Bitcoin Forum

Some devs are good with project, but lacks community, While Some dev lacks good project, but their community noise can drive price to heights beyond a good project with lack of community can attain.

And if you will agree with me many solid project have gone below radar because of that while many over hyped projects are being shilled endlessly.

An example is the dynamite  with several hypes and wins community vote almost everywhere, getting listed in several  exchange, yet, no product, nothing just a lame project.

The question is, would these undervalued, poor dev projects ever compensate investors in terms of returns on investment?
I hope to learn further more below.

The ICO craze has enabled a lot of these developers to just march out on their own and start coding, make a website, answer telegram questions etc etc, all the while thinking that they are doing something truly unique. They forget that at the end it is a business and they need a product. A product needs marketing, advertisement and all that shit. Yet, the problem with most of these so-called undervalued, good devs is that they all think they are on to something unique. It is impossible for everyone to be a Satoshi or a Bill Gates and make a business from scratch simply on the basis of the novelty and brilliance of their ideas. The echo chambers of their telegram/ Reddit groups makes it all the more easier to fall for this narrative.

They all could do much better only if they used some business sense and actually invested in marketing their product, meeting potential clients and just run an actual business.

The hope that these can give returns on investments is bleak because everyone has their own list of the "under the radar, awesome project that nobody else knows about". This happens with everyone. Back when i was naive, i bought something called CarVertical. They were supposedly selling insurance reports on vehicles in the shitty parts of europe. ;D I bought something like 30K of those at shit prices from a shit exchange thinking "What if this reaches just 1 USD?" ::)  So everyone is waiting for those pumps that will never come. Most real businesses are moving on with whatever actual blockchain use cases are there.

Till the Alt-space gets a little bit more serious about itself rather than relying on the diminishing returns from doing cheap bounties and then doing pre-sales, hoping enough newbies will fall for the false advertising, its not gonna be possible. These projects, developers, bounty participants, Bounty managers, we all need to stop feeding on our own tails..

In fact, you mentioned the most important issues. Project management (not just those related to crypto, but all) is a matter of team and vision. In this way, a synergy is provided as a team, community and project.

Contrary to popular belief, the team is not at the top of these important items. Because, as we can see from Bitcoin, it is not very important that those who started the project are visible. But it can be very useful if everything is objective and transparent. Unfortunately, there are things that project teams ignore. A healthy communication with the community is actually the biggest advertisement. There is no need to advertise on very famous sites, twitter phenomena. Sometimes even doing nothing can have very positive results. The most obvious example I can think of is DogeCoin. The community likes Dogecoin even without any reason. Maybe it doesn't work very well, but people love it.

I think that when the priority is given not to earn money but to advance and develop the project, both the project owners and the community will already earn money.

Professional teams who are ready for the worst and at first introduce something very useful to the public, the successful of a project or the soon of a project all lies in the teams hand

1) Constant proven development
2) Working product (which 99% of crypto projects doesn't have).
3) Great community.

These are the most important things, IMHO.

Blocknet was founded in 2014, and has everything above, more over they work on true decentralization through their DEX, and their decentralized oracle network.

A coin/token with an actual utility is a good thing, as it adds value to the overall network. There need to be a "demand" for a given project, in Blocknet's case it's service nodes (5000 BLOCK required), which makes it possible to earn passively through DEX fee's and other things.

This is just a guideline, there are TONS of great promising projects out there. Just do your own research!

When you call them as investors then their goal will be making profits from it,so one who is smart will invest on hyped project and dump as soon as possible when it gets listed so just one time profit making intention.

Good project doesn't need to be profitable always.In long term eventually it will.

A good project needs solid team who are tech savvy
A good project needs constant funds to back steady development and growth.
A good project also needs a good exchange. Ect.

I think a good project should not be devoid of these three keys and some others.

