|
Title: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: truth or dare on February 27, 2020, 10:22:08 PM This member jollygood is using the trust stem as a weapon for personal retribution.
He seems to be upset that he is excluded from the new guild that wishes to establish a transparent set of objective standards that ensure people use the trust system to give warnings to those that pose a direct fnancial threat. Rather than use it to silence people who say things they don't like or point out they are scammer puppets under the guise of scam hunters. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53920334#msg53920334 Jolly good has been. caught out before going after small scams and scammers only to shy away from DT members who are offering to work or assist the very scams he is "apparently" trying to scam hunt?? read thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5205331.0 read thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.msg53296788#msg53296788 see how lauda a few posts up is trying to defend his scamming pal suchmoon is there calling this blatant scam facilitating and enabling " erratic judgement " until mosprognoz calls him fat. Once suchmoon is insulted they reveal they knew mosprognoz was a scammer all along. Just like she is well aware lauda is a dirty scammer too but dared not openly attack him. one can research and note how mosprognoz and lauds were all set to work with them and JollyGood did nothing to them, actually you note JollyGood and documented scammer lauds are both crying that mods don't ban people who present truths about them they wish to remain hidden He is clearly a coward and scammer puppet since why else would he call out scams and punish them then do nothing and say nothing to his DT pals that seek to work with those same scams or offer advice to them to assist their acceptance on this forum.. A double standards cowardly illiterate weasel. Will police all scams that he feels pose no threat to his position here. Gives his scammer assisting DT handlers a free pass though. JollyGood of bitcoin talk dirty untrustworthy scumbag. Examples can be given on request. Or one may view JollyGoods prior behaviors and his lack of action towards DT pals working with, assisting or facilitating the very scams he is busting other members for working with. Exclude him from your trust lists ~Jolly Good My sig my avatar are for sale he says.... so are his morals and opinions. These types are all the same. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: yahoo62278 on February 27, 2020, 10:59:29 PM Can't you kids learn how to play nice? Getting a little ridiculous with all these blah blah is a trust abuser threads. Just ~ him and move on.
BTW who cares about the guild bs too, it's just someone(TECHSHARE) trying to start an actual gang. Nothing objective about it. Just a totally biased group hoping to take over IMO. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: truth or dare on February 27, 2020, 11:40:09 PM Can't you kids learn how to play nice? Getting a little ridiculous with all these blah blah is a trust abuser threads. Just ~ him and move on. BTW who cares about the guild bs too, it's just someone(TECHSHARE) trying to start an actual gang. Nothing objective about it. Just a totally biased group hoping to take over IMO. I don't think that can be true. Since the important aspect of the guild is not the specific members, only that they abide with transparent objective standards that provide the optimal environment here that can currently be devised. JollyGood is a prime example of the urgent need to prevent red tags bring used to crush free speech. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: yahoo62278 on February 27, 2020, 11:47:12 PM Can't you kids learn how to play nice? Getting a little ridiculous with all these blah blah is a trust abuser threads. Just ~ him and move on. BTW who cares about the guild bs too, it's just someone(TECHSHARE) trying to start an actual gang. Nothing objective about it. Just a totally biased group hoping to take over IMO. I don't think that can be true. Since the important aspect of the guild is not the specific members, only that they abide with transparent objective standards that provide the optimal environment here that can currently be devised. JollyGood is a prime example of the urgent need to prevent red tags bring used to crush free speech. Really? This right here makes it a biased group. Why you think he listed these names? For fun? SUGGESTED INCLUSIONS: qwk monkeynuts Ticked figmentofmyass BayAreaCoins Lesbian Cow Rmcdermott927 teeGUMES bill gator LoyceV eddie13 hacker1001101001 DdmrDdmr SUGGESTED EXCLUSIONS: ~smoothie ~BitcoinEXpress ~Vod ~Foxpup ~ibminer ~TMAN ~Lauda ~Timelord2067 ~TheNewAnon135246 ~mindrust ~cryptodevil ~suchmoon ~owlcatz ~nutildah ~tmfp ~yahoo62278 ~Last of the V8s ~Lutpin ~TwitchySeal ~bob123 ~marlboroza ~blurryeyed ~nullius ~JollyGood ~mosprognoz ~DireWolfM14 EDIT YOUR TRUST LIST HERE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust) Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on February 28, 2020, 12:21:08 AM I had to unIGNORE you just to see what all the fuss was about and why another thread with my name in the title was started by yet another imbecile ::)
Not to my surprise after reading it I realised it was nothing much (another pathetic thread) but nonetheless I am posting my views here... This member jollygood is using the trust stem as a weapon for personal retribution. Where is the proof? Link?He seems to be upset that he is excluded from the new guild that wishes to establish a transparent set of objective standards that ensure people use the trust system to give warnings to those that pose a direct fnancial threat. Rather than use it to silence people who say things they don't like or point out they are scammer puppets under the guise of scam hunters. I have no interest in any nonsensical guild or any other system within a system that is not authorised as an official facility by theymos. Regarding the link, it is to a useless and worthless thread. Any imbecile can create a thread for the sake of attention seeking and creating division - I do not have much time for those who glorify themselves completely with narcissism.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53920334#msg53920334 Jolly good has bee. caught out before going after small scams and scammers only to shy away from DT members who are offering to work or assist the very scams he is "apparently" trying to scam hunt?? Where is the proof? Link?He is clearly a coward and scammer puppet since why else would he call out scams and punish them then do nothing and say nothing to his DT pals that seek to work with those same scams or offer advice to them to assist their acceptance on this forum.. Where is the proof? Link?A double standards cowardly illiterate weasel. That is a new one. I have never been called that before, I will add it to my resumé of being on the receiving end of name-calling.Will police all scams that he feels pose no threat to his position here. Gives his scammer assisting DT handlers a free pass though. Where is the proof? Link?JollyGood of bitcoin talk dirty untrustworthy scumbag. Where is the proof? Link?Examples can be given on request. Or one may view JollyGoods prior behaviors and his lack of action towards DT pals working with, assisting or facilitating the very scams he is busting other members for working with. Where is the proof? Link?Exclude him from your trust lists On the basis of.... ?~Jolly Good My sig my avatar are for sale he says.... so are his morals and opinions. These types are all the same. Where is the proof? Link?Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: suchmoon on February 28, 2020, 12:47:18 AM I know red-trusting CH's alts is a popular sport around here but come on... what possible benefit does this red trust bring to the forum?
On the flip side, there are negative consequences, one of which is new threads popping up to complain about it and a forthcoming new alt account, and generally fueling incessant rants against the system. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: AlexSimion on February 28, 2020, 06:49:54 AM Another day another bullshit "trust abuse" reputation thread . This section is starting to look like the the plot of the young and the restless , 100 seasons of the same old recycled crap over and over again.
Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Lauda on February 28, 2020, 06:50:47 AM Another day another bullshit "trust abuse" reputation thread . This section is starting to look like the the plot of the young and the restless , 100 seasons of the same old recycled crap over and over again. The problem is inherently a failure of moderation i.e. the staff team. The tolerance for trolling and bullshit is absurd. Nobody needs this.Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: TECSHARE on February 28, 2020, 08:47:38 AM Can't you kids learn how to play nice? Getting a little ridiculous with all these blah blah is a trust abuser threads. Just ~ him and move on. BTW who cares about the guild bs too, it's just someone(TECHSHARE) trying to start an actual gang. Nothing objective about it. Just a totally biased group hoping to take over IMO. Take over what? This giant pile of shit you call the trust system? Now because I offer any resistance whatsoever to this abuse by exercising my right to have a voice in the system I am trying to "take over"? All I am doing is advocating for supporting people who I think use the trust system properly. Everyone else is free to form their own little cliques and abuse people who criticize them. Of course any time I include, exclude, criticize, or organize people within it it is automatically evidence of abuse of some kind. Can't you kids learn how to play nice? Getting a little ridiculous with all these blah blah is a trust abuser threads. Just ~ him and move on. BTW who cares about the guild bs too, it's just someone(TECHSHARE) trying to start an actual gang. Nothing objective about it. Just a totally biased group hoping to take over IMO. I don't think that can be true. Since the important aspect of the guild is not the specific members, only that they abide with transparent objective standards that provide the optimal environment here that can currently be devised. JollyGood is a prime example of the urgent need to prevent red tags bring used to crush free speech. Really? This right here makes it a biased group. Why you think he listed these names? For fun? Who is free of bias? You? Anyone who claims to be free of bias is lying. You are free to maintain your own bias just as I am, even if that were the case that the list is bias. This list is nothing more than a number of users who I feel either use the trust system appropriately, or abuse it. What you want from me is submission and silence in the face of abuse, not lack of bias. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: blurryeyed on February 28, 2020, 10:10:35 AM I had to unIGNORE you just to see what all the fuss was about and why another thread with my name in the title was started by yet another imbecile ::) I didn't even bother unignoring. Tagged & moved on to the next crybaby thread. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on February 28, 2020, 12:12:35 PM Maybe those responsible for moderation are showing a great deal of tolerance because of the open and liberal format of the forum. It is precisely because of that open and liberal attitude that some users come along and push the boundaries of trolling and trash-posting.
