Title: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: irfan_pak10 on November 10, 2019, 03:56:37 PM I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time, Still he is reluctant to understand the matter.
Here is his accusation I don't normally post an alt report unfinished, but circumstances beyond my control (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5197305.0) have forced my hand. Unfortunately, this means the scammer might be able to cover their tracks and delete evidence. If anyone is able to continue on this investigation of these wallet addresses, I would appreciate it. I'll be able to resume my investigations in a week or two, however I need to divulge certain information now to be able to use that in the other thread. ...oh ... and I implore anyone reading this (not just those on the DT) to give these UID's Red Paint TM for being scammers/alts of scammers. 20 Accounts Connected: kabootar1234 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=319458) ( +0 / =0 / -1 ), irfan_pak10 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=350580) ( +6 / =1 / -0 ), superSTAR777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355868) ( +2 / =0 / -0 ), BTCreward (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=357490) ( +0 / =0 / -1 ), Babba D (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=374921) ( +0 / =0 / -2 ), abduluk (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=379221), neesa1124 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=379232), superstar7777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=406740), Nauro (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=403195;dt) ( +0 / =0 / -5 ), Nauro2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=410873), NxT Designs (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=419964), DabbuDESIGNS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=420951), salilBH (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=436758), moneynot (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=436771), mallukhan (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=462617), magiitr (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=462627), temp_superstar777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=486882), VPScreator (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=510931;dt) ( +0 / =0 / -5 ), MargonCreatives (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=741487;dt) ( +0 / =1 / -5 ), margon2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=875265), ...and probably: wangxinxi (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=14002) ( +0 / =2 / -1 ) Proof: niktitan132 connects Babba D (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=374921) and superSTAR777 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355868) in this thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=820714.0) through their use of wallet address 1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82 (https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82) part of Wallet [0523ba5fba] which has the following 54 wallet addresses: Code: 1Juf6G2L6oWgjQTqM4bT6krCPPYU3PGgih 0.00001363 72 587945 In the same thread quickseller posts: (15 March 2015, 01:31:27 part of the overall post) I recently sold an account to a brand new user and gave him the following address to pay me 1FTdAhi8V7ENw7pqovfVW5QNSQePi6qhUx (http://blockchain.info/address/1FTdAhi8V7ENw7pqovfVW5QNSQePi6qhUx). I received funds from 1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82 (http://blockchain.info/address/1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82) which is linked to Babba D and superSTAR777 Post #14 (https://web.archive.org/web/20191023000659/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=820714.msg10778863) user DabbuDESIGNS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=420951) is identified as also being an alt using wallet address 17F87TCKzxu9V5iNYyjauTUBWvj71nx3CG.
Related Addresses: facebook name : tushar bab link - https://www.facebook.com/pages/Crypto-Humor-Hub/705940909479518 - BCT page [link (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=709865.msg8026416#msg8026416)] [Archive (https://web.archive.org/web/20191025115157/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=709865.msg8026416)] Facebook neesa1124 facebook link is https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100008411527128 Twitter: https://twitter.com/raiderhamara https://twitter.com/neesa1124 (??Vanessa??) @abduluk1 Minter address: Mx6bfcc0e3d447db0f39087908500a654a684614a3 [Archive (https://web.archive.org/web/20191024102050/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5180961.msg52347706)] DOGEcoin wallet address DBjgqD3XCu7saH7dki6WhdsGn1nBeFQrap Miscellaneous: Post incomplete due to circumstances beyond my control. Please pic up the trail and find the remaining alt/scammers. Here is my proof: -snip- irfan_pak10 discusses a trade (https://web.archive.org/web/20191023142410/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=962358.msg10601681) giving the above wallet address 1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY in this post. If you read the entire thread discussion here (https://web.archive.org/web/20191023142407/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=962358.msg10601756) you will see irfan_pak10 then quotes the wallet address that Equinoxx has also just quoted, so there is no "mistake" in irfan_pak10 using the wallet address 