Bitcoin Forum

Do you know why only few projects are dynamic and effective? They have genuine/pro teams and their Teams & Developers are experts with past experiences from other crypto businesses and companies in their pasts,when pro teams come together to build new ideas they will easily reach their milestone and become successful. If you can do research on projects that arent scam but failed its because they lack the professionalism idea.

Many projects that are coming into crypto worlds are been built by teams that have no experience about crypto at all,this is why many projects that appeared to have good ideas failed in the end.

Projects with pro teams always have a solution to every problem they come across when development is ongoing,either in Bear Market or Not they always know what to do that won't affect their coin or token

You know what, it does not matter on what time any project enters the market. The only things that matter are a great team, a working product and a healthy community. With all those three components together, any project will become successful.

Whenever you are doing research on a project, it cuts across all areas, including the team. Even while carrying out research on the team, the focus of some people is if the team is real or not, by looking at their claimed identity through KYC.
Yes, they might reveal their true identity, that does not mean they can effectively manage the project and the funds collected. Mismanagement, can there leas to the failure of a project, where the team uses the fund on unnecessary things, while the development of product is lagging.
Also, a professional team will not only focus on product, as the norms of some are, the market (price and marketing) is very important. Which entails maintaining a particular level of price and ensuring there is volume.

Even if you have a good team, if the concept is not good enough to generate support from investors and traders, it will not move forward, I have seen a team with good developers and they keep recruiting new developers in their team, but their project failed to get support and failed to advance in the market.

Before the main developer starts building his project, he needs to do a study on what the community wants and needs and can it be adopted everywhere, developers just want a platform and a team to work on it without realizing it's potential and do not ask if is good enough to generate support.

the reason few projects get successful because they see what others don't and they have the optional to successfully launched the project.

That's very true, the team is everything. Towards the road to a successful product hundreds of obstacles will show up and no matter how good the project idea is a bad team will get stuck in those obstacles pretty fast.

Because only few project are original and do know what they are actually doing, if you look at the space now, so many copy cat projects in the space and only selected few are truly out there to solve real world project, and with time these money grabbing projects would die and allow the good ones to thrive

And what they see that others can't in your opinion? What OP has said is true. There are good ideas that are converted into projects but they have an incompetent team so whatever they are doing, it's not clicking to the community. There are projects that has the same idea with the ones before so its nothing new anymore but they still click because the team that's working on it are very well professional in good in different aspects.

They don't actually have the solution to every problem but they do have the experience and expertise to stay calm, research on the problem and probably find a solution in the nearest time possible. Also as the team are made up of expert the community will have trust in them to solve the issue and not to run away with their funds, as a result the project will continue running while solutions to such issue like flaws in smart contract codes, new exchange listing, marketing for more audience etc is been researched on by the team.

A conclusion would be, projects with experience team members give the investors more confidence and trust in the project that's why they do last long and probably becomes a successful project.

There are some projects that had decent teams but their idea didn't combine with the essence of blockhain technology. These project wanted to apply blockchain to real sectors of economy but failed although they hardly were scams.

not all depends on team but project that can run well because their products are really real and much in demand by everyone, in my opinion the failure of the project was because the team could not use the funds collected properly

I think the team and community are healthy enough to make the project a success, because in the crypto era any ideas can be a way to build a new market

It depends because even a project do have a professional team behind and a great project plan or roadmap it wont guarantee 100% to be successful yet all things will vary or depend on the community itself it would be supported and with current situation of the market where hesitance and doubt is there you cant be sure if those will be tailed up by investors but somehow seeing projects that do have solid foundation or team behind is really a good indication that the project do have a chance.

The main strength of the project is its idea, which developers want to come up with and implement. Of course, the experience of developers has an impact on the popularity of the project, but it is not the main criterion. It is also very important whether the developers have a working sample of their project so that it can be shown to investors and convinced them to invest.
A huge plus is the participation of large campaigns in investing, they add confidence for smaller investors.

I think there are major reasons on why only a few projects have been successful right now (some were already mentioned in previous posts) and one of it is that most of them lack the necessary fundamentals needed to make the project a success. Moreover, the events that has unfolded during ICO days of 2017-2018 which resulted in the offspring of many scam projects resulted to potential investors being discouraged to take on the crypto bandwagon but on the lighter side, it has also resulted to a more experienced crypto-community who are often vigilant and most probably would only invest or support a more promising project that satisfied their criteria and rejected inferior projects accordingly.