Unless a consensus can be reached where a united request to ask moderators to take action much early can be put forward, things will remain the same. Another day another bullshit "trust abuse" reputation thread . This section is starting to look like the the plot of the young and the restless , 100 seasons of the same old recycled crap over and over again. The problem is inherently a failure of moderation i.e. the staff team. The tolerance for trolling and bullshit is absurd. Nobody needs this.Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Slow death on February 28, 2020, 12:51:25 PM you wrote a lot when in fact your objective was this
Exclude him from your trust lists ~Jolly Good honestly, I see no reason for anyone to exclude Jollygood My sig my avatar are for sale he says.... so are his morals and opinions. These types are all the same. I confess that I didn't understand anything and there are more things that I can't understand, how is it possible that a person who creates account on February 10 knows so much about Lauda? very long posts, frequent attacks on the trust system and Lauda, you remind me of someone Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on February 28, 2020, 01:01:17 PM Where is the proof? Link? Don't bother even asking that, because all you'll get is another diatribe. Also, I would advise not taking OP off ignore. Just keep him on it, and even if there's a thread with your name in the title, just ignore it. He's just baiting you into responding, and there's nothing you can write that's going to change his mind--nor do you really need to write anything. In all these threads OP or one of his alt accounts has made, has there ever been any support from the community at large? Nope. So it's not like you have to defend yourself lest your name get sullied, because nobody's listening to all that nonsense (or at least not taking it seriously). Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: bonesjonesreturns on February 28, 2020, 07:52:21 PM I know red-trusting CH's alts is a popular sport around here but come on... what possible benefit does this red trust bring to the forum? On the flip side, there are negative consequences, one of which is new threads popping up to complain about it and a forthcoming new alt account, and generally fueling incessant rants against the system. Suchmoon I believes knows what truth and dare is referring to. It involves mosprognoz and lauda. Both of who she knows are dirty, but is scared of the scammer lauda like many here. Jollygod sure lauda and mozprognoz trying to facilitate a scam and even told the scam to hide with an alt account. Jollygood does not say or do anything to his friends lauda and mosprognoz. JollyGood and lauda both crying for moderator intervention prevent details being discussed they want people to forget will assist truth and dare. Next time better to provide some evidence from the start in the thread. These cry for proof when you accuse them, but feel no obligation when accusing your account or tag it for advertising what a DT members is promoting himself. Alt account is fine an speaking the truth with high risk is the intended purpose for alt accounts Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Lauda on February 28, 2020, 07:54:11 PM Suchmoon I believes knows what truth and dare is referring to. It involves mosprognoz and lauda. Both of who she knows are dirty, but is scared of the scammer lauda like many here. Jollygod sure lauda and mozprognoz trying to facilitate a scam and even told the scam to hide with an alt account. Jollygood does not say or do anything to his friends lauda and mosprognoz. QFR.Alt account is fine an speaking the truth with high risk is the intended purpose for alt accounts Can you make alt accounts as fast as I can tag them? If there was some more consensus to stop labeling defamation as trolling, then the question would be: Can you make alt accounts as fast as we can flag them? ::)Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: bonesjonesreturns on February 28, 2020, 08:16:13 PM Suchmoon I believes knows what truth and dare is referring to. It involves mosprognoz and lauda. Both of who she knows are dirty, but is scared of the scammer lauda like many here. Jollygod sure lauda and mozprognoz trying to facilitate a scam and even told the scam to hide with an alt account. Jollygood does not say or do anything to his friends lauda and mosprognoz. QFR.Alt account is fine an speaking the truth with high risk is the intended purpose for alt accounts Can you make alt accounts as fast as I can tag them? If there was some more consensus to stop labeling defamation as trolling, then the question would be: Can you make alt accounts as fast as we can flag them? ::)Off topic. This is the point scammer. There is full expectation of red trust from scammers like you. The main treasure must stay behind the shields. Keep throwing red silly baboons. Don't try to label the truth as defamation dirty bitch https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0 You are low life. JollyGood double standards coward. It is there for those to view. Suchmoon know but is scared one. JollyGood scared to say anything against scammer lauda and mosprognoz lauda bitch for trying to help scams work here. Scams Hollywood knows well. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5205331.0 All are collude together and make a invulnerable gang. Truth or dare can tell more. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Lauda on February 28, 2020, 08:19:13 PM Suchmoon know but is scared one. Suchmoony what are you scared of kittens? :-\ :DTitle: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: suchmoon on February 28, 2020, 08:34:54 PM Suchmoon know but is scared one. Suchmoony what are you scared of kittens? :-\ :DOf course. Everyone should be. I just came across your dox and it's terrifying: https://media.giphy.com/media/f2fVSJWddYb6g/giphy.gif Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: bonesjonesreturns on February 28, 2020, 08:49:12 PM Suchmoon want to make a joke about it
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5207250.msg53296788#msg53296788 The only thing to make suchmoon unfriend her scam pals or boss lauda is insult her ego If they call fat or make her look foolish and talk in a condescending tone with her Then she reveals she knows for long time before they are scammers. She know mosprognoz she know Lauda same. JollyGood the sameway. Punish only the small juniors and look away when scammer lauda or other dirty DT dirty turds will help a scam to be accepted. Don't trust each of those. Each one can read history here to see it is true Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: suchmoon on February 28, 2020, 09:10:38 PM The only thing to make suchmoon unfriend her scam pals or boss lauda is insult her ego If they call fat or make her look foolish and talk in a condescending tone with her My ego is so fat that it can't be defeated with puny insults. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on February 28, 2020, 10:31:16 PM Another pathetic imbecile alt-account...
Suchmoon I believes knows what truth and dare is referring to. It involves mosprognoz and lauda. Both of who she knows are dirty, but is scared of the scammer lauda like many here. Jollygod sure lauda and mozprognoz trying to facilitate a scam and even told the scam to hide with an alt account. Jollygood does not say or do anything to his friends lauda and mosprognoz. QFR.Alt account is fine an speaking the truth with high risk is the intended purpose for alt accounts Can you make alt accounts as fast as I can tag them? If there was some more consensus to stop labeling defamation as trolling, then the question would be: Can you make alt accounts as fast as we can flag them? ::)Off topic. This is the point scammer. There is full expectation of red trust from scammers like you. The main treasure must stay behind the shields. Keep throwing red silly baboons. Don't try to label the truth as defamation dirty bitch https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0 You are low life. JollyGood double standards coward. It is there for those to view. Suchmoon know but is scared one. JollyGood scared to say anything against scammer lauda and mosprognoz lauda bitch for trying to help scams work here. Scams Hollywood knows well. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5205331.0 All are collude together and make a invulnerable gang. Truth or dare can tell more. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: bones261 on February 28, 2020, 10:51:17 PM Another pathetic imbecile alt-account... ~snip I'm curious if this new alt account was in any way inspired by me. Or if it is just a coincidence? And yes, the song is about me. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQZmCJUSC6g) Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on February 28, 2020, 11:19:32 PM It is possible that maybe you have inspired those from the lower end of the fringes to create what could be seen to be a semi doppelganger ;D
Maybe if he posted something worth reading and was a stand up member of this community nobody would have noticed but since he is obviously an alt-account created for mischievous purposes you noticed the similarity straight away. I'm curious if this new alt account was in any way inspired by me. Or if it is just a coincidence? And yes, the song is about me. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQZmCJUSC6g) Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: suchmoon on February 28, 2020, 11:26:41 PM I'm curious if this new alt account was in any way inspired by me. Or if it is just a coincidence? There are no coincidences. There is enough evidence for Timelord to determine that it's your alt. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: truth or dare on March 03, 2020, 04:05:01 PM I'm curious if this new alt account was in any way inspired by me. Or if it is just a coincidence? There are no coincidences. There is enough evidence for Timelord to determine that it's your alt. Make up your mind. These are all alts of cryptohunter any alt that brings up inconvenient truths are cryptohunter. That is proven nutildah the scam faciltating friend of yours says so. JollyGood is going to debunk these claims of they are untrue. Suchmoon you can help him. Tell him how those seeking to work with and facilitate scammers is fine. Like mosprognoz unless he calls you fat of course. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on August 13, 2020, 11:53:50 AM This member jollygood seems to have given me a red tag based on ideas he pulled out of his turd world asshole.
