Bitcoin Forum

To developers out there, if you still don't know what can easily make your project successful, the answer is liquidity, if the exchange you want to use to raise fund has no big liquidity you won't get better results, Best IEO results are from top exchanges, think very well

So?
What should we understand from here? I guess everybody knows liquidity is important. I think you've been addressing more project teams, not us. I'm not sure you're in the right place for this.

Yes, you have a point as we have seen lots of early successful IEO projects being push through large exchanges such as Binance. But I think it's really up to those new projects what platform there are going to launch. Perhaps because of budget strain, they really can go on top exchanges and just chooses mid-tier which will eventually affect the success or failure of their project. I'm sure they have that in mind when they start their project but again due to some circumstance beyond the projects control not everyone can afford to launch their project on big trading platforms.

Or just make good projects and decent sites will gladly list them. If the project is shit from the core, they probably also will run their ieo on exchange that is famous from their wash trading and lack of liquidity.
All those projects will be dead on arrival. Only shit projects will rely on bought wash trading.

Yes, but to get listed on the most reputable exchanges you need to pay higher fees and also you need to prove that you are legit. And that is the problem right? How many IEOs and ICOs are legit nowadays?

that's right, liquidity is very important with the aim that tokens can be sold quickly and have high volumes. if you only focus on low fees or even free on exchangers who don't have liquidity then tokens will end badly. thinking about the long-term future of tokens is the best choice for the development team.

Every IEO would want to get listed in the exchange with highest IEO but that would not be possible for most. Best of the exchanges are very selective in choosing the IEO as it's also linked to their popularity. Binance hasn't issued any IEOs for a couple of months now. Projects needs to prove their worthiness before listing to a trusted launchpad while they can just pay off to get listed on others.

You should probably tell that to the cartesi team, the project you are currently promoting in your signature. It's really convenient to tell these projects to think as if they don't already know this basic thing. Maybe become one of their advisors first rather than a bounty hunter?

With large capital funds not only for launchpad at Binance but they must prioritize the products they run and concepts that have been designed for a long time, IEO at Binance takes time to be selective and also requires a large cost to increase their liquidity but after walking there you can determine whether the project output from Binance was successful in its project? I think that most of the Launchpad from Binance ended with success for a high liquidity future.

That's common sense these projects knows it. The problem there is the ability to enter on those big exchanges. It's not just about how good they project are also considered the payment on this exchanges such as Binance. Plus even you advise them not to enter mid range exchange its inevitable if they dont have funds.

No doubt! It should always be on their list. But I think most of the projects with potential are smart enough these days and will not miss a chance or steps that will make their launch successful. Let them play their plans, they have a lot of brains they probably know their tracks.

exchange markets that have large liquidity also require something that the developer must provide.

You can give the same understanding to the project that you are following first, sometimes there are some parties who do not want to spend their big funds early only for listing IEO in trusted exchanges, this is your chance to communicate it directly to the cartesi parties in more detail.

You are wrong calling out to developers and making it appear as if liquidity is the silver bullet that will make their project successful. That is not true. Liquidity is just a simple aftereffect of a project with a working product, an active team, vibrant partnerships, and so many other factors. Liquidity cannot just be given out by the exchange however large it may be. Remember that even the largest exchanges are delisting coins because they do not have the liquidity.

Liquidity of an exchange is just one part of a successful IEO but before all the listing of Big exchanges, the project must have a well thought whitepaper, professional presentations, good marketing strategy and an adept developer.  Missing any one of those will hinder the project's success.

Liquidity is just one of the factors that makes a program successful for a time being! It's definitely not the only factor that counts! In long term, the project quality and profitability of a project also comes into the picture and that's where everything goes for a toss! If a project is not handled professionally, liquidity will not matter and that's what is happening to a lot of IEO projects nowadays!

We have seen a number of IEOs conducted by big exchanges in 2019, but can you name at least 5 which are still successful?

Liquidity has the same meant as the demand that already raised by the coin in the market. The project becomes successful caused by it create a proper development that makes a lot of demand interested to create their buy wall order in the market. Liquidity will not come instantly even if you are getting listed on the big market. Exchange site which is not having it will make the project becomes instant scam or fraud.
That's why some people called big exchange site gives more guarantee.

this is some 80IQ shit right here :D
a prime example of this is the VBK IEO, it had massive liqidity, a solid team, good use case/idea, and sold out in 3 hours
they then put up massive buy walls to support with liquidity
it then proceeded to fall flat on it face, the walls got eaten, and it continued to fall. its now at a 95% loss for IEO buyers, an almost total flop market wise
one could argue VBK did EVERYTHING they could do prevent this, one could also argue they probably sold alot more "Angelcoins" prehand that they forgot to mention, who knows
thats crypto baby!

Very low projects are legit nowadays and that is why we have to rely on projects from top exchanges instead of projects that lists on low exchanges, i think it's that simple, many projects have failed in 2019 because they list on low exchanges and the developers still failed to learn lesson

Many developers don't, i believe developers or upcoming developers are amongst us that's why i make the original post, if you are not a developer or a developer wannabe just read and move on, the importance of too exchange that many developers failed to see is why i created the OP.

Whatever liquidity is indeed very important for the project. but the problem is sometimes a project is unable to pay fees on a top exchange, it is not uncommon to see a good and potential project, but to do crowdfunding on a simple, successful exchange. I think even though it is listed on the top exchange, but it has minimal potential, later the edges are only directed at manipulation.

You need to be more specific about your post, we all know about this but as users that's not our problems. Prepare liquidity is exchanges responsibility, they can use fresh fund from investor or exchanges profit as back up fund. More important is create healthy market for better volume, if they can do that I believe investor and trader will stay more longer than take dump action.

Liquidity is important. That's the way to attract many trader/investor invest in that coin/token
But ofc, it needs reason to get good liquidity, such as good project, good team, partnership, community etc.
Those are what should coin has. If not, liquidity wont be reached. Or even investor wont see the coin

Means that only the liquidity factor makes the IEO project successful or not?
If that's the reason there should be a lot of IEO projects in the top ranks at the moment.
But in reality an IEO project also needs a good concept in order to compete with existing large projects.

Liquidity is always considered first when investors look at the project because if that coin can not make investors feel secure, it is just shitcoin and you should find ways to stay away. In fact, exchanges like Latoken, p2pb2b or Hotbit have very poor liquidity and many of the projects listed here make people feel uninterested in participating.

I think currently should only choose to invest in large exchanges such as Binance, Okex, Huobi because this is the top 3 largest exchanges in this market and the liquidity is always very high so there is no need to worry about trading.

Liquidity and exchange reliabelity are doing this

You're right in one sense.

Liquidity is one of the most important attributes that a project can have within its infancy. Investors love to have liquidity, sometimes more so than even the long term fundamentals when we are talking about the short term markets.

As a result of IEO providing liquidity to these newly born tokens they can attract short term investors; but does not necessarily guarantee that in the long run a project would succeed. That still depends a lot on the team and developers themselves.