Because not every field needs a blockchain. Most of the time people confuse crowdfunding and ICO. They think that blockchain is "a new tomorrow" or something that sounds cool (look, we have a cow milking industry on blockchain, to bad we have only 1 cow and old bard, but hey, you can buy our milk coin with 30% discount and become an early investor).

in addition to a solid team, of course the investors also influence the success of the project. especially with stable prices and they don't dump. besides that the project must have such an important function and will continue to be used coins or tokens until now.

The above sentence actually gave your post credibility. The reason is that, some project are actually out to scam and that is why they must fail. If a project is not scam, they will employ great hands and pay them well to do the job.

This is the problem when so many people without a good skill in the blockchain development us interesting to get in the blockchain without any knowledge. not only they lack of professionalism and skill and majority of them don't even understand about how economic system works.
They don't even know about what is ICO and what is the purpose of that thing.

Most of them have no real use case so this is the main reason they fail. The second reason would be that after they gather the minimum funds they don't care about the road map of the project so they start to spend money everywhere letting the community in a doubt. I lost the count of how many failed and I'm sure more will fail as there the numbers of projects with blockchain are increasing every day and everyone wants a pice from bitcoin.

Teams control the developments of the project and its development is the basis of the token's price.  If nothing binds the team from developing the project, even if they are pros in doing things in crypto, soon they'd snap.  But then of course there are real good developers. The problem as I see is that there is nothing that binds the team's wealth to the project, they can simply turn their tokens to USDT and then abandon the project, but if there is a contract that they can't do this or go out thru smartcontract they'd be force to develop the project to work.

Actually this is very true, the team goes a long way to determine whether a project will be successful or not in crypto space. Aside proffesionalism, another very vital aspect is genuineness of the team. Some team members will only do token sale and list on exchanges just to cash out at the end, without any intentions of developing the project. Forget what you see most times on whitepaper, some will even go as far as enticing the community with an MVP, with no plans of developing a working product. Once I see that there is no project development for a project I believe in, I take a bow since its not worth it. 

Do you think these pro team can help giving solution to the project?? I have seen many projects with a lot of expert advisors And not everything can be successful.
Like Naga Coin (NGC) that one of the advisors is Roger Ver. But looking on the project now seems like it's not very successful indeed, but it's still good to follow.

It's because many projects tried to raise funds for nothing but just to make money. They didn't even believe in their own projects, so the founders of those projects dumped their token as soon as they get the chance.

Some teams worked really hard, but they lacked experience, and didn't understand their product is useless if nobody uses them.

I really like your points, team experience and devotion matters a lot in propelling a project towards attaining the project aim. Some team members are clueless, especially those who are just interested in making the money, then abandon the project. With such mindset, the project mission and vision can never be achieved and there will be negligible or zero project development.  Once the team is up to the task, definitely there will be project development updates and hence a successful project.

The secret of the success of new projects is not known to me. Previously, I thought that projects need a good team and idea, but there are many projects that collect huge investments without this, while good teams with great ideas do not receive investments. Perhaps projects need to learn how to sell themselves to investors. I can’t say this with confidence.

Just take all these projects like real life offline businesses just like a grocery store, a cafe or a restaurant we have seen that not every business is a success, even with more investment, space or time projects do fail and some become super succesful.so i think it is basically about luck as well and we should be mature enough to know that every online investment falls under extremely risky category so we should be prepared for the worst too.

Of course, it all depends on the team. When investing, I just always look and study the team in detail. Besides the silent study, I try to communicate directly with someone from the team. Having put together these 2 puzzles, you can make a principle about the project and its future.In the team can be Only those who are ready to work for money and there is a team that is ready to work for the realization of an idea.Efficiency as You know will be more in the second team.And every investor should look for just such a team.

That is the importance of analyzing the projects that we will support. If the project is planned in a structured manner, has objectives with a clear roadmap, a good marketing strategy, it will definitely attract market interest. All that will be achieved if the support team has adequate experience in their fields. If the project is engaged in crypto but there is no experienced team in that field then it's useless, it won't be optimal.

