Bitcoin Forum

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

This is more reason why you must keep on updating the community and do not give false hope. Many devs have midget dream already. So it is better to always give an update and do not work to impress the communities. If things are not working let the community understand what you are doing to make it work and how you intend to go about it. It is only you that know you are working, the community does not see you, so they do not know what you are doing. Do not be afraid to lose some of the community members, those who believe in you will stay till the end but if you do not communicate or you like giving false hope, it will boomerang on the project 

You are right, we need to take every new startup project just like any other business that one starts in hopes of making good money but not all businesses end up in profit rather ratio of failure or loss is more than profit, so we should take each new crypto startup as the same and if we invest we should know about the risks.

It is a fact and truth that it's not easy being a developer. But before committing themselves into a project, they need to think of it as many times as they can. It's not just about the creation but also the commitment that they will dwell while making the project.
The progress should also be monitored and expectations are normal for the fellow investors but if the developers really see that it's not going anywhere, they can admit it despite doing all that they can.

Investors are to blame. They continuously fall inti the trap of marketing teams dream white papers. These are often pure techno garbage that sound convincing to the untrained.
Investors that are untrained should keep with completed new designs that have a real use case.
So many investors running to every new dream. That leaves a lot of almost completed interesting designs at good price point for entry.

I know it's hard, and the reality that happens on the ground right now is that the bounty hunter can't wait to get paid while the team always has a reason behind the pending, I'm sure. I think as long as the team still provides clear communication and confirmation to the participants, I think they can still be trusted. yes, although it's a little bad with this situation because bounty hunters really want to get paid immediately and with a good price or exchange rate too. so, just respect each other's work and don't occasionally spam and scam so the bounty industry never dies.

It's getting really hard for new projects to attract investors as investors have became too much dubious about investing in just another ICO.
For them to get attention, they need either to stand out or get a official license from the government to operate an ICO.
For every other teams dedicated on their project, it would be better to look for fund their initial works and come up with a working project for the ICO.

You can blame those people on not to trust easily with most projects in the market currently due to lots of scams and frauds do happen after all these years.Its no surprise that people would really have that kind of expectation or treatment even into those legit projects.

Its true that not all projects are scams but even though they are high likely to fail, projects now that arent passing through IEO would hardly get financial support.I cant even spot
a project that succeeded on accumulating funds through ICO these days or im just missing out.

Really not easy I have seen some good developers trying to build something for the community, but having a hard time because the atmosphere and investors sentiment is not good towards a new projects, so it's very important that developers launch their project at the right time with the right atmosphere.

It's sad the way crypto users condemn projects just because a flaw. I agree with you. Most projects tagged bad only needs encouragement from the community to boost the activeness of the project. It's true we have 70% of bad project, but let's give some credit and try as much as we can to believe in these projects.

If all projects are bad, there would be no altcoins now, the truth is, most of the projects are bad so the altcoins market are heavily affected by that reality.
Actually if investors will be more matured, we can prevent investing on bad projects because we are already knowledgeable in choosing a legit one.

I'd like to have an insight on what the project is trying to achieve before investing on them. The teams should altogether stop issuing and ICO the next day they have dreamt about an idea. If the person or team want to have their dream come true, they should look for some private investors or a bank loan to go for the initial development and use ICO as a fund raiser for expanding their market. Just the way IPO of shares works.

Many projects end up failing and there are many factors that cause. Developers start to give up on the project they work on. There are several projects that can be included in exchanges but buying and selling transactions are not crowded. So many bounty hunters hold the coin for a long time.

Investors are not like the year 2017 when many Bounty projects have success. Nowadays many new projects but have poor quality. But I was a bounty hunter who would also not give up because I am optimistic that there is still a great opportunity to make money.

I am a bounty hunter I have been involved in many projects with good ideas but did not raise enough capital, they informed the community that, I sympathize and have no complaints. But on the other hand, some of the projects successfully call for capital and are listed on exchanges but don't pay rewards to the hunter or reduce the rewards by a lot.

One question, how can the community know the project is working and not dead? It is by updating the community on latest developments and so on. It is hard to see a project which constantly updates it's community on their latest success and fails most which do keep their community is updated keeps growing might be slow but still worth it. There are many projects once they face a challenge Instead of them to keep the community abreast of all that is happening they will go mute from there come up with a long write-up then shut down, most times it is all planned. If a team sincerely creates a project and cares about it, they will take several steps to ensure they come out of their issues. There have been projects surviving for years, and one of their secret is, keeping their social media accounts active, keeping the telegram group active etc.

That's right, you know what's wrong on the mindset of the people? They think that all projects that are getting failed are all bad projects, they don't know that there are also some projects who are good but doesn't get the expectations or meet it and becomes failed. This probably might change the mindset of many people that not all of the projects that are getting down is bad but instead there are still some good projects who doesn't just get their expectations.

Having a good projects, good teams and yet failed to be recognized is not a reason to give up and yes some are still here even if they are dumping and most of them was able to survive. Hunters should think positive and don’t think for an easy money on the bounties but of course they deserve to be compensated well. Not all projects are bad, they just failed to deliver and investors didn’t see their importance.

A good develover will never say that the project that he build is bad when the project can't be used by many people. But they will looking for many thing and learn more about the project that he develop. Indeed it is not easy to build a good team with many character in it. They should have a same why in order to their innovation can be accepted by many people and they will support everything when then run it. It is otherwise when the team behind the project which is many character and didn't have the same why, an affected that will happen is when the project cannot be used by many people they will leave it and find another chance or even make another project which is in line with what he wants. We can see it with a project that eventually being shitcoin right now, there is no any information about the project because the team have leaved it.

