Bitcoin Forum

   If the available resources can be fair shared amongst available inhabitants this would greatly spore a happy community, state, and even nation.
 The birth of a child, the first cry of a baby, a new life should most likely bring joy and happiness but no being able to take care of the child because of low income and resources can become a night mare and very frustrating. This is a circumstance experienced by developing countries.
With few economical developments going on the level of over population in developing countries is worrisome not only to the country but to the world at large, we get to see on a daily occurrence immigrant try to legally or illegally get into a country with more prospect than theirs. Some get them self killed and to those that manages to get in "any thing to survive" becomes there watch word which can increase crime rate.

     Why are developing countries getting over populated
Developing countries are getting over population via so many reasons like

Poor education~ developing countries are struggling with poor educational system, they lack adequate family planning orientation, a family who feeds on below1$ a day can get over 8-12 kids and they see it as a blessing

Early marriage~ this is also an urgent issue that should be tackled you girls as young as 9 get pushed into marriage and start as a very early stage to give birth and when the hit menopause they must have given birth to over a dozen of kids.

Sexual crimes~ sexual offense like rape, taking advantage of the poor for sex, child trafficking, sex trafficking can cause a rise in unwanted pregnancy and over population grows.


Overpopulation is dangerous for developing countries and the government has it as a priority to educate the people on this and also look into the issue.

 

In my view, I don't think that over population of the developing countries of the world that is the major problem but mismanagement of their resources human resources inclusive, corruption and bad leadership are the are the main reason why they remain underdeveloped till today. In most of these countries you will see that corruption is a lucrative business.

It's a rather a major problem because there is lack of funds when it comes to developing countries and because of the overpopulation issues the government will have to provide social amenities for citizens so that none would be deprived meanwhile the funds used to provide these amenities could have been used for other things which would have brought capital to the country.

Overpopulation of a developing country is a problem only if government doesn't let the people do some development. Underpopulation slows development down a whole lot more. Fewer people to do the developing.

8)

In a way it's the core problem but there are some other like crime and addiction. The average African country cannot develop on its own because 80% of the population consists of uneducated morons who only eat, sleep, fuck, and get drunk (Uganda). the 20% can try to change it but when they invest and actually build something it gets destroyed by drunk morons or burglarized by organized, sober morons.

Quite, true sir. As long as the government keeps the population educated, skillful, healthy and with opportunities this population contributes to development. This becomes a problem when the population is unhealthy since more expenses for the government, more unemployment, poverty, etc. Overpopulation consumes more resources a country can produce and this becomes a problem.

The problem is the corruption and mismanagement, which are closely tied. I mean look at diamond producers in Africa and how much they are earning from just one resource. Yet majority of the population don't even have a job. A classic example of mismanagement is Venezuela, going overboard on "free" to the point they even amassed loans.

Some of these can also be linked back to foreign entities wanting to keep a cheap supply of resource that they either resort to corruption, for example de Beers or outright destabilization, for example the banana wars in Central America.

The issue of overpopulation arises when the population is rising without commensurate increase in the resources of the particular country or when the the population has outgrown the resources of the country in which case, the resources have been fully utilitsed. With the exception of certain countries, I think overpopulation is not the problem rather is the failure not to harness the amount of resources nature have bestowed unto them. Most developing countries if developing at the right proportion as biology of their citizens, there won't any need for overpopulation but because of several factors such as poor leadership, excessive believe in the supernatural rather than calling their leaders to order have continued to be the reason for effort to be focused on unnecessary things as the cause of their failure.

I don't think overpopulation has got to be a negative thing all the time. Human resource is something those type of government can make use of.

Here in India, majority of the youth are unemployed. They get into crimes, etc. And they are in millions. The government can easily put them under army employment. Would make the country strong etc. But, to get employed safeguard the borders, the government asks them what degrees they have completed etc.

I guess, the countries that can't use human resource efficiently is doomed anyways.

Over population of a developed country is more of a problem. It is certainly do here in England.

Population largely seems to be related to status of women in that society. Though there are exceptions everywhere, generally the empowered women tend to give birth to less number of children as she needs to look after her job/business and could give less time to child. Likewise a country where women are backwards or are greatly dominated by male, tend to have larger number of children.

