Title: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: pirashki on July 04, 2019, 06:51:40 PM suspect BTT username: leonard2016
suspect profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=800379 link(s): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=620798.msg49695841#msg49695841 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2533534 -------- what happened: in 31 oct 2018 user meri56 asked a question (link:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=620798.msg47463513#msg47463513) about "if anyone worked with Pivot app or not and is it scam or not". he got answer from other user in the same year (see the next post in the same thread). after a few months, a newbie user (mone ro) appeared and sent a short, one line reply, to that question (link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=620798.msg49695841#msg49695841) and he got 10 merits from leonard2016! - leonard2016 has no reply to Persian(فارسی) topic on BTT (so there is no proof that he even can understand Persian) or at least I cannot find his replies in Persian - user "Mone ro" only has 2 posts on BTT, 1 in offtopic. he/she is inactive since February. Well, I think he is abusing merit system. mods may take a look at his profile. Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: actmyname on July 04, 2019, 07:19:32 PM (Bad) translation of the post:
"Hi, good time, I do not think it's skim. Because there are more than a million downloaders from Google Play, they also support the Beatins and Hubs exchanges." Could be merit abuse, could not be. At the end of the day it doesn't matter because you cannot link Mone ro to leonard2016 (never mind the fact that the former account is inactive). Leonard is already a scammer. Might be time for a flag but it shouldn't have to do with "possible" merit abuse. Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: pirashki on July 04, 2019, 07:42:47 PM (Bad) translation of the post: thanks for your reply!"Hi, good time, I do not think it's skim. Because there are more than a million downloaders from Google Play, they also support the Beatins and Hubs exchanges." Could be merit abuse, could not be. At the end of the day it doesn't matter because you cannot link Mone ro to leonard2016 (never mind the fact that the former account is inactive). Leonard is already a scammer. Might be time for a flag but it shouldn't have to do with "possible" merit abuse. life is hard when you have to type with an 4 inches phone display, so I wanted to keep the post short as much as possible, and skipped some details... translation of the mone ro's post: Quote hi, good morning. In my opinion it's not scam (or "I think it's not scam") because it has more than a million downloaders on Google play. Also Beatins and Hubs exchanges support it. Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: xolxol on July 05, 2019, 04:11:31 AM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 speaking o merit abuse,how about this profile?? DT's? are you freakin blind? time to red tag lauda's precious account if you dont have double standards.
Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: logfiles on July 05, 2019, 08:30:49 AM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 speaking o merit abuse,how about this profile?? DT's? are you freakin blind? time to red tag lauda's precious account if you dont have double standards. Come on, It's actmyname's alt and not Lauda'shttps://talkimg.com/images/2023/07/19/ndU8g.png Why should you always be negative about everything at every opportunity you come across without having any appropriate proof. Do you expect people to ever take you serious with this kind of baseless accusation? Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: xolxol on July 05, 2019, 09:22:24 AM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=2627094 speaking o merit abuse,how about this profile?? DT's? are you freakin blind? time to red tag lauda's precious account if you dont have double standards. Come on, It's actmyname's alt and not Lauda'shttps://i.imgur.com/wzI6P5s.png Why should you always be negative about everything at every opportunity you come across without having any appropriate proof. Do you expect people to ever take you serious with this kind of baseless accusation? Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: logfiles on July 05, 2019, 11:43:02 AM abuse is an abuse no exception,if someone not on DT did this do you think the same treatment will be done here? system is being abused wake up kid. Basing on how you are addressing people, i think it's petty clear that you the kid here.Very immature. You said it's "Lauda's precious account", do you have any evidence to back up you claim? Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: xolxol on July 05, 2019, 03:04:19 PM abuse is an abuse no exception,if someone not on DT did this do you think the same treatment will be done here? system is being abused wake up kid. Basing on how you are addressing people, i think it's petty clear that you the kid here.Very immature. You said it's "Lauda's precious account", do you have any evidence to back up you claim? Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: actmyname on July 06, 2019, 12:26:29 AM abuse is an abuse no exception,if someone not on DT did this do you think the same treatment will be done here? system is being abused wake up kid. Basing on how you are addressing people, i think it's petty clear that you the kid here.Very immature. You said it's "Lauda's precious account", do you have any evidence to back up you claim? The: Lauda meriting a post of ChemicalSpillage Lauda meriting a post of ChemicalSpillage (prior to my alt reveal) ChemicalSpillage sending merit to various individuals (Quickseller incl.) Or perhaps something else? Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: xolxol on July 06, 2019, 06:52:25 AM abuse is an abuse no exception,if someone not on DT did this do you think the same treatment will be done here? system is being abused wake up kid. Basing on how you are addressing people, i think it's petty clear that you the kid here.Very immature. You said it's "Lauda's precious account", do you have any evidence to back up you claim? The: Lauda meriting a post of ChemicalSpillage Lauda meriting a post of ChemicalSpillage (prior to my alt reveal) ChemicalSpillage sending merit to various individuals (Quickseller incl.) Or perhaps something else? Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: xolxol on July 06, 2019, 06:56:22 AM abuse is an abuse no exception,if someone not on DT did this do you think the same treatment will be done here? system is being abused wake up kid. Basing on how you are addressing people, i think it's petty clear that you the kid here.Very immature. You said it's "Lauda's precious account", do you have any evidence to back up you claim? The: Lauda meriting a Lauda meriting a ChemicalSpillage sending merit to various individuals (Quickseller incl.) Or perhaps something else? Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: YOSHIE on July 06, 2019, 08:43:10 AM There is no human being perfect.
Behavior: mistakes, intentional or emotional, often do what makes people suspicious and unreasonable. However, in this case @ Leonard2016, you can suggest incorrectly giving sMerit, or something intentional. I think this can not be considered as a single user / alt account, in sending sMerit, for that we need steps to anticipate at this time. Shipment history. 1. https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=mone%20ro&from=Leonard2016 Topic: 2. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=620798.msg49695841#msg49695841 You can see here, For example: Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138819.msg50880854#msg50880854 Alt @ Leonard2016 account, which is connected: Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=800379 Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: xolxol on July 17, 2019, 06:51:11 AM Lauda is being taken for granted with his (mafia) colleagues! abusing system but still on the loose but these members are being unforgiven to those who abused the system! double standards dickheads.
Title: Re: possible merit abuse - leonard2016 Post by: actmyname on July 24, 2019, 04:57:00 AM Lauda is being taken for granted with his (mafia) colleagues! abusing system but still on the loose but these members are being unforgiven to those who abused the system! double standards dickheads. Quote from: talktotransformer.input(xolxolQuote) the only thing is that, what has happened with the president is very different to the mafia! when i was in power the mafia would threaten people and then make threats to harm me when i was done with their people ! it was very clear that it worked, even when it was in the midst of the most brutal and violent episodes of violence against us. for example, some year back they threatened me directly by saying i would be killed if i did not give information about organized crime. i was extremely angry and tried to talk to them but they used the threat as a weapon to silence me! of course this was done by using a very, very, very dangerous system ! i would urge everyone with experience in mob law to watch for the same thing . i have seen that situation in other countries and i have seen it in my own country too . how many times in the past 5 years have we seen mafia members calling, threatening the people of other countries and then being in an emergency after making such threats? and we had to resort to some system just to cope with the crisis ? no, it should be the other way around ! they should be the ones to take responsibility for this situation and not the mafia ! I do not understand where this mafia is taking the blame ! This was the most evil mafia ever ? We all know about the mafia as our enemy and enemy only, but why are they calling for the killing of anyone ? If we ask ourselves is the mafia's behaviour towards us different today then perhaps ? They might be different today then ? How does it feel to embrace your own word salad? |