Bitcoin Forum

Which one should come first? better to get through bounty before ICO/IEO fund raising or better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing... Suggestion need

both can be the most important choice is you are able to find a profitable project, but my choice is to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing because in my opinion better.

The earlier you join the campaign the better rewards you may get but first you have to make sure that the project you will promote is a worthy one to avoid wasting your time. Always make a research about the project before joining because there are lot of scam or fake projects out there.

The best is to make the bounty at the same time as ico / ieo and he must be very active in social networks

most people do before fundraising and yes, I think this is indeed the right way because it makes the bounty as a promotional tool, but running a bounty during the fundraising is also a good idea but I prefer the first choice.

If you are a bounty hunter, Choosing an ongoing IEO/ICO might be the better one, Checking the team status or the crowd sale is one of the reasons. If you are an investor it's nice to see the project being advertised early before the crowd sale begins. Bounty hunters are scared to waste their time on non-sense projects, So if you are seeing a bounty offering/job that is having an early advertisement, a bounty hunter must do a research on the team and the project future plans.

To be honest, this is a rather strange question, you have 200 messages and a signature, probably you should already know the answer. I can only say one thing, if you are going to invest in a project that runs a bounty, then you decide to participate in the bounty or not. After all, at the end of the bounty, you can get $ 20 in project coins, while spending a lot of man-hours on this. Decide for yourself.
Be prepared for the fact that it’s for the bounty that you will not get as much as you expect, however, if you believe in the project, then I would use all possible methods.

As a bounty hunter its better to promote projects that have ongoing fundraising either ico or ieo, you will be able to predict how demanding the project is, of its good you can continue and if its bad you can opt out

Its best if you are backed by the platform you are going to be using. For EOS I think you will be funded by the blockone if they find your project to have potentials. That is your best clue there. If your project is just going to be one of the shitcoins that doesn't even need to use a blockchain, your project is best to be killed before it can scam. So you have to evaluate your project first if it really needs funding.

Most do it before start of ieo to create awareness about their project and product but i think during the ico bounty campaign is very important as it sends the message across and reminds people again and again to invest if they like the project.

Bounty should be there from project conception until listing. Or atleast until funding rounds closes. After ICO/IEO closure, if the project wants to get good exposure, then they should continue bounty in different format.

Bounty campaigns are form of cheap marketing services and this create a whole lot of hype and also makes the project known in the entire crypto industry. So it's best to get the project out there so that people can participate fully when the ICO/IEO begins or else there would be low participation it in the initial offering.

This can be answered on two fronts;
- If you're are a bounty Hunter looking to join a bounty, the best bet is to join  the bounty before the ICO as this will help you get in on time and stand a chance of better rewards.

- On the side of the project, they should start the bounty campaign way before the ICO in order to create enough awareness and should still go on till the end of the ICO/IEO.

Its yet uncertain if the ICO/IEO is going to receive funds so you better not join the bounty campaigns yet. you will end up not paid again if they are not going to receive funds from investors or sale on exchanges. These had happen to several ICO already in the past and until now they were not distributing coins to the bounty participants.

What the team has to do is just gather private investors who are really interested, if it ain't getting much just refund them and forget the project.

Most of the bounty that comes happen before the fundraising. This makes their project more visible and attractive to the investors so if the bounty comes after the fundraising, there's still a chance to take some investors but it wouldn't be that much unlike before the sale.

I'd say before because the most excitement comes before the project is released and people will have time to complete it and get rewards all at the same time.

The bad part of this is that they can be cheated and be rewarded in tokens that get dumped on the same day. If they were able to start a bounty while the project is running they could see if it's popular or not and if the bounty is worth their time.

Running bounty before the token is traded is better for the team but worse for bounty hunters. That's why you should put pressure on the team to pay rewards in a coin that is already on the market not their unreleased token.

The bounty should be operating for several weeks before the ICO/IEO begins. Obviously bounties take a while to pick up speed since it takes some time to recruit enough bounty hunters to get the world out effectively.

Because of this, I think a bounty should run 7-8 weeks prior to the ICO/IEO, and then overlap the token sale period for a few additional weeks.

If your research is correct and you already find the appropriate project, wasting time will not bring you anything.  And I guess that is what we are all looking for. I mean, why would you join a unneeded bounty? The time difference may only be necessary to find out whether it has reached the softcap. If they have reached softcap, then you are one step ahead of the others.