Agree, we cannot meet the needs of everyone in this market. So all altcoins in this market have FUD, even many people say that BTC is a scam. The best, developers work their way and should not care about what investors and people say, they only care about profit. If their investment were to suffer a loss, they would surely curse the project

A good project is not meant to be successful while a successful project doesn't mean it is good

A developer certainly has to think of a good concept first before starting it and being a developer does not seem easy, it must have high insight and also partners to develop more broadly, marketing and products, especially in a project, sometimes with the failure makes developers prustasi and not want to try marketing again in the project they are running.

Well, I guess not adhering to basic crypto standards is why they find it hard to convince investors especially in difficult times. Developers will need to show investors that their project is technically sound, decentralized, viable, safe, transparent etc in order to convince them.  Hopefully, this standards will be improved, adopted by decentralized community and coded into decentralized crowdfunding platforms to make building crypto-friendly things easier for developers who don't know or understand the purpose of crypto

i think you are wrong by blaming bounty hunters. PLEASE NOTE: HUNTERS ARE NOT INVESTORS. They are not part of your team or company. they are interested in promoting your brand to the world with the best information you provided to them. At the end of such work, you as a project owner or developer should pay them. and then focus on your promoting your project on your social platforms.

Yes of course all of the proposed projects are aiming for good either for transaction, security, utility tokens etc. Even the scammers creates a whitepaper that aims to do good but their real motive is to deceive and scam others.

At first thought you will think that they might be having a hard time but if you're here in the forum for a long time you will eventually realized that most of the scams and failed projects have the same reasons, circumstances,etc.

Of course not all projects are bad but many of them are not good or a scam project. I know it is not easy to become a developer but people don't know if that developer can be trusted. It is really risky to invest a new project, people should take time to research the project if they really want to get big profit in the future.

Right. I agree that not all projects are bad. sometimes people are too quick to judge all projects as bad, even though there are still many projects that have good potential for the future. only when referring to the back indeed many fraudsters projects that have sprung up so that many people are disappointed, especially the bounty hunters. therefore we must be able to move on from the negative and look ahead with a good project that can produce benefits for us.

many projects die because they choose the wrong direction of development. many areas simply don’t need tokenization and the blockchain’s creation, but developers want to earn money. yes they really try to work hard but then they get to their limits and projects die

Many projects fail for a variety of reasons. Especially the failure caused by sales targets that are not met or softcap has not been achieved. Some of the failed projects that I have participated in have good potential for redevelopment, but due to constraints on unmet costs, they have to be stopped.
Projects that succeed in reaching the target and pay bounty hunters with tokens also cannot be said to be successful, because they only distribute tokens and do not provide Exchange to sell the tokens, it is a manipulation that ends in projects that will be abandoned and tokens will become junk.

Good and bad projects can be determined in various aspects and research needs to be done first.

You can't consider each and every project as bad, it's just that some of them don't fulfill their promises. It is mostly the reason why investors are in doubt on investing in some projects because they are aware that they can't assure themselves that it will be worthwhile. Doing your own research will help you as an investor to distinguish which project will give you profit because you will be able to see various of information that can guide you as you settle your decision.

The most amazing thing is that now it is very difficult to understand which projects will be really good and will bring big profits. if now I open a coinmarketcap and see coins there that conducted bounty campaign 2 years ago, and now they cost very good money, I am surprised because I did not participate and 2 years ago I think that this is scam projects

There are more scam projects than the good ones and the bad ones combined.  The ones you think have good value today like the ones who did a campaign two years ago might just be gone after another bear market. There are really good projects back 2015 and 2016, you can't even believe they are gone now. Those teams were left behind and taken over by better teams and they lose faith at what they do and end up scam.

Not all developers are equal and not all "investors" are equal. There are several developers behind which serious investors poured a lot of money in form of BTC or Ether. The problem is the easy "marketing" that is available now. Most of these projects market only to the so called bounty hunters who only bring behind them another set of moon hopefuls.
Back in 2017, when this was all very new, people flocked like crazy at the combination of BTC Ann thread, Whitepaper, Website, Telegram and Reddit channel. A lot of us bought our first BTC or ETH to "invest" in these. The lucky ones got them from Signature campaign here when there were still a few serious devs left. That "flock of hopefuls" has kept decreasing and i guess only the scammiest of them remain in the market still offering bounties and airdrops.

If the Alts are to have a future, everybody should simply stop rehashing old ideas into new whitepapers and stop with inventing bullshit names for their website. Most of all, people looking for bounties should stop giving these people the cheap, free marketing from thousands of FB and twitter accounts. Its a losing game with diminishing returns for everybody in the space. Just focus on the few serious ones and get involved.

Indeed. Specially talking about getting into the vast world of cryptocurrency where we are all currently into in which there are lots of existing projects that play as competition due to the reason that people are more likely looking for project that offer big bounty reward and not the project itself already. It is so awful that great projects that have great ideas are most likely being set aside because people seems to be more focus into what they can get from the project and not the idea why the project is made after all. It is hard to be a developer nowadays now that there are lots of competencies around that's why even the real, reliable, legible and unique project still turns out to fail because some contributing factors that are needed to make the project successful is not being met by the team in a span of time. Creating or developing a project is more likely building up a business which is real to hard due to lots of competencies that are blocking the way directly to success. Failed projects does not momentarily mean that the project is bad or a scam. It is just that there are really cases that even the good ones still cannot achieve success.

That's not even a big problem when they were choosing another direction as long as they are still in the same vision. The fact that most of the scam projects were changing their vision in the middle of the development progress.