Over population is always a problem any where and it's fast rising, England is considered as a world power and a developed country with good economical system.
According to world population review England has about 66million with a gross domestic product nominal of over $2 trillion.
Now let take a country from Africa (West Africa) like Nigeria
The population of Nigeria this year is estimated at over 200million people with a gpd of approximately 450million.
Considering this factor developing countries has more disadvantages of overpopulation

Thank goodness you said overpopulation of a developing country is 'one' of its major problem because corruption is the major problem of a developing country. For a country like Nigeria blessed with mineral resources, so abundant that if properly utilized, the rate of poverty as a result of overpopulation would have been on the low. Though Nigeria is the most populated black nation in the world and the most populated in Africa, mismanagement of funds is the major problem been faced. The GDP keeps rising as the population keeps increasing.

Philippines population is estimated as 108 million as of mid year this year. It is one of the major problem as overpopulation is affiliated with poverty, pollution, traffic and even crimes. There is more demand than supply. For a big family without stable earnings, everyday is like a survival game. Sometimes, they seek for easy money to fill up their stomach even if such doing is illegal. More people means more trash, and there are people who dont care about sanitazion, thus it cause pollution. I think, it is important to do a family planning. The government think of it also that is why they implemented a law known as the responsible parenthood and reproductive health act which tackels about family planning and others related to such. :)

Well i think it's a major problem in general. Not just in developing countries. It's a about resources and basic services being available to every citizen. Then you put in the problem of greedy old politicians and bankers who can't seem to have enough of money and power at the expense of the majority of the population. This is prevalent in third world countries where the government supply for basic necessities can't reach every part of it's population.

The country have a birthrate just slightly above replacement level and it's steadily dropping. The problem is it's the people who cannot provide basic needs that are having a dozen or so kids. The middle class tend to just have 3-5 kids. I do not agree with Duterte saying he'll limit it to 2 kids per family, China tried just 1 and they now raised it up to 2 and people still don't want to have kids. They still have a large population but a huge part of it is aging. You can't just play with demographics.

Over population may be a problem for some country but some countries like India have taken full advantage of there huge population in attracting companies for the purpose of trade. But i do agree that growth rate must be kept under check.

over population is not the problem
its only offring services to a small dense area (towns and cities) that make people congregate towards these area's to make it fel like its over crowded

we see it even in fully dveloped countries.
schools and hospitals appear cover crowded. not due to a national growth of population, but a constraining of rsourcs to particular area's

such as creating 'food deserts' by shutting down local stores and using only malls. makes people who cant afford to drive miles to a mall, unable to get a good variety of healthy foods

schools shutting down makes the students numbers per class of the remaining schools increase, without there being a massive birthrate/immigration rate from other nations

in the UK in the last 20 years the number of hospital beds have halved. it used to be 300k now its under 150k beds.. thus making it appear as overcrowding by having patients in corridors instead of wards.
but the reality is restraining the resources. not population numbers

There is no over population. There is lots of under population. Government needs lots of people to get ahead in life. People make government happen, because it's people - not machines or AI - that get things done. Does government want to go to the moon? People will do it. Does Government want to solve the energy crisis? People will do it. The only thing that government has to do is find the right incentive for the people. When they do, the people will bend over backwards to do the government's bidding. Ecclesiastes 5:9:If the king/government wants more "stuff," they need more people to make it for them. GROW THE POPULATION! INCENTIVE!

8)

Improving healthcare is one reason.
In the past in developed countries, and right now in countries with poor healthcare, people have more children because the chances of them surviving are lower.
As healthcare improves, more survive and the population grows.
In time people will have fewer children, but the cause is largely that standards of healthcare advance faster than the birth rate drops.

When we speak of the developing countries I feel they’re aware of over population issues, but since this issue is very sensitive for their citizens the governments avoid taking any harsh steps towards it. The problem of overpopulation is huge and the developing nations governments need to bring out strict laws and provide incentives to people to stop producing more than one or two kids. Do you’ll also believe that governments turn a blind eye to over population issues, because it’ll increase people’s dependence on them and they’ll get more votes in the long term.

my country no longer has anything to do with this because their passion is more concerned with religion than logic, my intention is that having many children is strictly not prohibited, but does not think about how to improve the standard of living.

