Bitcoin Forum

I was just reading few threads and noticed that one of the best members of the community here OgNasty which as far as I know,since in 2016 I am here and have seen only good deeds from him, I now see his reputation thrashed by Lauda bullshit propaganda and associates , lol a bunch of fucking Croatian pigs given power from theymos ? This is not the way to go.

Wondering, why most of red trusted users are using name of OgNasty as weapon. No I am not against of OgNasty or not supporting someone else. But my question is, if you have any specific problem then just discuss with it, is it necessary to mentioned OgNasty? To be honest I had not bothered on OgNasty and Lauda, because both are decent user in my opinions and I have less experience about their previous history.

I think you know theymos's opinions about Lauda;

My point here is that there is no justice at all, it has always been so and it will always be, that is why I don't see many new users joining here.
If that is theymos opinion I will go ahead on a more conspiracy scale and say that theymos account has been hacked :)

Maybe you can look on Amazon and see if you can buy a new pair of eyes.  There are millions of registered users and countless new threads being started by newbies on an hourly basis.  People from all over the world flock here to join bounties mainly, but also to learn about and discuss bitcoin.

As far as OgNasty goes, don't worry about him or his reputation.  He can handle himself, and despite any red trust he's gotten, he's still able to do business with no problems.  I think he's a total dick, but I wouldn't consider him untrustworthy and wouldn't tag him for his arrogance.  It's basically a DT spat and doesn't reflect on the forum as a whole. 

I think you're still a bit disgruntled because of the incandescent redness of your own trust page.  Looks like justice in action to me.

As ever, the smarmacist is first to protect the euro trash scumbags. Lauda and his bunch of alts or friends, have given red trust to any person that attracts attention to their previous lies, scamming and probable extortion and escrow schemes. Theymos has no idea if lauda is good or bad? but his actions suggest that he and his dirty friends can remain on  DT and label anyone a scammer for any reason they choose. So long as they have the backing of their cronies.

When you hear DT members claim. I can, I will and I just have given you red trust for presenting facts about my friends untrustworthy deeds. Then you know when other DT members allow this with no answer at all the entire bunch of DT are mass of putrid scum.

Do I feel sorry for Ognasty? yes. Does he deserve red trust NO.  Is the entire boards free speech under threat right now. YES it is.

Sadly, no. The liberal theymos is very much the same, otherwise you and scum such as yourself would be long removed.

Lucky for everyone that what you say doesn't matter, right? Must be fun being a kool-aid drinking 'murican monkey. Now dance.

I’d be willing to put money on The-One-Above-All being one of cryptohunters alts. It’s the same typing style, same use of grammar & walls of text being argumentative.

Edit - Looking at the post history he puts his points into numbered bullst points too, that’s what CH does.

   Well, if it is CH, at least the walls of text seem to be half the size now, or less. I can actually read through a whole post without my eyes glazing over. I should just spare my eyes entirely and actually use the ignore function.  However, I'm sure if too many people do that, they'll just spawn another troll account. Maybe we should just require that all new accounts have to pay for a copper membership.
    

If you don't like the forum just leave... no point in sticking around and wasting time on something you don't like lmao  ???

They actually do like the forum. Most of them would rather argue than eat. (Although I am guilty of this indulgence as well TBH.) Since there are plenty of people here, they will always find someone to feed them.

Yea I guess that's true, probably because they feel they put too much time in or something / have a connection

I agree. BitcoinTalk can tick me off the quickest out of most communities I partake in, but overall I've gotten less sensitive at the quality that we're seeing today as well as the reputation shitstorms that pop up every so often. (They do seem to occur more and more often nowadays, but that's how it is sometimes.)


I think it's more of people reminiscing what the forum has been in the past and comparing it to its current state - which I, for one, understand and oftentimes agree with.

Couldn't this have fit into one of the many Lauda hate threads or something. Your OP doesn't seem to fit with the title.

I would argue that more people care ATM than in the past. Maybe not in the way you'd like or for entirely selfless reasons. There has been a large movement unrelated to Merit and Feedback for quite a while now, trying to increase the signal to noise ratio, by reporting Spam. There are also many members out there investigating ICO's, IPO's and any other combination of I's, O's, coins and tokens, to weed out scams before people get taken.

These are all great things. It's just to notice them you have to look further than a trust score or the merit system.

On the note of seeing OG's trust score, you can create your own custom trust list, and exclude who you want.

No doubt. Though now I'm suspecting CH is also Thule (is also The-One) based on the usage of the word "proofen."




Or else CH used that word after being called out on being CH in order to throw the trail off in Thule's direction.


This is obviously not true. You have at least 4, but probably more. And frankly if you really were banned, then these accounts should also be banned for ban evasion. You're not fooling anybody.

My call is Thule,  I recon the loser is on sickness/incapacity benefits for the poor state of their brain. Probably was using the forum to earn money so they can keep up the domino’s pizza habit that lead to them being a 500lb basement dwelling virgin.

Who wants to bet they also own multiple fedoras and dodgy swords

We noticed tman added red trust to the intial poster here to silence his complaints.

We notice tman added the red trust on the basis of account sales. Yet his friend nutildah is guilty of buying or selling his account for 0.3btc  and has recently been begging for 0.02btc loans. A very a dangerous addition to DT.

This clearly demonstrates what the intial poster is claiming is true and there is great cause for concern. The entire board is going to shit with these shady euro trash at the helm. I would not hesitate to remove them on the basis of just the previous probable extortion attempts, the lies and trust abuse.

The nutildah account should be frozen.

https://i.imgur.com/I0pRG9k.png
Oink, oink

https://archive.fo/QqUED#selection-3773.0-3773.10 Oink  :D
http://archive.is/dqBG0#selection-7700.0-7700.1 Oink, oink  ???

Oink   8)

If I remember correctly, someone has tagged aTriz because he edited quoted post. I don't remember you fighting for justice then.

Maybe Croatian pigs but we ain't licking anyone's ass.

I'm sorry to disappoint some of you, but it's clearly not Thule. it's CH. Nobody else uses the word demonstrate as frequently as CH does. It's like a virtual narcissistic mark with which he leaves/signs each message.

Btw, we should see CH back today or tomorrow (if it really was only a soft ban), unless he feels more comfortable using a bunch of sockpuppet accounts now.

observable too:

https://meem.link/i/a/rOGvUW.jpg
Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

He's not banned. Probably just scared of losing his Legendary account so created a bunch of disposables.

Oh yeah, you are right, even more so!


Damn, I don't get tricked easily but he got me with this one, took the bait. Well-played CH, well-played! ;D

Video evidence under the moronbozo is not zorroback is on its way?

This observable demonstration of wild speculation, demonstrates an observably clear desire, to derail and drag off topic, this observably important thread. Snitchmoon is observably obsessed with our inspirational true legend cryptohunter. The very same members of the gang observably appear, on every thread, about their observably scamming friend/alt lauda to defend his observably dirty and untrustworthy deeds. Suchmoron has tried using sock puppets like scumbuster before to get the true legend banned. You can ban an account but a legends true voice can never be silenced.

Back on topic. We, the observably honest and trustworthy members of this board, showing  0 observable untrustworthy events in our past here should unite, and have a single goal: To ensure the freedom of speech of all honest members on this board. Who will remain free to point out the observable scamming and lying actions of all members even the scamming and lying DT members that have gamed the merit system and infiltrated the trust system.

As more high profile members like ognasty  start to become targets of the observably untrustworthy individuals on DT, it observably demonstrates a great need for change.