1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY[/li] [/list][/li][/list] -snip- After going through your accusation, Just today I get some time to go in-depth of this accusation and found why I used the same address once which Superstar used. At that time I gave an order of designing some logos to Superstar and he created that for 0.002BTC (Proof (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=970866.msg10601776#msg10601776) ). Where in the meantime I was playing a game with the Equinoxx and I won that bet and I asked him to pay me 0.002BTC (Proof (https://web.archive.org/web/20191023142410/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=962358.msg10601681)) in the same address that Superstar asked me to pay for his designing job. If you like I can provide you Private convo made with Superstar. Also, I'm not going to remove my negative feedback on your profile, you idiot. Learn some better ways to find alts. His reply: Also, I'm not going to remove my negative feedback on your profile, you idiot. Learn some better ways to find alts. Your feedback is a retaliatory which @theymos has stated is no longer tolerated. Who would you like to nominate as your intermediary to contact me via PM? After going through your accusation, Just today I get some time to go in-depth of this accusation and found why I used the same address once which Superstar used. At that time I gave an order of designing some logos to Superstar and he created that for 0.002BTC (Proof (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=970866.msg10601776#msg10601776) ). Where in the meantime I was playing a game with the Equinoxx and I won that bet and I asked him to pay me 0.002BTC (Proof (https://web.archive.org/web/20191023142410/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=962358.msg10601681)) in the same address that Superstar asked me to pay for his designing job. If you like I can provide you Private convo made with Superstar. Also, I'm not going to remove my negative feedback on your profile, you idiot. Learn some better ways to find alts. Doesn't matter what time zone you are in there are three transactions that occurr on the 28th of February 2015 around the time of the dual postings of the 1bat... wallet address: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY?page=3 https://i.imgur.com/vMT07oK.jpg @irfan_pak10 admits to "incorrectly" posting 1Bat... as payment for a bet and @Equinoxx lists the TX https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced (https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced) as the payment to irfan_pak10 of the BTC 0.002 wager. there are only two other transactions on that date, one prior and one after. superSTAR777 asks for a payment of BTC 0.004 (http://archive.ph/WNnDk#selection-13565.0-13567.28) - yes? The above even quotes the payment request amount: http://archive.ph/en81u#selection-7579.0-7581.28 there's no mistaking the payment irfan_pak10 TO 1Bat... for the amount of BTC 0.004 So, where is it? the third payment on the 28th of February 2015 is FROM 1Bat to another wallet address... In the text exchange between irfan_pak10 and superSTAR777 In post 33 (http://archive.ph/WNnDk#selection-13621.0-13637.6) @irfan_pak10 says he has made payment and quotes the TX https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced (https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced) for BTC 0.002 @irfan_pak10 has therefore undercut superSTAR777 out of 0.002 and then on the 5th of March 2015 (post 35) asks superSTAR777 for more to do more work. But let's just back that up a little bit... @Equinoxx uses https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced (https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced) to pay irfan_pak10 in their wager. irfan_pak10 then uses the same TX to pay superSTAR777 Equinoxx pays irfan_pak10 http://archive.ph/lE0Df#selection-3089.0-3093.10 won the game please pay here: 1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced (https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced)Good game. irfan_pak10 "pays" (half) to superSTAR777 http://archive.ph/TDC79#selection-5737.0-5753.6 Good work man best of luck here is your money https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced (https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced) HAVE A GOOD TIME Thanks irfan_pak10 could argue that the 0.02 from Equinoxx was a part payment, but I don't think so. The other 0.002 payment to 1Bat... on the 28th of February 2015 is not from irfan_pak10's wallet address 1ASavcpvS9JzQxRzmiVvgboxUwAD9cqYhs - it's a totally different wallet address. https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/ba86b130974d54773503459444b368adc0fe464803eba7e75da0dffb98d91284 (https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/ba86b130974d54773503459444b368adc0fe464803eba7e75da0dffb98d91284) So, who *did* use the TX ba86b130974d54773503459444b368adc0fe464803eba7e75da0dffb98d91284 ? [Archive (http://archive.ph/v15NZ#selection-6849.0-6859.9)] I have sent you the Bitcoins , thanks for your efforts . https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/ba86b130974d54773503459444b368adc0fe464803eba7e75da0dffb98d91284 (https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/ba86b130974d54773503459444b368adc0fe464803eba7e75da0dffb98d91284) I can add 0.004 BTC if you are willing to do some changes on that Global icon because I don't really like it . thanks ~ Madness In creating a series of quick posts to