He should be removed from DT and from sig campaigns. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Vod on August 13, 2020, 12:01:15 PM This member jollygood seems to have given me a red tag based on ideas he pulled out of his turd world asshole. Actually, I find his feedback spot on. :) My ego is so fat that it can't be defeated with puny insults. You are showing your age - phat. :) Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on August 13, 2020, 12:21:58 PM Thank you Vod ;D
I had to make it fair so used the following and see nothing wrong with it: BEWARE: "Laudanum" is a newbie account but he is hiding his 'real' user account. Allegations he used malware to gain illegal access to a users email address then used a different alt-account to post here. I added "Laudanum" to my IGNORE list and recommend you all do the same, avoided him like the pneumonic plague. Do not trust him This member jollygood seems to have given me a red tag based on ideas he pulled out of his turd world asshole. Actually, I find his feedback spot on. :)Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on August 13, 2020, 01:06:44 PM This member jollygood seems to have given me a red tag based on ideas he pulled out of his turd world asshole. Actually, I find his feedback spot on. :) My ego is so fat that it can't be defeated with puny insults. You are showing your age - phat. :) That's good to hear. Lets see the evidence for 1. The hack 2 I am responsible. 3. Hiding my real account. Vod has been here since 2011 and is a broke down bum. Imagine the poor lack of judgement to achieve this feat. Brewster wanted tips from Vod. Anything spot on for vod is a sure direct path to being 100% wrong. Parts of your brain dying does not excuse this level of retardation vod. Well maybe it does. Your memory is gone that's for sure. Vod now take it slow and provide the evidence I have asked for. Let's save time. You won't. Allegations with no evidence that some one did something we can't even prove happened. Lol Thanks morons. This is more fun than I remember. Has this got even easier? I need to warm you guys up more. No hiding on ignore now. I can see you need me around you have become soft and fat and pathetic. Yes I know vod and suchmoron have always been that way but the rest of you have really gone down the pan. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Vod on August 13, 2020, 01:11:07 PM Vod now take it slow and provide the evidence I have asked for. Let's save time. You won't. I'm sorry, who are you? Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on August 13, 2020, 01:21:23 PM Vod now take it slow and provide the evidence I have asked for. Let's save time. You won't. I'm sorry, who are you? Irrelevant and anyway you must have the evidence to prove who I am. You just said you support jollygoods claims. Provide the evidence I have asked for. Or by lack thereof you demonstrate you don't know shit and have no clue. You are simply a brain damaged fat fool and broke down bum spouting support for something you clearly can not back up when called on it What are you waiting for you fat retarded dummy? Oh you have no evidence at all? For any of it? Lol Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Vod on August 13, 2020, 03:12:00 PM Sorry, but if you don't know who you are, I'm not going to give you any more attention.
Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on August 13, 2020, 03:37:28 PM Sorry, but if you don't know who you are, I'm not going to give you any more attention. Iow vod is running off because they can not provide any of the evidence I have requested. Also vod you are again refusing to answer whether or not you said parts of your brain died in public. Did you say that yes or no? If you did your feedback is a lie. So far we see vod can not provide any evidence at all to substantiate jollygoods claims at all. Vod is full of shit as usual. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on August 13, 2020, 03:43:36 PM Allegations he used malware to gain illegal access to a users email address then used a different alt-account to post here. Where did that accusation come from? His account just popped up here on the forum in the past day or so, and I haven't read anything about him hacking anything.I added "Laudanum" to my IGNORE list and recommend you all do the same, avoided him like the pneumonic plague. Do not trust him That much I'll agree with, though I'm going to defer adding him to my ignore list for the moment. I've got a feeling he's an alt account of CH or some related member, and if he keeps spouting this tired anti-DT nonsense he'll be added to my ignore list lickety-split.Sorry, but if you don't know who you are, I'm not going to give you any more attention. Frankly, if you knew who he really was you probably wouldn't have given him even this much attention. lolTitle: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: dragonvslinux on August 13, 2020, 06:52:14 PM Allegations he used malware to gain illegal access to a users email address then used a different alt-account to post here. Where did that accusation come from? His account just popped up here on the forum in the past day or so, and I haven't read anything about him hacking anything.Does it even matter if there's a reference or source? This is JG's feedback MO (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5260202.0), take it or leave it really... Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on August 13, 2020, 07:33:33 PM That is the way to do it Vod, do not give any more attention to the attention-seeker otherwise you will be fighting a losing battle.
Vod now take it slow and provide the evidence I have asked for. Let's save time. You won't. I'm sorry, who are you? Sorry, but if you don't know who you are, I'm not going to give you any more attention. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on August 13, 2020, 09:47:14 PM That is the way to do it Vod, do not give any more attention to the attention-seeker otherwise you will be fighting a losing battle. Vod now take it slow and provide the evidence I have asked for. Let's save time. You won't. I'm sorry, who are you? Sorry, but if you don't know who you are, I'm not going to give you any more attention. Wrong Vod will be fighting a losing battle because as he said parts of his brain died. Now he has denied saying it lol That is the basis of his feedback. False, and now he is running away from answering the questions I am asking him. A fat mongoloid chicken shit. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: marlboroza on August 13, 2020, 11:34:39 PM He should be removed [...] from sig campaigns. I contacted his campaign manager and he will be removed shortly.Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on August 13, 2020, 11:42:37 PM He should be removed [...] from sig campaigns. I contacted his campaign manager and he will be removed shortly.Great work moronbozo I see hes already begging to whore it out. Good team work. We should collaborate more often. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: marlboroza on August 13, 2020, 11:53:44 PM Good team work. We should collaborate more often. Good. As we now resolved issue about JollyGood's signature campaign, we can move to resolving issue about JollyGood's avatar campaign. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on August 14, 2020, 12:41:11 AM Good team work. We should collaborate more often. Good. As we now resolved issue about JollyGood's signature campaign, we can move to resolving issue about JollyGood's avatar campaign. Why does he not have a picture of my 19inch flexed arm there already and paying be 1btc per month for the pleasure of looking at it and the kudos of having it associated with his account. Or is 1 btc selling myself short? I mean you would pay more just to touch it once right? Let's say 2btc per.month. You like that new word kudos hey moronbozo? Stick with me kid I'll show you the world. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: hacker1001101001 on September 22, 2020, 11:48:26 AM JollyGood still seems to be a general imbecile. Can't imagine how low life troll he is...
Shame on DT for still keeping that biased trust abuser there. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: KaneVWE on September 22, 2020, 01:31:07 PM JollyGood still seems to be a general imbecile. Can't imagine how low life troll he is... Shame on DT for still keeping that biased trust abuser there. Well to be fair I mean jollygood https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5229023.0 is in good company there on dirty turds 1. He's just a dumb fool who's not smart enough to conceal his blatant double standards and scammer facilitating ways. There are others far more insidious. Jollygood ? Where did this noob trash spring up from anyway. Never heard of this pleb on any project I've taken interest in the past and that is a great many projects. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on September 22, 2020, 01:48:33 PM They are full of nonsense therefore I added them on my ignore list long time ago.