Indeed, we can say that yes there are lots of projects that are scams, there are projects that are intentionally scamming people and that is their purpose developing that project but there are projects that are legitimate but sometimes they cannot continue because of some reasons so they are failing as they continue by some reasons, maybe because of the market's condition or because they are really doesn't have enough investors to support them because it is actually based on their platform if it is really encouraging or promising that it will succeed in the future.

Of course there are those who try to work honestly, but there are only a few such projects. The steelworkers deceive consciously and do not need to protect them. I have met such projects many times when they say that everything is fine, but in the end they write sorry we could not achieve success. Others generally refuse to pay and their reasons are completely ridiculous. I believe that honest projects are those that play fair games.

Agree, as for the expectations, it is something a project/team out of hand because it is something an individual view with regards what the project is offering, and the team were doing. Well but that doesn't mean they need to carry people's expectation always, well, what they must is to make the project successful and at least reach what they wrote on their timeline, and pronouncements. Anyway, saying theat they won't be able isn't a hard thing though, majority are being silent to avoid and/or escape a lot of rants, complaints/grievances among the participants especially the investors.

I have taken part in most translation campaigns in the ICO era and beyond. What I can say is out of 500 projects only 5-10 remain at a viable price/are alive today.

No doubt in the beginning of any project it needs to work hard and make its place into the market, But sometimes its quite tough if you didn't receive expected respond from clients or community. But continuously work with honesty always matters.

Yes. The developer of a project must be very hardworking and has done a lot of preparations before deciding to develop the project so he can meet the community's expectations. But even if the project does not end up successfully, it does not mean that its a bad or scam one. Sometimes even the most good projects that we are expecting still fail in the end.

I agree that not all the projects are bad but most of them are suppose to be scammers these days, most of the ICOs are not long-lasting nowadays which means the projects fail. Also they want to steal from the Bounty hunter after the work is done, however I would appreciate most of the signature campaign where they pay on weekly basis.

I'm afraid I have to disagree, projects that are good and have realistic ideas and experienced teams in their fields will surely get support from crypto audiences, the problem is that the concept I mentioned earlier is gone, new projects only want to create hype with bad ideas which is packaged as if an innovation.

This is the fact that not all projects are bad so in every project we must rely check if it's good before investing. Yes Ico did not last and many users become a victim of this kind of project because it turns out failed. So it is really important to assess first a project before we invest.

we should not generalize all project have same quality.each developers have their own motive and spirit while announcing new project. and we could take look about their seriousness by analizing how they will pay bounty campaign,serious developers will use bitcoin or ethereum as payament although usually it have small value. its very rare this projects will die, cause no one will dumped free token.

The success of a project is determined by many factors. A huge number of projects with excellent developers failed because these factors were not taken into account, or the project was simply unlucky.
There are three key components: development, marketing, and current market conditions. Unfortunately, any of these gifts can play a trick on the project.

But, what will be the point of putting all their efforts and dedication when the basic concept of a project is not up to the point of solving some real life problem. All I mean to say is, from the beginning itself they must work hard like they must choose an unique idea for their project but most devs are just imitating what projects are already existing with a few improvements and enhancement and this is the reason investors are simply ignoring such project which will be leading to collapse of all their efforts and time.

I agree all the projects are not bad still I believe all the good projects will not fail. Yes, when a project is based on unique concept and providing some solution for the problem then definitely it will get enough attention from investors and traders so it will be finding its own way to survive in this crypto space.

Don't forget the financial capability of the project. without initial funds from the dev's pockets or from private investors, the project is likely to fail. because if they will rely from crowdsourcing, and due to the fact that it is too hard to raise money nowadays, the project might end up not raising their financial targets. and if they didn't, how can they pursue their developments? so even if they have noble idea or good concept, they can't implement it into reality because of the lack of funds. that is the reason why many good projects are abandoned.

Marketing and development are two different things.
The developers should focus on the task that they are working with while the marketing, we know the task that they are assigned with. It's a matter of prioritizing and commitment.

I strongly agree that not all projects that fail are bad. Sometimes the bounty hunter presses the developer to immediately distribute tokens.
Even though the sales of the IEO tokens have not ended, we as bounty hunters should understand that they cannot instant get paid from
IEO projects. Actually the key is in communication between developers and bounty hunters. Each parties must understand each other, and
also developers should be open from the start regarding the distribution of tokens. Hopefully we are can see a lot of successful projects like
2017-2018.

Let's just say I am lucky as I have participated in different bounty in the last 2 years, especially during the bull run, I was so active and I made  good earning on that time, but I also did a wrong decision which is holding some of them because I believe it will rise in the long run, but it is almost worthless now.

I would say that it's all about the market condition, maybe when we will be back in time where people are aggressive in investing again, we might enjoy good reward in bounty again as we will see more projects that will be successful.

Agree that not all projects are bad and there are also many developer teams that are dedicated to the projects they are working on in accordance with the roadmap that has been made. The problem with many good projects is the volume of transactions and investors tend to be interested in investing in projects that are liquid in the market

I guess that's what we can say about most of altcoins start. People tend to criticize when they don't know much about a project. Change is not comfortable for anybody but I guess we just have to be patient for people to adopt and inform those who don't have a complete understanding of a project.

It's not just easy to be a developer that's what I want people to know, sometimes you have to be in others shoe to really understand what they are going through, we worked for new projects and all we hope for is our payments, not bad but there is always more that meet the eye

So you mean the fund raised you recieve is just a payment for a developer?

Not a good mindset you are making an ICO and offering a product to investors that's why they are investing because they see the potential of the coin. If you think its just a payment then how will you develop a project?

