Bitcoin Forum

Linked senior accounts, including green trusted profile, are participating in the same signature campaign.


4 Accounts Connected: Killerpotleaf (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64542), high110 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=118908), yingfeng (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=175257), SoloV (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1059938)

Proof:

(Archive (http://archive.md/OLgIs#selection-1423.1-1423.4))

(Archive (http://archive.md/1zVU8#selection-4263.1-4263.4))

(Archive (http://archive.md/CZgwt#selection-6929.1-6929.4))

(Archive (http://archive.md/eoA7O#selection-2561.1-2561.5))


Tokens sendings to the same ETH wallets.

1) https://etherscan.io/token/0x814f67fa286f7572b041d041b1d99b432c9155ee?a=0x9529fc67ee33bf0102394cac000c6c564b0bcf1f

https://i.imgur.com/GsqLWNi.png

(Archive (http://archive.md/eoA7O#selection-2561.1-2561.5))

(Archive (http://archive.md/CZgwt#selection-6929.1-6929.4))


2) https://etherscan.io/address/0x57299bc588c78a5fdf3a83686dbcb4e67d25bb02#tokentxns

https://i.imgur.com/zt6n26U.png

(Archive (http://archive.md/UGKfa#selection-6947.1-6947.5))

(Archive (http://archive.md/CZgwt#selection-6929.1-6929.4))


(Archive (http://archive.md/eoA7O#selection-2561.1-2561.5))


Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:
Most likely that accounts Killerpotleaf (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=64542), high110 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=118908) and yingfeng (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=175257) have been sold or hacked in autumn 2017, considering gaps and changed languages in their post history.

Tagged for now, you should pm the manager as well and inform them of this thread

Nice post that shows the ignorance of the cheaters and their greedines for money and they will not care about anything and enrolling same accounts in the same bounty. They were thinking that no one would notice them buried deep in that section. The manager will not care much and he accepts even red trusted members because I was part of the Blbx signature campaign for one week.

Gentlemen, hello.  As far as I know, the rules of the bitcointalk forum do not prohibit having multiple accounts.  It is forbidden to use more than one account in the same company bounty.  And I noticed that all the evidence provided by the author of the topic suggests that one person participated by these accounts not in one, but in different bounty companies.  Explain to me what is his violation of the rules?

Just these transactions showed the usage of more than 1 account on the same campaign.

https://etherscan.io/token/0x814f67fa286f7572b041d041b1d99b432c9155ee?a=0x9529fc67ee33bf0102394cac000c6c564b0bcf1f

I Haven't looked on this case and I don't know if more transactions are involved.

I apologize, but really, in this case, two wallet addresses appear in the same company.  Although here you need to review all the information, since these address are registered in different companies, such as social networks and company signatures, or a blog or YouTube. after all this is also possible?

If they don't gain any advantage by using alt accounts in that bounty you would be right, but they did (and still do). Three accounts are enrolled in Miracle Tele signature campaign:

yingfeng: http://archive.md/CZgwt#selection-6843.0-6843.8
Killerpotleaf: http://archive.md/UGKfa#selection-6857.0-6857.13
high110: http://archive.md/1zVU8#selection-4173.0-4173.7

That's not allowed and red trust is the result.

And somehow I have the feeling that the account YuryK. (http://archive.md/CZgwt#selection-6043.0-6043.6) is also involved (But I don't have a proof. If someone wants to dig a bit feel free to do so  :P)