More nonsense from this multi-scamming user who has been exposed in this thread but refuses to post there as he has literally no defence thanks to the efforts by marlboroza: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.0 One day hacker1001101001 he might apologise to the forum community for the multi-scams he participated in to deceive community members. Good team work. We should collaborate more often. Good. As we now resolved issue about JollyGood's signature campaign, we can move to resolving issue about JollyGood's avatar campaign. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: ronaldo40 on January 27, 2021, 12:03:54 PM at this moment mister jollygood is giving negative tags without any reasons and has a big negative obsession for adkinsbet as well
i dont ask people to judge about adkinsbet.com but i want to ask if they can judge about what jollywood is doing is with the principles of begin DT1 member? bumping accusation topics every time, trying to slender adkinsbet in ann topic and giving neg tags for nothing. that could not be the idea of DT1. he is using his DT1 status now to seek revenge for his frustrations Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: stompix on January 27, 2021, 12:30:14 PM bumping accusation topics every time, You're bumping a topic that had no replies for 4 months alsotrying to slender adkinsbet in ann topic Are you sure about that? I know the forum has some really kinky topics but don't know what this one is.Maybe before using big words you should learn how to spell them? he is using his DT1 status now to seek revenge for his frustrations Revenge for what?i dont ask people to judge about adkinsbet.com Thank you for making me interested in that whole drama, I've tried to stay away since topics were multiplying like rabbits there but now I might take a look into it, and especially in this shill army I see so pissed off. LE: I see you have left negative feedback on his account (with no reference or proof) while he has not done so to you, pretty interesting. Talking about frustration and revenge. ;) Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: BlackFor3st on January 27, 2021, 12:37:30 PM bumping accusation topics every time, You're bumping a topic that had no replies for 4 months alsotrying to slender adkinsbet in ann topic Are you sure about that? I know the forum has some really kinky topics but don't know what this one is.Maybe before using big words you should learn how to spell them? he is using his DT1 status now to seek revenge for his frustrations Revenge for what?i dont ask people to judge about adkinsbet.com Thank you for making me interested in that whole drama, I've tried to stay away since topics were multiplying like rabbits there but now I might take a look into it, and especially in this shill army I see so pissed off. LE: I see you have left negative feedback on his account (with no reference or proof) while he has not done so to you, pretty interesting. Talking about frustration and revenge. ;) With this reaction you only made one thing clear, that this is an alt account from jollygood. It is very special that you have a positive trust in your account, and that it comes from jollygood (your self). When I read your comment, I already knew you are the same person. Your trust summary says enough. The way of writing is also exactly the same as jollygood. Next time when you give a reaction, try to use another alt account of yours that is less suspicous. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: stompix on January 27, 2021, 12:51:21 PM With this reaction you only made one thing clear, that this is an alt account from jollygood. Oh, you got me! I almost feel tempted to send Jollygood positive feedback so it will be clear for everyone that I'm his alt, or actually, he is my alt because..age! ;D The way of writing is also exactly the same as jollygood. I'm apologizing in advance to Jollygood ;D, but this is bs man, and you know it! Now that we have concluded I'm an alt of JG, how about the points I've raised, do they become invalid? Guess no! So, now that your shill army has piqued my interest prepare to get slender. (did you google that term to see what it means?) Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on January 27, 2021, 05:14:02 PM With this reaction you only made one thing clear, that this is an alt account from jollygood. Oh, you got me! I almost feel tempted to send Jollygood positive feedback so it will be clear for everyone that I'm his alt, or actually, he is my alt because..age! ;D The way of writing is also exactly the same as jollygood. I'm apologizing in advance to Jollygood ;D, but this is bs man, and you know it! Now that we have concluded I'm an alt of JG, how about the points I've raised, do they become invalid? Guess no! So, now that your shill army has piqued my interest prepare to get slender. (did you google that term to see what it means?) Lol, I thought accusation of alt auto voided everything including indisputable independently verifiable evidence of scamming. Jollygood is a piece of shit. He will punish anyone for scamming except if they are DT. Total double standards piece of corrupt dirt. Chipmixer shills know their position spamming for 5k a month is only safe as long as they collude and keep the corrupt shit stains that are on DT already stay there. Jollygood accuses places of being scams then when those same scams want to work with jollygoods pals to repatriate onto the board he turns a blind eye. Same for running after anyone wearing a yobit banner except if they are DT. Vile little peasants like jollygood will do whatever they can for some btc dust. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Vod on January 27, 2021, 06:26:27 PM at this moment mister jollygood is giving negative tags without any reasons and has a big negative obsession for adkinsbet as well Are you claiming to understand what is going on in his head? ::) If you're going to make a scam accusation - think about what you write. When I read things like "without any reasons" or "everything is 100% a lie" it's an indication you have a weak/no actual argument and need to cast a very wide net. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on January 27, 2021, 07:05:59 PM at this moment mister jollygood is giving negative tags without any reasons and has a big negative obsession for adkinsbet as well Well, I just checked your feedback and am not surprised about your defending the Adkinsbet scammers.i dont ask people to judge about adkinsbet.com but i want to ask if they can judge about what jollywood is doing is with the principles of begin DT1 member? bumping accusation topics every time, trying to slender adkinsbet in ann topic and giving neg tags for nothing. that could not be the idea of DT1. he is using his DT1 status now to seek revenge for his frustrations Considering you were one of the many users that had no principles that you gladly promoted the Yobit scammers for the sake of pocketing signature cash it says everything about you. Thank you for making me interested in that whole drama, I've tried to stay away since topics were multiplying like rabbits there but now I might take a look into it, and especially in this shill army I see so pissed off. LE: I see you have left negative feedback on his account (with no reference or proof) while he has not done so to you, pretty interesting. Talking about frustration and revenge. ;) With this reaction you only made one thing clear, that this is an alt account from jollygood. It is very special that you have a positive trust in your account, and that it comes from jollygood (your self). When I read your comment, I already knew you are the same person. Your trust summary says enough. The way of writing is also exactly the same as jollygood. Next time when you give a reaction, try to use another alt account of yours that is less suspicous. Them telling DT members to withdraw support for the flag in return for one victim getting just a partial amount of their seized funds returned to them shows Adkinsbet are nothing more than opportunistic scammers that try to selective scam here and there. Your diversion tactics are pointless but if it makes you happy - yes you did what nobody else did in the forum, you said I am an alt account operated by stompix ::) With this reaction you only made one thing clear, that this is an alt account from jollygood. Oh, you got me! I almost feel tempted to send Jollygood positive feedback so it will be clear for everyone that I'm his alt, or actually, he is my alt because..age! ;D The way of writing is also exactly the same as jollygood. I'm apologizing in advance to Jollygood ;D, but this is bs man, and you know it! Now that we have concluded I'm an alt of JG, how about the points I've raised, do they become invalid? Guess no! So, now that your shill army has piqued my interest prepare to get slender. (did you google that term to see what it means?) What is the world coming to when users promote scammers for the sake of getting their signature campaign money would go so far as to saying two people with completely different writing styles are operated by the same account. Instead of addressing the issues they create diversion tactics that fall flat on their faces but they keep coming back for more.... silly on their part really. at this moment mister jollygood is giving negative tags without any reasons and has a big negative obsession for adkinsbet as well Are you claiming to understand what is going on in his head? ::) If you're going to make a scam accusation - think about what you write. When I read things like "without any reasons" or "everything is 100% a lie" it's an indication you have a weak/no actual argument and need to cast a very wide net. Some of these users have no moral compass at all and would gladly sell their souls and those of their grandma in return for joining a signature campaign operated by scammers. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: stompix on January 27, 2021, 08:03:32 PM So, since I'm finally back home and with a bit of free time I've had to satisfy my curiosity, unfortunately, it triggered more question than answers, I know you bunch of shills are watching all those topics, I'm sure you're going to read it so enjoy it.