Devs doesn't guarantee the ROI for investors. It's still the investors decision to risk money as they invest to a project that they want to. It is always something like that but the belief that has been built, whenever there's a newly built project, investors think that it's going to be an easy and instant money for them because that's how it was before during the bull market. That belief must break because investing to a project doesn't really have an assurance whether it's a poorly made or the one that has the potential.

Unless there is no honesty and integrity involved in all the projects, there will be no good project that will prevail.  If the project will all depend on hype and false marketing strategy then it will be a lame project at the end. What we need now is a quality project so that we can win the respect and trust of the users and investors. What we need now is a neutral body that will be funded by all the incoming projects and will trim down all the good projects from the lame one. If there will be no corruption, I think this is possible.

Good project always need partnership which brings trust to investors. Exchange, development and others things also could be done by huge money. By good funds new projects can show development performance. Only by partnership funds can rise easily even in bad cryptocurrency.

Unique ideas and transparencies are also important in every project. Like even you have already a project and community but there's still something in your project that already in other project and there's is much better.
Transparency too, you should let your community know what is going on like in the financial situation.

Agreed that most projects that are legit have gone now. I saw some but not necessarily they are good. Problem here is lack of authencities of those new projects. There you mentioned that some have good community but the developer are sucks. Yeah I can attest to that, but I prefer a good developer who knows what are they doing cause more important here is the solid concept and not just a hype one with the community.

Investors who keep believing in hype are going to lose eventually they will awake that they lose their investment unless they dump their share ahead of the others, but there will always losers in a pump and hype coin, investors should always look on platform and usability of the project, the hype will eventually come, projects with good potential will not just die easily.

I see many new projects that already have working product but in the end this will eventually turn into scam,  or the tokens or coins listed in poor exchanges that why price become worse and become shitcoins.
That's why for me much better to not invest in ICO or IEO because new project now are riksy to invest and this will only become scam at the end.

And there are also some projects that had been hyped with a good project but yet forgotten all of a sudden.
One of it was Waves and if you are here at that time you might've saw it too. It was almost the non stop talk for like a month or a couple.

They can. But it takes time.
Investors must be willing to wait for a large amount of time.
It takes mostly 3 years before it will become fruitful and others takes a lot more time than that.
But, I see some who never stops up until now.

No matter how good the teams of a project are once there is lack of funds there is a big problem, they won't be able to show their worth, there are many things to worry about and even team makes wrong choices some times

In a project everything must be prepared.
-The team is experienced in technology so their concept will be good if it is experienced.
- Funds must be prepared because building a project must have funds. Do not rely on funds from the sale of ICO / IEO. It will be difficult if the project does not develop.
-Products must be prioritized because the project has a goal on the product so this step must take precedence.
-Good marketing and can build a community with many who are interested in the project.
-Do not underestimate tokens at the entry into the low exchange because it will anger the investors.

I don’t know of any projects that would be bad, but the project community has created a positive buzz around itself. if you find such a project then the community is just a group of idiots who don’t know what they are doing. I thought that now people who invest their money have become smarter, but as we see not all of them.

The poor developers will be only compensating the early investors in this case i meant we have seen a bunch of crap projects that hyped but the community but in the end they become nothing. I know about your main concern looks so unfair for a project that has made a good product but it's still undervalued. I have been using a product that comes from the undervalued project too that was placed on below top 100 CMC and i never encounter any problem by using its product and i can even use my crypto virtual card properly.
The problem is too much short term speculators who were driving the hype from the project and after they have achieved what they want.

No project is perfect when it comes to different factors, that is my opinion. But I think the best way to gain much attention is to be in touch with the community and with a good marketing team for sure, it will soar high! See, every developer already got knowledge or ideas when it comes to a so-called "good project" but it will make a difference if it is being hyped just like what OP said.

If project in the first place is very promising, good content, idea is unique and have improvement, I think it will make the community more effective and investors will easily give their attention to it. If devs give it more effort and time to promote the project. They should make sure that it will develop through the day to keep on the right track and keep up with the trend about cryptocurrency.

