|
Title: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 23, 2019, 10:08:27 PM Hello, After some advice from other members on the meta Section to write it on this section about my problem then i will try to explain it here because this is risking the reputation of my account.
So in March or April I joined a bounty from FABA Invest (Content Campaign) My content was approved before and was passed my kyc too and everything went smoothly until yesterday when I was banned because it indicated that I had the same address with this account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1231909. Then I asked why I was banned and he said that I used the same address but with a different username When I asked him the proof, it was all private because of security reasons, I understand. But for this case I ask for a valid proof to ban me from the campaign, Like Response from google form and from which e-mail the form was sended or anything else that makes this all valid. https://i.imgur.com/67PUomy.png Details: Spreadsheet link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d6G8B0uW7zSCLLLNBc-LAUdB59o05blc2H4L8IBiFLk/edit#gid=704737311 (FABA Original Spreadsheet) Backup Spreadsheet for future refrence: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1d6G8B0uW7zSCLLLNBc-LAUdB59o05blc2H4L8IBiFLk (Stored on my gdrive and pc) My Bitcointalk account that was registered on the campaign: dhemasm Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1049524 My Eth Address That was registered on the campaign and also KYC: 0x2D923A09Bf3110b21381A528552700531dE83F63 Suspected Bitcointalk that admin think i was same with him: Mymikagab Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1231909 I am ready to receive negative trust because multi account (?) from the DT members here if I am proved guilty. This post was archived here: http://archive.fo/HLr09 Edited 1: The post was archived again after some discussion, The link was here: http://archive.fo/n3fAE Edited 2: The post was archived again after some discussion, The link was here: http://archive.fo/65mgr 24 May 2019 00:18:36 UTC Edited 3: The post was archived again after some discussion, The link was here: http://archive.fo/fOkhM 24 May 2019 00:47:47 UTC -Zip File Before "24 May 2019 00:47:47 UTC" https://drive.google.com/open?id=1eAoiwGp2B9V9bGLE9M2T288CoR89ONNB Edited 4: The post was archived again after some discussion, The link was here: http://archive.fo/KTaIQ 24 May 2019 11:27:55 UTC Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 23, 2019, 10:52:28 PM As I rightly pointed out to you that kyc forms are not for public view but for the sake of clarity, below is your kyc and the said user whom you have the same wallet address in the campaign.Removed
Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Obasi1 on May 23, 2019, 10:53:07 PM Hey man! You are a scammer. Because you have the power to post BTT on doesn't give you the right to lie against people.
You filled in KYC twice with different names, and you foolishly submitted the same wallet address, and now you are crying foul. Your KYC details will be published here as a proof to show that you are a cheater. Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 23, 2019, 10:54:08 PM You can explain to everyone why the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a secret affair.
Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 23, 2019, 10:55:08 PM As I rightly pointed out to you that kyc forms are not for public view but for the sake of clarity, below is your kyc and the said user whom you have the same wallet address in the campaign. https://i.postimg.cc/c4qH8089/dhesa.png Second user https://i.postimg.cc/JzJDN6zK/glaiza.png. From Which Spreadsheet? KYC Form? There was no eth address column there. I need more details not only screenshots like thatEdited 2: From Which email that form was filled? Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 23, 2019, 10:57:10 PM As I rightly pointed out to you that kyc forms are not for public view but for the sake of clarity, below is your kyc and the said user whom you have the same wallet address in the campaign. https://i.postimg.cc/c4qH8089/dhesa.png Second user https://i.postimg.cc/JzJDN6zK/glaiza.png. From Which Spreadsheet? KYC Form? There was no eth address column there. I need more details not only screenshots like thatTitle: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 23, 2019, 11:00:12 PM Kyc form had no eth Address? Which details do you need? Are those not your kyc details. Or you want a full publication of kyc for everyone in the campaign? This form on this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095858.0 I was trying too fill it again and there is no eth address there on this one https://goo.gl/forms/2N065j9QekmpCJC13.Edited 2: From which email that form was filled? Send us the google response not screenshot like that Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 23, 2019, 11:02:23 PM Hey man! You are a scammer. Because you have the power to post BTT it doesn't give you the right to like against people. Go ahead bro, that's why i want to discuss it here to make it more transparent. As I said on the first post You filled in KYC twice with different people, and foolishly submitted the same wallet address and now you are crying foul. Your KYC details will be published here as a proof to show that you are a cheater. I am ready to receive negative trust because multi account (?) from the DT members here if I am proved guilty.[/b] You can report me if i'm proved guiltyTitle: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 23, 2019, 11:03:38 PM Kyc form had no eth Address? Which details do you need? Are those not your kyc details. Or you want a full publication of kyc for everyone in the campaign? This form on this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095858.0 I was trying too fill it again and there is no eth address there on this one https://goo.gl/forms/2N065j9QekmpCJC13.Edited 2: From which email that form was filled? Send us the google response not screenshot like that Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 23, 2019, 11:07:18 PM Kyc form had no eth Address? Which details do you need? Are those not your kyc details. Or you want a full publication of kyc for everyone in the campaign? This form on this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095858.0 I was trying too fill it again and there is no eth address there on this one https://goo.gl/forms/2N065j9QekmpCJC13.Edited 2: From which email that form was filled? Send us the google response not screenshot like that Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 23, 2019, 11:07:45 PM Every bounty hunter provided a wallet address for their kyc. Those who passed through the process early weeks of the campaign got a mail requesting their wallet address so you can't tell me there was no wallet address during kyc. What I'm concerned about is are those not your details in the kyc?
Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Mymikagab on May 23, 2019, 11:08:12 PM You can explain to everyone why the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a secret affair. No sir, im married and also i have 4 childrens i am from the phillipines.I know that Its very clear that i passed the kyc and already recieved an email, only one email with my real eth wallet.I dont know who is Dhemasm we dont have any connections and i dont know why that it happens that double eth in two kyc. I dont do anything wrong Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 23, 2019, 11:08:34 PM Kyc form had no eth Address? Which details do you need? Are those not your kyc details. Or you want a full publication of kyc for everyone in the campaign? This form on this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095858.0 I was trying too fill it again and there is no eth address there on this one https://goo.gl/forms/2N065j9QekmpCJC13.Edited 2: From which email that form was filled? Send us the google response not screenshot like that Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 23, 2019, 11:09:55 PM As I rightly pointed out to you that kyc forms are not for public view but for the sake of clarity, below is your kyc and the said user whom you have the same wallet address in the campaign. https://i.postimg.cc/c4qH8089/dhesa.png Second user https://i.postimg.cc/JzJDN6zK/glaiza.png. These are your kyc details if they are not good enough I don't know what other proof you're asking of. Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 23, 2019, 11:11:23 PM You can explain to everyone why the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a secret affair. No sir, im married and also i have 4 childrens i am from the phillipines.I know that Its very clear that i passed the kyc and already recieved an email, only one email with my real eth wallet.I dont know who is Dhemasm we dont have any connections and i dont know why that it happens that double eth in two kyc. I dont do anything wrong Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 23, 2019, 11:13:34 PM Hey man! You are a scammer. Because you have the power to post BTT it doesn't give you the right to like against people. Go ahead bro, that's why i want to discuss it here to make it more transparent. As I said on the first post You filled in KYC twice with different people, and foolishly submitted the same wallet address and now you are crying foul. Your KYC details will be published here as a proof to show that you are a cheater. I am ready to receive negative trust because multi account (?) from the DT members here if I am proved guilty.[/b] You can report me if i'm proved guiltyTitle: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 23, 2019, 11:33:14 PM Reporting you for neg trust isn't my concern. I keep asking how come the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a private affair. That's my concern as you have dragged this out here. Those are your details in the kyc I'm sure you can't dispute that. Likewise the second person. This message was not for you but for obasi and maybe other people that see this threadI keep asking how come the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a private affair. That's my concern as you have dragged this out here After doing some research i got some point. KYC was private affair, yes i agree but the form was public everyone can fill it out even though I don't know how the details are but you need to ask the second person.Second, after seeing the screenshots above i'm number 188 and was suspected column was 196 you need to ask him about that. Third, Only with such baseless accusations is not legit, at least track first to provide legit proof if we are a same person or use a same address not only with the photo. The problem it's not on my side but on Mymikagab Anyway please keep the post low, just edit it. Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 23, 2019, 11:40:21 PM Reporting you for neg trust isn't my concern. I keep asking how come the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a private affair. That's my concern as you have dragged this out here. Those are your details in the kyc I'm sure you can't dispute that. Likewise the second person. This message was not for you but for obasi and maybe other people that see this threadI keep asking how come the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a private affair. That's my concern as you have dragged this out here After doing some research i got some point. KYC was private affair, yes i agree but the form was public everyone can fill it out even though I don't know how the details are but you need to ask the second person.Second, after seeing the screenshots above i'm number 188 and was suspected column was 196 you need to ask him about that. The problem it's not on my side but on Mymikagab Anyway please keep the post low, just edit it. Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 23, 2019, 11:47:42 PM I tried explaining things to your pm you insisted on bringing it out here. I keep asking the both of same questions if you guys had a misunderstanding you explain yourself order than Draghi g what is transparent out. Yeah with kicked me from the bounty group and tell me that i was making drama? The screenshot chat was there. I brought this to the forum because on the telegram bounty are full random people that disrupt the discussion and by discussing here it makes it more transparent and better than there.Or did you think I was out to cheat you on your rewards? Did I say that you cheated me in the previous post? Please find the word, this thread has also been archived, you can see the first post. I asked for more valid evidence and not saying you are cheating me, so I make the thread here.Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Mymikagab on May 24, 2019, 12:01:56 AM Reporting you for neg trust isn't my concern. I keep asking how come the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a private affair. That's my concern as you have dragged this out here. Those are your details in the kyc I'm sure you can't dispute that. Likewise the second person. This message was not for you but for obasi and maybe other people that see this threadI keep asking how come the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a private affair. That's my concern as you have dragged this out here After doing some research i got some point. KYC was private affair, yes i agree but the form was public everyone can fill it out even though I don't know how the details are but you need to ask the second person.Second, after seeing the screenshots above i'm number 188 and was suspected column was 196 you need to ask him about that. The problem it's not on my side but on Mymikagab Anyway please keep the post low, just edit it. I submit my eth wallet and its very clear. Many now make way to break bounty hunters, just like using details See the picture and the date And please dont ever say that me and dhemasm have affair I love my husband especially my kids In your telegram group many hunters there have no respect, they laughing us and bullied after that you ban me. With all my respect. I respect you manager you know that https://m.imgur.com/3v8VDHG https://m.imgur.com/5KtXMbz Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 24, 2019, 12:04:50 AM Reporting you for neg trust isn't my concern. I keep asking how come the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a private affair. That's my concern as you have dragged this out here. Those are your details in the kyc I'm sure you can't dispute that. Likewise the second person. This message was not for you but for obasi and maybe other people that see this threadI keep asking how come the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a private affair. That's my concern as you have dragged this out here After doing some research i got some point. KYC was private affair, yes i agree but the form was public everyone can fill it out even though I don't know how the details are but you need to ask the second person.Second, after seeing the screenshots above i'm number 188 and was suspected column was 196 you need to ask him about that. Third, Only with such baseless accusations is not legit, at least track first to provide legit proof if we are a same person or use a same address not only with the photo. The problem it's not on my side but on Mymikagab Anyway please keep the post low, just edit it. Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 24, 2019, 12:08:57 AM [/quote]Hope I can remove this it's not meant for public view. Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: The Cryptovator on May 24, 2019, 12:16:18 AM Your KYC details will be published here as a proof to show that you are a cheater. Don't post personal information on publicly. Why are you making too much argument about this matter? If someone post my eth address it doesn't mean he/she is my alt account. Perhaps someone copy paste post and forgot to change Eth address. I am not supporting anyone, just it might be an incident. However let's make it simple, As I rightly pointed out to you that kyc forms are not for public view but for the sake of clarity, below is your kyc and the said user whom you have the same wallet address in the campaign. If you are bounty manager then ask both user to sign a message from their ETH address. Whoever can successfully sign message you can keep him/her on campaign. Who can't sing you can kick him/her.Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 24, 2019, 12:17:04 AM How do you propose I track who's real and who's fake the spreadsheet screenshot is kyc form the team I worked based on the information provided and the details I saw there are same details I shared with you. It's your job as a bounty manager to do that and inevitably you have to do that is not it? Just by relying on information without doing deeper research does not make accusations valid, right?KYC was private affair, yes i agree but the form was public everyone can fill it out You were in a haste to create the thread maybe you thought I was making things up. I was with you via pm trying to address your problem but you insisted on bringing it here. Have I ever said that I blame you or say that you made it all?? Please quote the post (The post was archived you can on the first post too), I am asking for strong and valid evidence to be proof that I am the same person as myk. Isn't this better? Everything becomes more transparent here, you can't kick me here like on the telegram bounty group.Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 24, 2019, 12:22:44 AM Your KYC details will be published here as a proof to show that you are a cheater. Don't post personal information on publicly. Why are you making too much argument about this matter? If someone post my eth address it doesn't mean he/she is my alt account. Perhaps someone copy paste post and forgot to change Eth address. I am not supporting anyone, just it might be an incident. However let's make it simple, Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 24, 2019, 12:23:01 AM How do you propose I track who's real and who's fake the spreadsheet screenshot is kyc form the team I worked based on the information provided and the details I saw there are same details I shared with you. It's your job as a bounty manager to do that and inevitably you have to do that is not it? Just by relying on information without doing deeper research does not make accusations valid, right?KYC was private affair, yes i agree but the form was public everyone can fill it out You were in a haste to create the thread maybe you thought I was making things up. I was with you via pm trying to address your problem but you insisted on bringing it here. Have I ever said that I blame you or say that you made it all?? Please quote the post (The post was archived you can on the first post too), I am asking for strong and valid evidence to be proof that I am the same person as myk. Isn't this better? Everything becomes more transparent here, you can't kick me here like on the telegram bounty group.Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 24, 2019, 12:24:30 AM This is kyc matter not public post. The point is both users have same wallet address in their KYC exercise. On the public form that everyone can see and fill ::)Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: The Cryptovator on May 24, 2019, 12:28:13 AM This is kyc matter not public post. The point is both users have same wallet address in their KYC exercise. Stop posting in a row,So you mean they submit same eth address during KYC verification? Then what about spreadsheet and proof of authentication? Describe briefly otherwise there will not solution instead of argument. If need deeply investigation then go to investigation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=227.0) section. Personal info should not post on public borad. Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 24, 2019, 12:29:48 AM Your KYC details will be published here as a proof to show that you are a cheater. Don't post personal information on publicly. Why are you making too much argument about this matter? If someone post my eth address it doesn't mean he/she is my alt account. Perhaps someone copy paste post and forgot to change Eth address. I am not supporting anyone, just it might be an incident. However let's make it simple, As I rightly pointed out to you that kyc forms are not for public view but for the sake of clarity, below is your kyc and the said user whom you have the same wallet address in the campaign. If you are bounty manager then ask both user to sign a message from their ETH address. Whoever can successfully sign message you can keep him/her on campaign. Who can't sing you can kick him/her.Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 24, 2019, 12:33:12 AM This is kyc matter not public post. The point is both users have same wallet address in their KYC exercise. Stop posting in a row,So you mean they submit same eth address during KYC verification? Then what about spreadsheet and proof of authentication? Describe briefly otherwise there will not solution instead of argument. If need deeply investigation then go to investigation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=227.0) section. Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 24, 2019, 12:39:07 AM ~Snip Stop posting in a row,So you mean they submit same eth address during KYC verification? Then what about spreadsheet and proof of authentication? Describe briefly otherwise there will not solution instead of argument. If need deeply investigation then go to investigation (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=227.0) section. https://i.imgur.com/r6IRRA4.png Anyway thanks for helping out to help find a solution. Edited: Just leave it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095858.msg50549613#msg50549613 This why even some campaign didn't need PoA On their campaign, i'm always post PoA For problems like this Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: The Cryptovator on May 24, 2019, 12:40:44 AM However, my personal opinion that they aren't alt although I didn't look deeply, may be I would be wrong. But seems OP made post on Indonesia board (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2010838.msg20055912#msg20055912) and "Mymikagab" made post on Philippine board (http://Mymikagab). I don't know if they connected any other way. Perhaps someone could investigate deeply.
So sign a message would be solution for now. Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 24, 2019, 12:43:54 AM So Emilyearl did we find this solution about this case?
Noted: I can sign a message anytime Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Patmille on May 24, 2019, 12:48:18 AM hmmm copypasting can also be done by the one who has edit access on the spreadsheet, you can try video conferencing with the two accounts to know if they are really alts.
Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 24, 2019, 12:55:07 AM hmmm copypasting can also be done by the one who has edit access on the spreadsheet, you can try video conferencing with the two accounts to know if they are really alts. A Member on telegram bounty group was suggested too before but he was tell that Funny https://i.imgur.com/Wi4s9mB.jpg Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Mpamaegbu on May 24, 2019, 04:46:47 AM You can explain to everyone why the both of you have same wallet address in kyc exercise that's a secret affair. Nope, it isn't really a secret knowing someone else's ETH address as some people have theirs on their profiles.Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Emilyearl on May 24, 2019, 10:35:30 AM So Emilyearl did we find this solution about this case? The team has decided to go on with this, anyone who signs message on the wallet will be accepted as the owner. Details to include are as follows: Bitcointalk username, Telegram Username with a description of the misconception. Pm me the signature afterwards for verification. Noted: I can sign a message anytime Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 24, 2019, 11:09:02 AM The team has decided to go on with this, anyone who signs message on the wallet will be accepted as the owner. Details to include are as follows: Bitcointalk username, Telegram Username with a description of the misconception. Pm me the signature afterwards for verification. Kindly please check it, Signed using Mycrypto, I send you a pm too on telegram.Code: {Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: Mymikagab on May 24, 2019, 02:44:10 PM So Emilyearl did we find this solution about this case? The team has decided to go on with this, anyone who signs message on the wallet will be accepted as the owner. Details to include are as follows: Bitcointalk username, Telegram Username with a description of the misconception. Pm me the signature afterwards for verification. Noted: I can sign a message anytime Hi Admin, this is my verified message on my Ethereum wallet kindly check it. This is my real wallet and this is what I used to on kyc and registered in bounty I do not know what happened to your kyc form and my wallet is different. Code: {Title: Re: Misunderstanding/Unclear acquisition (Faba Bounty) Post by: dhemasm on May 27, 2019, 08:55:36 PM The problem has been resolved so i will lock this thread, thank you for the cooperation Faba Team and for the others, thank you for helping :).
|