My dear user of account BlackFor3st, can you please let me know how these things are possible? https://ninjastic.space/user/BlackFor3st Altcoins (Deutsch) 234 10% View This is the power of crypto currencies and the marketing of big exchanges are pretty awesome as they were able to expand it to sports. Football is not really familiar in our country but I know that it is very popular in other countries. There a lot more interesting posts already archived about "your country" which seems to be quite far away from the fatherland ;D I thought of typing all this in german but since you haven't posted for quite a few years there I assume you've forgotten the language? Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on January 27, 2021, 10:05:44 PM Funny how jollygood is still trying to criticise people for pushing yobit when his pal was running their sig campaign and he said nothing to them LOL
Jollygood is a double standards scum bag. Research for yourselves. It was pointed out to him that his other mates lauda and mozprognoz trying to ensure a scammer jollygood claimed to have busted worked with them on their reintroduction to the forum under another alt. He didnt dare say shit to them. Jollygood is a total weasel. Like all the other weasels on DT they will tell you that you should have a red tag for thing they let their pals get away with and even worse. Then scum like stompix comes along as sticks up for them? Why because they all collude to control DT so they get to milk the forum with all the best sig spots and other rev streams. Don't let them tell you otherwise. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: gadado on January 28, 2021, 09:49:24 AM Funny how jollygood is still trying to criticise people for pushing yobit when his pal was running their sig campaign and he said nothing to them LOL Jollygood is a double standards scum bag. Research for yourselves. It was pointed out to him that his other mates lauda and mozprognoz trying to ensure a scammer jollygood claimed to have busted worked with them on their reintroduction to the forum under another alt. He didnt dare say shit to them. Jollygood is a total weasel. Like all the other weasels on DT they will tell you that you should have a red tag for thing they let their pals get away with and even worse. Then scum like stompix comes along as sticks up for them? Why because they all collude to control DT so they get to milk the forum with all the best sig spots and other rev streams. Don't let them tell you otherwise. This is a perfect summary. At this stage Jollygood is going a bit crazy as well, as he is apologizing against his own (with his 2 accounts). Probably he forgot to take his pills. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: actmyname on January 28, 2021, 07:36:20 PM Oh, you got me! Yeah, you forgot to log out of the account. Happens to the best of us: sometimes when I'm LoyceV or Lauda or theymos, I post on the wrong topics.That's what happened when I posted this way back: Quote from: Lauda on June 9, 2018, 6:09:23 PM I think Lauda's trust ratings are accurate. Maybe 1% of them have errors or have expired in relevance but that is no example of corruption, at least not blatantly. Oh, silly days. :) At this stage Jollygood is going a bit crazy as well, as he is apologizing against his own (with his 2 accounts). Now, is there any concrete evidence for these claims or should we start linking together everyone who types similarly?Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: nasipadang on January 29, 2021, 05:23:23 PM Somebody must remove that donk jollygood out of DT.
Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on January 29, 2021, 06:08:14 PM Oh, you got me! Yeah, you forgot to log out of the account. Happens to the best of us: sometimes when I'm LoyceV or Lauda or theymos, I post on the wrong topics.That's what happened when I posted this way back: Quote from: Lauda on June 9, 2018, 6:09:23 PM I think Lauda's trust ratings are accurate. Maybe 1% of them have errors or have expired in relevance but that is no example of corruption, at least not blatantly. Oh, silly days. :) At this stage Jollygood is going a bit crazy as well, as he is apologizing against his own (with his 2 accounts). Now, is there any concrete evidence for these claims or should we start linking together everyone who types similarly?This is all largely irrelevant to the independently verifiable evidence that is supplied in the OP. What do you think about that? Would you like to have an open and transparent discussion on jollygoods observable double standards? I have no idea why you actmyname are not more supportive of placing the spotlight on their actions. If you personally busted a scammer and noted 2 other DT members discussing how they can repatriated to the forum and helped to relaunch another service requiring trust if they use those DT members services? What would you do? Same for red tagging those wearing yobit sigs given to them by the campaign manager DT who is working with yobit? Or what about simply not tagging other DT who wore the yobit tags. Jollygood is a double standards corrupt shit stain. Let's be clear on those points regardless of anything else. Also be sure to defend all accusation of alt based on posting style. But lets keep to topic anyway. Jollygood is a double standards corrupt pussy who colludes with his DT bum buddies to push double standards here on others. Jollygood will stand by and let his friends work with scammers but others he will red tag for presenting the truth. Cheap ass little peasant that wants to be part of the sig spamming club. That's all jollygood is. Non achieving parasite on this forum. Scam busting is used largely on DT to give a false impression of being themselves trustworthy. This is a grift many of DT1 are found undeniable to be supporting and protecting scammers. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Vod on January 29, 2021, 07:54:14 PM But lets keep to topic anyway. Jollygood is a double standards corrupt pussy who colludes with his DT bum buddies to push double standards here on others. Curious Laudanum, are you interested in discussing JG with facts and debate, or are you just going to overwhelm any attempt at logic with your unorganized rants? If you are serious, consider that. Or, just ignore and insult me for trying to improve things. The choice is yours. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: wildan88 on January 29, 2021, 10:20:04 PM Oh, you got me! Yeah, you forgot to log out of the account. Happens to the best of us: sometimes when I'm LoyceV or Lauda or theymos, I post on the wrong topics.That's what happened when I posted this way back: Quote from: Lauda on June 9, 2018, 6:09:23 PM I think Lauda's trust ratings are accurate. Maybe 1% of them have errors or have expired in relevance but that is no example of corruption, at least not blatantly. Oh, silly days. :) At this stage Jollygood is going a bit crazy as well, as he is apologizing against his own (with his 2 accounts). Now, is there any concrete evidence for these claims or should we start linking together everyone who types similarly?This is all largely irrelevant to the independently verifiable evidence that is supplied in the OP. What do you think about that? Would you like to have an open and transparent discussion on jollygoods observable double standards? I have no idea why you actmyname are not more supportive of placing the spotlight on their actions. If you personally busted a scammer and noted 2 other DT members discussing how they can repatriated to the forum and helped to relaunch another service requiring trust if they use those DT members services? What would you do? Same for red tagging those wearing yobit sigs given to them by the campaign manager DT who is working with yobit? Or what about simply not tagging other DT who wore the yobit tags. Jollygood is a double standards corrupt shit stain. Let's be clear on those points regardless of anything else. Also be sure to defend all accusation of alt based on posting style. But lets keep to topic anyway. Jollygood is a double standards corrupt pussy who colludes with his DT bum buddies to push double standards here on others. Jollygood will stand by and let his friends work with scammers but others he will red tag for presenting the truth. Cheap ass little peasant that wants to be part of the sig spamming club. That's all jollygood is. Non achieving parasite on this forum. Scam busting is used largely on DT to give a false impression of being themselves trustworthy. This is a grift many of DT1 are found undeniable to be supporting and protecting scammers. What Laudanum is writing, is completely true actually. People who share his opinion get negative trust out of nowhere. The DT system is corrupt and nobody is doing anything about it. Always the same DT members who are replying and defending the others. Actually, this guy Laudanum should be in DT position since he writes useful and honest information. But in return, he get negative tags because he comes to close to the truth and that is not something that you DT member want :) Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on January 29, 2021, 10:27:12 PM How strange, the number of Adkinsbet paid shills is still not as big as I thought it would be. is this the best they can do?
