea97da32e0d19c047bb4c87 What we can look now at the merit history and see if we can find more ::) *You must have EARNED a minimum of 5 Merit in the last 120 days to participate in this Campaign. *Do not enroll alt-accounts in this campaign. If it is found out you've done so you'll be removed without payment or notice. The only relevant thing is the quoted one, they will probably not accepted on the campaing but I like the feeling to be a small Sherlock so Merit summary for oegarod Merit: 252 Sent in the last 120 days Today at 02:19:35 AM: 1 to Hhampuz for [OPEN] BestMixer Signature Campaign | Sr. Members - Legendary | Up to 0.01225BTC March 25, 2019, 07:38:44 PM: 2 to jvdp for Re: Active bounty with reached softcap? Received in the last 120 days Today at 02:09:13 AM: 2 from Anait for Re: Favoritism vs Addiction Merit sent by slackcryptoz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006323) from January 24, 2018 until March 22, 2019 (source (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1006323.html)) http://loyce.club/Merit/history/img/1006323_red.gif Sat Jun 23 02:17:27 2018: 1 to Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1366793.html)) for Tue Feb 20 04:49:09 2018: 1 to litepresence (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=114845) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/114845.html)) for Re: How to known a good ICO (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2916104.msg30638844#msg30638844) Merit received by slackcryptoz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006323) from January 24, 2018 until March 22, 2019 (source (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1006323.html)) Have you notice nothing? I did: The user Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) in on both profiles, so let's get more on this user Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) uses on his profile Code: 1GeJx6V9GsYZcoTfFZqieaDQd3fJprJN4W What about his btc address? another address whit the same 2 transactions and no cashout https://www.blockchain.com/it/btc/address/1GeJx6V9GsYZcoTfFZqieaDQd3fJprJN4W https://puu.sh/D6AGM/ead0e0d174.png So now what do we need to do? Investigate on this user merit (missing the today transaction till new Friday theymos merit.txt file) Merit sent by Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) from January 24, 2018 until March 22, 2019 (source (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1366793.html)) Merit received by Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) from January 24, 2018 until March 22, 2019 (source (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1366793.html)) http://loyce.club/Merit/history/img/1366793_blue.gif Tue Jul 10 17:10:14 2018: 2 from Zaizoun (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=882152) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/882152.html))for Re: I will pray for you! (literally) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4632723.msg41871936#msg41871936) Tue Jul 3 08:52:01 2018: 1 from G2z_Riya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225419) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1225419.html))for Re: BTC is back ? is that good time to invest ? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3311514.msg41404054#msg41404054) Wed Jun 27 06:31:28 2018: 1 from xIIImaL (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=129114) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/129114.html))for Re: ⚽⚽World Cup and crypto, what do you think?⚽⚽ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4432838.msg40135139#msg40135139) Sat Jun 23 02:17:27 2018: 1 from slackcryptoz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006323) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1006323.html))for Sat Jun 23 02:01:08 2018: 2 from ASHLIUSZ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=798271) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/798271.html))for Thu May 17 04:08:33 2018: 1 from Altas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=957806) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/957806.html))for Re: India closes doors for Crypto Currency (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3263490.msg36897288#msg36897288) Sun Feb 25 00:53:19 2018: 2 from n0ne (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=26401) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/26401.html))for Re: [2018-02-24]Gifting Bitcoin Is One Way a Person Can Avoid Paying Crypto-Taxes (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3014025.msg31002959#msg31002959) Wed Jan 31 20:35:32 2018: 1 from Slow death (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=783422) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/783422.html))for Re: Bitcoin worth $25k in 2018 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2855381.msg29320981#msg29320981) And what do we notice here? These profiles: Zaizoun (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=882152) G2z_Riya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225419) xIIImaL (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=129114) slackcryptoz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006323) ASHLIUSZ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=798271) Altas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=957806) n0ne (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=26401) Now we need to look also from patterns here https://puu.sh/D6AQ4/5f8b18bb10.png https://puu.sh/D6AQJ/9b0db6d841.png Those 2 are actually on the same signature same logout and seems to have same transaction on the past https://puu.sh/D6AR3/d2bec6a9f3.png https://puu.sh/D6ARk/e970d6da4b.png Same transaction from, sane singature on the past? 1L7bityoFcXwZAXoKQm6wVFkiusKW1pMMr https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1L7bityoFcXwZAXoKQm6wVFkiusKW1pMMr For now I stopped my investigation here. I think oegarod (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006363) slackcryptoz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006323) Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) G2z_Riya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225419) Are alts and ASHLIUSZ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=798271) n0ne (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=26401) can be alt, Idk If under the same person. (notice they both use bitcoin and eth addresses on profiles, another "strange coincidence" Notice same patterns from similar profiles, logout, activity, number of posts etc. Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: morvillz7z on March 28, 2019, 04:59:46 PM I looked at oegarod and slackcryptoz accounts briefly and found some additional information that further links them both.