Also not every bounty hunter are same. Some people really like to do some research about the project before joining it and try to do his best to maximize the promotion. Yes, it's not every project is bad and sometimes a good project failed. But it's not because of bad marketing its just market conditions and timing that causes this problem.

I really agree what you say but some of us would rather assess to the downside of a project because it is often a victim in fraudulent projects and to bounce back it takes time, as well as from many projects today just Some of the projects that pay bounty hunters, then this is our very thing, for the Dev and team who manages a project respect time that we have spent to promote your project.

Being a developer of a coin is hard since you will be having a hard time to produce a quality coin and be able to control the volume and the price of it. We just need to analyze every projects that we are going to invest to so that you will be able to avoid the failed projects of it.

There is such a thing that it may take many years to create a good project and of course a lot of money, but not all developers are ready to develop their project for several years and many want to just make money and then just abandon their project, unfortunately there are more and more such projects.

Many projects started as good but end up failing. But it doesnt mean its a scam project, maybe due to lack of support from investors or not reaching the soft cap the team cant continue anymore the project. The dev is responsible for this but its inevitable to fail thats why its a must to have a good plan and solid team before starting to build a project that will be useful and can attract the investors. Sometimes expecting too much is not good for the part of bounty hunters because this scenario can happen even how good the project is.

although like that, there are still many ICO or IEO projects that currently cannot guarantee profit because usually the developer does not support the price of the token or coin at the exchange so that many are disappointed and many lose, whereas for projects that work with bounty hunters, it will provide positive and negative sides, the positive side of the project will quickly spread while the negative side when the distribution of payments to bounty campaign participants, the price at the exchange may fall because the bounty hunters will exchange their work and make prices go down.

being a developer you must be ready in all instance to not bringing your investors down,the problem is those you called Developer just running a project easily without being that ready and obviously just to gain and from investors and gone away.admit it or not this is what really happens nowadays and even in past.there are too many ICO/IEO that only seek profit and don't really care about their project in future.and another thing is most of them are just creating project that has been in the circulation for long no new ideas and not really a new project afterall.

This is why many project fails, they expect too much and never calculate with the risk. Have realistic target and back up plan are really important, from there developer have guide how to face market in different situation. Running slowly but survive is better than scam, I agree project should survive to get position in market. Prepare for the worst, that's the key.

Yeah, now many projects have sprung up just for oneself, not thinking about future projects, even with successful sales they are not growing anymore and developers are taking off investors' money because they only think about profits.

There are many new ideas in the project, but all this is just nonsense.

ICO was never meant to last, and I think most people who used their sense told them this, but most of us even though sensible decided to go in (myself included) and we got burned. But let us remember that it was not just all this ICO business but the general greed that did it. They can have different names now but they are all ending up the same!

That is what I thought of Exscudo, it's been 3 years since they finished their ICO at that time. But until know they are still under development on their exchange, even though the ICO was a huge success AFAIK. I mean, it's not bad but I think that they are just postponing the exchange with slower update but I don't know since I am not a developer yet.

this is the legend project that unfinished till now on but still have an update about their developtment. many people have big hope to exscudo but unfortunately the fact very different. we know its not easy to developt exchanges, but another developers could do the same thing why they dont.

its depends what your mean about bad in this case, im agre not all projects are bad, maybe the idea of that project is great but the team is make this wrong to inform, sometimes we got great team but not enough good for idea project.

Investors define a good project as a project that brings them profit. Face the truth that none of these investors invested in a project due to technical aspect, everyone is after profit. There are a lot of good projects out there but due to limited budget were not able to survive the market.

I agree that not all projects are bad, but the problem is many of them don't continue the project and abandon the project without any attention to come back rerunning the project. We can see there are many examples that we already saw so far, and that makes many people sad about promoting the project. We don't know the real reason why they cannot continue the project because many of them only say that they don't get any investors to supports their projects, so they decide to delay their project temporarily.

I don't think so,

They failed because their project is not good enough to find enough investors and it is not their time yet. It only means that the project is bad because they can't attract or they don't do their research to find a suitable product for their target market or the target consumer.

Conducting a project requires a lot of effort, and so much dedication to be able to make others see that it is a good and profitable project and to attract investors. In working with a project, of course you want to work with people you trust so you can assure yourself that your team is really working for the project.

I know it's not easy to be a project developer because everything takes a long time for them to achieve their goals, maybe dev or team should provide information about their project process to the point where investors or bounty hunters know if the development process is not short. Also, I don't like a project to give false hope to the community so they don't keep asking about it.

ofcourse its very difficult to build good projects. developers team must build best team which is have experience and good skill blockchain skill. mostly now dev team did not have solid team that able deliver good product that accepted by crypto community. transparency will be obligation to keep investors trust , monthly update must deliver to them  so they will understand the process.

"Bad" project doesn't always reflect the code the project has, nor the team, nor whitepaper basically nothing they have done has to be considered bad. However, if you build a "good" project but didn't get any decent traction or didn't even get proper funding, that does make you a "bad" project for the investors since you are not going up neither.

You can build the best project in the history of crypto world but as long as you do not get funding or volume or basically spark interest amongst the community that will result with you labeled as bad. On contrary you can be as horrible as XRP which has a centralized printing of xrp any time the owners want and it is still a third ranked currency with that much crooked scams going on inside it.

even with the best concepts now it's really difficult for new projects to get full support from investors. Not all projects are bad, but most of the projects die and cannot survive in the market after some time. if you are in 2018 then you will see several projects making success statements in sales with 100% achievement but after a while, they disappear. That makes the reason how investors no longer pay attention to new existing projects because in the market there are assets that are more promising to them with very little risk of losing money.