I would say before fundraising starts, though you'll likely experience success too while running a campaign during fundraising. The entire point of bounty campaigns is to make noise on the forums about a particular project, and if you're only running a bounty campaign a short time before whatever token or coin you're marketing starts up, you won't get as many sales. The same goes for starting a bounty campaign during fundraising, though if you run a campaign through to the end of fundraising, you might get people FOMOing near the end as things are closing up. Campaign participants might not be as happy if you start a campaign before a solid price for the token is revealed or before true fundraising, but it makes sense from a manager's point of view.

Better to get through bounty when fundraising is ongoing if you a participant but if you are a developer and it's better to go through bounty when the fundraising is not yet started.
if you are a bounty participant and you can get more information on whether the ICO will be successful or not based on how much amount that already collected by the ICO itself.
That means you will increase your chance to get a legit bounty dude. I'm doing this so many times and i always look at the total amount that already collected and so far i can avoid the scam project and that gives more guarantee for me to get my payment from the bounty campaign.

This makes sense rather than join in the bounty from when it was started but again that depends on your research whether if it's a legit bounty or not. I'm just saying based on what happened to me. So many scam projects in these days and we must be careful before joining anything.

You are right.  Joining at the beginning of the period will provide many opportunities to get full stake if consistent.  So the consideration is no longer the fundraising period because a quality project will definitely easily reach the sales target.  Although the sales achieved can be an assessment of project success, we will not miss the opportunity to get a full stake if you do not join from the beginning.  after all the bounty campaign was relative, some began at the beginning of the sale, mid, and even at the same time as a fundraiser.  so, just maximize the analysis.

If it goes on the same time it is cool. The reason is that investors will have the opportunity to follow up at same time. Also, it will give more respect to the commitment and focus of the team. And, investors don't like delay, so doing both at same time will show readiness from the team.

You right. Sometimes if the project not come from "familiar" team they will lack of promotion so better make bounty as promotional or marketing strategy.

Absolutely I agree because you save a lot of stakes until the project is finish to get huge rewards, but we can't avoid the risk to waste time as hunter getting scamm project they can't avoid it even if they learb well and investigate well the project we need to accept thatnis part of the life of the hunters.

from my experience (when ICO still Hype and success), it doesn't matter if you join before ICO/IEO at some bounty. but the important part is Time you must waste for it. joining 1 month before ICO/IEO are good, but to be honest you must analyze the project first. if the project has the possibility percentage of success more than 90% so you can join it. if not, I suggest you change your mind then join with another project.

Actually both of them are fine, but as a bounty hunter, I prefer bounties running simultaneously with ICO or IEO. This is also to find out the public opinion of the project whether it is of interest or not.
In addition, the distribution will certainly not take long because in IEO the coins will soon be launched on the relevant exchange. But at the ICO there could be a delay in the distribution of the bounty due to reasons for waiting for the exchange.

Do you want to run a bounty? I think you start to create a team structure and projects that will be run, then you can start fundraising. because investors need an explanation of the project to be launched, then they want to provide funding. Likewise with bounty hunter, they also want to promote the project after they know about the project that has been or will run.

so in my opinion which is more effective, if there is sugestion, welcome .....

Ongoing should be best because running a bounty before is not a good ideal for the bounty participants as it will only favor to the project owner so there is a big chance that your bounty will not be successful.

This is very common also and there are few projects only that runs a bounty before their fundraising but if you can provide a good reason for the bounty participants to join before your fundraising then there is no problem like you will run a bounty campaign that pays btc or other coins that has a value.

The choice between taking part in a Bounty before or during a fundraising event will affect the reward you get.
Following the bounty campaign from the beginning makes the rewards that can be full, but it must be ensured if the bounty campaign is genuine and definitely pays.

But, if you want to follow the bounty campaign when the fundraising is underway the reward will be reduced, but the risk of scam is slightly reduced because there must be a review from other participants about the campaign and pay or not.

Both of these choices can be chosen according to what you want, but still do your research first before joining the bounty campaign. Don't promote scam campaigns.

Bounty projects may refer by those bounty managers which is the best way to be implemented. On my opinion both are good but it will depends by the support and demand of many investors as well as users. Also, the kind of project that can be very attractive by many here in crypto currency community.