The government has also deactivated the 2-child program since it slowly turned into a democratic country. gaps begin to emerge and expertise bases are no longer put forward, most impacts can only complain and demand, overpopulation in developing countries makes matters even more complex.

Western government is only out after the oil. Everything else they do is only to make them look like good people (a little bit) to the Muslims.

8)

it wasnt the europeans that stopped colonialism it was the noneuropeans, they have put themselves into the misery of the current, during colonial time there was always a possibility to join the workforce of the european colonial empire and get to the colonial regions that were constructing infrastructure.

oil isn't a big problem enough substitutes existing, the big problem in the west is now that entire savage third world tries to enslave westerners for their problems.

Of course oil isn't the problem. Finding it, owning it, and controlling it are the problems.
http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/272025-2019-11-19-billionaires-are-licking-their-chops-over-distressed-u-s-oil.htm
https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/5ga7w3/the-iraqi-war-wasnt-waged-for-oil-greg-palast

8)

Garbage,
Japan old age people diapers about to outsell baby diapers. Lots of virgin up to mid thirties, company is more important as a companion.

Over population is truly a big problem for the developing countries. If the governments are ready to be transparent and corruption free, population is not at all a big issue. Another thing as years pass the advancement will reduce the population in terms of birth, same time death too gets lowered. This is the reason for population. Well planned infrastructure thinking of future will make population to be an effective way for productive and creative growth.

The World's Shrinking Population
2.1 is needed to sustain population, Europe has 1.6 Japan 1.4 fertility rate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYZPTaV-RcQ

‘One Child Nation’
https://youtu.be/RdkHA_-xryk

Population of a country will become an issue when people don't create their own business and waiting for their governments to bring jobs,its not possible to make job opportunities for every individual on a country so any individual need to realize that and start making money on their own and increase job opportunities by yourself.

That's why I said overpopulation would be a problem in developing countries because most of the citizens wait on the government and they are not really ready to do things with their skills or knowledge

Just like I have earlier submitted. The reason why the over population is a problem is because the amount of resources that they have. With the exception of India, there are several developing nations whose population is not anywhere close to the United States but it seems that population is their only problem forgetting the fundamental things that needs to be put in place. Population is harnessed properly can be used effectively to the benefit of all. Companies wants to make profit, then they set up in places where more people would buy their products in which case, they hire. With policies that would limit the use of machines, it comes at a great advantage to the country among several others.

But we can't control from the flow of the population so we need to take some new planet which we can full that planet to start over again with advance technology but if we think that then it would be hard by the budget we have. So the solution is to stop from getting or create a new born but it was impossible to do.

In the 1900s they did population control. Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and others killed off some 200 million people in the 1900s. Now it's the medical, chemtrails, the US military and others doing it around the world.

Like you say, however, their efforts seem futile with how fast the population is continuing to grow.

8)

Agreed. Easiest proof can be found in India. I like the country, but why have more children when you can't support + when there isn't enough resources around to go for?

A little off topic, but this is similar to what Thanos wanted to achieve. But instead of wiping out 50% of the universe population, I think there are less barbaric ways. Perhaps limit the amount of children a couple can have based on income?

Well said! I belong to a country where people see giving birth to multiple children as an achievement, hence, the country's population keeps getting much. I think the best way to control this in developing country is to set a limit to the number of siblings by a couple, with that, i am sure there'll be much, improvement.

If any country thinks that they are over-populated, why don't they do a nationally owned seastead, and send their excess population there? See the links in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1814814.msg53860399#msg53860399.

8)

I also think the overpopulation of a developing country is a big problem Because the population is more green then the development of a country is never possible This is why population growth must be prevented In order to control the population, everyone has to be aware of it Also most of our countrymen are illiterate and educate them. Then the development of the country is possible.