Meetings with the Angullia government and premier of Angullia is showing how temtum is the leader in being the chosen cryptocurrency architecture for a country’s aim to deploy their own digital currency !

Why invest in companies that only have a white paper or an idea - pick one that has real contracts with the potential of millions of users 

https://twitter.com/wearetemtum/status/1235231478893727746

You are right and I share your views here. From my point of view, focus is going to change a bit. What do I mean? Investors are now a bit tired of similar and simple tokens. So as I understand, the switch will happen towards more technological and valuable solutions. And there are already some that are coming with entirely new opportunities even on traditional industries

Sounds rational and I absolutely share your views here. But you know, I wouldn't say that I am aware of many solutions that are bringing some new standards onto the market and wouldn't even say that there are many I can call advanced. So if you have such, I would definitely be interested to hear

You mean advanced solutions I am following? I also cannot say that there are many advanced. But my latest discovery and one of the most interesting is Carnomaly, heard of it? In few words, Carnomaly will become the first company ever to offer a worldwide rebate for an automotive purchase. Both new and used vehicles will apply, as long as they are purchased from a verified legal dealer anywhere in the world. Upon completion of our consumer platform, Carnomaly will begin buying back tokens to replenish the rebates. And I also recommend you to have a closer look at their website to have a better understanding of the idea, cause it definitely sounds interesting

Hmm, agree with you, from your words sounds pretty attractive and interesting and sounds familiar. Probably I have heard of it. But will have a closer look and get back with own thoughts, thank you

This is right,being a developer takes a great deal,putting up innovation and making it work is another thing,then also making People believe in your project,I understand all that,but then every developer should try their best with good and unique concept,and a a good marketing team,I believe the project will gradually excel.

Actually what you said is true, but when someone or rather a team or developers cares deeply about their project or about what they aims to achieve all the bad words people throw at them will only encourage them to do more so as to prove them wrong. Giving up means they were right about the bad words they said, thus only the developers will be at the receiving end. Also, in the outside world many projects passed through that stage and today they are on lips of everyone. Therefore in my own opinion, stick to what you believe in as a developer, do your best, seek advice and help and lastly prove them wrong, it will make you a winner.

Not really. If the team is working really hard on the project, then their community will really appreciate them. They won't hate the team. The dedication by the developer team will instead cause the price of the tokens to increase.
Most of the people hate the projects and calls them a scam because the developers really stop working at their project at all. They don't give any effort for the further development. Most of them are "all talk" for which people start to hate them even more.

It is quite difficult to develop projects. I agree with you on this. Also in any other case. You need to give your best and spend a lot of time and effort on this case. Only then is it possible to succeed.

Building a project is not easy especially at the beginner level. This i guess is what affects most projects and turn them to a failed project

You have your point but it will always be a scam when the team didn't reach the right amount of investment the token will be released in the market since the team or funds needed is not reach.

This is already common to ICO it would be right if you could refund your money if you invest in the token and if the funds do not reach or the token is not successful you should be able to withdraw your money.

The problem is we know there is project built without preparation, just sell promises and low price coin with out information in which exchanges will list?. I stay positive with every project but when they look play with us just leave it. Developer should have ability to make bounty hunter, investor and trader stay in their project even not easy for that. Even only have little expectation but don't have ability, every project will fails.

The main reason why a project fails even if they have a great team, a good plan and promote it for months is because they can't produce the outcome they promise to their investors. They can't show how highly effective their progress by developing the project.
Always remember, even if how good the project is and their plan, if the investor can't see the potential due to how the developers handle the project, the project will die soon after.

Yes, not all projects are bad because a project with a solid team and has a solid roadmap will always the project to reach the desired target. Community members will support the project only when we are seeing improvements from the team, in the beginning, it is impossible for us to find the potential about the company. Based on their activity we can understand the project and their goals.

If the project is well manage by the team itself even it's not getting the community support right away, the desire of continuing and surviving and keep
doing progress will attract investors to check it out and do some research.
There are projects that quietly moving ahead and still trying to convince people to support them not just by doing some hypes but convincing that the
project have a good usage in the long run.

There are many projects that failed after the market suddenly down after the bullrun. After investors put their money in their project, and yet they can't handle the negative impact of the event. I think they should have different plans to execute if this suddenly happened. Plan A, B or C. If this couldn't work it they will have plan B to execute. I know a lot of projects that have a great idea and platform, but they are not prepared for this. It's just purely business.

True not all of them are bad maybe they just lack of funds to continue but if they shown some eager to continue wouldn't it attract some investor?
The problem is people are tired of getting scammed and doesn't want to support or invest in new project anymore.
I think it is time for the developer to at least show some development or products before looking for investor.

Bounty hunters certainly expect their expectations according to the campaign. Most bounty hunters or investors are disappointed because prices in the market differ greatly from IEO or ICO prices and this makes the rewards or profits that are not according to expectations. I agree that not all projects are bad and there are some projects whose prices may go up after the initial listing

Some projects are just failed experiment but who are to be blamed? The team of course, why embark on something you hardly know about? Why start something you can't finish? Is this not why some hire professionals as team?

I am not going to blame bounty hunters, they did their job and they deserve to be paid. Nobody would like to put in hard work for a very long time only to be told that they’re not going to be paid, they wouldn’t feel happy about that. You should be talking about the investors that are expecting the project to grow immediately and fetch them millions of dollars profit. Those are the ones that will even make it worst for most of these new projects by pumping and dumping them.

So, I am not going to blame the bounty hunters, they did their job which is to help promote the project and they deserve to be getting paid.

From my perspective if a project fail i think its because the team behind the project it self. They dont have a strong concept or being greedy in mid time. Bounty hunter just doing his job and wait for the payment. Its not bounty hunter responsibilty if the project ended fail.