Registered on the same date back in 2017: https://i.ibb.co/Hx7VBLL/123.jpg https://i.ibb.co/YZpnpQt/1234.jpg They both applied for Multi Asset Security Token Signature Campaign on the same date, posts within a minute...also edited a day later within 4 minutes: https://i.ibb.co/zmH3BYN/oe.jpg https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112783.msg49854845#msg49854845 https://archive.fo/GfJXo Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: coinlocket$ on March 28, 2019, 05:24:18 PM Keep in mind they can be or they can not be alts, it's only a suspect for now based on the id registration and "randomly" joined the same campaign (2 times)
Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: morvillz7z on March 28, 2019, 06:00:36 PM How many more coincidences do we need? :P
Just for the heck of it...there is exactly 20-day post gap between their last posts and MAST signature campaign applications. Time gap on both posts made on February 01 is 10minutes. Looking for plagiarism is what we need to do, multi-account signature campaign abusers often tend to copy and paste as they struggle to produce 100+ original posts per week. (I will look into it tomorrow). https://i.ibb.co/sPqz14B/oegarod.jpg https://i.ibb.co/NnJ1WQR/slackcryptoz.jpg https://archive.fo/x3Z2R#selection-925.1-1039.389 https://archive.fo/QPUfl#selection-511.1-639.121 Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: Hhampuz on March 28, 2019, 08:38:12 PM FWIW, I probably wouldn't accept either of these participants due to their post history. Much appreciated with the investigative work here coinlocket$!
Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: YOSHIE on March 29, 2019, 07:28:35 AM Accounts behave strangely, you can say alt, by connecting with each other.
Enough for evidence, or need to be investigated deeper. Connected account: 1. Nekoma2018 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2150914) 2. Psalmy2cute (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1153318) 3. winbk15 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2126074) 4. Kaneki11 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2199064) 5. Akeeto (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1596340) 6. AMANULAT (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1591002) 7. weaverkaggs (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2521200) 8. Locotoni (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1319477) 9. winjk02 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2166647) 10. MrSpasybo (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1308842) 11. biternet (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1149942) 12. GAronov (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2090445) 13. eldarbek (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1798656) 14. winbk14 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2126022) 15. catbuizz4 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2125968) 16. loinguyen1984 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2104418) ETH address Related: Code: 1. 0xe32c340433A440A800277CA53627d99b4414345c Just proof of being connected: Proof of authenticity Facebook: http://Facebook.com/Mary.tanpinnu Twitter: http://Twitter.com/bossman06011439 Wallet address: 0xe32c340433A440A800277CA53627d99b4414345c ( archive (http://archive.is/WeyGK) Btt username: psalmy2cute Link to your profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1153318;sa=summary Erc20 wallet: 0xe32c340433A440A800277CA53627d99b4414345c Telegram username : @bossman ( archive (http://archive.is/mrzLI) Twitter username: @ScottEric14 Twitter url: https://twitter.com/ScottEric14 Twitteraudit:https://www.twitteraudit.com Followers: 3236 ERC20 Wallet address:0x628DF842a6CE463475b024Fc7a981Fcc8b917568 Twitter username: @ScottEric14 Twitter url: https://twitter.com/ScottEric14 