Yes, it causes a problem for these countries, if the policy of these countries is not desirable by the people and there is a lot of corruption in them

There seems to be an ongoing misconception between what is, in practical terms, actual overpopulation and what is more aptly dubbed overabundance. If we're talking about a situation where there are far more people than an environment/the physical space can satisfactorily sustain, cases in point Hong Kong/Singapore/megalopolises, it certainly can be framed as overpopulation, which isn't the case for countries with low GDP & life quality conditions and a lot of inhabitants.

An important step for fast & efficient development is a demographic window (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_window). That essentially means a country will have a lot of young people, and therefore a prominent workforce, capable of providing for the "dependents" (children and elderly). Assuming 2.1 children per woman (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate#Replacement_rates) is necessary to maintain stable population levels, to achieve the demographic window a nation would require some good 3 - 4 children per woman which is the case, as of now, in Africa (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate#Africa). (Also, many of you

Also, in regards to poor people having a lot of children,


Missing that demographic window has some costs (https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/wiseup-news/what-now-brazil-the-demographic-bonus-is-over-five-years-earlier/), and so does inorganically (and carelessly) decreasing fertility rates (https://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-chinas-one-child-policy-helped-to-endanger-its-retirees-2019-09-06).

My argument here isn't advocating poor people having a lot of children, as such behaviour does have perverse effects (birth mortality & criminality rates & overpopulation in urban areas & some others) but instead that overabundance of people isn't a burden to development (in fact, as I pointed, it's the opposite of that). An underdeveloped country with stable population (for instance, Brazil) will still have terrible life conditions due to its underdevelopment, and said underdevelopment is produced by a multitude of factors, especially those related to productive capacity & institutional strength (https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/page1-econ/2017/09/01/why-are-some-countries-rich-and-others-poor/). Those two things are strongly tied to long-term goals or, as we Brazilians call, a "nation project", a set of cross-generational development projects, which is often the opposite on what happens in underdeveloped/developing countries (where populist, short term measures to alleviate the immediate misery are the norm).

Lastly - and that may trigger a lot of people, but it's undeniable - historical inheritance is another heavy factor for underdevelopment. The constant meddling of world powers (the three largest culprits are always US/UK/USSR) in internal affairs has delayed a political interest in developing a "nation project" in several, SEVERAL countries.

^^^ But all people should have more children... not only poor people. Outside of not eating the fruit, more population was the next command that God gave Adam and Eve. He also gave the command to Noah and his family after the flood.

Yipee. :D I can go out and have lots more kids, just to obey God. What fun!

8)

You are right in saying that the views of every one of our countries are different and that they don't suit the policies of the govt at present corruption may be a common incontrovertible fact that thanks to this corruption everyone in society is bereft of various privileges. Corruption is one of the foremost obstacles to being a developing country.

Well, I believe the population won't be a problem anymore if they are being useful for the society by doing something meaningful using their skills and talents. The problem is there are lot of people who do nothing for the country rather wasting its resources without giving anything back to the society and to the country itself.

I agree with you but if the government takes adequate measures to prevent the population without corruption it is possible to prevent the population. Most people in our country are illiterate. Due to the lack of adequate education they have no idea about the birth control system It will not be a hindrance to the development of education by educating them.

#
if european colonialism would today still exist those people would have found homes all over the world, instead of getting rasterised and imprisioned by nationalists

This is all bad (about the negative points). This all happens while in many developed countries families often either have 1 child or not at all. Now it is inconspicuous, but imagine what will happen in 50 years. The population is going down a lot. Therefore it is not necessary to go to extremes. The problem is not overpopulation, but how it is organized. But I agree that on one territory there should be such a number of people who will be comfortable. There should be so much land that every person can be full when some kind of agro culture is grown on these lands

Yes if there's enough land  people can cultivate many crops by cultivating  Because the population is increasing at the speed of food production isn't increasing. People consider the population because the biggest problem which may be a major obstacle for developing countries when the population is above required that's why we all got to increase the quantity of cultivable land.

population isn't actually the big problem, considering how big and ressourceful the world is, afrika, sahara, russia the americas are still extremely thin populated, but people from there still migrate to dense populated europe?

why?
because of better organisation of life.

overpopulation is a labour chance, the problem however is, not enough people want to be working class, everyone wants to be a banker or a capitalist.

If people won't work, let them starve. That would be population reduction for those who want it.

