Bitcoin Forum

He should post from this accounts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3 claiming it is Craig or else Craig is a fraud.

As simple as he needs sk.e attention or he are doing something that to make his name very popular and after that he will a plan to promote something like a new discorved crypto that can beat and hit bitcoin. Make sense because if he is the real Satoshi,you think he may confess? If he do that it is like he buy his own funeral plan to use because I am sure that many are looking for Satoshi because on his wealth.

What would that do?
Surely the creator of bitcoin can fly...
Probably has a bunch of superpowers too.

I don't know why anyone would claim to be satoshi

Wow where did you get this information?this is the latest we have now that Craig “satoshi” Wright is claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto?lol

This has been around for a long and now creating another topic again?but theres a good advice from someone here
Perfect on that one,this will prove him being Satoshi if he jump even withiut parachute 😂

I believe so that the creator of bitcoin can fly. Just to prove that he is truly Satoshi. But, kidding aside, don't trust this kind of thing. This is just to brainwash you people.

I think I had read this a week ago. A lot of crypto influencers are claiming to be satoshi. It's clear that he only wants to claim it for fame and publicity or it might be he wants to promote something. Maybe if he does what OP is suggesting, he would have been able to prove what he claims is legitimate.

Here is an article worth reading: https://www.ccn.com/craig-wright-is-a-fraud-binance-chief-changeng-zhao-slams-not-satoshi (https://www.ccn.com/craig-wright-is-a-fraud-binance-chief-changeng-zhao-slams-not-satoshi)

He's not the first one to claim to be the real Satoshi, I don't know why a lot of people are claiming themselves to be the real Satoshi without the proper evidence to prove themselves that they are the real Satoshi, yes, all of them may have Bitcoins and all but I don't think that it is enough, I just really think that they are doing this to make the other fools believe in them and for the power as well, though I don't know if they are trying to prove themselves as the real Satoshi or they just really want to make a fool out of themselves.

Craig is Fraud and the entire community do knows that.A quite number of people do claims as satoshi but all of them failed up to prove it out thats why its just a complete
waste of time if we do stress out ourselves on how he would prove it out. Yes, that simple activation of that forum account would really prove out that he's the one.

Theymos already locked that account. Even if he hasn't, it shouldn't be completely impossible to break into. If that account suddenly posted "I am Craig Wright", I'm sure people would be screaming "HACKED!", as it's a far more plausible explanation for it.

A better way to be to sign messages from (a lot of) the earliest blocks and maybe consolidate the speculated 1 million or so untouched coins reportedly belonging to Satoshi from Bitcoin's early days. Ultimately, even if the real Satoshi did resurface, people will never stop finding ways to be skeptical.

first of all that account is locked for this very reason, to prevent scammers from trying to hack bitcointalk and fool people. this already happened 2 years ago with Hal Finney's account which someone hacked his Email and then reset his password and started scamming people right away.

secondly there are lots of other ways that the could have proven his identity such as simply signing a message to provide cryptographic proof but not only he couldn't do that but also he tried to fake it foolishly and got caught. so the fact that you are still talking about it shows you are either way out of loop of what this scammer has been doing or you were foolish enough to fall for his scams.

A signed message from one of 'his' known addresses shall do the trick, though he always diverts the attention of the media from the said option that he has, thus proving that he really isn't ready to do such. Also, it has been proven numerous times that he really isn't Satoshi due to the inconsistencies and lack of technical knowledge, or perhaps a limited one, on things related to bitcoin. I admire the person's ego and guts to state a lie straightfaced, though I don't admire the person nor am impressed in his cunning at all.

He was been exposed already and there's no way for him to proved. Obviously, he can't signed from any 'known' Satoshi addresses, so I guess this kind of discussion should be put to rest already, just saying.

He wont do anything to prove that he is the real satoshi as he cant prove it. Lets just forget about his claim, no need to spread about his unproved claim as it will only help him to be famous and get more attention from the bitcoin community. Lets him do everything he wants but lets ignore it. :)

Why are you directing attention towards this guy op? This will only help him. The best thing to do in this case is to simply ignore his claims that he is the real Satoshi.

Anyone with a half decent brain realizes that the real Satoshi will most likely never reveal himself or herself.

Skydiving on its finest! I will only believe if they can survive on that jump and go up high again just like the power of bitcoin.
Craig Wright is a computer scientist but it doesn't mean that he's telling the truth, we must still look for a better Satoshi.  :)


Too big not be recognized, let people judge this one. :D

Let him make a noise in public and meanwhile, we can watch a talk show from him while drinking a cup of coffee ;D
The time will prove who is CW and who is Satoshi. Besides that, I enjoy to watch this drama, and I am curious how its end. I think if CW is the real Satoshi, he can follow what jseverson said to prove that he is Satoshi. But I don't want to hear that he will say "Oh, I am forgot the private keys so I cannot sign messages from the wallet"

That is a good challenge but one of his alibis is he forgets his password and the email that he used, he is a fraud and experts and those who studied Satoshi can prove that, and there is no need for the real Satoshi to come up.we are in a better position without him and it will just imperil his reputation and his life, we should just concentrate in the technology that he left to us.

The consensus among the OGs of the community is that if he wants to prove he's Satoshi, he'll have the move the earliest coins minted. Of course, he claims this would not be proof for whatever reason, and it would only prove he obtained the private keys and not that he is the creator of the protocol.

Craig Wright, is a fake name Satoshi Nakamoto, has become increasingly popular since his recognition as the owner of the name behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto which was published exclusively only on a number of major media choices, such as BBC, Economis and GQ in May 2016. Since that claim, Craig Wright has received a lot of harsh criticism from most in the Bitcoin community.