It is not necessary that the options will only be limited to the two. I prefer that a project should run a bounty campaign before the ICO/IEO is launched for people to have an ample time to read and study the project before they decide. It is also important that it is running while the ICO/IEO is ongoing so that people will not forget about it. And it is also important that the people will continue following the project even after the ICO/IEO is conducted. A bounty campaign would be of much help for this.

As an investor, I prefer bounty while fundraising is ongoing because the investor can invest right away the moment they see the campaign, with so many projects doing fundraising and so many coins in the market, investors can easily forget new projects, it's better that they can invest right away the moment they see it.

Choosing ongoing ICO or IEO have pass first or second round is better than you are joining with first time bounty campaign is open for participants, we don't know about how interested IEO and ICO for public investor, will be success or not at the future will give impact for bounty campaign reward, when joining on early time bounty open but third weeks ICO have failed we have waste three weeks with bad campaign without get reward.

I prefer to join the ICO before fundraising because it will provide more benefits usually there is also a good promo for investors or prize hunters who take part in the ICO before fundraising. but of course we must do research before joining to make sure that the ICO or IEO that we follow is not a scam project. we have to do research from whitepapers, roadmaps, websites and social media projects.

Well if your certain about the project it is better if you get involve in the campaign early to take advantage of higher rewards. But unfortunately some projects conduct bounty extensions or duration could prolong due to different circumstances and you should also be aware of that.

The two are the same, where we do not see from that side. We must know the project about how they run properly.
But it's a good idea after those fundraisers because if their income is from fundraising a lot, I'm sure the crypto investor and community are enthusiastic about them.

of course, because after the fundraising process is complete and successful the project will certainly be highlighted by the community. community development will develop rapidly. Many partners and support will come from other projects. but if you want to buy after their sales are finished and waiting on the market you need to be careful. first, learn the character of their coin trading. because many are successful with sales but cannot survive in the market.

If you promote a project without IEO ongoing they can easily die on you and end up wasting your time, i think the best choice is to promote bounty project that have its IEO ongoing on exchange, you will be able to know some facts like how demanding the token is or how investors are more interested in the project

Both are good. But the earlier the better the thing is, it is more riskier than the other one. The benefit from this is incomparable than other one though you must be cautious before joining in such stuff. Do research about the project and so on, so that the time you'll be exerting won't just be going for nothing. Well, if you want everything at hand to be sure, then, the first one is better for you.

If I had to choose I would wait for the fundraising to proceed first while monitoring and analyzing the project. I did it so as not to get caught up in a bounty scam campaign that wouldn't pay me. Even though the reward is reduced, it doesn't matter to me, the important thing is that the project is genuine and paying.

It's better to get through before tha ICO/IEO fundraising because you'll get more investors when you promote the project as early as possible. People will be familiar once it was launched a bit earlier than its actual date of fundraising thus once its fundraising get launched, they'll consider investing on it rather than seeing its promotion on its actual date of fundraising wherein the date is limited that doesn't allow some investors in thinking if they should invest or not.

If told to choose, bounty hunters will definitely choose bounties on projects whose tokens have been traded on the market or exchangers. But most bounty campaigns take place before the token sales period and bounty hunters must select which projects are good and worth following.

Promoting projects whose IEO is ongoing is more likely to be paid compared to projects that carry out ICO. ICO is currently largely avoided by investors because the developer team can escape funds without being clear about the fate of the funds that have been invested. I think IEO is safer because the token sales fund is held by the exchanger and investors get certainty of listing on the exchanger that organizes IEO

That's right extended time frame will give investors enough thinking if they able to notice the project and have a good time to study how things will work then they'll be deciding things according to what they've understand, it will be noticed by more people and the target investors will be hit much early unlike when the waiting for the fundraising it will be hard for investors to go along without researching and its needs more time before they can decide.

investors usually do before fundraising, from the initial bonus offer and you will get a double profit but if the project is successful including a product sold out in the market. my advice is always to reconsider before choosing any project and managing your financial management properly. I mean don't spend all your capital on ICO / IE0 projects. setting aside some of it for the top crypto investment in the market.

when fundraising is running more efficiently and effectively because we can see how far their sales are, if it is approaching softcup we don't need to worry if the project fails because it doesn't reach the softcup.
because bounty hunters must know how to take advantage of opportunities.

Better rewards when joining the bounty at early stage. You will be having the largest part of the bounty pool by doing that.

