|
Title: Bitmex Research vs Craig Wright Fraud (Faketoshi) Post by: dragonvslinux on October 15, 2019, 03:40:01 PM https://blog.bitmex.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/BitMEX-Research-Logo-Color-RGB.png (https://blog.bitmex.com) Bitmex Research vs Craig Wright: 13 Part Tweet Storm Courtesy of @BitMEXResearch (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch), October 13th 2019. Further reading: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.0) Click on images for larger versions. Note this is a collated post with links & mark up, not original content. (1/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183487951227047937) Craig Wright is speaking at @ForumChallenge (https://twitter.com/ForumChallenge) this week in London, in a session entitled “What was your purpose as Satoshi writing the Whitepaper?” Please see below some of the court rulings and fraud accusations related to Mr Wright Source: https://cc-forum.com/agenda/ https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyYBFzX4AAtmdU?format=jpg&name=small (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyYBFzX4AAtmdU?format=jpg) (2/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183488141216354304) In a 2005 case, in an Australian court ruling against Mr Wright, the judge mentioned that there were “doubts about his credibility”, due to contradictory evidence Source: http://austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2005/368.html https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyYMFNXUAA49VJ?format=png&name=small (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyYMFNXUAA49VJ?format=png) (3/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183488357814472705) Mr Wright appears to have edited his blog dated 2008, in 2015, to make it look like he was writing a cryptocurrency paper at the time, while a 2014 snapshot of the blog does not include this cryptocurrency comment Sources: http://web.archive.org/web/20151003011022/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com.au/2008_08_24_archive.html, http://web.archive.org/web/20140602022658/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com.au/2008_08_24_archive.html https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyYYFfXkAYsN8l?format=jpg&name=360x360 (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyYYFfXkAYsN8l?format=jpg) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyYYFlWoAA9wPp?format=jpg&name=360x360 (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyYYFlWoAA9wPp?format=jpg) (4/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183488468816662528) According to @DrFunkenstein6 (http://htttps://twitter.com/DrFunkenstein6), Mr Wright may have submitted an email to the court for the Kleiman case, where the date and date implied by the email signature timestamp are inconsistent Quote from: Dr. Funkenstein6 @DrFunkenstein6 (https://twitter.com/DrFunkenstein6/status/1118229116711518211) Craig Wright just submitted a provably fake email in court for the Kleiman case. @PeterMcCormack (https://twitter.com/PeterMcCormack) and @adam3us (https://twitter.com/adam3us), you may find this interesting! https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D4S_VdgXoAEfltn?format=jpg&name=small (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D4S_VdgXoAEfltn?format=jpg) (5/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183488560831311873) According to @jimmy007forsure (https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure), Mr Wright may have submitted another email to the court for the Kleiman case dated in 2008, when the domain is question was only registered in 2009 Quote from: SeekingSatoshi @jimmy007forsure (https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1165776816943976448) This email was blown apart ages ago. But BSV fans still seem to think its legit and was provided by Ira Kleiman and thus proves Craig is Satoshi .. Sorry its another forgery and Craig handed the doc over under discovery. Craig is a liar, fraud and a bloody idiot. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EC2r09fVUAAdjST?format=jpg&name=900x900 (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EC2r09fVUAAdjST?format=jpg) (6/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183488748689842176) Court transcripts from the Kleiman case appear to imply that Wright backdated messages he sent on Bitmessage, because the software was not released at the time on the screenshot Mr Wright provided Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/421765199/gov-uscourts-flsd-521536-261-1#from_embed?