I think new projects can't fail if partnership, legit idea and strong team members exists in any project. In 2018 billions USD were gone for scam project, then some some legit project couldn't success. Now legit project can't failed for scam history, before any project can get promoted by hunters.

I think for a prize hunter, when participating in a project and then the project fails then it will still get a bad assessment of it. Because after doing research and the time and thought expended to be in vain.

certain that not all projects / ico are bad, there is a small percentage (about 1%) that has great potential the difficult and to be able to identify them, you must evaluate the team's skills with objectivity, the idea if it is innovative and if it has outlets on the market but not even then and said to be successful if they have not made a targeted and pounding advertising, so you have to invest with wisdom and caution...

We understand how difficult it is to be a developer of a certain project. But of course, it is the developer's job to at least stick to the roadmap of developing the system or application. We all know that the project really depends on it. No matter how good is the marketing team or even the leadership team, if there is no good output from the developers, I think the project will be considered a failure. If there is no output, then there is no project. If the developer is not qualified or he needs a team to develop the said system, then they should hire someone that could help the developer on his endeavour.

I do not agree with you.

The bounty hunter area of responsibility also includes responsibility for the failure of the project, to some extent.
After all, it is Bounty hunters who bring new investors into the project.

The better we will do our work, the better the content we create will be the more likely we will see more investors in the project.

No disputes truly, because in all sincerity, not all projects are bad.
But majority are bad and that is not good enough.

The core purpose of crypto currency altcoin projects are to create value for all, but it has become a profit oriented venture for both developers and investors.


Just ensure to do your own research, and avoid the bad eggs amongst altcoin projects

Most investors have failed in 2018 and 2019, this is caused by projects that do not meet their targets to enter several markets that have failed, That is why the current project lacks the trust of investors for them.

But there are also those who find success for some projects, it's mostly investors from among themselves including the team to develop projects to be successful, not counting on outside investors, if most current projects that rely on outside investors have failed.

for now ... the developer must work extra because of the impact of the previous 2 years, where in 2018 until 2019, we know for yourself that many project scams even though the concept and project team are well conceptualized, now investors have experienced a crisis of confidence with the crypto world

This is an interesting topic to discuss. And I also have own opinion here. You know, what I would also say - it is not easy to find multiple solutions that meet requirements. What I mean is evaluating the factors. From my point of view, platform must be advanced, innovative, reliable and, of course, bring real and practical value

Hello. I fully agree with you that it is not easy to find several tokens that widen the horizons and set new standards on the industry. Talking about you, are there many solutions you can recommend in general? Interested to know your favorites

One of the most advanced solutions I am aware of is definitely Carnomaly. In few words, Carnomaly will become the first company ever to offer a worldwide rebate for an automotive purchase. Both new and used vehicles will apply, as long as they are purchased from a verified legal dealer anywhere in the world. And rebates are rather high, up to 30%. I recommend you also to have a look at their website, cause a lot of info is available there

From your words sounds very attractive, thank you for recommendation. I will have a look shortly and share my thoughts

That's right what the OP said, not all new projects are bad and many developers are honest and serious in carrying out their projects. Especially for now finding funds from investors is very difficult, so for those developers, the current situation is the most difficult time in creating and developing new projects, so many new projects fail and the image becomes bad.

In this case, what matters is how developers behave after that. I believe that if they apologized to their investors and explained the situation well, no one would say anything bad about them.

indeed not all projects are bad but only fate is always unlucky because it always finds a bad project. of all the many projects, only a few are good and the rest are bad. that's why many people say that all projects are bad because never find a good one.

They'll never find if they won't work hard enough, there's still a lot of good projects in the market now but only those investors who are really smart can find that one, the thing is, it does not pump right away after the IEO, it depends on the market and since the market is not yet bullish, it will take time but as long as the team are capable of working and they are really working, I don't think it's right to call those as bad projects, we need patience for the projects we are investing as they are a start up.

They failed because they don't have enough funds to spread awareness to thier project. That's why many bounty hunters don't think to promote them because of low payments. And also creating project now are risky because many bounty hunters and investors victim of scam campaign before. That's why if you are developer you need to have huge fund to promote your project and also you need to be transparent because this is the number 1 needs to gain more trust.

For me project failed because their funds are not enough for the demands of the joiners, that is one of the reason why project become bad in the eyes of people. So we should very careful of choosing a project because there's a time can encounter a project that only used us but don't get any from them. It better to find project that gives you transparency about their created project.

Yes thats right,Not all projects are bad but also good projects rarely come.Some are only shit,some failed There also some successfull projects but dont paid the hunters.This is so sad,Good and legit project are hard to find now.

If am a developer and I build a project but aren't meeting my expectations, the only way out is to keep going because people will always say whatever they want and the best way to keep them shut is to win at the end. You are right that's what is happening but yet some projects see it as a means to shut down then going away with the little funds remaining while blaming the community or rather people for talking down on them. I think when a project faces issues, it is best to ask the community their opinions to know where the problem is coming from then make amends if possible get an advisor. No man or team is an island hence the reason to seek others opinions.

No luck doesn't matter. Only the project matters and if the developers have the right strategy. But first of all the project is what matters most! If you have a shitty idea for a useless shitcoin, you won't obviously attract anyone with that. If you have a new, game-changing project you will have success. Unfortunately 99% of all Altcoin projects fall under the category of useless shitcoins without any purpose.