Twitteraudit:https://www.twitteraudit.com Followers: 3236 ERC20 Wallet address:0x628DF842a6CE463475b024Fc7a981Fcc8b917568 ( archive (http://archive.is/BuO6A) ) Proof of authenticity Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lydiaros.ogbode.98 Twitter: http://Twitter.com/scottEric14 Address: 0x1Ab59fE1e699fdf3624FD2B5295Da3Eca45F7a71 ( archive (http://archive.is/kvvQ8) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4631237.msg41926666#msg41926666 Quote week 1 Bitcointalk UserName : akeeto Telegram Username : kanekitty Campaign Participated : telegram, facebook, twitter Ethereum Wallet Address : 0x1Ab59fE1e699fdf3624FD2B5295Da3Eca45F7a71 facebook; https://web.facebook.com/lydiaros.ogbode.98 ( archive (http://archive.is/AKTaf) ) BitcoinTalk ID: AManulat BitcoinTalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1591002 Twitter ID: @j_tolop Telegram ID: @JTolop ERC20 Wallet Address: 0x004edCC6a582EEA4691100d4ed35ed119d39d35a ( archive (http://archive.is/YapKA) ) WEEK 2 - FEBRUARY 15, 2018 - FEBRUARY 21, 2018 spreadsheet : 453 eth : 0x1FEfB1e64313c8cf9AeF6215797d3f264cAcBA18 ( archive (http://archive.is/D27s3) ) # # # Proof of joined post Bitcointalk username: weaverkaggs Campaign in which you participate: Telegram ETH address: 0x1fefb1e64313c8cf9aef6215797d3f264cacba18 ( archive (http://archive.is/xM9oT) ) ETH address: 0x1fefb1e64313c8cf9aef6215797d3f264cacba18 ( archive (http://archive.is/uXTra) ) BitcoinTalk ID: AManulat BitcoinTalk URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1591002 Twitter ID: @j_tolop Telegram ID: @JTolop ERC20 Wallet Address: 0x004edCC6a582EEA4691100d4ed35ed119d39d35a ( archive (http://archive.is/oHVm0) ) (29/1 – 4/2) BCT username: MrSpasybo Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1308842 ETH Wallet: 0xBc38F2403e277634d14Ad9638122052599A57e0F Twitter URL: https://twitter.com/MSpasybo ( archive (http://archive.is/fjYgL) ) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3207011.msg40235097#msg40235097 Quote #Proof of authentication #Proof of participation: - Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=post;topic=3207011.0;num_replies=1910 - Twitter Profile Link : https://twitter.com/Kanokko59007907 - Facebook Profile Link : https://www.facebook.com/kanokkorn.rattanasamai ( archive (http://archive.is/XAI4Y) ) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3828804.msg40145888#msg40145888 Quote Username bitcointalk: GAronov LINK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2090445 TWITTER CAMPAIGN UserName Twitter: @georg_aronov URL Twitter: https://twitter.com/georg_aronov ( archive (http://archive.is/Ev5N8) ) #Proof of authentication 1)Telegram username: @kfh9893287492834 2)Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1798656 ( archive (http://archive.is/8CNkC) Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3713694.msg39593634#msg39593634 Quote Telegram Airdrop Bitcointalk username : catbuizz4 Telegram username : @catbuizz4 ETH address : 0x29535BB9b64059983B7eb475e4D9Fd56490beFB2 ( archive (http://archive.is/YcbdG) ) #Proof of Authentification Bitcointalk username: winbk14 Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2126022 ETH Address (only one) : 0x29535BB9b64059983B7eb475e4D9Fd56490beFB2 Joining: Telegram Advertising Bounty (Phase 2) ( archive (http://archive.is/7rEwi) ) #JOIN AIRDROP Medium ID : @loinguyen19842018 BitcoinTalk URL Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2104418 Telegram Username: @loi_nguyen ( archive (http://archive.is/NC5i7) Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: morvillz7z on March 29, 2019, 11:58:18 AM Blockfolioz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1211155), G2z_Riya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225419) and Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) enroll together in MAST signature campaign. Applications submitted in the same day within 7 minutes.