I believe that one of the reasons is "PATIENT". If someone consist to work on something, the one will be an expert finally. Projects are the same thing. While many team changed their business scope and forgive the project in the middle since it can't bring short profit. Sometimes, the team find more fast ways to get more money. They would not like to stay and waste time. There are seldom teams can stay in one area patiently but they ones stay would like to be industry leaders finally.

Of course, the decisive role belongs to the project team and the relevance of their product. In addition, the state of the market still matters. If the market is bullish, the chances of becoming successful in the project are greater.

You're correct, a solid team and a healthy community backing you up will most certainly get your coin to the level you wanted it to be. Projects who are dedicated into making their project successful are always gearing towards real partnerships (https://www.contentos.io/?utm_source=lx) in their genre and in the blockchain space. I've seen some teams where they lost their communities trust because of the lack of communication, which I think is a strong piece for the team's devs to consider.

Same for startups in non crypto world. Team is key point of every project. Second one is idea in general. Thats why big companies prefer to buy teams rather than steal idea

Many of the projects just have someone that thinks he has an idea of how to do something but lacks the basic skills and competence so he just go forward and starts looking for people. From my experience, many of them go to large freelance websites to look for people to work with them and when things get hard and hard, the so call team will start to leave one after the other until you see one day that the so-called CEO is the new admin manager of the project telegram group. BNOW, Kickcity, infracoin, Productivist, all end this way  ;D

I believe experience aside; every successful projects in the crypto currency has had qualities such as hardwork, persostence; good team; good decision making skills and a bit of luck

Coupled with favoring hypes around the crypto currency space

It could be very easy to say what you think as it relates to the reason for several projects failure in the cryptocurrency space. In my opinion, Many projects are concerned about the returns to be derived from the project and not necessarily the job or work to be done, that explains why they get easily discouraged ones the returns are not meeting their expectations.

I always look out for such project that stand the test of a bear market. Those are projects that I can say are really established and have the potentials to strive high in the crypto space. Such projects are not easy to come by but it's always advised to do a thorough and extensive research to get such.

I agree with your opinion, that the Team is experienced and has a high flight term so they really understand where their project will go next.  So the project they worked on became truly successful.
but all that also depends on the response of the community to the project, although however many factors influence the success of a Cryptocurrency project.

I think the reason why only few project are became successful  is marketing strategies. I believe that the life of every project is based on marketing strategies. In this aspect investors will undertand well the project if marketing strategies and promotion will delivered in a right and good way. So I think this is the first aspect we need to improve to make project's success.

Perhaps many projects have overestimated their capabilities. Perhaps they thought that in the cryptosphere it is easy to make money although it is not. About frank scam and say no.

That is without a doubt an important reason but it does not tell the whole story, if a team did not had any previous experience developing blockchain projects but if they were honest about their skills and they were willing to work hard then we will see many successful projects, but that is not what we see, most of those that are releasing new coins not only do not have any experience, they do not care at all about producing a working product or service, they only want money at all costs and that attitude has created the current crisis that we are seeing in the ico market.

because only projects that are truly serious in their work will survive in a very tight crypto market.
there are a lot of cryptocurrency projects that trace exactly to existing projects and we can see many projects that only make half-finished projects and leave when there is a lot of funding from investors it mean SCAM project.
i just hope no more scam project in cryptocurrency.

And what prevents large, serious and smart people from creating new projects that will also all reach their goals?
Or what prevents brilliant students from building a team to create an idea to raise funds and bring everything to life?
Of course, from most projects, as it usually happens, most of them will not achieve their goals, but it always has been.

Quality over quantity. The quality projects don't copy the other team's work, that's why these projects can be successful on the fundraising goal. Modern financial technologies have different qualifications which can't be found inside whitepaper of the failed projects. Few projects understand the needs of the crypto investors and they work with the different reserve plans if something unexpected happens.

It is not only the team behind the project that has a large influence on the success of the project. The product that was delivered and how to attract investors to invest in the project to get enough funds so that the project can run and be successful. Indeed, a professional and experienced team will consider all of these things in order to be achieved, but the products they carry must have innovation and be different from what ever existed.

most projects are successful because the developer and the team can manage their projects well, besides if the project has a good road map and the team's reputation has extensive experience about the project, it is likely that the project can achieve the targets set.

We are still at bear market and most project are down once enter the market.
In addition, ICO is not successful before as many groups are just scamming people. If IEO became more successful that is the reason that investors will be active again.