Befoee thinking of setting up a project, any developer should have think it through. It's always good to have developed your idea and test it before coming to anouce a project and also for funding. But opposite is the case . Developers just write something on paper and then start a project and start asking for funding . After a while they now say they didn't meet their expectations.

indeed at this time many developers are like that, they are only concerned with raising funds while the planned projects and concepts are not too mature so that many investors are disappointed and prefer not to invest again. so that finally made the name cryptocurrency not good anymore because many people do scam.

there are must discussion group from blockchain expert which is reviewing project worth to launch or not. if there is no reviewing from outside of developer, they will careless about project quality and all concept just written in paper only,,not applied in their developtment. this kind of projects will create investors fearlessness to invest their money.

Mostly projects that are coming are bad due to making money by the creator of projects and some projects are good and giving good profits to investors, I want to provide an example of OGN that is good project and price is increasing day by day. They also paid a lot of free tokens to the community. Still, after all, this is a good project.

yes in what terms, if in terms of fundraising it will be a complicated problem because every project needs funds for development even though no matter how good the project you are running, on the contrary without the support of a good team and marketing the project will not develop.

everyone wants to see the good development of a project, so when the project is not good, it will cause a variety of negative reactions. because of this, the team is required to always provide information about the development of a project. however, a professional team will try to calm their investors by always providing updated developments and information. however, most projects currently do not provide new information, even for some projects that I think are good, the team rarely appears in telegrams to provide information to investors, therefore investors always put negative pressure on a project.

Projects can easily fail if not much investors have interest in them, for this not to happen developers need to produce something very useful for the public and such project will be very demanding, I'm tired of new projects anyway, too many new projects are just waste of time

The measure whether the project will succeed or not will start at the crowdsale, if they have a good number of investors and raise a good amount, they are like 60% successful already because they all have the resources to develop the project, so they need to work hard and smart not to fail investors.
However, although they work hard for the project, still there is no assurance that the project will succeed, so investors has to always ready to face failure as well.

Projects that only want to take money from investors are very dangerous and scam projects, because projects that don't have good ideas and goals to build in the long run will always die and won't develop, so everyone should stay away from projects that only aim to take money from investors, because developers of projects like that clearly don't have experience in any field.

Indeed its hard to determine a legit project that will also pay the bounty hunters in the end of the campaign. Not all projects are bad its just that majority of existing now are just scam and sometimes it looks genuine to fool the hunters. Research is a must to avoid ending up in scam and your effort wont be wasted.

Not all projects are bad, but the confidence and patience of investors and bounty hunters is no longer as high, due to many SCAM projects. It is frustrating for a bounty hunter to choose a project, and during its development he realizes that it is a weak project or a SCAM. Hence the lack of patience. However, the crypto market requires a lot of patience, so only the patient and knowledgeable will survive on this market.

The problem nowadays is that we have dozens of different projects covering the same topic. So there is a certain degree of fragmentation with the investment. Manytimes, good projects go down due to lack of interest from the whales. In such cases, the project and the promoter team may be good. But the promotional campaign may not be up to the mark.

Maybe it just seems like a failure, but the team members earn enough money.

I think it's natural that many people hope for short-term profits. But if the project is legit and has a large product and market cap value, I think it can be used as a long-term investment because I think the crypto market will continue to grow

yes sometimes the projects that we believe are good are not in line with the thoughts of others which is why many projects are said to be quite good and interesting but fail.
I guess Dev just needs to develop or promote other ways to get people interested.
maybe changing the name or ways to promote can help the project to be launched.

Most new projects have good ideas but they team have no will of backing the project up, I've stop reasoning that way, now I prefer good team over quality use case because I've seen not too great use case doing better because the team are determined

I do agree with you that not all projects are bad and sometimes, the good turns bad and the bad turns good equally.
And when it comes to investors and bounty hunters, i  do not think there is anything like half cake

As bounty hunters, the aim and goal is to work and get paid for work done which should be the normal situation of things.
While for investors, the aim is to always get profit.

In which ever case you fall, All you have to do is dyor before making your choices.

You are right, that a project didn't succeed in the market doesn't mean its bad. Some developers and teamay have put in a lot of effort to get their project to desired height but failed because of technical or financial reasons.

We all know this, not to judge, but these project team and developers should be aware of what they need to run a project and get them ready before embarking on starting up the project. Some people just wake up and decide to delve into crypto projects cause they see others succeeding and think it's easy to get there.

I think if a project failed, it's as a result of poor management or the team intentions is just to cash out. Alot help the project to survive like partnership, strong marketing skills and so on. And when it comes to bounty hunters, not all are selfish, many hunters also work with a project for the success of it. Many hold there tokens till it turns shit and even developers dump on hunters, and so many to name a few. The main point is, if a project fails to deliver it is neither the Dev or the hunters. All depends on the intention. We have seen cases of hunters and airdroppers dumping a token and the project still stays stronger. So I think most times, it's all depends on the Dev management.

Indeed. The only reason why a project ends up to be unsuccessful because they didn't manage it that well, and they didn't pick the right partnership that will help them to grow. It is really awful to know that a lot of bounty hunters that are expecting on a project to be good and successful, but it really turns out to be unexpected that most of us are disappointed even the project is legitimate, some of us think that it is a scam because they didn't distibute a good reward.

It is true that not all projects are bad in the crypto currency space.
But we cannot deny the fact that most projects are bad, which is not a good return in the crypto space.

Whats key is investors or bounty hunters, doing the best of research functions to ensure that the best projects are always followed or worked upon.

Yep, I agree with you...
not all ICO / IEO projects are Scams, many of them don't reach the Hardcap or Softcap target, but the mistake of the developer is not being open to the public about what happened to their project, developers tend to just disappear, so many people think that it's a scam.