Since Ray has not signed an address to show Adkinsbet are solvent and a real business, it is safe to assume they do not have enough funds to pay for a real army of shills and do not have enough money to purchase lots of accounts for sock-puppet purposes. Oh, you got me! Yeah, you forgot to log out of the account. Happens to the best of us: sometimes when I'm LoyceV or Lauda or theymos, I post on the wrong topics.That's what happened when I posted this way back: Quote from: Lauda on June 9, 2018, 6:09:23 PM I think Lauda's trust ratings are accurate. Maybe 1% of them have errors or have expired in relevance but that is no example of corruption, at least not blatantly. Oh, silly days. :) At this stage Jollygood is going a bit crazy as well, as he is apologizing against his own (with his 2 accounts). Now, is there any concrete evidence for these claims or should we start linking together everyone who types similarly?This is all largely irrelevant to the independently verifiable evidence that is supplied in the OP. What do you think about that? Would you like to have an open and transparent discussion on jollygoods observable double standards? I have no idea why you actmyname are not more supportive of placing the spotlight on their actions. If you personally busted a scammer and noted 2 other DT members discussing how they can repatriated to the forum and helped to relaunch another service requiring trust if they use those DT members services? What would you do? Same for red tagging those wearing yobit sigs given to them by the campaign manager DT who is working with yobit? Or what about simply not tagging other DT who wore the yobit tags. Jollygood is a double standards corrupt shit stain. Let's be clear on those points regardless of anything else. Also be sure to defend all accusation of alt based on posting style. But lets keep to topic anyway. Jollygood is a double standards corrupt pussy who colludes with his DT bum buddies to push double standards here on others. Jollygood will stand by and let his friends work with scammers but others he will red tag for presenting the truth. Cheap ass little peasant that wants to be part of the sig spamming club. That's all jollygood is. Non achieving parasite on this forum. Scam busting is used largely on DT to give a false impression of being themselves trustworthy. This is a grift many of DT1 are found undeniable to be supporting and protecting scammers. What Laudanum is writing, is completely true actually. People who share his opinion get negative trust out of nowhere. The DT system is corrupt and nobody is doing anything about it. Always the same DT members who are replying and defending the others. Actually, this guy Laudanum should be in DT position since he writes useful and honest information. But in return, he get negative tags because he comes to close to the truth and that is not something that you DT member want :) Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on January 30, 2021, 01:39:14 AM And what about the Adkinsbet scammers that you are now shilling for?
And what about paid shills such as you? Should you be removed? Should Adkinsbet be removed for selective scamming users? Maybe in your opinion they should be removed for blackmailing DT users in to withdrawing support for a legitimate flag in return for them partially returning funds they stole? Or maybe not, in your opinion ::) Somebody must remove that donk jollygood out of DT. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: andulolika on January 30, 2021, 11:22:02 AM I like the word imbecile.
Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on January 30, 2021, 03:51:17 PM And what about the Adkinsbet scammers that you are now shilling for? And what about paid shills such as you? Should you be removed? Should Adkinsbet be removed for selective scamming users? Maybe in your opinion they should be removed for blackmailing DT users in to withdrawing support for a legitimate flag in return for them partially returning funds they stole? Or maybe not, in your opinion ::) Somebody must remove that donk jollygood out of DT. Look at scum bag double standards fake scam hunter jolly good Remember mozprognoz here is trying to help the same scammers jollygood says he busted to sneak back to the forum under a new name and use his pals laudas escrow service here Actually mozprognoz was more or less saying that was the only way back .. They would work with scams if they could make some money out of it more or less Jollygood was told to act on this and was well aware but that cowardly fake scam hunter didnt dare say shit to mozprognoz or lauda , no red tags nothing as usual will collude with DT and allow it to happen unchallenged. Look even has mozprognoz in his DT includes way after the fact If this is one of you guys's scambuster proteges that's all well and good.. Maybe he is a good detective and scam buster, but the things I am seeing this account post in relation to forum social and business etiquette are just about blowing my mind.. I forced them to start an escrowed campaign. There are a lot of scam accusations and some People think that this exchange is a scam (Including me). But, still waiting for the problem with the trust to be resolved so as not to expose participants to the risks. That's the reason for this delay. mosprognoz, can you give one more good advice on how to speed it all up? That is a very silly excuse. If only one neg tag from DT member is stopping you from starting of this bloody sig campaign, than buy a new legal copper member account and start the promised campaign. Now you are suggesting he evade red trust by using multi accounts? Why do you want this campaign to run so badly? How are you so ignorant of proper business etiquette here? You don't "force" escrow.. You don't advertise for scams, escrow or not.. You don't just create a new account to evade red trust.. "Legal" is not a descriptor of legitimacy.. LEARN You trying to step up as some position of authority to "resolve" anything is laughable while stating so many utterly distasteful propositions.. I am almost in disbelief.. Now you are suggesting he evade red trust by using multi accounts? Anyone can buy a copper member account any time. That is completely legal. Making a new account does not let you escape your feedback.. I suggested that Obviously this guy won't listen to a word I say so I am handing this responsibility off to you below users who trust mosprognoz and have him included on your trust lists.. Your boy here needs to be shown the ropes if you care about him because this shit ain't gonna fly.. owlcatz, psycodad, JeromeTash, dkbit98, Coinfan, nutildah, and JollyGood all have DT +trust on this account and it has inclusions from the following.. mosprognoz's judgement is Trusted by: 1. nutildah (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=317618) +5 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (10) 1486 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/317618.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/317618.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=nutildah)) 2. IconFirm (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=841288) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=841288) +3 / =1 / -0) (38 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/841288.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/841288.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=IconFirm)) 3. blurryeyed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=885996) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=885996) +3 / =2 / -0) (11 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/885996.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/885996.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=blurryeyed)) 4. xtraelv (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=897509) +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (23) 1402 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/897509.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/897509.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=xtraelv)) 5. JollyGood (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016855) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1016855) +10 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (6) 217 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1016855.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/1016855.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=JollyGood)) 6. CryptopreneurBrainboss (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1052091) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1052091) +1 / =0 / -0) (894 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1052091.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/1052091.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=CryptopreneurBrainboss)) 7. logfiles (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1247226) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1247226) +2 / =0 / -0) (389 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1247226.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/1247226.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=logfiles)) 8. dkbit98 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1410401) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1410401) +2 / =1 / -0) (514 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/1410401.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/1410401.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=dkbit98)) 9. TalkStar (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2136362) (Trust: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2136362) +8 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (4) 393 Merit earned (http://loyce.club/Merit/history/2136362.html)) (Trust list (http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-30_Sat_04.13h/2136362.html)) (BPIP (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=TalkStar)) Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5102296.0) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5201132.msg53074902#msg53074902 That's my signature.. lolPlease stop posting off topic related posts, you can be banned for that. This threat has nothing to do with your relationship with Lauda and with a freedom of speech. Now he thinks I'm going to, or can be, banned for having a quote in my signature.. And one more question. Why are you using the quote from Lauda's post as your signature? It looks like a plagiarism done via signature. It is not plagerism, lol.. Click the link!!!!!!!See what I'm sayin? DT1 and doesn't even know what plagiarism is!!! And this guy is on DT1 !!!!! Utterly unbelievable.. What is this place coming to? If you guys want this guy on DT he needs to learn, or be removed.. _______________________________________________________________________________ ________________ 1/8/2020 adding what could be considered as a blackmail (against me) "offer" here to the OP.. Now about the offer I and my friends will start investigation regarding some project created by "Jim Blasko" and his alias (In this case it is you) .... .. ... .. .. .. . I am just a lttle bit lazy to serch more, because I am sure we will find a lot of new info about creators of that wonderful projects Now here is my offer. You just stop posting B.S about me on the forum. I will do the same. Or I will proceed with my investigation. Now jollygood wants to ruin a legends account for giving an opinion check back 1 page https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5229023.msg56222983#msg56222983 Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on January 30, 2021, 03:55:18 PM Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on January 30, 2021, 04:23:24 PM Should blender Wallet really be sponsoring someone who is corrupt and trust abusing members here whilst including those that are willing to work with scams if they can make money on their trust includes? I guess its only something blender wallet can answer. Should corrupt trust abusers and those willing to include those willing to work with scams for a fee be paid to post? I think trust abusers are corrupt and trying to prevent warnings about scammers being posted. That is dangerous behavior that has direct financial implications for honest members. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: andulolika on January 31, 2021, 06:35:40 PM Should blender Wallet really be sponsoring someone who is corrupt and trust abusing members here whilst including those that are willing to work with scams if they can make money on their trust includes? I guess its only something blender wallet can answer. Should corrupt trust abusers and those willing to include those willing to work with scams for a fee be paid to post? I think trust abusers are corrupt and trying to prevent warnings about scammers being posted. That is dangerous behavior that has direct financial implications for honest members. There's plenty of abuse, and even more shittext being posted to cover stuff and make reading unapetisant. I'm not sure why all the whining goes towards 2-3 folks when you got a whole group of atleast 20 members with back of atleast one mod. On the other hand what the hell is blender wallet... wallets suck private keys are nice. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: BitcoinAccepted on February 01, 2021, 10:11:36 PM I can't really understand where JollyGood got the status DT1 member from? Anyone who does anything they don't like is immediately given a negative tag.