All three accounts edit their posts on the very next day; edits happen within 8mins. https://i.ibb.co/KjjB0Zs/mast.jpg The same 20-day post gap can be seen here (for some reason Anait makes two extra posts but February 1st post aligns perfectly with the other two; 20min gap : https://i.ibb.co/R6P7JNB/blockfolioz.jpg https://i.ibb.co/3CkxXb5/riya.jpg https://i.ibb.co/1r2wST5/anait.jpg archive1 (https://archive.fo/JYS3Y#selection-1509.1-1636.0), archive2 (https://archive.fo/9KHgX#selection-1579.1-1707.308), archive3 (https://archive.fo/G7RC9#selection-1505.1-1763.293) Shockingly, earlier this year they join another signature campaign (MoonX) in the exact same order, 4 minutes apart. https://i.ibb.co/XpWDgbR/moonx.jpg Posts prior to their MoonX applications happen in the span of 6 minutes, 12 hours earlier - same day. archive1 (https://archive.fo/oiqut#selection-1191.1-1301.377), archive2 (https://archive.fo/CTGEb#selection-1027.1-1137.334), archive3 (https://archive.fo/4jB0z#selection-1373.1-1493.272) Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: coinlocket$ on March 29, 2019, 10:07:49 PM Summoning the artificial @loyceV AI. Can you scrap unedited?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4979978.msg44913950#msg44913950 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4979978.msg44913988#msg44913988 Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: morvillz7z on March 29, 2019, 11:03:30 PM `snip` Do you think they may have posted different BTC addresses? It's probably something else and rather insignificant but definitely worth a shot if LoyceV has access to these posts. I looked at the oegarod and slackcryptoz accounts one more time. Besides the BTC transactions you found, the posting timeframe, their registration dates, I accidentally noticed that their bestmixer avatars are somehow broken/pixelated. You can see it here, they just look weird: https://archive.fo/GfJXo#selection-5921.0-5921.7 There are two more accounts with avatars that look "damaged", one probably has nothing to do with them, but Virtual miner (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=177094) like Blockfolioz, G2z Riya and Anait has a MoonX campaign application posted around the same time as the other 3, and you've previously investigated his MOZO BTC addy: 3BMEXUS2p6gE4ePxgKxrfN7is3fYmEQC9g (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118846.msg50120062#msg50120062). Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: coinlocket$ on March 29, 2019, 11:34:21 PM Yeah is a shot but we can try it, sometimes those farmers make mistakes https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5117790.msg50051758#msg50051758 and copypasted wrong data.
Well if the avatar is the same pixeled and is/was not downloadable from the bounty means that is probably uploaded local from the same pc Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: LoyceV on March 30, 2019, 09:07:21 AM Summoning the artificial @loyceV AI. Can you scrap unedited? No, sorry :(I started saving new posts on September 12 last year, these posts were made on August 30. Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: yahoo62278 on March 30, 2019, 09:21:11 AM Both applied in Windice (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118542.200) signature campaign within minutes of each other a few hours ago.
Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: morvillz7z on March 30, 2019, 11:57:08 AM More non-coincidental applications by these two. ;D
Note who is the third account posting right after oegarod and slackcryptoz - ReiMomo (https://archive.fo/8U3dQ#selection-6315.0-6319.11) Him (http://archive.fo/BJSxD#selection-3991.0-3995.11) applying for bestmixer campaign ten minutes before his two buddies (p.s all three posts are now deleted, I suppose they are aware of this thread). And again, ReiMomo (https://archive.fo/JRpt6#selection-9735.0-9739.11) in MAST two minutes after slackcryptoz' entry. Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: akamit on March 30, 2019, 03:35:19 PM Coincidence is a rare thing and it doesn't happen very often.
If there was a way to check the IPs then it could be very helpful for investigations. Theymos may help but it is very unlikely I think, I have seen such case only once. How abt mods, do they have the privilege to check IPs? Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: Quickseller on March 30, 2019, 06:44:36 PM I want to point out that the accounts all having the same transaction being sent to their addresses is probably them all receiving a payout from a signature campaign they were enrolled in at the same time.