Most people have a narrow perspective so it's easy to say it's a scam, it's a scam, especially the one I see most often is uneducated bounty hunters. Even though there was only a delay in the distribution of rewards, uneducated said it was a scams, even though the project showed good progress. Be patient and understand what we support well, everyone will want to immediately benefit, but that must also be based on knowledge and not in a hurry.

not all, but because of the many project failures that arise, leaving investors a little hesitant and this reduces the funds that will be allocated to new projects, to be honest, no matter how good the current project is it is difficult to obtain complete funds when collecting at the ICO / IEO.

Absolutely agree with you, I see a lot of good projects in the past but they still can't complete ICO / IEO because investors are scared of new projects. They lose a lot when investing in new projects so they ignore new projects at the moment. It has caused a lot of difficulties and made new prospective projects stop working because of lack of funding

I used to think so too sometimes ago. I thought that everything was fine and this was just a small delay, but according to statistics, it turned out that 90 percent of projects that are starting to delay payment for bounty hunters turn out to be a scam. these are just statistics.

At this time, no bounty projects have paid for hunters and certainly with the current situation, any project is in trouble and there are not many investors during this time.

I have done a lot of different projects but there is only one project that helps me make money during this time. Most of this is a general situation and we need to work harder because covid-19 is making things worse.

Agree with you on this issue, bounty distribution delay projects are scam projects. It's funny to hear that they are afraid that the bounty hunter will dump the token and will decide to lock the token within 6 months or 1 year, I don't understand why they can make ridiculous notices like so

I agree with you but to an extent. Yes it is not easy to be a developer as it comes with a lot of responsibilities and obligations, but yet there have been successful projects which contributed to this space, so the question is, what did the developers did differently? The answer is, they are after success which they went after till it's gotten. So any upcoming project struggling can take a leaf from the successful ones and meet up with what's expected of them especially when public sale was successful.

In my opinion, they should be see as scam if they are able to complete their sales, list on an exchange and at they decide not to pay, but for a project that fails, what does he want to pay, but a shitcoin with no iota of value.
Sometimes i see bounty hunter ask for payment, even when a project did not succeed. It is quite funny. If they eventually get paid, the token will be useless, because you are not sure if the developer will continue with it or not.

You are right but we are on 2020 now and not 2017. Even legitimate projects fails because there are no investors, and they are very picky and cautious on which projects to invest. Some successful projects does not conduct ICO anymore, they just get a private firm to back them up and list to a reputable exchange an have an IEO.

Keep working ultimately failed, were used to it from 2018. This year something changed. All projects can never be failed if you have a good team and good partnership. For scam situation, funds rise never isn't easy with legitimate all information.

The year now is totally different and since last year most of the project failed once they get into the market. Many new projects are just a scam and very few who offers the real one and yet didn’t get enough investor. Private entities are the target now for some project, and that makes more successful compare to the ICO.

In this 2020 the projects are now different unlike the year 2017 where it is the  year where the success of the projects are on its peak. I do not participate in projects anymore like ieo and ico because it is too risky for me. It is better for me to trade than to make investment in shit projects that can make me to have losses. Be careful especially for thosw who want to put their money in todays projects.

Investing in new projects is indeed quite risky, apart from many scams and also unfavorable market conditions. The projects that in my opinion are worthy of investment are projects that undertake IEO in large exchangers because most of the projects have increased prices after the initial listing

Unfortunately not all investors are given a chance to invest in big exchange, like for instance in Binance, so some of you might just wait until the price will dump and buy it cheap as eventually it will rise if it's indeed a great project.

Don't invest just because of the hype alone, try to evaluate the whole purpose of the project and especially the team behind the project.
Not because it's traded in big exchanges it would be successful, sometimes devs are just investing on big exchanges for the hype they'll get and just leave the project afterwards.

ICO, IEO are two things we often hear when a project collects funds that will be used to develop the project and carry out project objectives. The condition of the sale of tokens or coins made by many teams from various projects has so far experienced a setback, this is closely related to market conditions and the direct impact of many projects that end in fraud. Investment is quite risky and of course many investors experience it.

Not all IEO or ICO are bad, there are still some of them that attract investors so they succeed. But it is difficult for the team to maintain price stability when the product is traded on the market, for this reason some investors may discourage investing in ICO or IEO and they may turn to trading and investing in well-known and reputable tokens or coins.

We should change the term "not" into "most" because not all of current projects are bad but most of it is bad. Projects nowadays are too risky for me and that is why I keep ignoring it because I do not want anymore to invest my money into something that is too risky. I prefer to invest my money in gambling than to participate in projects in this current year because I have more control over my money.

You know when the crypto community pressurises the developers, some will become frustrated and dump their projects. I believe every transparent project will get the support of the community provided there's a relationship between the team and the people and also developers should be proactive in the project development.

yes, from what you say it might be true that not all projects are bad and vice versa. but in most cases in the ICO project almost the entire ICO project is fraudulent. if there is a good project but fails for several reasons., now the important concern is how the developer works and is serious in developing the project.

Go and take a look at ilcoin, not yet bull  but this means you can still buy at low with high possible roi.

I have never seen any good ICO project but failed. Most ICO projects are lies and scams, since 2018 until now I have not seen any successful ICOs. They ended the ICO with a huge amount of money from investors but they did not continue to develop the project. They ran away with all the money and left the investor with a useless project

Unofortunately in this field, we are output based. If the output didn't met in a given time frame regardless of the reason, it's already considered as failure or bad project. That's why some developers are reconstructing the purpose, vision, and marketing of their projecg thus they can atleast benefit the idea they come up from the previous one. However the danger in this thing is that it's more difficult to gain investor's trust. Getting rid of this determines your skills and intellegence.