give the illusion that superSTAR777 has customers irfan_pak10 has gotten himself confused who is paying whom and how much and used TX's which no one is likely to verify. Until now. Yes? You are correct. He is insane, and you are not connected until he can provide further substantiating evidence. I have left you a counter rating until Timelord either deletes your negative or explains to me personally the connection. Am quaking in my boots... Mine again: -snip- superSTAR777 asks for a payment of BTC 0.004 (http://archive.ph/WNnDk#selection-13565.0-13567.28) - yes? The above even quotes the payment request amount: http://archive.ph/en81u#selection-7579.0-7581.28 there's no mistaking the payment irfan_pak10 TO 1Bat... for the amount of BTC 0.004 So, where is it? -snip- It was a misunderstanding, I asked him to create a single logo, and he thought it was two, so he asked me 0.004BTC but in PM's I corrected him and we agreed at 0.002BTC (Which I already mentioned I can prove you, Bring anyone intermediary). But you are being you which is idiot, egocentric and immature. Also, I'm not going to remove my negative feedback on your profile, you idiot. Learn some better ways to find alts. Your feedback is a retaliatory which @theymos has stated is no longer tolerated. What about who wrongly accused someone? Is there anything that @theymos mentioned? I would like someone who can help me in flagging this guy of wrongly accusing me and wasting my time? Mine again: Doesn't matter what time zone you are in there are three transactions that occurr on the 28th of February 2015 around the time of the dual postings of the 1bat... wallet address: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY?page=3 I think you are on the wrong date here, all this transactions occurred on 27th of February 2015 not 28th of February 2015. As per I see, all that was explained by irfan_pak10 looks genuine, and the transactions match as per the explanation. There is really no benefits in attacking good members of the community overall. GMT +10 is where I am - the dates are reflective of that, hence the 28th/27th discrepancy. That transaction occurred on 27th of February 2015 https://i.imgur.com/pJ6mw3t.png https://i.imgur.com/nNd80bu.png Title: Re: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: Joel_Jantsen on November 10, 2019, 05:01:22 PM I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time That is not the right reason to create a flag against someone. I mean if you check the type of supported flags, Quote Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.) your case doesn't fit any of the above-mentioned reasons. This user violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages. This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages. Title: Re: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: irfan_pak10 on November 10, 2019, 05:03:33 PM I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time That is not the right reason to create a flag against someone. I mean if you check the type of supported flags, Quote Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.) your case doesn't fit any of the above-mentioned reasons. This user violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages. This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages. He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category. Title: Re: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: DarkStar_ on November 10, 2019, 05:36:49 PM He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category. Please post the casual/implied agreement made between you and Timelord2067. Title: Re: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: suchmoon on November 10, 2019, 06:02:54 PM He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category. It doesn't. At best it's a flag for trolling, which I must oppose. You already posted a borderline-retaliatory neg-trust rating and you should leave it at that. Title: Re: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: irfan_pak10 on November 10, 2019, 06:04:12 PM He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category. Please post the casual/implied agreement made between you and Timelord2067. It's an implied agreement, as there is no such written agreement between us. Title: Re: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: DarkStar_ on November 10, 2019, 06:06:29 PM He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category. Please post the casual/implied agreement made between you and Timelord2067. It's an implied agreement, as there is no such written agreement between us. Post the written aspect that implies an agreement of some sort. When did he state that he would exempt you from any "investigation"? Or when did he state that he would remove his negative trust? I'm not seeing any form of agreement, implied or not. What exactly was this implied agreement about? Title: Re: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: DireWolfM14 on November 10, 2019, 07:40:33 PM He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category. Many have tried to damage reputations of others around here, and many have failed. Timelord2067's review is not trusted, so it really doesn't mean much. It would be pretty hard to justify the claim that it cost you potential income, and impossible to prove that any agreement was implied. That's not proper justification for a flag, and if you create a flag under that premise then you are abusing the system. I've read your