I do not agree with you

For me it's obvious that projects fails at the most important thing to exist: What's the real problem that you project will solve?

You can have professionals, great devs, community etc, but if your project doesn't have utility, it'll die, no matter what

Crypto experience is the main factor, agree. But another factor is perfect timing - if ICO is being held on a bear market, usually it fails. Saw some cases when the team was trying very hard, but failed in fact, because of the total panic at the market.

the reason few projects get successful because they see what others don't and they have the optional to successfully launched the project.

  I agree with your point of view. Most of the bounty hunters they decided to join the project were because they saw the project had good developers as well as geinue / pro teams. It also helps investors to trust and invest in that project. So they will succeed more easily than teams without crypto experience

ICO is not only about idea or product that you are offering it also about  branding, some of the ICO they don't market their very well and very lack of communication to connect their investors.

The field of ICO and now IEO is already oversaturated with various projects that often repeat the same ideas. Even theoretically, all projects cannot be successful.

I partially agree with you, but it’s not only the team’s experience. There are a huge number of factors. An experienced team does not guarantee success.

Usually the main reason that makes the project does not work is due to lack of funding and results in failing to run the project. of the several projects that I have seen, most of the reasons are their funding. other than that the team is not serious in developing

The great majority of successful projects have not even attempted to solve real world problems. I don't even think that's a consideration for most investors.

I agree most of the success of the project depends on funding because developers need to pay something and advertising needs to be promoted.  But it is also very important which product is the result and what is its feature.

There is no space for every altcoin, only for the best one. Like in normal life, only few people become successful, there is not enough wealth for all, think about it in this way.  ;)

Many projects that are coming into crypto worlds are been built by teams that have no experience about crypto at all and this is why many projects that appeared to have good ideas failed in the end because they lacked the knowledge to move forward. Most of these projects too are also bringing what already exist in the crypto world instead of bringing something new and these are the reasons why only few projects with dynamics are becoming successful.

I agree that behind a successful project there must be an experienced developer team. New projects that emerge sometimes do not have an advisor or an experienced team in the cryptocurrency world so they cannot handle the complexity that occurs on the blockchain.

It takes a team that has an excellent experience. Many projects fail because the managed team is not professional. In addition, many people are irresponsible and just want to earn money. Better stay alert and do some research before you join the project. And follow a team that is capable of working well.

Besides that, the team will not be afraid even if the market still at the bear market, and they insist on continuing the project no matter whatever the market situations. They need to hard work for the project and to make their investor satisfaction with their project so they can grow big in the future. But unfortunately, not many projects can realize that, and they choose to stay quiet than to explain what is going on with their project.

The investor will not be comfortable with that because they need to know everything about the project so they could still support the project. The team should give the right information to the public, so they don't think that the project will scam them.

That’s why any time I see people bring up questions on how they can tell which project is worth investing , I usually see a lot of people mentioning whitepaper, but I always suggest that they first look out for the team and get to know who the teams are. I am not saying they shouldn’t check out the white paper, but knowing the team that are running the project is very important. Even scammers knows that, that’s why some of them will pretend to be who they are not until you find out.

A good team will be able to run a project perfectly with the experience they have had in the past, they will able to know who and who to connect and where to promote and how to sort out every problems they are having. But if you just go through the white paper, it might be very good , but as long as the team is just a bunch of newbies that doesn’t know what they are doing, they are likely to fail, despite having a good plan, because they wouldn’t know how to carry out that plans and where to start it from.

Even if others are newbies and there is one good person who is an expert in their team, then it’s likely that the project is going to be successful cause that one person will be able to connect the rest of the team to the pros in the business.

I do not think being a pro team alone and having the experience is enough to make a project successful. Any successful project must have invested a huge fund into marketing and listing on exchanges. Most of the failed projects with good team usually do not have the fund and people have lost trust in ICO's, so not easy way to raise funds.

seeing from the progress that is running we certainly know very well, why only a few projects succeed,many new projects have stopped midway so there is no support, after a few moments then a scam happens

Many projects fail only because their developers initially wanted to make a lot of money and not create a quality project. Thirst for money does not allow them to come up with something good and realize it.
Those developers who set themselves the goal of creating a quality product and, thanks to it, make some money - they come to success.

