Bitcoin Forum

Hello everyone,

Our latest DuckDice review has just gone live  8) You can find it here: https://bitcoinchaser.com/casino/duckdice-review/

We are looking for community feedback specifically covering issues that players have experienced on the site, as well as what they like about the platform.

Thanks again everyone! :)

If you want to read some user's experience, you can look up at some discussions and reviews on their ANN thread:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1676313.0

Unfortunately, they were tagged by some DTs here with a negative feedback way back 2017 which is likely unresolved until now. Refer here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=917361

Elaborating some few issues as well.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103053.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5144652.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2022797.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5090388.0

Looks like whoever wrote that article clearly doesn't understand grammar, how can you not even know when to end a sentence with a period?

I'd suggest providing some more depth to your reviews and hiring a native writer.

Hey, I quite enjoyed learning about the site but what I'd like to suggest is in relation to the interactive game, which btw I think it's a really nice touch but while reading this section I noticed it how it was mentioned its availability for mobile users only. I think this feature is cool and its availability should, in my opinion, extend over that of mobile users

Source: https://bitcoinchaser.com/casino/duckdice-review

Your review it a total joke and poorly researched. No one in their right mind would say such about DuckDice unless you are paid to do so. Just do a little digging around the forum especially the scam accusations board

Prior of doing a review you simply should put "duckdice scam" into google. ;)

Despite, the problem is not to review something, the problem is to enforce the money they scammed from customers!

You need to stop creating a new thread for every single bitcoin casino that you review on your site and instead just create one thread with your review website which would include the reviews to all the casinos.

So far I noticed you created a thread for DuckDice, Legends of Cleopatra, and Betchain. Since there are 100's of Bitcoin Casinos are you going to thread 100's of threads? Eventually all of them will get locked or deleted.

Regarding your writing skills, I've read your DuckDice review and didn't find any errors and could understand it no problem. No idea why the above posters said it was poor.

Below link redirects you to the profile of Duckdice here on Bitcointalk. Check the trust ratings to get an idea as to why many people don't like this site.

Check this link op: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=917361

This is something I noticed too(Posted in his recent Betchain thread). I can understand that op wants to attract attention towards his site, but this is not the right way to do so. A single dedicated thread is the best way to tackle this problem.

There so many tools out there that can improve grammer on this particular article. I am suprised that proof reading was not done before publishing this article. Try using grammarly next time before publishing.

I think DuckDice had a huge problem, which you can find in their trust settings,,, and which you should really reflect and talk about in your review. For the sake of openness and transparency. Now of course everybody has the chance to do better and change their reputation but you cannot for sure ignore it in your review:)

Op may be paid to do the review or simply lacking information about duckdice and even don't know how to use period at the same time. Reviee like that viewed by any gamblers who are looking for review of the duckdice will put to trouble. Such misleading information would lead to trouble.

Yes, it really depends on duckdice if they will resolved the previous issues but if the site owner is inactive then it won't be resolved and the negative trust will remain as it was. We should suggest that op should add all information to the review like the trust issue (negative trust) and other stuff that will help gamblers to avoid such site until the issue is resolved.

I don't think that once lost trust could be easily brought back, it's not that simple.
It's up to DuckDice how much efforts they will put to ensure people they have solved all issues from the past and decided to run legitimate and transparent bussines.
However, users that suffered damage once will not be so easy to convince and only long term honest behaviour of casino owners can improve situation but not over night.

Ouch! But thanks for that :) We will take note of this.

Very good point, should be definitly part of the review. In general, if reviews reuse the sites trust rating here at BTT it strengthens the importance of such reviews and leads to the fact that sites have an immediate interest in getting the causes of the trust ratings sorted out asap.
Are there currently any scam accusations open against DuckDice? A quick forum search brought up only old (2017) or sorted out accusations.

As it stands at the moment people are saying that they're still owed money from them since the last shout-down of the business. If you want to read more into this, you can have a look at their first launch page, where discussions about their negative review is ongoing: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1676313.2760

Op should added it on the site's review about duckdice. It is important not to miss any information regarding to the said site. It would also help gamblers know such information and save them from facing a problem and not waste time or worst. I think it is not yet resolved.

^ A pure joke and nonsense one to be honest. OP did not matter about the review if that is good or not as long as Op can benefit from it through affiliating the website. Op simply promote the website he made different thread here together with that link. His given fake review on his own just for the sake of the profit might be got from affiliation or referral link. Even though Duckdice here is very well known on scamming issues and unsolved cases towards them.

Basically every single bitcoin casino review site is more or less the same. They almost never write anything negative about the casino because they actually want you to visit the site under their affiliate link, make a deposit, and they will earn money from you.

If they put "this site is a scam don't gamble here" then nobody would click the link and they wouldn't get any referrals. Might as well not bother writing a review in that scenario. One thing that these review sites don't realize is this. If they promote some type of shady sites that scams their gamblers, eventually they might start scamming their affiliate people too. So best to avoid a site like that all together.

The problem is not to review or find an online casino or sportsbook.

The problem is to collect your money if the online casino or sportsbook will try to scam you!

Does your review site offer a collection service, or do you simply put the affiliate commissions in your pocket and that is it?

Exactly this.

But does your service actually deliver people's money back either though? So far, we've seen you advertising your service a lot, but I haven't seen anything that shows you can actually deliver on your promises.

Nobody is getting their money back if a casino goes rogue, it's as simple as that, and it's one of the risks of playing at sketchy platforms.

If people don't like that risk, don't play at sketchy platforms!