The only thing that most new projects lacks this days is seriousness of the team, I've seen few project that failed to raise good fund but still continue the development of the project, for others they just stop updating and exit

Every good project takes time to build no matter what. true, what we are seeing now is hype projects where people hype a project to drive the market and after which they pull their funds and dissappear leaving the project to it's fate. There are projects that don't care much about the hype, the noise and fame But are Focused in promoting and building their platform. Some options to spot good projects are:
Check out their BITCOINTALK THREAD HERE FOR UPDATES.
They keep updating their road map with developements and achivements so far
check out their github account where they are active and live.
their telegram group is always active with announcements and the latest.

So I checked this Dynamite token on coinmarketcap and browse their website. I'm surprised none of the previous comment talked about the example in the original post.

They have their MVP which is a platform for freelancers and online jobs that pays in crypto. The total original token supply is only around 900,000 and that will continue to decline because of the 2% burn fee everytime the token is transferred to another wallet. They did not do an ICO and 60% of the supply was given to the community. Up to this date, around 39% of the supply are still locked.

With the above information, I think it is not fair to call this project as pure hype and lame project. If what you said is true about them winning a lot of community voting, they must be doing something right to have a good community support.

It would have been fair if ampere also use an example of a good project that is still undervalued. In that way, we could also see what they may be doing wrong.

From my perspective, projects should balance development and marketing. It is not easy to attract attention and they need both a product and the right marketing strategy to stand out. The proper timing is very important also

I think you have already mentioned the basics that a project needs.
Apart from a good product, and a  working principle, a good project definitely need good communities to push the good news, push the products to everyone on social media, to help create the neccesary and basic hypes equally.

I definitely understand your point of view, But if we deduce your support in factual terms.
I believe we will both agree that they have benefited from unsual hypes, than some platforms would get.

And also, i do not rate timing, as long as your project is genuine, you will thrive.

will give a refund if indeed they sell at a higher price than at the beginning of the purchase, as you said earlier this project is hype so do not have to wait long or expect the price to be higher again, because there is no effect, the product that is given is actually only news and the community that makes it look real.so you should sell right away once you make a profit because a project like this won't last long.

To answer your last question, I do not think those projects can bring out great ROI for the investors. Almost 99% of the token that is being traded today is far less than the price during ICO and IEO with no hope of reaching back the peak. Just as you have said, many of them have no working products which means the demand for the token will continue to decrease until the project become dead. This is exactly what is happening to many of today's project

Yes, that's right, almost the average project with the hype model does not last for a long time, because they only play with the news and the community, while the original product does not exist at all, that's what makes the project can not survive in the long run.

Not guaranteed I think. Investors should always be reminded of consequence for these risky projects. Yes not all the time ROI will be seen on some hidden gems and also as a trader we know how volatile this market right, if you want to earn and gain some profits, risk some but dont always expect something sure. Many undrvalued project posses a very high risk and those who keep losing here are those who dont have enough knowledge.

Dont trust mostly what those developers or owners says, about profits cause this is an obvious shill or just part of their words to make you feel relieve.

Instead of believing them, why see for yourself and observe first before putting up some money. Dont believe on quick return profits projects. These will turn out to be exit boys in the end once they gain some profits already.

if it's a really good project, and the team is responsible for it, then the team will compensate and give their funds back if they don't reach their target. but of course, that takes time. some people can't wait to make it look to scam, but in reality, they only need time.
to make a good project, honesty is needed, and when people don't support the project to reach the target, at least, the team has a value in compensation. projects that are not goodwill certainly run away from this responsibility.

Responding to your very last question. Every investor is always advised to do enough research before investing in a project, also note that all investors bears in the risk and profit of the businesses in which they commit their resources to. so they will not have refunds in cases where the investment goes south.