Not only in cryptocurrency, in any field, if it is not supported by an experienced team will not get the maximum benefit. Moreover, cryptocurrency is still something new, many people who want to use it even though they have minimal experience.
So we must be selective in choosing projects that we will support. Make sure the developer team is trusted, the network is wide, the strategy is good and the product is relevant.

Those team might actually be good in the area of the business they are proposing, but many of them lack the blockchain application idea, and you see them hiring blockchain developer that does everything, and once the developer is done, he leave them to their fate, but because of lack of their understanding like the op said, they tend to have a bad management off it.

Before anyone can really think of applying this new technology first, they ought to have thoroughly learn about the blockchain and probably even take a course in it first before thinking of coming up with a system that will be a product of blockchain technology.  I believe the newer projects would be learning now and be correcting the mistakes that made the older ones failed woefully.

Left to me the main reason why only few projects succeed is because it is only few projects that offer value and real life use cases/usage.
A lot of projects gets listed in the cryptocurrency market everyday but most of them just offer things that are not yet available or achievable and expect to get accepted immediately. Forgetting that people are not concerned about your technology but the product you offer that can better their lives.

You are very right
The situation in most cases is that project developers are all out to make the token pump and dump all supplies on investors

And it’s one reason why there are so many shortermism in crypto currency

Advertising. I think the reason is primarily in it. Even if a very weak project spends many millions of dollars on advertising with the help of well-known advisers, pays for advertising in popular online publications, attracts a large number of professional PR and advertising managers, conducts a good bounty campaign, such a project will be successful at investors.
"Now people pay more attention primarily to the bright wrapper of candy than to its taste."

I think that projects become successful not for the reasons of good team, good product, but for the good management and a part of a luck.

Few projects become successful, maybe the announcement of them is better than another, it depends on team and it can be on chance. Why chance? Because we saw Dogecoin was successful than other projects. Another project can work themselves, but Dogecoin was created only for joking. It can be only called a chance. We would say experience is also important, but if we make a little research, as mentioned above, we can see a lot of projects failed, that have a lot of experience and they were not scammed.

I agree they do not have real experiences to create a platform, in fact, some of these devs are just hiring coders to set up a platform or create a concept for their project, now in 2019 there are no real projects, that deserves a big buzz in the community,  or will have a chance to hit the market big.

These reasons are very true but I also think that the main reason behind why a lot of new crypto projects fail before they hit the mainstream market is that, these projects do not provide any significant solution to gaps seen in both the crypto ecosystem and the world financial ecosystem or specific answer for a particular problem in the entire world in general. Once these projects do not contribute any specific value to the world and the crypto space, they are very irrelevant to investors.

Projects that makeup teams of people with little experience in the target areas are big mistakes. How can the less experienced person determine a good strategy to deal with the problems that often arise? That's why analyzing the development team is one of the analyzes that must be done before joining a project. One easy step is to observe their social media and profile.

There are lots of such project. You might appreciate the fact that they did not at least scam people, but saying or assuming you know, when you do not know and not ready to accept others who could provide solution can lead to an outright failure.  Not every project should be lunched with the idea of cryptocurrency.

Original ideas comes from a good developers who really have a sets of goals to achieve, those who just copied and only here to earned pennies would not succeed in the long run, all of those trash projects will die along the way, investors are getting wisers from time to time and will no longer to be impress by good promises without real products to show up, while the team that have a great visions with projects that they've created will continue to progress and from the scratch they will improve and get enough exposures to rise high.

Having a good idea is not enough, for example, you already have the shape you want to draw but your hands are not able to draw it because it is not a painter, every project must have a pro team to make great project plans and they can develop projects according to the roadmap.

This is where team performance is needed in promoting their projects, so that, the funds collected can be used optimally in future project development and one of the important things are how their products can be accepted in the market so that the project will continue to grow and live after token sales and the listing of their tokens on the market.

in a cohesiveness team to work in advancing on a project must be really active in a relationship with investors and good to serve consumers in sharing social media because social media triggers the progress of the program to be launched, has a concept that is both clear and very transparent in the matter funding.

So much has to be taken into consideration in setting up a project. The truth is that it's more easier said than done because the beginning process of an exchange is quite a hideous task and requires so much effort. With an experienced team who are committed to the success of the project, a project should do well.

Only few projects become succesful and this will continue to happen because many new projects out there are bringing into the crypto market or industry ideas or projects that already exist, there is no innovative or new ideas behind these new projects and only few are trying to bring something new to the crypto market and these few will continue to be succesful because they have taken their time to learn the market to know what the market lacks.