justification for using that address, and I believe you. The best thing to do at this point is for both you and Timelord2067 to remove your feedback. You left feedback for retaliatory purposes, which I think is wrong in the first place. Perhaps by rationally discussing the situation with Timelord2067 in PM you can convince him to remove his feedback. Title: Re: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: LoyceV on November 10, 2019, 08:06:32 PM He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category. It does not. Theymos is pretty clear about it:For contractual violations only, a scammer flag can be created. This is the only thing which causes the "Warning: trade with extreme caution" warning to return. It also triggers a banner similar to the newbie-warning banner which is visible to all users. A scammer flag requires 3 more supporting users than opposing users to become active. I've opposed the Flag because I think it's Flag abuse. Just yesterday (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-09_Sat_06.11h/350580.html), you were on DT2, but you're not anymore, which means you've been excluded by at least 2 DT1 users (suchmoon and DarkStar_ (http://irfan_pak10)).~snip~ Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed. You left feedback for retaliatory purposes, which I think is wrong in the first place. Agreed. I've explained my position on this in LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5191802.0).My advice: withdraw this Flag, Oppose it, and make your arguments against the accusation without the drama. Title: Re: Not wrongfully accused by Timelord2067 Post by: Timelord2067 on November 15, 2019, 06:50:37 AM I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time, Still he is reluctant to understand the matter. This is what's known as doubling down... (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackjack#doubledown) irfan_pak10 starts a thread Need 0.16 BTC [Archive (http://archive.ph/AnGA3#selection-255.0-255.14)] Post #1: 25 October 2014, 03:15:40 Quote Wanted to buy 0.16 BTC for skrill USD Post #3: 25 October 2014, 04:00:24 Quote Trade done with niktitan132 https://blockchain.info/tx/39fe9aef735ffc7d431e9bb5f2f80430303c699bb914b7d7e03b6357f652fb6f https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/39fe9aef735ffc7d431e9bb5f2f80430303c699bb914b7d7e03b6357f652fb6f Wallet Address 1MbhYTsw7orqD3ZtC9Geak7CGQ2jVntvu1 receives the BTC 0.16 is part of the Wallet BTC-e.com (https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/BTC-e.com?from_address=1MbhYTsw7orqD3ZtC9Geak7CGQ2jVntvu1) series of wallets... I'm keen to hear how the wallet address was used by two different users? Because... Wallet Address 1MbhYTsw7orqD3ZtC9Geak7CGQ2jVntvu1 is used by aNtiClocK here: [1 (http://archive.ph/TexEY#selection-3645.22-3645.56)], [2 (http://archive.ph/AA7f7#selection-1643.19-1643.53)], [3 (http://archive.ph/Je8p1#selection-3945.19-3945.53)], [4 (http://archive.ph/rc99S#selection-7439.19-7439.53)], [5 (http://archive.ph/RS9zV#selection-3007.19-3007.53)], [6 (http://archive.ph/wJchH#selection-3243.19-3243.53) (with irfan_pak10 also posting)], [7 (http://archive.ph/KAwu4#selection-4175.17-4175.51)], [8 (http://archive.ph/YrQIr#selection-7103.17-7103.51)], Let's just back up just a little bit: 23 June 2014, 17:33:12 Date Registered: imranskfuuast (see below) 02 July 2014, 01:28:13 Date Registered: irfan_pak10 05 July 2014, 05:39:53 last actual post imranskfuuast https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/16/blob29482dfba9b41953.jpeg 25 October 2014, 04:00:24 irfan_pak10 posts a TX with the wallet address 1MbhYTsw7orqD3ZtC9Geak7CGQ2jVntvu1 in thread Need 0.16 BTC ... 21 December 2014, 23:29:25 Date Registered: aNtiClocK 22 December 2014, 00:06:57 first use of wallet addess 1MbhYTsw7orqD3ZtC9Geak7CGQ2jVntvu1 by aNtiClocK http://archive.ph/lSNd1#selection-1835.19-1835.53 03 July 2015, 06:15:34 last actual post aNtiClocK 02 September 2015, 01:17:57 Last Active: aNtiClocK 16 July 2017, 05:26:08 Last Active: imranskfuuast As I indicate in this post: Are you tagging account sellers too? chronicsky (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=353680) was selling accounts here: aNtiClocK was keen to buy (http://archive.ph/VCAKI#selection-1555.0-1555.9)... In this ponzi thread (http://archive.ph/Q2vi3) (started and being promoted by irfan_pak10) in post 39 (http://archive.ph/Q2vi3#selection-15175.0-15175.103) irfan_pak10 wants to buy LPCBTC 's account therefore it is possible LPCBTC was sold to irfan_pak10. aNtiClocK posts in this ponzi thread started by irfan_pak10 saying they have joined. Notice how aNtiClocK is mentioned *before* posting (http://archive.ph/Q2vi3#selection-1903.0-1905.108)? irfan_pak10 also sells accounts in this thread: [Archive (http://archive.ph/fwsnb#selection-487.0-505.19)] irfan_pak10 uses the code imranskfuuast ( http://archive.ph/Q2vi3#selection-549.29-549.42 ) in their ponzi thread - coincidentally, there is a user imranskfuuast here on BCT as indicated above. irfan_pak10 also uses the name imranskfuuast here: [Archive (http://archive.ph/jprIZ#selection-5099.20-5099.33)] irfan_pak10 and aNtiClocK both post in the ponzi thread started by irfan_pak10 - plus they jointly post in #6 numbered archive (http://archive.ph/wJchH#selection-3243.19-3243.53) above for wallet use. So... 3 Accounts Connected: imranskfuuast (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=347000), irfan_pak10 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=350580), aNtiClocK (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=405107), Title: Re: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: fratoshi on November 15, 2019, 08:36:57 AM The same thing happened to me, this user nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618