He is claiming that in case he proves that he is Satoshi, then the FBI can arrest him for an array of charges. And at this point of time, I can't say that his arguments are without any basis. Every month or so, I am reading news reports about Bitcoin users in the US arrested for "illegal money transmitting" charges. So his reluctance is perfectly justified.

From what I saw in a post in this forum, I saw that Craig Wright filed lawsuit on one guy that gives disbelief on him as Satoshi Nakamoto. Well, that's not new. If he is the real Satoshi, he should be not wasting his time in making people believe on him.

really do you really know it?  :D
glad to be yourself who can get to know the number one person on bitcoin "Satoshi Nakamoto"
so you are not as curious as I am constantly like this.  ???

Back in the day, Satoshi interacted with many BCT members and users of P2P Foundation.

While he never disclosed to us his identity, many of us figured it out.

Due to the awful situation of the country i'm in right now(Venezuela) i can't watch those kind of things often sadly. But sounds like really good entertainment.

But i mean the guy who started the post and you are right, he should post from his accounts and problem solved. I don't really think that Satoshi would really care about fame, since he was obviously trying to avoid it.

he is doing what "he should do", he is being evasive and whenever the subject rises he throws everyone off the subject but going off topic, because what he wants to do is to scam people and rob the real Satoshi from his identity and abuse it to fill his pockets. someone needs to sue him for identity fraud!

Perhaps, he wants more profit besides of having 1 million bitcoin. Besides that, by claiming that he is the real Satoshi, he can get famous and popularity from the public. Who doesn't want to do this if he can convince the public? But unfortunately, public especially member on here doesn't trust him, so it makes him difficult to prove that he is the real Satoshi.

But so far, he just lied to the public and kept saying that he is Satoshi Nakamoto and he wants to prove in the court. So let's see what will happen later, but I think people will not believe that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

I can. He keeps loudly and publicly claiming to be Satoshi. If they wanted to arrest 'satoshi' that is all they would need. Digital signatures are not needed for arrests or else no one would ever be arrested. In in this case they literally have a "confession".

Craig Wright isn't just a fraud. He is an obvious fraud.

It seems this Craig Wright has been trying to discredit bitcoin in anyway possible. He might have been sponsored by his paid masters. A tweet was forwarded to me yesterday by a friend where he tweeted about BCH to take over the market from BTC, that has failed already, he went on to BSV, which is currently fighting the battle of its life. See the image below.

https://i.imgur.com/p9ct5LD.jpg?1

I agree
if he is satoshi he must access the satoshi account itself.
if he really is satoshi nakamoto.
but he only wanted to find popularity to look for sensations

Well... we could call him Splashtoshi.

True even if Satoshi's account posted it people would just think that it has been hacked .
But I don't think that Craig couldn't really prove anything this has been around for so long and up till now it is still an issue?
Let's just move on we all know that he isn't the real creator of BTC .

My perspective is, "why will Satoshi want to resurface now" after several years of anonymity? CW or anyone else claiming to be Satoshi shouldn't be given any attention at all (even if they were the real Satoshi). The crypto world has gone passed the era of wanting to know the true identity of Satoshi. We have noticed Bitcoin is surviving without the control of a "known" Satoshi and it should remain that way.

The appearance of Satoshi would put decentralization of Bitcoin in jeopardy. I think that's why Satoshi chose to be anonymous. Besides, he's a damn rich man.

It doesn't prove anything, if you don't believe him just go away and find some interesting information which not related to it. I hope there no one who will assume that he/she is satoshi because at the momment we don't need it. Which we need is bitcoin can be grow up and accepted by many people because bitcoin really worth to be use by them. 

Could he be slapped with a charge of being an "accomplice to fraud" ???

---

Not this again and for someone that I thought was smart & the king of anonymity, this move of revealing himself to the world kind of contradicts with his invention(btc) ...

Even if he wanted to, I don't think he will ever be coming back, which I would also do....

Why we should spend our time to read news, discussions, and drama about Craig Wright, and not only Craig Wright, but also anyone else who starts drama to claim "I am real Satoshi Nakamoto"? In my opinion, such drama looks a bit silly, and I don't see any things that can force me to believe anyone whom suddenly appear and make such claim is real Satoshi, whom probably have not had interests and intention to appear publicly. Satoshi likely has demonstrated plans to stay anonymous since the start of crypto world, with Bitcoin more than 10 years ago.

I'm guessing you are referring to Dave Kleiman (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Kleiman), who many believe to be Satoshi. This puzzle is truly fascinating.

He can claim that he is Satoshi until he dies. I can say that I'm Satoshi anytime I want. My neighbor can say it too. Even a beggar can say it. My point is anybody can claim that they are Satoshi since Satoshi remains anonymous. For me, I don't even care who Satoshi is as long as I'm using Bitcoin then its ok :).

He can say it every day and no worries about it. Nobody is believing in him unless there are stupid people out there who have been hypnotized by his words :D.

He can't post from there because he doesn't have the login details. He may even allege that a fake Satoshi own this account. I have Craig Wright learnt his lessons soon that this community is bigger than all his baby day act in trying to ridicule a system that made him come to lime light. People are always quick to forget. Craig Wright is a FAKE Satoshi.

I do not believe on it. If I were satoshi then I should not disclose my identity of course for safety purposes. I do believe that Satoshi now is one of the richest individual around the world. This because time after time bitcoin grows as more and more users are now joining in cryptocurrency especially bitcoin. And many users now do love bitcoin so it will going to be shared to friends and relatives.

My opinion of Craig Wright: it is a fraud.  8)

We can't disregard those poor people that will still believe with this man, claiming to be the creator of Bitcoin without any evidence, let's just continue ignoring him I guess anyway we can still enjoy things inside this industry without knowing real identity of such creator, the system will work without Satoshi's present now.