If they were both created at the same time, consistently enroll in similar campaigns within minutes of eachother, and are last active within minutes of eachother, they are probably the same person. The most telling piece of evidence presented in this thread is the enrolling within minutes of eachother many times, and I don't think this can be explained away as a coincidence. I don't believe these people are doing any kind of harm to anyone, even if the "TOS" of the campaign is along the lines of "one account per person". If someone is making very good posts, it would benefit the company being advertised if one person is using two accounts to advertise. If someone is making bad posts with two accounts, the campaign manager should have not accepted either account in the first place. I looked at their history, and think they are probably harmless. If they were to scam, I would prefer they be not exposed as alts until after they have (tried to) harm someone. The reason for this, is if they use oegarod to scam for example, he might think he is only risking the reputation and income generated by oegarod, but if the reputation and income from slackcryptoz is also affected, the scam may not be profitable for him. Also, if it is seen that scammers lose reputation/income from many accounts they control they thought were not connected, then others will be more hesitant to scam in the first place. Lastly, someone reviewing these types of threads can see what they can do to avoid detection, and not lose the reputation/income of their alt accounts when they harm someone via scamming. Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: coinlocket$ on March 30, 2019, 07:02:51 PM I don't believe these people are doing any kind of harm to anyone, even if the "TOS" of the campaign is along the lines of "one account per person". If it is "against" the TOS, they are doing an untrusted thing enrolling on the same campaign, sadly I haven't a lot of time on these weeks but they seem to have more and more accounts. Also, in my opinion, this is a "harm" to who wants legitly join a signature but he can't since people like this one do it with a ton of accounts, even if they can be good posts like this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5118846.msg50120062#msg50120062 (sadly I have no time to check them all also you know I'm not paid to do it) Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: asche on March 30, 2019, 09:39:10 PM Enough for me to paint em red.
Thank you for the investigation, be it solely for abusing bounty campaigns when they apply at the same time for the same bounty. At worst I am wrong, but it will make them come here and give us the girlfriend or neighbour explanation :D Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: coinlocket$ on April 01, 2019, 11:06:22 AM Blockfolioz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1211155), G2z_Riya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225419) and Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) enroll together in MAST signature campaign. Applications submitted in the same day within 7 minutes. Yes, those 3 are 3 Alts, may be owned by the same owner. https://puu.sh/D8qI5/a07926733a.png https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4979978.msg44913950#msg44913950 http://archive.fo/wa6aE https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4979978.msg44913988#msg44913988 http://archive.fo/IZLnk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4979978.msg44914133#msg44914133 http://archive.fo/8C5MG https://puu.sh/D8qIj/a915182178.png https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112783.msg49855003#msg49855003 http://archive.fo/YDGxJ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112783.msg49855051#msg49855051 http://archive.fo/A5F9L https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112783.msg49855108#msg49855108 http://archive.fo/qmkYt This can't be casual and I think is statistically almost impossible. Probably going to tag them as well. Mumble mumble, more patterns. Merit sent by Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) from January 24, 2018 until March 29, 2019 (source (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1366793.html)) Thu Mar 28 03:09:13 2019: 2 to oegarod (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006363) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1006363.html)) for Re: Favoritism vs Addiction (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5110143.msg50023038#msg50023038) Merit received by Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) from January 24, 2018 until March 29, 2019 (source (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1366793.html)) Tue Jul 10 17:10:14 2018: 2 from Zaizoun (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=882152) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/882152.html))for Re: I will pray for you! (literally) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4632723.msg41871936#msg41871936) Tue Jul 3 08:52:01 2018: 1 from G2z_Riya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225419) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1225419.html))for Re: BTC is back ? is that good time to invest ? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3311514.msg41404054#msg41404054) Wed Jun 27 06:31:28 2018: 1 from xIIImaL (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=129114) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/129114.html))for Re: ⚽⚽World Cup and crypto, what do you think?