But I guess there is a doubt being marinate here.
What you could do is heighten the reach of your research and try to look for even the little hole of error in their campaign.
If you see one, then better pick another.
Not all will be successful but worse is if it is a scam. Efforts will just vanish.

the maturity stage of bounty is 3-4 months before launching ico and is stated in their road map, dev can garner a lot of attention from the community and their investors, provided their projects are well suited to the quality of their communication. But if the campaign runs when ico runs, be sure to ask about the project's readiness and their possibility for market listing, if the answer seems to be just nonsense, then it's not good because the project is running so hurriedly and only prioritizing income.

I joined ez365 bounty because of their strong community and of cos they have many interested investors, they almost make it to softacap already so its a good sign of success, why promote bounties that haven't start fundraising at all? they are more risky

More exposure means more opportunity for success, so I would go with bounty on or before the IEO.
People in the space are looking for great projects and if the project is good and they will see the potential, they will surely invest as long as they are aware of it.

That in my opinion is just as good, not so important in my opinion it's just the difference between a bounty hunter and an investor. if a bounty hunter would definitely prefer that the ICO is in progress so that they can see the progress of a project, of course this does not take your time for nothing. what the prize hunters and investors are looking for is a clear project and not bullshit.

Participating before ICO / IEO has more potential to get big rewards because of the longer duration of time.
But you have to really monitor the project that you are taking part in because there are usually many projects that stop suddenly when fundraising is taking place, whether it's because of lack of investor funds or other factors .

I think what make both of your plan is different is stake each week that we can get from the bounty. But, maybe if you join when ICO still ongoing, you can see how much funds that they get, or if you want to be safer, look ICO that already reach softcap. At least the project wouldn't end with nothing if ICO already ended. And the rewards will only depends on price in market.

You need to do both if you really want to earn more than a penny. Join all their activities as much as you can. But before that you should be able to choose the best that is currently ongoing, I mean the one that you have a feeling that won't run and be a failed project, because all of the hardships you will make will be for nothing if that happens.

In my own experience it would be better if start bounty before the ICO/IEO fund raising because if the icos are not yet starting and the bounty is starting early then the fund raising will be more faster and merrier, as soon as the bounty start earlier there would be some extensions about the campaign or supporting the projects so it would be better for the bounty hunters if that's the case then. While running a bounty at the same time having a ico or ieo fundraising is quiet good but it would be slower because of the bounty over and the project fundraising didn't reach the funds they targets then the project will be failed and the bounty hunters and the investors will be suffer the most, so better do exact research on what bounty you are participating with.

Best way to go research. one idea that will guide is in our whole career of bounty participating. a lot of scammers have their style to victimize us but we can avoid it by purchasing knowledge. a lot of project owners will have profit if they have worthy project and participants of their marketing will have benefit also. but with the current situation now this year I couldn't find any project that are true worthy of our hard work. hoping that next year will have more changes and finally we could find any worthy of our time.

You should be wise enough to know that not all projects will reach their softcap successfully, its better to be on watch out of their fund raising progress first before jumping into the promoting train

Both has its own plus and minus. Most cases in here, bounty started before its fundraising. Kinda rare to find a bounty while fundraising is ongoing. But sometime there's a bounty that finished their private sale. Whichever you choose to, anything could happen at the end of the day. If you're joining a bounty before the fund raising, you won't know if it will succeed or not, and in the middle of fund raising you could see how many investors are in there to invest their money. With all that in mind, you could know how well the projects will be.

If the project is the potential as you want, join earlier, waiting is a waste of time. Also, the first choice is more appropriate because the stakes reserved for jr.member are small. Some may fail, but if you catch one you succeed, the others will be forgotten quickly.

It's not actually rare I think, you can track a certain campaign until their fundraising started and have progress. After you see their progress, whether if it is a good start or bad, it will become your go signal to decide to join or not.

If you are sure and ready to work from the beginning until the end of the project, it is much better. Supporting a project you see potential with from the beginning is better to watch the project closely. Whether it succeeds or not, its result will remain unknown until it ends.

Personally, I believe that both options can bring rewards. Since fees go during the project, this is already a positive factor that the project is developing. And the other option is fees but also there is a sale. So both options are suitable for making good money.

it depends on the situation

It makes sense to participate in the bounty campaign in the ICO period, after the end of the token sale, the faith of bounty payments becomes a pure speculation theme. The delayed bounty payment is a big concern of the bounty hunters and they look for an efficient solution that can be applied during the ICO period. Otherwise, I don't think the team will agree to make new changes to the terms-conditions of the live bounty campaign.