Often minorities in America protest against government to give them MORE. Help them wak up by sending them to real 3rd world countries.

Better oranisation of life has to do with libertarian freedom - do unto others... - which is really less government.

8)

exactly however massive industrial productivity makes it possible to do socialism in limited ways's societies then thrive because people don't have to be constantly afraid of their social security people become relaxed and easygoing, and have time to orient themselves.

however radical capitalism removes the neverending mental destruction of people abusing a nation's welfare system.

You are right but it will not only increase the amount of arable land but also control the population If the population is reduced then the amount of cultivable land will increase Due to the housing crisis, the amount of cultivable land is decreasing. In that case if the population is controlled the amount of cultivable land will increase.

Socialism is what families are all about. When you are enjoined to the socialism of big business or a country, you are considered part of their family. The great thing is, big business and government families always allow a man or woman to get out if they want. They essentially have no choice. Think of all the people who saw the NAZI dangers in Germany before WW2, and moved out. Those who wound up in concentration camps, moved out when they died.

8)

Even Bangladesh, probably the country that has more population per square mile than any other, is surviving and expanding. Properly organized, the population of the country is its wealth. The more population the better.

Are there any countries of the world that don't exist any longer? Look at history. Search on "Tartary." This is a nation that existed to some extent as recent as the early 1900s. It was bigger than most nations, and covered most of Siberia and Northern Europe into Northern Canada. Why are they gone (they aren't really gone)? Because they didn't have enough population for the land they were trying to hold.

8)

as soon as people in a society don't have to work,

then work makes fun for quite a huge portion in the society.

in societies in which people have to work, work is often considered horrible.

Overpopulation is dangerous government should have policy for this , such that is maintains in normal way and every age people are equally be declining population is also bad and population whit over aged people like in china now is also bad , government should make rules so that it maintains steadily

You have rightly said that if the govt has taken steps to regulate the population then it are often cured. i feel the standard of people's lives must be improved for social control. If there's adequate enforcement against rapists  social control is feasible and various health services got to be prepared for birth control then developing countries are possible.

jes but third world countries are dependent on the scientific development of the centuries old imperial powers,

without the scientific skills of the western and european powers and china, and also their massive landmasses and natural ressources a tiny country like bangladesh can't develop itself, it is then simply just a zergish mass of people full of extremists and not a potential labourforce.

the leftists and billionaires in the developed world completely have forgotten that without the so called "racist right wingers and deplorables" their labour force wouldn't work

Talking about science, one needs to know why science was developed. Among the reasons for science are, for people to improve their living conditions by using science, and to improve their living conditions by selling their science to other people. Yet, when you think about it, all science that people develop, is based on the science of nature, the place where all science knowledge and ideas ultimately comes from.

This means that the increase of population comes from nature, not from scientific advancements of man. In fact, because of the focus of of science into small areas rather than considerations of the whole, science produces tamporary imbalances in nature which ultimately destroy populations, not help them.

Labor forces that are based on the science of man rather than on the science of nature, are ultimately going to destroy themselves. Why? Because the science that exists in nature naturally will ultimately balance the imbalances that mankind uses to develop his own science.

In other words, bringing science to a nation to develop it and its labor force of people, ultimately will destroy the nation and its people. The more the people tend to incorporate their living with natural balances rather than the unbalanced science of man, the more their populations will grow. This is part of the natural operation of nature... big populations.

Nobody can tell for a fact what will happen worldwide with a big population worldwide. Why not> It has never happened, yet... at least not in recorded history. We can only guess.

In the past there was pangea... which also was an expansion of the earth... but nobody knows why this happened. There is no reason to suggest that it will not happen again when the population of the earth gets really big... like 150 billion.

8)

Where did you get Tartary is a country? Is is an obselete term for a wide region spawing Manchuria, the Gobe Desert and the Tibetan Highlands. It has always been inhabited by a variety of people. From what I get, Tartary is in a certain way associated with the Mongols, Manchurians and other Khanates, Khaganates and all that jazz, so it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever to say "they're gone". That's like saying the Indian subcontinent is gone.

If you search for it, you will find that they even had their own coat of arms.

8)