Said it a hundred times before. Idea is worth shit if it doesn't have a way to use it for normal people. I can use Bitcoin, Litecoin, even Monero right now to pay for stuff I need. And it's all done in a few seconds, easily and no nonsense 3rd party or gateway. No needing to trade for some token that can only be used in 1 ecosystem and then needing to trade out or negate the balance.

It's not about the idea, but about the implementation.

I would say a good project should have a good development team who are sincere, good marketing officers who carry the community along with all the happening without frivolous promises, a good solution offering program and not an imitation of already existing projects but one that provokes sound reasoning, getting listed on reputable exchanges and lastly a decent community with an even coin distribution.

A good project needs.

- active github development
- active community management
- transparent team

and the rest will follow in time...

Yes, and the problem now is that not all projects have active github development, active community management and transparent teams, and on average most projects don't have these three things, so it's not worth saying good.

Yes they always do compensate investors. What lame shilled projects does is create high liquidity depth out of the shills it gets from community members. What a good project needs is good development and great community. Without the community factor, no project can survive every project needs the hype to make money for investors.

Developers are always behave like the smartest sometimes, they failed to listen to the community, they behave like they know everything that will make a project to be successful but in the end they lack alot, devs can't know everything, it's impossible

You're right, the current state of the project seems to be far from good because there aren't many projects that do that. we no longer see any projects that are truly transparent with their finances. especially if you see an exchange project that is holding a withdrawal from their platform. it is a developer action that is not very good and makes a bad image.

Professionals and transparency, that's all it takes for new projects to become very demanding in crypto space, many new projects are been handled by none pro teams that's why they fail in several ways and they don't have interest in the community, they forget that without community there is nothing else

I have not seen a crypto project team more transparent and more sincere then the sinovate project..
they even pay back the missing rewards to their community.
DYOR..

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5147827.1100

If other investors should know of this, most especially concerning the project mentioned, then I am sorry, it is already a failed project. One could have assumed that a group with so many activities, disguising as if they have real investors, might just have hired those who would do that for them. A lot of projects are into acts like this, which is why I am not surprised if they later fail. Sometimes, they may have deceived their community, get their fund and at the ends entire into thin air.

Yes. They seem very active, sincere and transparent.

A hidden gem that is about to explode but for the explosion they need only one decent exchange  ;)

From a different point of view, i would not generally term the team as been unserious at all, because intentions matter a lot.
Some project team just want to fame and the profits, and this is why we observe several projects been dumped and abandoned by the team before vanishing.

In reality, less than 10% of project devs care about the product their platform has to offer, just the money involved matters to most of them,

I think we cannot blame developers, of a project
They started their growth from the scratch right before they got any community members or investors, so rebuffing their opinion or trying to force yours upon them may be anoying for them.

Nobody knows it all, in the whole world, and that is why we have different types of projects daily in the crypto currency space.

A good product. If a good project don't have a good product then project will be dead for sure. Many projects comes here with lot of hypes or promises but those projects will be dead when people don't need them that's why a good quality product need if they want to carry their project. Think, if people don't need your useless product then why they'll bye it, of course they'll show their interest that product which one give them more profit. In my opinion may be the project with bad product don't stay long but the project with good product will always give you benefit.

I think the rest does not follow easily like that, for the rest to follow, the team and developers must put in alot of hardwork to ensure to get due rewards.
The team must also follow proper advise, such as if crowdfunding is needed, best page for crowdfunding, and other critical decisions that guide a token must be gotten rightly.

All of the aspects must be integrated from one with each other to make sure the good product will be rolling out as expected by so many investors and speculators. The main thing is if the development is not about the developer create a product but it's much more the community must be involved in the creation of the product to get a lot of help to do various tests to the product.

A new project needs good funding but what is most important is the qualifications of the team, many teams don't even know what fake volume is or which exchange has best Liquidity

A upcoming new project always need professional team with high qualifications developing program then their IEO/ICO will be successful easily. Actually the crypto market situation bad think everyday so all investors now more smart about their investing. So if a project called more smart investors then their need improve project own power.