Experience and track record are important for success in life but unfortunately some projects promoters do not have them, how do you expect them to be successful

Crypto projects are really unpredictable, you will need luck more than research to achieve good results in crypto either when investing or promoting new projects as well, projects with experienced team members do end up a failure too so after doing good research on projects you will still pray not to run out of lucks

In my opinion, successful projects depend a lot on investors and marketing. If they have a lot of big investors, it will certainly be IEO at the major exchanges

yes you are right .. should if you make a new project the team really understands in the crypto world. we call justin sun he is a former ripple official but he wants to make a new idea so as to create a tron and see tron is now ranked 14th top coinmarketcap

I think a lot of factors can be reason why project is failed or not. But maybe price in market can be something that be used if the project is success or not. Like maybe when it is reach more than ICO price, although for a short time, maybe can be considered success, about investors, it is their choice to sell their tokens or not. But there are many more developers who only think to get short money for themself.

most of the time their profiles are just fake, when people who have experience in the crypto world they always have a solution not just the words "soon". Development is also clearer, those who have experience will be more careful in making their roadmap know which is more needed first

the developer seems to ignore the future of the project for the long term and look for profit for a moment, so that when there is a pump, the price of the dump is also deeper, and in the long run the project has no progress, so it becomes a junk coin. indeed we have more projects like this

in my opinion the main thing that makes the project successful is the developer and the team because they have full control of the project they want to run, if the developer has good experience in managing the previous project the project is likely to run well but now investors are also smarter in choosing projects and many of them are interested in real project products.

of course all of the projects created are only a few that can be successful and get a lot of money collected depending on how the team is in the project and depending on what platform is developed, so the concept developed is good and very useful for many people then it will definitely be successful.

Not always even a professional team can make a project successful. In general, success depends on many factors. There are many interesting projects, but their relevance and need to the market is overestimated, so they fail and the project does not receive proper development even with a strong team. If a project with its product appeared at that time when the market needed it, then the likelihood that the project will be successful is growing.

The success of a project because the team can manage their project correctly, they can develop the project according to their road map, but at this time we know that a bad market situation also affects investor interest, many investors are currently reconsidering before investing in a project. but I'm sure the key is only in the team and also the project developer.

Logically, projects with pro teams inside will be choose by the investor. The teams must be able to control in great way for their projects. Now, the investor really smart and carefull in choosing projects. They will be more interested  in projects which manage by capable team and already has much experiences in handle project.

by looking at the development of the project for now is very difficult and very difficult to guess its success, a successful project for now that is of sufficiently high quality has a very experienced team and active marketing, the most important is that the product or performance has proven to work and is very real often successful and directly entered in exchange, now many abal abal projects are widely marketed in various ICOs and IEOs just to deceive investors' money but are not real in terms of their work

What makes a team strong is not only their intellect, but also their ability to drive the project to any length, there are some people that are too calm for a project, too calm in the sense that they are not aggressive about it, they have the idea and they create the product, but to the push to drive the product is not there, and they wait for all manner of external factor to influence the project in their behalf and that is why they don’t get to be known.

Take a brief look at binance, despite that binance already got its hype, the CEO still did not stop there or relent on just the exchange alone, but he often do come up with other additional features that would make the project to keep getting popularity and that is why is succeeding more than every other exchanges that you see out there.

I am not going to doubt the OP on this. A typical example is the CEO of miracle tele who thinks everything should be decided by him alone and this is so boring in this type and level of world. There is no team work and this affirms the lack of professionalism that the OP was saying. Many projects have forgotten that to be successful, it doesn't take the whole years of their live but rather just a professional tactics to be so.

I totally agree with your opinion,, cause Professional and expert development and advisory teams are a reason why a project can be successful and fail ... as you said when a project has a good and experienced team it will produce a project that grows well ... and if the project does not have a good team so it tends to fail .. then the work team will determine the success of a project

Totally agree with you. If a project want to be a success one then they need to be a great team management. In my opinion there is couple of things need for be a success project and team effort is one of them. No matter when you lunch your project if you have good plan and pro teams you don't need to be  worry for your project. Because they know which problem need to be solved in bad time.