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=100652X1574425X601bafb21062f76b9a122e2322edb2c7&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyYvicXkAEm5Vc?format=png&name=900x900 (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyYvicXkAEm5Vc?format=png) (7/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183488913886928898) Mr Wright may have claimed to have a PhD in Computer Science from Charles Sturt University on his Linkedin profile, however a Forbes article implies this may not be the case Sources: https://archive.is/XnLQd, https://forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2015/12/11/bitcoin-creator-satoshi-craig-wright-lies-hoax/#46034df67947 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyY5EeX4AMWnd8?format=png&name=small (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyY5EeX4AMWnd8?format=png) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyY5ElWwAAUdfE?format=png&name=small (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyY5ElWwAAUdfE?format=png) (8/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183489097211486208) A recent article by Sam Williams indicates that Mr Wright plagiarised some academic papers, copying large chunks of text from other papers Source: https://medium.com/@samwill102244/anatomy-of-a-fraud-a-deep-dive-into-one-of-craig-wrights-plagiarized-papers-96bc8624fc12 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyZDeMX0AEYHEI?format=jpg&name=small (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyZDeMX0AEYHEI?format=jpg) (9/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183489185640042498) According to @kyletorpey (https://twitter.com/kyletorpey), a lawsuit against Craig Wright claims Wright used a computer-generated font called Otto to forge Dave Kleiman's signature Quote from: Kyle Torpey @kyletorpey (https://twitter.com/kyletorpey/status/968187874268114944) The $10 Billion lawsuit against Craig Wright claims Wright used a computer-generated font called Otto to forge Dave Kleiman's signature and acquire hundreds of thousands of bitcoins. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DW-xuN2VAAIYm31?format=jpg&name=small (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DW-xuN2VAAIYm31?format=jpg) (10/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183489357627478016) Mr Wright appears to have claimed to have had one of the world’s fastest supercomputers called “C01N”, however according to a @ZDNet (https://twitter.com/ZDNet) article the supplier he mentioned denied having any relationship with Mr Wright Source: https://zdnet.com/article/sgi-denies-links-with-alleged-bitcoin-founder-craig-wright https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyZSZiWoAYIBrd?format=jpg&name=small (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyZSZiWoAYIBrd?format=jpg) https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyZSZkXUAAvhP9?format=jpg&name=small (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyZSZkXUAAvhP9?format=jpg&name) (11/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183489483649552385) Mr Wright claims to be entitled to over 1 million Bitcoin in the “Tulip Trust”, which trust documents show was created in 2011. However, as @MyLegacyKit (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit) points out, documents imply that Mr Wright may have acquired the company as late as 2014 Quote from: Arthur van Pelt - Dragon Industries @MyLegacyKit (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1156138825825116160) For those who still think this Tulip trust thing is a genuine set up in 2011/2012, please pay attention now. In the Kleiman v. Wright lawsuit we found out the following. The Tulip Trading Limited trust was requested by Craig Wright on October 16, 2014 as a "shelf company". https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EAtuIW7XUAAfoaL?format=jpg&name=small (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EAtuIW7XUAAfoaL?format=jpg) (12/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183489644178083841) In May 2016 Mr Wright claimed he was about to release a message & signature proving he was Satoshi, however as the BBC points out, he "backed out" and all he produced was a signature “that could be found via a search engine” Source: https://bbc.co.uk/news/technology-36213580 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyZjXLWkAIbR4n?format=jpg&name=900x900 (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EGyZjXLWkAIbR4n?format=jpg) (13/13) (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1183489772519600134) And finally. The 2019 court ruling in the case between the estate of David Kleiman and Mr Craig Wright concluded that Mr Wright "willfully created fraudulent documents" and acted in "bad faith" Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.277.0.pdf Quote from: BitMEX Research @BitMEXResearch (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1166634862780006400) The court ruling in the case between the estate of David Kleiman and Mr Craig Wright has been published The court reaches damning conclusions against Mr Wright, who "willfully created fraudulent documents" and acted in "bad faith" https://courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.277.0.pdf https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EDC4OHEX4AA642g?format=png&name=900x900 (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EDC4OHEX4AA642g?format=png) https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEEZ0aCeXoAAyC-j.jpg (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.0) Sourced from @BitMEXResearch (https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch) tweet storm, October 13th 2019 Further reading: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.0) Title: Re: Bitmex Research vs Craig Wright Fraud (Faketoshi) Post by: TheNewAnon135246 on October 15, 2019, 05:38:37 PM Their tweet storm is still only a snippet of all the information about Craig being a fraud.