The answer to this question is way too broad for a straight answer. It is going to end up being made up of biased opinions because several conditions and or anomalies can occur affecting ones decision on whether or not to join a bounty campaign at any given time (Before ICO/IEO or During). It could be easier to join a bounty campaign during the initial offering sale to the public, this way if the campaign is proving to be successful, there is a chance the campaign could be extended. Instead if you go the Pre-ICO/CEO route which is before the fundraising, you give your self time to earn from a project and start your planning at hunting for a new campaign after the one you joined early finishes!
  As I said, the reason on which someone may join at this particular time, or that particular time is going to be different for every individual, so to answer your question, just simply join a bounty campaign during a time that is most convenient for you!

I think its better to run a bounty at same time run also a fundraising campaign, in order to maximized the project's exposure and choose an ICO first, and second was IEO for the listing preparation but just choose a better exchange platform to run and IEO to unleashed the projects full potentials in the short term and may drive it for the long run.
'

I will go with fundraising going the same time as the bounty program. The bounty program is supposed to raise more awareness, so more people can show interest and invest in a project. So, if the fundraising is done at the same time as bounty, there is a higher possibility of projects reaching their set target fund.

It would be best for me to start the bounty campaign as IEO / ICO campaign funds rising are being prepared. Because investors have more opportunity to prepare their invesment and better study the ICO or IEO campaign. This often happens to me because of the huge numbers of ICOs last year and I never had the chance to buy into token sale of popular tokens coins before

To be honest, I no longer join in campaigns that just start and have not yet made any money so I prefer campaigns that already reached its softcap. I am becoming more practical due to the many scams or fake projects I have participated in before but of course, I still investigate the project before joining so I won't regret it at the end of the campaign.

It will not be known until the project ends. but at least we have analyzed it first. Following the project from the start will only affect the rewards of social media campaigns such as Facebook, Twitter and others who must deposit task records every day. But for Blog and video campaigns it will not reduce rewards even if it follows the project in the middle of the road raising.

Only will be evaluated and selected articles and original videos.

Even if a project reaches the soft-cap, there is no guarantee that it will be successful at the market. A lot will depend on whether the team is honoring the previously agreed timelines or not. If the team gets inactive after the ICO, then it will start losing its value at the exchanges and eventually the trade volume will drop and it will get delisted.

On the one hand, starting a bounty before raising funds in the ICO/IEO will attract the attention of the community, and on the other hand, starting a bounty during raising funds in the ICO/IEO will be a good impetus to the development of the project.

@OP I believe this one could be better...

*better to run bounty while fundraising is ongoing*

Investors will appreciate if they know that developers are working on it while fundraising is still going on. It makes it into reality if they'll see the effort of the project owner knowing the fact that people will easily get doubted when they don't see anything and most of us wanting assurance with our money.

I would also suggest going for the bounty program first so that masses can actually understand the project well and make up their minds to invest. Bounty programs sole purpose is to teach public about the features of project. This will indeed help investors in taking right decision. However, this does not mean there should not be even a bit of fund raising simultaneously. That can leave some doubts among investors.

It' s up to your capacity. If you have lot of time so you can go with run bounty while fundraising is going on becauae I know it is not hard if you have more time that you can focus on what you are doing but if you want to play safe and to the more focused and to have fund as capital you can go to join bounty first but I think this startegy is fot for the newbies.

I think it's better to run the bounty when the fundraising is going on. Now is the time that the project before you run the project you need to have investors who are willing to invest in them. But then you can raise the interest of other people.

I think that it is better to go for bounty project when fundraising is already going on because with that, you will be able to know which project may likely hit their cap which will still give you the chance of getting paid unlike after you have ran a bounty from the beginning and after a very long time of dedicating your time and resources, the project will end up not meeting up with their cap and thereby cancelling the campaign and not paying the hunters a dime of even the previous work they have done which is understandable because there is no way that they can make payment from money they have not generated, which is the part of the scarifies sometimes in this bounty hunter. We must also try and check every project too before we go for it because some scam project do reach their softcap.

I better go on the second one. It is better to participate or invest in a bounty who are on the run of fundraising. I just feel that it is more somehow kinda robust assurance that the project are already going halfway through successfulness rather than before that you did not even know if it will be going okay or not. It is just a trick to climb up in a project who you knew have a path towards success.