And that while he himself is on the forum with several alt accounts. Stompix is 100% his alt account. And he has received only one positive trust from .. precisely .. JollyGood himself. And who is suddenly a DT member too? How long should that circus last with JollyGood as a DT member? The community would be wise to throw out figures like JollyGood from the DT group. He is seriously damaging DT's reputation. Somebody should stop him for tagging out of nowhere without any reason. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on February 02, 2021, 03:11:08 PM This thread says it all about the way Adkinsbet have disgraced rhemselves using paid shills and sock-puppets. Instead of using them to promote their agenda they started attacking DT members and those claiming to be victims.
Adkinsbet Shills & Sock-Puppets: "Slender/Slander" and "Donk": https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313867.0 Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: ronaldo40 on February 02, 2021, 11:06:32 PM I can't really understand where JollyGood got the status DT1 member from? Anyone who does anything they don't like is immediately given a negative tag. And that while he himself is on the forum with several alt accounts. Stompix is 100% his alt account. And he has received only one positive trust from .. precisely .. JollyGood himself. And who is suddenly a DT member too? How long should that circus last with JollyGood as a DT member? The community would be wise to throw out figures like JollyGood from the DT group. He is seriously damaging DT's reputation. Somebody should stop him for tagging out of nowhere without any reason. maybe jollywood can finally give an answer why he is using alt accounts on the forum that have also dt status like stompix and he should explain why stompix has received 1 trust from jollywood this is just a big conspiracy i dont think these things are allowed Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on February 02, 2021, 11:49:57 PM I added the following to my distrust list:
~AdkinsBET ~aomakun ~BitcoinAccepted ~BlackFor3st ~BTCGOLD ~Cacingkemi ~codegnome ~coin.princess ~cutesgirl ~deadthings ~gadado ~imutlinda ~jollyg00d ~MI6 ~nasipadang ~ongkok87 ~pranjicka ~ronaldo40 ~sempak ~wildan88 Ray from Adkinsbet has just used 7 of his sock-puppets to pump the thread and then locked: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5290408.0 He should have at least resolved the scam accusation made against Adkinsbet but took the wrong option, he still had time to save the reputation of his website if he just stopped using shills and sock-puppets to flood the thread and did not use them to attack any user that questioned their tactics against scam accusations. What will happen to these users that made scam accusations against Adkinsbet and the money they say they are owed? oz.kashi https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5308700.0 polasaz https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5302600.0 Adzivu https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5310071.0 realscout https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5309454.0 Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on February 03, 2021, 11:14:47 AM I can't really understand where JollyGood got the status DT1 member from? Anyone who does anything they don't like is immediately given a negative tag. And that while he himself is on the forum with several alt accounts. Stompix is 100% his alt account. And he has received only one positive trust from .. precisely .. JollyGood himself. And who is suddenly a DT member too? How long should that circus last with JollyGood as a DT member? The community would be wise to throw out figures like JollyGood from the DT group. He is seriously damaging DT's reputation. Somebody should stop him for tagging out of nowhere without any reason. maybe jollywood can finally give an answer why he is using alt accounts on the forum that have also dt status like stompix and he should explain why stompix has received 1 trust from jollywood this is just a big conspiracy i dont think these things are allowed These noob trash double standards greedy dogs like jollygood are a joke. This forum has zero credibility whilst they can give out red tags and flags for pointing to independently verifiable evidence they pushing double standards at best and others are proven scammers. Fuck DT and any turd that supports their self serving corrupt shit. Is there any compelling evidence that jollygood = stompix? Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on February 03, 2021, 09:13:40 PM Adkinsbet should be ashamed of themselves.
Just looking at the list below speaks volumes about the tactics that were employed by Adkinsbet in order to try to pump their thread and in the process try to fool users in to thinking Adkinsbet was something successful when it clearly was not. ~AdkinsBET ~aomakun ~BitcoinAccepted ~BlackFor3st ~BTCGOLD ~Cacingkemi ~codegnome ~coin.princess ~cutesgirl ~deadthings ~gadado ~imutlinda ~jollyg00d ~MI6 ~nasipadang ~ongkok87 ~pranjicka ~ronaldo40 ~sempak ~wildan88 Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: andulolika on February 03, 2021, 09:57:02 PM I can't really understand where JollyGood got the status DT1 member from? Anyone who does anything they don't like is immediately given a negative tag. And that while he himself is on the forum with several alt accounts. Stompix is 100% his alt account. And he has received only one positive trust from .. precisely .. JollyGood himself. And who is suddenly a DT member too? How long should that circus last with JollyGood as a DT member? The community would be wise to throw out figures like JollyGood from the DT group. He is seriously damaging DT's reputation. Somebody should stop him for tagging out of nowhere without any reason. maybe jollywood can finally give an answer why he is using alt accounts on the forum that have also dt status like stompix and he should explain why stompix has received 1 trust from jollywood this is just a big conspiracy i dont think these things are allowed These noob trash double standards greedy dogs like jollygood are a joke. This forum has zero credibility whilst they can give out red tags and flags for pointing to independently verifiable evidence they pushing double standards at best and others are proven scammers. Fuck DT and any turd that supports their self serving corrupt shit. Is there any compelling evidence that jollygood = stompix? Not all DT is fucked. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: GazetaBitcoin on February 04, 2021, 08:13:52 AM I think i last in dt2 for about a week. Good Lord, now I can say that I've seen everything. andulolika was in DT2 after making death threats (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266646.msg54939116#msg54939116), after various scam attempts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231508.msg54928059#msg54928059), after shilling shitcoins (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266095.msg54928424#msg54928424), after being a loan defaulter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5262205.0) and after evading his ban (https://archive.is/ovgVq). Oh, not to mention also after being an imbecile, illiterate, underclassman and having an IQ even lower than hacker's. Not all DT is fucked. Yep, fortunately, this is true, as you are excluded from DT2. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on February 04, 2021, 01:59:17 PM If trolls and obnoxious users such as andulolika can get to DT2 then it shows the system is not working correctly BUT when they get swiftly removed after ~andulolika by users after being found out, it clearly shows the system is working.