wrongly accused me of something, i confronted him and he continue with the same sociopath pathological behavior towards me, as i was new and did not understand well this trust system i follow his steps and wait for him to support a scam, and when i found out that he was supporting VIVA-e scam i put a negative trust on nutildah profile, because if the rule apply to me because i was apparently supporting the scam exchange tradesatoshi then nutildah deserve the negative review i left on his profile, we are all the same under the forum rules. Misteriusly later the post where he was supporting the scam got deleted, but i was able to archive it with a nice tool i found on google. So my advice is, wait for that person to support a scam and then flag him as supporter of the scam as i did with the scammer nutildah Title: Re: Not wrongfully accused by Timelord2067 Post by: Timelord2067 on November 15, 2019, 11:32:08 AM ... So my advice is, wait for that person to support a scam and then flag him as supporter of the scam as i did with the scammer nutildah I'm sorry to hear that happened. Yes, from my own experiences with that person I have them on ignore as they tend to high-jack threads with their obsessive startling rants. As you can see, they hadn't posted in this thread prior to your mention of them, so they are either stalking references to their own name, (if they aren't stalking your posts). When did your encounter with this person occur? As you can see from this quote: Have just recalled that user nutildah (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618) offered their own account for sale (http://web.archive.org/web/20190704162438/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1622642.0) for a ten month period that account was up for sale by the owner. Take some advice - just ignore the tossers and don't feed the Trolls. Title: Re: Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation Post by: fratoshi on November 19, 2019, 09:01:34 AM The same thing happened to me, this user nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618 wrongly accused me of something, i confronted him and he continue with the same sociopath pathological behavior towards me, as i was new and did not understand well this trust system i follow his steps and wait for him to support a scam, and when i found out that he was supporting VIVA-e scam i put a negative trust on nutildah profile, because if the rule apply to me because i was apparently supporting the scam exchange tradesatoshi then nutildah deserve the negative review i left on his profile, we are all the same under the forum rules. Misteriusly later the post where he was supporting the scam got deleted, but i was able to archive it with a nice tool i found on google. So my advice is, wait for that person to support a scam and then flag him as supporter of the scam as i did with the scammer nutildah I never once said I supported that exchange you fucking retard. Furthermore its already been explained to you multiple times why your supporting post "misteriusly" disappeared. and i am not denying what i said, is there in the history, any one can see, not like this post from you that mysteriously got removed https://archive.md/C0XaV#selection-2387.0-2439.35 There's no "mystery" behind why it got removed. Suchmoon already explained it to you. It's you spamming the forum and the trust system with useless garbage. And using threads posted by a known troll as references, so they disappear when the troll gets nuked. Create your own threads and archive them. The person who wrote the thread you referenced was evading a ban for spamming. They got caught and their posts were deleted. Basically, you were relying on the words of a banned spammer to make your point. Congratulations. Next time you open a flag, make your own thread instead of relying on that of a ban evading spammer, so that way it won't be removed by mods. YOU are the Timelord in this situation, fuckbeans. Edit: Here's an example of what it means to "be a Timelord": In this ponzi thread (http://archive.ph/Q2vi3) (started and being promoted by irfan_pak10) in post 39 (http://archive.ph/Q2vi3#selection-15175.0-15175.103) irfan_pak10 wants to buy LPCBTC 's account therefore it is possible LPCBTC was sold to irfan_pak10. You're referencing an account for the Ponzi scheme, not a Bitcointalk account. Do Bitcointalk accounts hold BTC balances? ::) I have This account With $2.52 Balance ( Must deposit To withdrawal ) If you wan I sell $1 Worth bitcoin ;) Escrow accept I wanted to buy your account please PM me if you are still selling. I can pay you good amount for this Of course Ponzi schemes and account sales aren't good, but all this happened 4-5 years ago, so I doubt any tagging will come of it by DT members. There is no need to call me fucking retard Mr nutildah, i also explained to you that i did not support that tradesatoshi scam exchange and i did not call you a fucking retard, i even ask you to reconsider your negative trust but you are acting with an evil spirit, always insulting me and calling me things like invertebrate. Why not do peace with me, we can be friends, i am nice person if you get to know me better. Love! |