|
Title: delete Post by: BitcoinEXpress on March 15, 2014, 09:33:58 PM delete
Title: Re: delete Post by: Stealthcoin on March 15, 2014, 09:35:29 PM Baritus claims he lost 500,000 DGC by failing to employ the most basic wallet security but runs an exchange. Massive confidence builder there I tell ya! The story makes absolutely no sense. Futhermore he won't post the public address of the supposed 500,000 DGC wallet. Why is that? Anyone have an idea? ~BCX~ Yep this is what i though when i read the first thread about this story. It always looks like they just want a good cover story. Do not forget that the digitalcoin dev got other project running like SecureCoin.... and maybe even more coins. Greed.... Greed never changes. Title: Re: delete Post by: iampingu on March 15, 2014, 09:38:12 PM Solid stories don't need proof!
Title: Re: delete Post by: Nullu on March 15, 2014, 09:38:55 PM Plausible deniability.
The sad part is how so few people are questioning his story. Title: Re: delete Post by: bnogal on March 15, 2014, 09:42:21 PM For me it sounds like that.
but at actual price it is not having sense to do that.... if he just wait half a year more he will be able to dump them at higher prices... So, i have my doubts. I dont believe someone stole them, but i dont believe neither he is dumping the coins..... if it is like this, i am sorry for the ones they paid for cryptoave.... cause i guess the coins come from there. I dont know... too much work he did to get, what? 40.000$? when he was able of making a community around his coin, and own multiple business taking fees from the system? I dont know... Call me bag holder :P but i am buying digitalcoins Title: Re: delete Post by: Bit_Happy on March 15, 2014, 09:43:17 PM Should everyone panic sell down to 1 Satoshi?
Did DGC ever develop beyond a clone? What features? Title: Re: delete Post by: BitcoinEXpress on March 15, 2014, 09:47:08 PM delete
Title: Re: delete Post by: Nullu on March 15, 2014, 09:49:02 PM So what I gather from all of the above is that the dev doesn't want to post the address because the community would instantly be able to follow the coins? ~BCX~ While that is conjecture, I do find it extremely puzzling that he would not post the address if his story is legitimate. You'd think he'd be desperate to post every bit of information he had to exonerate himself. Not buying it. Title: Re: delete Post by: Stealthcoin on March 15, 2014, 10:03:42 PM Found this inside another thread don't know if useful or not.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=370807.0 35. Securecoin**Dev removed Quarkcoin copyrights, lied about hashing algorithms, mismarketed the coin, and is generally a liar. This coin belongs here. DGC and ARG probably belong here as well. Title: Re: delete Post by: rockstar888 on March 16, 2014, 09:56:55 AM clearly he has been selling all the time. Digitalcoin people, I feel bad for you |