It takes putting a lot of good measures in place for a project to actually been seen as a good project. Many people do not wish or like to participate in projects that will never bring bountiful reward to them, hence they always look out for projects with good plans and future goals. In order for a project to be seen as a good project,it must have good advertisement plan and a good managing team.The mode of interaction of community people with the team members should be consolidated. Also,if a project will be seen as a good project, it must be transparent and reliable for all its promises to community people.

Compensation? it looks like it will not be done by the developer team, and think that is a risk in investing or promising better development for long-term investment. In this case, investors must be truly selective and understand every risk from the chosen investment. Investment starts from understanding what you are going to invest in, learning the project as well as possible, from the team, superior products to the roadmap to create a framework when your investment can provide benefits. As for the developer, investor confidence is the most important thing, to get it, the developer must develop a systematic and professional plan, create a real and functionally superior product, and actively provide development, supported by a broad community and network.

If a coin is going to survive long term it needs to become a national currency.
Thats the future.
Look at TemTum, in talks with Anguilla and more countries still to be announced.

Whatever needs to new project. Project that makes any promises, it's not very easy make to real or actuals service. Good project more need excellent team manager and good partnership. I also follow team members working speed and social update every time.

We all know that there is no guarantee of return on investment and all investments are risky which are confirmed now after months of downtrend we have seen many alts and tokens to drop to hundreds time less than ico price or there peak price values.
A good project is the one which has all the good ingredients added like competent and experienced team, highly in demand product/service/platform, large community and also massive userbase, continuous targetted advertising, active and ontime product developemnt and also continuous work to enhance user experience are some points for a successful project.

I do not think all tokens have to follow temtum path as a national currency
There are diverse ways for a product to be successful and survive on the long term.

Solid products, good team of developers and necessary marketers does it quite well.

Good projects require experienced developers and of course have a good reputation in managing previous projects. good projects must also have tangible products, demand for tokens in the market is always increasing and the team is always active in updating their projects.

it also have to be trustworthy, have to has good experience and reputation, but this field is here only for a decade so we shouldn't expect to be there a lot of projects with heavy past experience

For me, a good project need essential elements to work out on getting into the way to success. A good project must be composed of trustworthy developers of the project in which it can be possible that there are well-known member in the developers team so that we can somehow state that this project can lead into a good path. It is also in need that they have unique or genuine idea for the project added by effort on having strategical marketing to be able for people to recognize their existence and get interested into the project itself. It will also be essential that the project has a large community to support and promote the project to gain and attract potential investors. For me, those are the essential, important and needed elements for a good project. It is not just all about the price but also for the idea of the project, and that is an ideal good project for me.

The most important thing is the background of the team and their track record . If the team jas exposure in the domain in which they are trying to develop something then it's well and good . Also see the market they are trying to penetrate and if there is really a requirement for such a thing.

To me, those are just too ordinary for us to evaluate a project. Nowadays scam projects can fake profiles in detail to deceive investors, we should pay attention to their ideas, their products and their partners. Those are the things that will make their project successful or unsuccessful

I think a good project really needs to be needed, where it concerns bounty hunters who always need a good project. For the problem of compensation for investment returns, I think it depends on the initial agreement between the developer and the investor. I think the project has its own policy in implementing it

From what I see it needs a good and dedicated developer, It needs financial support in private companies because ICO does not work now. Of course, community support, also some partnership with existing and working companies. It is very hard to start now if you don't have any funds just like starting from scratch it does not work anymore maybe IEO will work but on a decent exchange like binance.

that means the transparency is something that really needed by anyone. We have blockchain and when a project can't even prove it through use tx id to make it becomes more transparent and becareful if that can be considered as a scam project dude. There were so many people getting fooled caused by this.