Many of those trolls and highly aggressive Turkish forum members that use the global board are still in the DT list albeit thankfully many have minus status ranking but after they made the racial slurs and the threats and the profanities and other accusations just because they failed to get selected for certain signature campaigns. Anyway, some are still there and others will rotate back next month but they are thankfully almost totally distrusted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dtview I think i last in dt2 for about a week. Good Lord, now I can say that I've seen everything. andulolika was in DT2 after making death threats (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266646.msg54939116#msg54939116), after various scam attempts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231508.msg54928059#msg54928059), after shilling shitcoins (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266095.msg54928424#msg54928424), after being a loan defaulter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5262205.0) and after evading his ban (https://archive.is/ovgVq). Oh, not to mention also after being an imbecile, illiterate, underclassman and having an IQ even lower than hacker's. Not all DT is fucked. Yep, fortunately, this is true, as you are excluded from DT2. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on February 05, 2021, 11:00:22 AM I think i last in dt2 for about a week. Good Lord, now I can say that I've seen everything. andulolika was in DT2 after making death threats (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266646.msg54939116#msg54939116), after various scam attempts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231508.msg54928059#msg54928059), after shilling shitcoins (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5266095.msg54928424#msg54928424), after being a loan defaulter (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5262205.0) and after evading his ban (https://archive.is/ovgVq). Oh, not to mention also after being an imbecile, illiterate, underclassman and having an IQ even lower than hacker's. Not all DT is fucked. Yep, fortunately, this is true, as you are excluded from DT2. Shut up you pathetic slobbering ass muncher. Jollygood you corrupt cunt why are you not tagging lengenster for pushing yobit? But you do anyone not DT? Fucking double standards broke ass dreg. I'll use you to demonstrate clearly how corrupt DT is due to your clear double standards. Why have you not tagged legenster? Answer or I bring the debate to meta continuously about double standards and corruption on DT Also why did you not neg mozprognoz or lauda for offering to work with scams you busted before and trying to help them repatriate to this forum under and different username? Answer you broke down turd? The retarded monkey jollygood is an easy target like tman was. The dumber ones are fun to bitch slap around with questions they run away from over and over. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Vod on February 07, 2021, 02:58:16 AM I just came here to say most of you can suck my dick. I dunno... some mouths are wired shut. Can it fit through the braces without grinding? Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: andulolika on February 07, 2021, 06:53:10 AM I just came here to say most of you can suck my dick. I dunno... some mouths are wired shut. Can it fit through the braces without grinding? And a big fuck you to you vod, hope you bite your nipple by mistake you fat fuck. God bless the trolls. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on February 07, 2021, 10:10:56 AM Vod I laughed at that braces and grinding comment ;D
Thankfully I was not drinking any tea or coffee at the time of reading it otherwise I would made a mess all over my keyboard then would have lost time deliberating whether to blame you or the alt troll hiding his real identity - for the mishap since your comment was directed at him. I just came here to say most of you can suck my dick. I dunno... some mouths are wired shut. Can it fit through the braces without grinding? Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Vod on February 07, 2021, 05:39:48 PM And a big fuck you to you vod, hope you bite your nipple by mistake you fat fuck. If you think my nipple (which you can't even see) is fat then I understand your anger issues. Alternate way of relieving stress, specially made for tiny wet wiggly objects, and it can't scream and run off. (https://www.autobodytoolmart.com/product/propick-wet-paint-tweezers/auto-body-painting-accessories) Good luck with your dream of fucking me. ;) Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Stalker22 on February 07, 2021, 10:14:14 PM I just came here to say most of you can suck my dick. I dunno... some mouths are wired shut. Can it fit through the braces without grinding? This is just priceless. LOL! 😬 Vod, you made my day again! Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on February 10, 2021, 11:44:34 AM I just came here to say most of you can suck my dick. I dunno... some mouths are wired shut. Can it fit through the braces without grinding? This is just priceless. LOL! 😬 Vod, you made my day again! Shut up noob gimp. Nobody gives one fuck what no coiner noob assmunching dregs find funny. Vod looks like sloth from the goonies but not as in shape and sloth only suffered 5% brain death due to being dropped on his head. Now that's cleared up go find some other DT buttholes to shove your peasant nose into Back on topic Jollygood you cowardly piece of pathetic double standards trash. I see you here but I dont see any defense of the independently verifiable evidence that you claim to bust scammers. Then dont say shit to your pals when they attempt to work with those same scammers and help them get repatriated to the forum if they pay to work with them? Lol what a weasel you are. Also why not tagging people on the same basis of working with or for yob? Jollygood is pushing double standard and using DT as a protection racket. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: JollyGood on February 10, 2021, 11:56:10 AM Vod is one of those users in the forum that could not care less about how trolls and scammers view him, that is a constant with him ;D
I just came here to say most of you can suck my dick. I dunno... some mouths are wired shut. Can it fit through the braces without grinding? This is just priceless. LOL! 😬 Vod, you made my day again! Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Stalker22 on February 10, 2021, 10:43:37 PM Shut up noob gimp. Nobody gives one fuck what no coiner noob assmunching dregs find funny. Vod looks like sloth from the goonies but not as in shape and sloth only suffered 5% brain death due to being dropped on his head. Now that's cleared up go find some other DT buttholes to shove your peasant nose into Oh boy, thank you for your contribution to the community. Without stupid people like you, this would be a very boring place and we would have no one to laugh at. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on February 11, 2021, 05:32:11 PM Shut up noob gimp. Nobody gives one fuck what no coiner noob assmunching dregs find funny. Vod looks like sloth from the goonies but not as in shape and sloth only suffered 5% brain death due to being dropped on his head. Now that's cleared up go find some other DT buttholes to shove your peasant nose into Oh boy, thank you for your contribution to the community. Without stupid people like you, this would be a very boring place and we would have no one to laugh at. That's a great come back. Now fuck off brown noser 22 The only person laughing is me at the bunch of peasant losers who've been here years and are still broke bums. They are secretly laughing at brown noser turd world dregs like you who will eat ass in public for btc crumbs Get it now? Now tackle the points raised in the OP and stay on topic or tongue ass elsewhere. What do you say about jollygoods undeniable double standards. Nothing except I want to lick his balls cos he's DT and I want to upgrade from gambling dust to mixer dust one day when I've consumed another 100 cubic meters of DT dingleberries DT ass stalker 22. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Vod on February 11, 2021, 07:17:53 PM Nothing except I want to lick his balls cos he's DT and I want to upgrade from gambling dust to mixer dust one day when I've consumed another 100 cubic meters of DT dingleberries You used to fondle his balls when you were on DT, now you want to lick them to get back on DT? Just what are you describing as dingleberries, ponzi pervert? 100 cubic meters of anything is gross, and usually an indication the person doesn't understand three dimensions. Probably in finance. :-\ Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on February 11, 2021, 10:06:21 PM Nothing except I want to lick his balls cos he's DT and I want to upgrade from gambling dust to mixer dust one day when I've consumed another 100 cubic meters of DT dingleberries You used to fondle his balls when you were on DT, now you want to lick them to get back on DT? Just what are you describing as dingleberries, ponzi pervert? 100 cubic meters of anything is gross, and usually an indication the person doesn't understand three dimensions. Probably in finance. :-\ Look you slobbering mongrel. Show some evidence that reasonably corroborates your mad theory I'm OG or stay on topic. Do you want to discuss jollygoods double standards and scam enabling ? Or just cry about OG nasty all day. We get it he's rich and successful and you doxed him and placed the forums fund in danger. Now stop being a fat whining downsy pleb and stay on topic. Discuss jollygoods double standards or create a thread about laudanum=OG This is not the place for your jealous sour grapes. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Stalker22 on February 14, 2021, 02:50:46 PM Get it now? Yeah, I get it. You have some serious issues, or your parents have made a hell of a mistake in your upbringing. In any case, professional help is highly recommended. Nothing except I want to lick his balls cos he's DT and I want to upgrade from gambling dust to mixer dust one day when I've consumed another 100 cubic meters of DT dingleberries DT ass stalker 22. Oh, you saw right through that, did ya? Damn! How does such a lovely person with such obvious intelligence... come to be here? Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on February 15, 2021, 02:15:58 PM Get it now? Yeah, I get it. You have some serious issues, or your parents have made a hell of a mistake in your upbringing. In any case, professional help is highly recommended. Nothing except I want to lick his balls cos he's DT and I want to upgrade from gambling dust to mixer dust one day when I've consumed another 100 cubic meters of DT dingleberries DT ass stalker 22. Oh, you saw right through that, did ya? Damn! How does such a lovely person with such obvious intelligence... come to be here? Look DT AssStalker22 You're not attempting to debate the points in the OP You're not doing so because you know there is no debunking independently verified truths. Yes I'm lovely, yes I'm intelligent.... this kind of flattery still doesn't mean you can roll with off topic all day. Tackle the points regarding jollygood being a double standards scammer enabling dreg or just dream about DT ass pipes somewhere else. Now think on my words and get some self respect boy. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Vod on February 15, 2021, 09:00:52 PM Do you want to discuss jollygoods double standards and scam enabling ? I sure would. Why don't you stop hiding and we'll discuss it OG? Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Laudanum on February 15, 2021, 09:36:32 PM Do you want to discuss jollygoods double standards and scam enabling ? I sure would. Why don't you stop hiding and we'll discuss it OG? Okay have it your way. You may address me as OG if that helps. Now get discussing jollygoods double standards and scam enabling For all further laudanum is OG chats make a thread and we can work through it there. I like this attention from you vod. Keep it up. Don't get lazy. Hmm now what shall I spend my btc on this week ..I mean if I have 2600 to start enjoying myself with rather than far smaller sum I am aware of now. I should need to be so frugal. What would you buy vod. I mean try starting with imagining you had 1 btc. Then working from there gradually. Do want to try the 90% remaining you claim to have retained. So jollygoods double standards and scam enabling even including the members that offered to work with and repatriate the scammers he claims to have busted so long as they use their services lol What a corrupt weasel. Take it from there vod. But remember no more OG chat here. You have a lot of OG threads already going I notice. I don't see a laudanum is OG one so that is something you could be getting on with. Title: Re: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. Post by: Vod on February 15, 2021, 09:54:34 PM I like this attention from you vod. Keep it up. Don't get lazy. I know you do OG, and I will. :) |