Majority of the ICO are running their bounty before their ICO/IEO fund raising, this is to create longer awareness, investors wants to see how the project evolve while in the bounty campaign, they want feed backs coming from the community, and of course experts opinion, this is also to better prepare investors of their funds but be sure that you a running a legit project because members will scrutinize your project.

Before fundraising started you need to promote the project using bounty platform so try to be more effective in choosing the right manager for your project.
Or else If you have good private investor then you don't need to worry about anyone and you start Bounty promotion at the time of fundraising also.

One way or another, the team of each project should be aware that an increase in investment interest in the project occurs during the active phase of discussing this project and advertising all the information about it.  Based on this, in my opinion, the Bounty of the company and the attraction of investment funds should occur at the same time, since this is one whole process.

It does not matter at all, there are enough examples of success and failures in both cases. More importantly to research the project before getting into bounty or investment, otherwise even IEO sale can turn out to be a scam.

If you are looking for a higher stake or much more higher reward then join before they even starts the fund raising.
But it is also risky sincewe wouldn't know if they would be successful or not.
But if you want to secure your reward then join the bounty campaign that have an ongoing fund raising that already have a huge amount of investment.

I promoted a bounty project that is already over due to its use case but i never knew they haven't start their fundraising at all, i guess i am a bad researcher, i should have quit if i knew because most times they end up a failure

You have made some point certainly. All would turn out to be useless if the chosen project is not capable of returning any profits. The market is full of scams and before participating into bounties, it is best to do deep researches on one’s own. Once that step is cleared, go with running bounty while the fundraising is taking place. That way, he wont have to wait for long to make good bucks.

If you do know that you are very bad in this case and i can't even understand what was your point. what you are saying in your post is about to tell others about your personal story and no more. What do you mean about "its use case". Dude, wake up from your sleep. no one asks you about have you watched the schedule of the fundraising or not because that's probably your fault. in this case, OP is talking about joining in the bounty when the ico is still in progress or it's not yet started.

I would suggest running a bounty during the crowdsale or fundraising in order to have parallelism with the outcome. If one would go first, the hype or popularity of the project has a tendency to fade. Also, this kind of process is what I saw to the previous successful projects in this industry, which is in my opinion, proving it to be effective if not interrupted by the market situation.

IMO, he talks about the successful projects without any ICO or IEO. If the token is used widely by the customers and the real use rate is higher than competitors, there is no need to start a new token sale for collecting more money for development. Even the private investor group can fund the project with the secret agreement but I don't think the OP had made decent research before thinking about to make an investment decision.

being part of a bounty campaign can indeed be utilized, the most important thing is to do your research properly because what can determine the profit or not is the research that was made and how confident you are with the project that was followed

Everything here for now is full of risk, which I think that there is no way that we can avoid it if we want to continue to be a part of this bounty hunting, so it is either we give up completely or we just keep pressing till we get the right project that will not maltreat us bounty hunters.

Most of the projects that we have now can really not be predicted, and like you said, there is still possibility of them scamming even if we join the campaign along the line, so better we join at the early stage, though we still have to look at it In the aspect of our time, it would have saved our time also if the period we took part in the project is when they have started raising fund, and if they eventually scam, it will still not be like the period that we have used on them from the beginning.

As long as you are promoting a promising bounty or ICO then it doesn't matter which one should come first and I think both of them bounty and ICO can have possibly had a scam so it is depend, so before promoting a bounty or ICO make sure that you check their project 1st than to waste your time promoting them.

This depends largely on your targeted investors, you might run the bounty first then proceed to fund raising because people are already aware of your project, alternatively you can run both together but never make mistake of trying to raise fund before bounty unless you have private investors.

IEO is for the project to put the token first in an exchange. Mostly they create their own trading platform for that purpose.
Next is the bounty. That is for advertisement.
Just for people or investors to see that a project is going on and it could be bought at this certain website.

I dont think a bounty should come first. How are you the investors going to end up buying it without information?

in my opinion both have weaknesses and strengths. if we follow ICO or IEO before fundraising, we will get more tokens, the more we immediately join, the more coins we will get. but if in fact the project that we are participating in is a scam then what we are doing is in vain and losing money. and if we join in raising and taking place we can avoid fraud at least we know that the project we are taking is not a scam. but the coins we will get are not many. I myself prefer to join the ICO when the fundraising takes place even though the tokens I get are few but the ICO that I follow is not a scam.

