Bitcoin Forum

I've read this post:

..and I tried to search for this gang but couldn't find it anywhere.

Calling teeGUMES to use this thread to write down all gang members they speak of, we need to know who are all members which are part of this gang.

Archived http://archive.is/sQJbQ

---

Local rules: Only teeGUMES is allowed to post here.

As teeGUMES decided it is best to put me on ignore https://archive.fo/oX67I and OGnasty merited off topic reply, I will remove this local rule. I hope they didn't put zorroback on ignore for the same reason :)

---

---

So far there are 3 members of this so called gang they are talking about, according to bitcoinsupremo:

https://i.imgur.com/bkyzCWr.png
Based on your previous replies to me I chose to exercise my right with the ignore button yesterday. I feel as though I lose nothing of importance by having your posts not show up. This won't change now or any time soon.

Edit to add: marlboroza was one of the four members of bitcointalk that decided a public doxxing was a meritable post.

https://i.imgur.com/e6BpWCH.png

That doesn't explain what you said.

What a bad attempt to move topic in different direction. Your new DT member folks. Calling people gang, when faced with it putting people on ignore.

Who is gang?

gang isnt the right word,its mafia and you know yourself you are one of them,haha.
thats a facepalm for you, ignored by teeGUMEs so its sad  :'(

Who is capo dei capi?

Don't you ever think you deserve that title, you are just a fucked up pile of toilet paper "il capo dei capi" uses as toilet paper for cleaning himself up.
You are just an idiot who have been given too much power and used and abused that all over the place. You still remain a toilet paper though.
Go ahead delete this post as you do always.

So who is the gang?

For me I have no doubt, all the communist lobby bullshit propaganda, for me it is you , Lauda and TMAN as the most dangerous communists of the forum  ;D :-*

Well, that looks like very small gang if you ask me. Thank you for your valuable opinion, I will update topic with this "information". Hm... just one more thing before I update topic, who is The-One-Above-All ?

Archived http://archive.is/RrdtA#selection-3885.0-3885.1

Don't know but 12 PM almost so off to sleep. By the way I have archived it before you have done here it is the link

http://archive.is/5IkDH

Dangerous for whom?
I don't think that they are dangerous for bitcointalk community users but yeah scammers and fraudulent persons have got fear about them. :D

Isn't it looking good to you dude?

She/he is just pissed. First I got negative from him/her, then she/he changed it to neutral, then positive, then negative, then removed old negative and placed new one, seems like she/he can't make up her/his mind. Probably whoever left correct feedback on her/his wall is part of the gang.

Locking this for now.

Even though I think a poll would be heavily diluted, I wouldn't mind seeing the results of a poll. Is there a "gang" yes or no.

Well, first we have to determine who is part of the gang. Without "gang" members, someone might wrongly interpret meaning of poll "is there a gang" and vote "yes" for the other "gang"  :P

Maybe there are multiple gangs. The bitcointalk bloods and the bitcointalk crypts?

Foxes and cats (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5145602.0).

Whats going on here? Did you quote your alt to try to get around my use of the Ignore button?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17080768#msg17080768 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17080768#msg17080768)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17067579#msg17067579 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg17067579#msg17067579)

I would reply to you but you won't see post.

Guess what? I am part of moderation "gang" now (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5147008.msg51202877#msg51202877).

---

Oh. OH:

https://i.imgur.com/X501qEy.png

Calls people a gang to start a conflict then hides behind IGNORE button to "de-escalate things" which they started.
Goes off topic.
Doesn't know what to respond to shit they wrote so IGNORE button and negative tag is best solution for this.
Doesn't tag "the other account".
Continues to post off topic replies, even thought they have OP on ignore, without addressing main question - WHO are gang members they are speaking of?

OK, I guess you are part of the "gang" now. New member of the "gang" is Owlcatz, according to BitcoinSupremo
I will update thread when I find more of these "gang" members.

---

---

On side note, Mr. Ignore Button's post has been removed because they simple can't stay on topic. Sorry nutildah, yours too, we don't want anyone to accuse us of being gang, don't we?

And what is very interesting is this:

https://i.imgur.com/xO5u6e6.png


teeGUMES wouldn't lie that they have me on IGNORE, did they read my previous reply where I said:

"Doesn't tag "the other account."

They wouldn't do it after my post, right?

I am really not sure what teeGUMES think with this:


This is link in reference(teeGUMES's quote is removed):

I am having very hard time to find where I have misspelled my name, considering that I am IGNORED teeGUMES wouldn't see it if that is posted in topic, as they put me on ignore a day before I started this thread.


Don't play mind games with me teeGUMES, you have big mouth and I just caught you lying.

Let me just blow your mind here marlboroza, you can show/hide and EVEN click the unignore button, read what you want and then press ignore again.
Last I checked one of the local rules was that only teeGUMES could speak here.. that changed pretty quickly when your narrative got shut down.. then once me and nutildah were having a conversation you deleted all of our posts... scared much?

And you clearly called your alt account zorroback when you know damn well its zorrobek.. because it is you. Throwing the scent off much?

Try to stop going into such large posts with line breaks and pictures and broken English cause you're getting too hyped up over looking like a twat.. plan your posts with a calm head and you might be able to present something worth replying to by half the forum.

You will never guess why I wrote "back" instead of "bek".

Nah, I don't trust you. I caught you lying. And, you spammed off topic replies 4 times. And, you didn't honor OP's request that "you are not allowed to post in thread any more".

But, as you decided not to honor my request, you can also read this again and stick to topic, I'll bold you part which has never been part of local rules and it is still part of this thread:

---

Guess I am back on ignore :) Locking this again.