Title: Arthur van Pelt vs Craig Wright Fraud (Faketoshi) Post by: dragonvslinux on October 16, 2019, 07:16:09 AM Their tweet storm is still only a snippet of all the information about Craig being a fraud. Perfect summary of Craig's forgeries and lies: https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242265864187904?s=19 Quote from: Arthur van Pelt - Dragon Industries @MyLegacyKit (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit), October 16th 2019 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242265864187904) Craig Wright - The TL;DR Fraud Timeline Summary -No Blacknet whitepaper -Handfuls of plagiarisms -Contempt of court verdict -Didn't write Bitcoin whitepaper -No fibre to Bagnoo -No Bitcoin email to Dave Kleiman -No early paper with 90% overlap with Bitcoin whitepaper 1/10 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242265864187904) -Didn't pay for bitcoin dot org -Many forgeries on his blog -Rewrites history of Hal Finney, Martti Malmi & others -Didn't mine Bitcoin as Satoshi -Couldn't have used Bitmessage -Microsoft Patch Tuesday didn't ruin Genesis block -Couldn't have used Bitcoin-Qt client in 2009 2/10 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242267063803909) -Lies about Bitcoin reusing public keys -Lies about USA Bitcoin mining location -Lies about Hal Finney's first mining -No mining son in 2010 -Only learns about Bitcoin in July 2011 -No mining to Panama trust -No Tulip Trust in 2011 -No locked files in Tulip Trust 3/10 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242268338823169) -No 1,100,111 BTC in Tulip Trust -No 215,140 BTC mining contract -No 650,000 BTC loan -No 821,050 BTC payment to trustee -No 300,000 BTC for W&K shares -No 380,103 BTC payment for gold/software -No 650,000/700,000 BTC market buy for $30 million 4/10 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242269664219137) -Never proved large BTC transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain -Never mentioned by investigative journalists -Forged emails with Dave about Tulip Trust -Backdated Directors/Shareholders in companies -Created bogus company figures -Only buys Bitcoin in 2013 -Can't code 5/10 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242270943485953) -Sets up court approved W&K fraud around dead Dave Kleiman -Tried to bring Ira Kleiman into his Bitcoin fraud -Lied about Dave Kleiman being involved in Bitcoin -Lied to ATO -Lied about his role in W&K -Lied to Bitcoin Belle -Doxed himself to Wired/Gizmodo 6/10 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242272092725249) -Lied to Jon Matonis, Gavin Andresen, mainstream media -Failed multiple key signing sessions (notable: Sartre) -Used fake & backdated Satoshi PGP keys -Lied about running SGI supercomputers -Lied about 2 Charles Sturt University PhD's -ATO tax fraud verdict $1.7 million 7/10 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242273221074944) -Makes fraudulent $54 million R&D tax concession claim -Doesn't have Satoshi's communication style -Truckloads of articles questioning or calling out his Satoshi claim -Promised 10,000 patents, delivers less than 250 -Does numerous failed SegWit, LN & BTC death threats 8/10 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242274407981056) -Gets sued by Ira Kleiman for fraud & much more -Kleiman v. Wright lawsuit is treasure dome of forgeries, from false signatures to backdated emails, pulled false evidence & perjury -Registered false Bitcoin copyright claim -Gives bad reputation to people in inner circle 9/10 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242275540439040) And then Craig Wright is surprised that people call him a fraud. So he starts a handful of libel suits, and expects to win them with rusty staples and coffee stains... 🤦♂️ 10/10 (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242276710731779) Source: Arthur van Pelt - Dragon Industries (https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1184242265864187904) collated tweets storm, October 16th 2019 Title: Re: ??? vs Craig Wright Fraud (Faketoshi) Post by: dragonvslinux on October 16, 2019, 07:16:35 AM Reserved (for any more tweet storms) ;)
Title: Peter McCormack vs Craig Wright Fraud (Faketoshi) Post by: dragonvslinux on January 09, 2020, 12:44:55 AM Just stumbled across this piece of fraud that seems to of slipped under the radar, and notably wasn't referenced in Bitmex's tweet storm:
https://talkimg.com/images/2023/09/10/mB82H.png Source: https://twitter.com/PeterMcCormack/status/1164384928781557765 Here's the metadump of the archived pdf showing the create date chronologically after the modify date ::) Code: File Type : PDF As a reminder this version of the whitepaper published to SSRN (https://web.archive.org/web/20190819142949/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3438956) [archive] (has been removed (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=343895)) was referenced by CoinDesk in 2018 (https://www.coindesk.com/craig-wright-again-claims-authorship-of-bitcoin-white-paper), while Peter only tweeted about the fraud a year later. |