I think both are the same. while the promotion was taking place and with fundraising, many projects were successful with the system, and by first promoting it to the end and resuming sales, many projects were successful. I think it depends on the policies of the development team to use which method

But most projects Bounties/ICO are having a promotion before taking into the fundraising. What makes difficult here is the risk for investors putting up their money for no assurance of returns. If this project never gets enough money during their fundraising, it maybe won't go over with its launching period. Thus, many investors compromised themselves and give doubts to reinvest ICO/Bounties that don't have a working product because of their past experience. Of course, they'll be taking it seriously and nothing it makes sense investing projects that always broked their promises, and much worse if they will turn into a scam which it is mostly happening nowadays.

I suggest supporting the project from the beginning before they start ICO / IEO. if you are absolutely sure about the project, there is no reason to wait to support it when their program has run. however, the prizes you get to become more. some people sometimes regret not supporting the project before they start selling it.

With fundraising while performing bounty is a very nice way to raise huge fund to support thier project , because it will attract alot of investors, but always remember the risk when investing this seasen because alot of project turns in scam.

Both are good but i usually doing bounty with on going fundraising because the duration of the bounty is not long. I usually joined a bounty for one month and move for another bounty next month, because i will have more chance to have many good altcoin. But if you really trust a project, you better do it from the announcement date because you will earn much if the project reach big success

And there are those people who also regret joining from the very first week up to the last and get absolutely nothing since it exist just to scam people no matter what kind of project they would sell. The thing is you need to do some research on your own and think logically rather than emotions. There are a lot of enticing projects out there but you should look around whether the people involved are legit and is the project possible or does it only exist in the fiction where the reality is just too much for it to happen. It’s hard to trust ICOs this days.

with use of more on offers as the blockchain customs of offers for developer on works as referring service the IMO might be of one with the early initials on investors to put with one on exchange as expecting with returns on denomination.

I know that ecxx is running a bounty and ICO now for their exchange token. I think it's best to do them at the same time.

Ecxx is one of the leading exchanges for digital assets and can be trusted blindly. Good to see that the exchange is planning to launch its very own token and becoming its participant now, will return some good profits soon. The best thing about tokens belonging to a renowned exchange is they are never scams. This token will definitely get support of ecxx customers and finally it is also in the race.

Are you referring to the bounty hunters or the team members organising the bounty? If both cases, the two strategies are OK. For bounty hunters, if you spot a good bounty, don't wait for it to start ICO/IEO before delving in. For team members, organising bounty before and during ICO/IEO is better than organising it only before the token sale. The sole aim of bounties is either to achieve successful token sale or to make the project or its product well known if token sale has been concluded.

So far the essence 9f of bounty is to promote the project, then it will be better if bounty and IEO/ICO goes together.
Boyn hunters will be doing the marketing of the project while its fund raising continues.

Both are good if the project is good enough! For example, I am not doing the EZ365 bounty campaign, because it looks good but I am not sure about their success! So, when they reach a soft cap, I will start doing its bounty with full effort. Otherwise, I am doing Hawk school bounty, because I have confidence that this project will be a success, and their main sale is yet to start. I hope you get the answer.

To run ICO/IEO simultaneously, i think is better. Why hunters are doing the advert, ICO/IEO will be going on the same time. Most investors get to know the project through hunters.

The bounty must be launched from the moment when the timing of the ICO is already known in order for the bounty advertising company to be able to raise more funds than the advertising company that project owners launch on all Internet sites. It can also be carried out when the project is already living a full life in order to increase the number of users of the project.

when fundraising is ongoing better to do. bcz in that situation, you can know huw the progress
if the progress looks good, you can join. vice versa

so, you have small chance to get bad bounty which makes wasting you time
that's the generic strategy to do for many bounty hunter

Absolutely true, it's best to run both token sale and bounty simultaneously. For instance, investors still considering to invest in a project doing bounty might come across an article (from a hunter) which explains the project or maybe SWAD analysis, hence giving investors a better insight on the project. If the IEO will be held on top exchanges like Binance, then doing a bounty prior to the IEO won't be a bad idea also.

If I were in your place I would be choosing to do both. As in I would post a bounty program which starts right before the ICO/IEO and continues throughout the fund raising part. This way we can create an awareness right from the beginning of the fund raising and that will continue throughout the series.

both are almost the same. running the bounty before the fundraising or running a bounty while fundraising is ongoing is has no much difference. i prefer running a bounty program after the fundraising has been successful or should i say after the first round is successful.