|
Title: . Post by: minerjones on December 03, 2019, 07:00:40 PM .
Title: Re: . Post by: Lesbian Cow on December 03, 2019, 07:12:31 PM I would like to make a matching set (killyou you sly dog you) with my other 2019 Sail the Seas 2019 specimen. Can we bid on specific serial numbers?
If so, #004 @ 0.0002 Title: Re: . Post by: krogoth on December 03, 2019, 07:21:32 PM Lot #1 0.0002BTC
Lot #2 0.0002BTC Lot #3 0.0002BTC Title: Re: . Post by: tothemoonsands on December 03, 2019, 07:31:25 PM Lot 69 (Coin #69) @ .0002
Title: Re: . Post by: Agrawas on December 03, 2019, 07:48:59 PM Coins 86 and 87 - .0002BTC
Title: Re: . Post by: alamjob239 on December 03, 2019, 07:51:45 PM Lot #1 .0004 BTC
Title: Re: . Post by: tweetious on December 03, 2019, 08:46:20 PM 10 @0.0002BTC
(10 coins not #10) Title: Re: . Post by: tweetious on December 03, 2019, 08:53:51 PM so.. is it still a "LIFO bidding style" or is it changed to specific # bidding style? i.e. 100 different bids (Any bid made in last 10 minutes will extend the SPECIFIC BID # auction 10 minutes beyond the ending time.)... chaos... LOL
(didn't want to edit my above bidding post, hence I am posting a sequential post, apologies about that) Title: Re: . Post by: haloxon on December 03, 2019, 09:02:06 PM produced by maker :D :D :D Title: Re: . Post by: ChiBitCTy on December 03, 2019, 09:47:30 PM 1 KY Jelly Sail the Seas 2019 @ .0002BTC
Title: Re: . Post by: FFrankie on December 03, 2019, 10:09:05 PM I meant coin number 14. Title: Re: . Post by: vizique on December 03, 2019, 10:17:25 PM #21 0.0002
Viz Title: Re: . Post by: geophphreigh on December 03, 2019, 10:20:55 PM #’s 13, 39, 40, 41, 42 @ 0.0002BTC
Title: Re: . Post by: dolphriends on December 03, 2019, 10:36:14 PM # 008 .0003
Title: Re: . Post by: tweetious on December 03, 2019, 10:55:33 PM #66 @ 0.0002BTC
#99 @ 0.0002BTC #100 @ 0.0002BTC Title: Re: . Post by: teeGUMES on December 03, 2019, 11:58:50 PM Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market.
Title: Re: . Post by: haloxon on December 04, 2019, 12:08:51 AM Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market. no worry tee, I'm fine with it, but thanks anyway :) edit: 48 it have been, will serve as small xmas treasures ;) - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200918.msg53114797#msg53114797 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5200918.msg53114797#msg53114797) Title: Re: . Post by: dolphriends on December 04, 2019, 12:18:22 AM # 008 .0004 thank you
Title: Re: . Post by: FFrankie on December 04, 2019, 12:19:18 AM Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market. If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture. The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin Title: Re: . Post by: teeGUMES on December 04, 2019, 12:26:16 AM Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market. If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture. The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin I will not convert their bid to USD and try to daydream up your production cost + additional runs? If they were not informed that another 100 of these were in production it is an asshole move. If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded. You effectively increased the mintage number by 100%. Title: Re: . Post by: FFrankie on December 04, 2019, 01:04:16 AM Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market. If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture. The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin I will not convert their bid to USD and try to daydream up your production cost + additional runs? If they were not informed that another 100 of these were in production it is an asshole move. If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded. You effectively increased the mintage number by 100%. Since when does production cost = manufacture cost? The cost of manufacture is lower than production as production includes a variety of expenses while manufacture is the sole cost of production of said item. At least to my understanding. I did not break even with the 2019 coin, and if you include the cost of the design for the 2018 coin I did not break even. Title: Re: . Post by: Lesbian Cow on December 04, 2019, 01:23:39 AM Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market. If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture. The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin I will not convert their bid to USD and try to daydream up your production cost + additional runs? If they were not informed that another 100 of these were in production it is an asshole move. If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded. You effectively increased the mintage number by 100%. Since when does production cost = manufacture cost? The cost of manufacture is lower than production as production includes a variety of expenses while manufacture is the sole cost of production of said item. At least to my understanding. I did not break even with the 2019 coin, and if you include the cost of the design for the 2018 coin I did not break even. You should teach a course at Wharton. Title: Re: . Post by: teeGUMES on December 04, 2019, 02:22:09 AM Did the guy that bought 60+ of these know there was going to be another 100 released? Seems kind of dirty if it wasn't mentioned before and he/she thought they were cornering the market. If you convert their bid to a USD it is about $1.50 per coin. You can increase the price of that multiply times and it does not cover the cost of manufacture. The first coins fit in a standard airtight and I think are better. But it seems most people prefer no airtight or an ugly airtight with a foam ring and a better looking coin I will not convert their bid to USD and try to daydream up your production cost + additional runs? If they were not informed that another 100 of these were in production it is an asshole move. If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded. You effectively increased the mintage number by 100%. Since when does production cost = manufacture cost? The cost of manufacture is lower than production as production includes a variety of expenses while manufacture is the sole cost of production of said item. At least to my understanding. I did not break even with the 2019 coin, and if you include the cost of the design for the 2018 coin I did not break even. Your ass salesmanship has nothing to do with this. Your production vs. manufacturing dictionary-off has nothing to do with this. Are you unable to answer a question without leading off down an irrelevant trail? Was the second run of 100 coins planned and known about when you offered sales/auctions of coins 1-100 of the first batch? I stand by this statement as a collector and seeing a seemingly limited mintage of coins double in size AFTER sales took place based on low serial numbers. If you convert their bid to USD multiplied by the number of coins they bought you'll find the amount they should be refunded. If the second 100 started as serials 101 to 200 I wouldn't even be arguing this. Title: Re: . Post by: Coin_trader on December 04, 2019, 02:36:11 AM 0.0002BTC for Number 16 to 20
Title: Re: . Post by: FFrankie on December 04, 2019, 01:56:41 PM The first 1-10 were auctioned early sept. These coins in this auction weren't even a thought until late October.