⚽⚽ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4432838.msg40135139#msg40135139) Sat Jun 23 02:17:27 2018: 1 from slackcryptoz (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1006323) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1006323.html))for Sat Jun 23 02:01:08 2018: 2 from ASHLIUSZ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=798271) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/798271.html))for Thu May 17 04:08:33 2018: 1 from Altas (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=957806) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/957806.html))for Re: India closes doors for Crypto Currency (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3263490.msg36897288#msg36897288) Sun Feb 25 00:53:19 2018: 2 from n0ne (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=26401) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/26401.html))for Re: [2018-02-24]Gifting Bitcoin Is One Way a Person Can Avoid Paying Crypto-Taxes (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3014025.msg31002959#msg31002959) Wed Jan 31 20:35:32 2018: 1 from Slow death (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=783422) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/783422.html))for Re: Bitcoin worth $25k in 2018 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2855381.msg29320981#msg29320981) Merit sent by G2z_Riya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225419) from January 24, 2018 until March 29, 2019 (source (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1225419.html)) Thu Feb 14 04:17:11 2019: 1 to romero121 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=109693) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/109693.html)) for Re: Martingale strategy in Sports Betting (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5109415.msg49731635#msg49731635) Tue Jul 3 08:52:01 2018: 1 to Anait (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1366793) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1366793.html)) for Re: BTC is back ? is that good time to invest ? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3311514.msg41404054#msg41404054) Tue Feb 20 07:34:43 2018: 1 to Wipro (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=759298) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/759298.html)) for Re: gpu or antminer s9 for mining many different of coins - 2000/3000$ (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2979143.msg30661477#msg30661477) Merit received by G2z_Riya (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1225419) from January 24, 2018 until March 29, 2019 (source (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1225419.html)) Tue Jul 3 00:07:42 2018: 2 from Duzter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=982321) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/982321.html))for Re: Remember, Bitcoin is the best Cryptocurrency to Hodl. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4337392.msg38913070#msg38913070) Mon Jul 2 23:59:28 2018: 2 from n0ne (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=26401) (history (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/26401.html))for Re: Women's interest in crypto trade increasing (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4451562.msg41387534#msg41387534) Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: omer-jamal on April 02, 2019, 03:08:51 AM also there are Merit between Nekoma2018 & Kaneki11 Nekoma2018 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2150914) send 2 Merit to Kaneki11 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2199064) for Re: 🔴🚀🚀[BOUNTY] ... (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125350.msg50344255#msg50344255) Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: Quickseller on April 02, 2019, 06:23:11 AM I don't believe these people are doing any kind of harm to anyone, even if the "TOS" of the campaign is along the lines of "one account per person". [...] Also, in my opinion, this is a "harm" to who wants legitly join a signature but he can't since people like this one do it with a ton of accounts, even if they can be good posts [...] I think if one person enrolls many alts in a campaign who post a bunch of garbage, I think it would be more accurate to say the campaign manager is scamming the company ultimately paying for the advertising, more than the person who enrolls the alts because it is the campaign manager not doing what they are being paid to do -- screen and vet campaign participants. Title: Re: Are those alts? Let's investigate 5 merits for the one who can prove it. Post by: coinlocket$ on April 02, 2019, 07:08:22 AM I don't think it is fair to say that someone is doing harm to others (in a sense they are scamming) if they are so good at something that they are crowding out other people from being able to participate in a trade. Logically speaking if someone who can make a lot of posts that are very good, a smart campaign manager will give a custom deal requiring more posts that pays more than a "normal" spot, and multiple "normal" spots would be removed from that campaign. I think if one person enrolls many alts in a campaign who post a bunch of garbage, I think it would be more accurate to say the campaign manager is scamming the company ultimately paying for the advertising, more than the person who enrolls the alts because it is the campaign manager not doing what they are being paid to do -- screen and vet campaign participants. I have a completely different opinion about it. If the rule is one account one person, and one good poster can't join the account because another with he same quality of posting is stealing spots, the abuser deserves a red tag (99% of cases). |