You are partly right, but there is one very important reason why everything is not so in projects as we would like. Most of them were created not for the sake of the product but for the sake of the team’s earnings. The product was created only in order to provide the ICO participant with their intentions or even nothing was created at all, but there were only promises. Also, projects don’t follow their roadmap at all, and there was silence in the chat where the dialogue used to go.

The marketing strategies of these start-up projects play a big role in the success of a project and well, those that implement the best strategies often get invested in. A project’s team should be all hands-on deck to ensure the success of that project. People will invest in something that they feel is legit.

I would add that highly motivated people without experience still will be able to run the project more or less successfully from a scratch.

I agree that marketing is one of the factors that determine the success of a project. but, I agree with the writer, that the most important thing is how professional a team is with what they do. in the case of sales, an experienced team will definitely create an accurate marketing strategy concept so that investors are easier to reach. some of the successful projects this year made sales in a very popular market.

therefore, seeing the team's expertise and completeness will be very good going forward. some projects have good concepts and get large investment funds, but because the team doesn't have a lot of experience, it makes the project slowly less attractive.

the first is experience and the second is marketing products.
If the team has extensive experience in managing previous projects, of course, investors will support it.
in addition, the team also needs a good marketing strategy in offering products to the market because that is what will determine the good and bad luck of a project.

There are many reasons why only few projects become successful in the cryptocurrency industry and only few understands this. Many of these few projects are failures from previous projects and sat back to work on their weaknesses. Many of these few projects are successful because they are tried to bring something unique to the cryptocurrency industry as in the case of bitrue with their power piggy feature.

You cannot give what you do not have. A tea that has no experience about cryptocurrency and no technical know how, cannot deliver, present or give what is not in their power.
What baffles me most is that, these same team might raise or might have them donated some funds too,  which mismanage the fund, by setting wrong priorities.

Not only that. Most the time, those newbie team tends to seek more profit than the development of their project, no wonder they are going to fail in the long run. Also, most of the projects that are "failing" are scams anyway. That's why only few genuine projects are getting recognize in the cryptocurrency space.

the word failed does not mean "scam", failure of a project can be caused by project funds that do not reach the target so that the team prefers to terminate their project. if the scam project indicates that the team embezzled the project funds, they left without a trace and there will be no hope for the success of the project.

I think no matter how experienced and professional the team of a certain project if people/investors wouldn't like to invest they will not succeed because they will not have funds to develop their project. A project must be quality, have a solid team which are active in developments, promotion and attending blockchain events in this way people will trust and invest on the project.

All of these developers with experience in other projects have been beginners, I just think it's an exaggeration to think that only veterans can have a good idea and a good project execution.

But it is certainly much more reliable and safer to invest in a project with an experienced team behind it.

Because the truth is they don’t really have intentions to be in crypto to help and progress but the reason he they are here is to scam and bag money easily from the misleading victims,and many of them are using fake team and fake threads
But these teams and project is really hard to find now,they are rare and I think endangered now 😂

that's right, even though the development team is very experienced and professional, if one of the criteria that you say is not in the project then the project will not be able to attract the attention of many investors and the project will fail.

currently investors are very careful in choosing projects, so each development team must pay attention to everything correctly and well. if everything looks good then investors will be interested to join.

I would never say that only veterans will be able to create a good cryptocurrency. But at the same time, let me ask you something. Will you be willing to invest in some altcoin, which is being developed by a few college students with no previous experience in this sector? I would avoid such projects, even if they have a good idea and project execution plan. The project may be good... but we need to think about the viability as well. With such a team, will they be able to get the necessary funding?

This is very right, it doesn't really matter when a project enters the market, they can withstand the bearish market as long as they have a solid team (professional) with working ideas. Also with good community it can help grow the project giving publicity to the project.

I don't know man, the few good projects that I am hopeful to be very successful because of the strong team has now left their teams or project to enjoy the money they have raised. There are still projects that keep on developing their project but they are not as good as the ones the once existed in the top 100 cmc. I will only consider a project successful if they translate in real profitable business.

Investment projects now are still not in good state. Investors are still afraid to join any ICO or public sales due to scam projects.
This will take more time before gaining the healthy community like before and i hope IEO will bring back things the way it use to be.