They are a lot different if you hold one of each and look at it. Title: Re: . Post by: chronicsky on December 04, 2019, 03:52:44 PM no reservations of old numbers owned?
lot 1 @ 0.0006 Title: Re: . Post by: FFrankie on December 04, 2019, 06:52:32 PM no reservations of old numbers owned? lot 1 @ 0.0006 If that were the case I would have saved the same numbers I needed for my sets. If that were the case you would have all the number 1 coins if memory serves me correctly. Title: Re: . Post by: Agrawas on December 04, 2019, 06:53:41 PM If that were the case I would have saved the same numbers I needed for my sets. You can still bid on the numbers u want. ;) ;) Title: Re: . Post by: ZipReg on December 04, 2019, 10:58:30 PM How do we know killyou didn't exit scam from original 2019 coin and sold account, this new ffrankie person may be imposter killyou just trying to making BTC from duplicates of 2019 coin, can y prove me wrong?!
20 @ 0.0004BTC 21 @ 0.0004BTC All left @ 0.0002BTC Title: Re: . Post by: FFrankie on December 05, 2019, 12:32:31 AM How do we know killyou didn't exit scam from original 2019 coin and sold account, this new ffrankie person may be imposter killyou just trying to making BTC from duplicates of 2019 coin, can y prove me wrong?! 20 @ 0.0004BTC 21 @ 0.0004BTC All left @ 0.0002BTC I appreciate the bids. The whole coin council can prove you wrong. Title: Re: . Post by: alamjob239 on December 05, 2019, 03:29:18 AM Lot #1 .0008 BTC
Title: Re: . Post by: chronicsky on December 05, 2019, 02:30:37 PM no reservations of old numbers owned? lot 1 @ 0.0006 If that were the case I would have saved the same numbers I needed for my sets. If that were the case you would have all the number 1 coins if memory serves me correctly. well that should have been the case but well whatever lot 1 @ 0.001 BTC Title: Re: . Post by: alamjob239 on December 06, 2019, 10:00:03 PM I give up on lot 1 and it is only 6th.
good luck everyone! :) Title: Re: . Post by: Hox on December 08, 2019, 03:55:00 AM #50-59 0.0004 Each
Title: Re: . Post by: Darker45 on December 09, 2019, 12:36:39 PM #2-5 @0.0004BTC each
Title: Re: . Post by: Coin_trader on December 10, 2019, 10:36:47 AM Never mind, I didn't notice that the time was linked to the countdown. 12hrs to go ;) Title: Re: . Post by: haloxon on December 10, 2019, 10:42:41 AM 1 - 0.0012
2 - 0.0006 3 - 0.0006 4 - 0.0006 5 - 0.0006 6 - 0.0004 7 - 0.0004 8 - 0.0006 9 - 0.0004 10 - 0.0004 19 - 0.0004 20 - 0.0006 50 - 0.0006 83 - 0.0004 99 - 0.0004 100 - 0.0004 Title: Re: . Post by: geophphreigh on December 10, 2019, 02:47:56 PM #13 .0004BTC
Title: Re: . Post by: Mbitr on December 10, 2019, 03:17:08 PM #25 -0.0004BTC
#26- 0.0004BTC #27- 0.0004BTC Please Edited - checked bidding increments :) Title: Re: . Post by: Ramelius on December 10, 2019, 09:46:36 PM #01 @ 0.0014
#07 @ 0.0006 #12 @ 0.0004 #17 @ 0.0004 #21 - #24 0.0004 Title: Re: . Post by: tweetious on December 10, 2019, 09:48:31 PM 42 - 0.0004BTC
69 - 0.0004BTC 96 - 0.0004BTC Title: Re: . Post by: transvestite lamb on December 10, 2019, 09:54:39 PM #4 @ 0.0008
Title: Re: . Post by: haloxon on December 10, 2019, 09:57:12 PM lot1 0.0016
lot4 0.0010 lot7 0.0008 Title: Re: . Post by: Ramelius on December 10, 2019, 09:59:50 PM #01 @ 0.002
Title: Re: . Post by: haloxon on December 10, 2019, 10:02:49 PM really George?
Title: Re: . Post by: transvestite lamb on December 10, 2019, 10:03:54 PM #4 @ 0.0012
Title: Re: . Post by: haloxon on December 10, 2019, 10:08:10 PM lot1 0.0022
lot4 0.0014 Title: Re: . Post by: Ramelius on December 10, 2019, 10:15:39 PM #01 @ 0.003
Title: Re: . Post by: haloxon on December 10, 2019, 10:19:50 PM not nice :( :'(
Title: Re: . Post by: Mbitr on December 10, 2019, 11:18:04 PM Thanks for another great auction MJ , will wait for pm :)
Title: Re: . Post by: haloxon on December 10, 2019, 11:20:39 PM whoop whoop :D
|