|
Title: NOOB QUESTION. When using miner CLI do I put the receiving address of my wallet? Post by: syn00ack on July 12, 2019, 09:07:55 PM I just want to make sure when I'm in a mining pool and using CLI CGminer that I'm sending the payout to the right place!
For example: My electrum wallet has multiple "receiving addresses" they all start with bc1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Is that what I put in as the username in cgminer? For example, is this correct? If my receiving address is bc1XXXXX, then my bat file should read: cgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://pool.ckpool.org:3333 --suggest-diff 128 -u bc1XXXXX -p x username "-u" is basically the entire receiving address in electrum wallet? And I can use any one of them since there are multiple ones? Thanks for your assistance. Title: Re: NOOB QUESTION. When using miner CLI do I put the receiving address of my wallet? Post by: AdolfinWolf on July 12, 2019, 09:14:00 PM That depends on the pool whether you can use a btc adress as your user login
Looking at the pool, it says the following: Code: (http://ckpool.org/#/) Set your username to your btcaddress with any or even no worker extension, and any password. So, any adress you control the private keys over should do. Quote username "-u" is basically the entire receiving address in electrum wallet? And I can use any one of them since there are multiple ones? yes. One thing i forgot to note: the bech32 adresses (bc1xxxxxx), are *relatively* new. It could be that ckpool doesn't recognize them yet..? In which case you should probably create a nested electrum segwit wallet. You can still create these P2SH wallets using a quite unorthodox method described here -> https://bitcoinelectrum.com/creating-a-p2sh-segwit-wallet-with-electrum/ EDIT: I do think they support native segwit by the looks of this post -> Dumb question but does this pool support overt ASICBOOST? Yep, dumb question. :) This pool was the pioneer of overt ASIC Boost. And native segwit addresses :) So you shouldn't have to do all of the above. Title: Re: NOOB QUESTION. When using miner CLI do I put the receiving address of my wallet? Post by: syn00ack on July 12, 2019, 09:24:11 PM Thank you for your assistance!
I ran my batch file with the BC1 address and it looks like it connected. It says "Pool message: Authorised, welcome to ckpool.org bc1xxxxxxxxxxx" Since it says authorized and not rejected, I'm assuming its a valid address for ckpool and that ckpool can accept segwit wallet addresses for payout? Here is the CLI copy paste: Connected to pool.ckpool.org diff 10K with stratum as user bc1qhafs8tl4nnuux0udhn05mmz8y3edn7zzfegpfs292k0xkm69gnfqpfl8 Block: b9ed9d81... Diff:9.06T Started: [17:10:57.027] Best share: 141 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB management [P]ool management 0: GSH 10032248: BM1387:02+ 100.00MHz T:100 P:94 (375:188) | 100% WU:^92% | 25.28G / 21.06Gh/s WU:294.2/m -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [2019-07-12 17:10:56.651] Started cgminer 4.11.1 [2019-07-12 17:10:56.658] Probing for an alive pool [2019-07-12 17:10:56.928] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 10000 [2019-07-12 17:10:56.977] Pool 0 message: Authorised, welcome to ckpool.org bc1qhafs8tl4nnuux0udhn05mmz8y3edn7zzfegpfs2 92k0xkm69gnfqpfl86h! [2019-07-12 17:10:57.026] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 128 [2019-07-12 17:10:57.026] Network diff set to 9.06T [2019-07-12 17:10:57.913] 0: GSH 0 - Toggling ASIC nRST to reset [2019-07-12 17:10:58.178] 0: GSH 0 - NewPac Bitcoin Miner (10032248) Title: Re: NOOB QUESTION. When using miner CLI do I put the receiving address of my wallet? Post by: AdolfinWolf on July 14, 2019, 11:27:22 AM Thank you for your assistance! I don't see any errors, so i would assume so, yes. I ran my batch file with the BC1 address and it looks like it connected. It says "Pool message: Authorised, welcome to ckpool.org bc1xxxxxxxxxxx" Since it says authorized and not rejected, I'm assuming its a valid address for ckpool and that ckpool can accept segwit wallet addresses for payout? I'm not exactly an expert on this though. |