To end it all , they are greed and looking for free money as usual for every one believe that crypto is a free money thing which has result in lots of project coming out everyday with no purpose or product to back it up , I still much believe in crypto power which will change the world and selecting the kind of project I buy and invest in even the ieo ones are most the shit .

projects with experience team members give the investors more confidence and trust in the project that's why they do last long and probably becomes a successful project.

easy to say but hard to find a valid project like you said. most projects are now almost like valid projects, in this case I'm stuck on the MiracleTele project, have you ever heard? if so, that's one example as you say ... they have a strong team, professional developers, quality products and even some other crew members look real. but in the end they embezzled investor funds as well as many prize hunters stuck in their exchanges.

I agree that the developer team must inform investors of every project development because investors need certainty in producing the product. Without good communication to investors, a project can lose confidence and this is very dangerous for the prices in the market

I was able to verify from personal experience that the team in the project plays a big role for success. Somehow I participated in one project and at the end of the company the terms of payment changed, payments were cut. When I asked the administrator why so? He replied that they were not professionals and had incorrectly calculated their strength, etc. At the moment, this project wants to conduct a token sale again, but already through IEO. I believe that this is a vivid example of a team’s lack of professionalism and, as a result, changing conditions and transferring the development of the project to the future. However, one thing pleases that the admin admitted that he and his team are not professionals.

This is somewhat true, but it is not accurate. Although there are many projects that fail, there are other projects that may succeed without team members having participated in previous projects.
The ability and skill of the team are determined by the success of the project.

There are many factors involved behind the success of any project.A solid idea, a professional team and great marketing strategies. if any project with common idea is developed by even professional trades it may not achieve the desires success. No doubt a dedicated and professional team is required to build any strong idea and to make it reality. Many new projects lack all these factors, either those projects are not backed by any strong product or lack in professional development of the idea, even some projects fail due to lack of good marketing. Before choosing any new project to invest one should consider everything required for a successful project.

Yes, for a long time, the status of projects was not so good when fraudulent projects appeared and attacked investors, a long-term consequence is that investors are always afraid and do not want to spend more money on projects, besides, developers also feel depressed with the same situation. And of course, with such a low level of investment, the opportunity is only for projects with enough potential and convincing investors, people don't want to focus on junk projects, and that is why only very few projects can be listed and developed

It’s all about transparency, great team , good support , and healthy community ! Any failed project  must have missed any or some of these qualities ! Successful project have them all ! I always say that success has a path , no matter what you do if you know how to thread the path you will succeed!

basically they really want to make a quality project, and are supported by the experience of a team that has been tested to overcome problems that arise. by looking at the seriousness of the performance of the teams, the investors are interested, so there is a symbiosis of mutualism from various parties,
unfortunately these things are not owned by most projects

Here you can find some reasons why most of projects are not successful:

- they are not original and just copy ideas from other existing projects;
- no vision
- team's members have zero experience in crypto/marketing projects
- their products/services have no real added value for users.

right, that some important points that need to be considered in seeing a project. some teams may be in a hurry to immediately run a project that they want to build, and it ends up not as expected. a strong and professional team will certainly have a broad vision and cover the needs that are currently really needed. it will create new ideas that have not even been thought of by others. things like that can also make the project easier for success.

Many con artists are in crypto space already and they are doing their best to steal from people by feeding them what they want from projects, stolen whitepapers and stole identities everywhere, lacl of regulation is really making these criminals walking free and they are making crypto looks bad to new investors

TRUST, still luck of trust from investors to new project coming in cryptocurrency.
Trust is just a word but hard to get once broken, and it is broken since a lot of ICO project were scammed.
I hope that this can be heal by this IEO now.

One word, competition! There are many of them, but just few of them can be successful. There are many factors that can affect the project, in a good or bad way. Team has to be good, their idea needs to be great, they need to have strong community, supporters. They need to have a good start, and to be qualified for the job they are doing.

Thank you for this, most people or rather investors are yet to understand that a great project isn't one built on hype or by the recommendation of so called experts, but instead a project built by a team with vast experience in what they are offering. Thus, when this type of team comes together to build whatever they want, things will fall into place as the project will speak for itself which is backed up by its working products. In the same way, with the project being on the path to success, the community will grow tremendously while attracting the right investors.

To me most of these projects are not suppose to be a stand alone project in the first place, but what we see is that a successful project will have team and when one of the team member has an idea on a new feature to implement into the project to make it more successful, he moved away and launch a new platform. To me I don't see any project in the space now apart from Ethereum that has the chance of success