True, because hunters will also feel very tired when after doing a good job but not paid, so in this case it is very clear that the hunters need a project that is really good and has the potential to develop in any condition.

If the project is undervalued and the development is not going well, there are more chances that the project will go down and under the table for anybody to notice. Then a few years later someone will buy the project shares by some private deal and the investors will be shown the middle finger and told to f-- off. This has been my experience with altcoins and thus I dont put money in them anymore.

Whether a community can bring back a project and depending on that to wait for the price pump is a risky move. It is better to just sell off at a loss than to wait for that, because majority of such cases are waste.

You are right, for altcoins to remain relevant, there is a need for projects to be good.
And if it is to highlight importance amongst others, you need to take note that a good project needs a good dev, a trusting community, a realistic product.

But good projects will not make bounty to attract interested people and investors. They have enough funds to operate and develop projects, bounty projects are non-investor projects and they are more likely to fail when they start an ICO or IEO. From 2019 until now I haven't seen any successful projects on this forum, they end up with a big scam.

Innovation is very very important, you are building a project in the lands of projects, there are probably close to 5k coins/tokens right now in the world, thousands of them didn't day of light and they are all gone, probably around 3k of them are still around somewhere in the world and around 1000 of them actually gets listed somewhere right now.

It means you have a HUGE competition and in order to stand out somehow you need to innovate, you need to do something that will actually change the world or at least make a huge impact on the crypto world. You may think the innovation and the idea you have is enough, but I can promise you that it is not really enough, you have to do even more and more so that you can show the world that you are "the one" otherwise people will just overlook you.

- A great leader.
- Unique developers and active github..
- Honest and Transparent team.
- Funds
- Good community management.
- Good business plan and economic model.
- Important use case and product.

You cannot rely solely on the team because what if the devs decide that it's going to be their exit scam? They made some good projects and made some money and reputation and now will run another bitconnect, get a few million dollars each and live of it for the rest of their lives.

You can't rely on the name behind a project. The most important thing is what the project is about. Is it something revolutionary or just another centralized shitcoin with big premine.

To my opinion I think there are some basic and advanced things a project needs.

Firstly, I will say a project needs a good team and leadership that has a vision. This is the most important in my opinion then followed by the community.

The community are the long-term and going concern of the project and they should not be neglected.

Advanced things are as usual capital(money), manpower(right mind-set).

It seems there is no compensation, shitproject has many reasons to run away, then slowly disappear with a bag filled with money full of investor funds.


A lot of funds and excellent products that are truly innovative.
Surely it will be easy to collaborate with people or companies that have a good reputation in the crypto world. It will automatically attract investors, thus a large community will form itself :)

Bith unique ideas and good community support are needs for a project to get successful then only it will be called a good project.But nowadays trust on the new projects get shrinking due to useless shit project or devs stops their development once they made profits for themselves so just stick with older better projects rather than taking a huge risk on new projects.

It takes a long time to earn trust. New projects are not to be trusted.
Trust a project if the team members are always the same for the core team...

I think we need to also add background check of the developer's and teams id what they did before . Some of the project already have pass scam doing before ,if investors early know about that they will not invested any money in that project even how good they promise they are.
Background check from how they enter crypto world until now not only to make an ICo to raised money from investors .

Skills of the owner and other bussineses they have before that is still running and working for them./ they should have bussiness management background so we can know if they can able manage a business to make thier own and entrust our money to them.

It's a combination of everything good developers, platform and community if you have all these combination it will end up a successful project all the best coins in the market, has all of these, take away anyone of that combination and it will slip in the market or they will just fade away in oblivion.

No matter how well written WP is, I don't think that evaluates to a good project as it needs many investors.
Relevance comes at place due to the degree of benefit that people can get from the project itself. Well popular example would be Bitcoin as we know it as it was found in 2009, and look what it solved to majority of the inconvenience that people are having back then.
It isn't just the good devs, community, and good vision of the project.

Exactly a good project never loss time and their combination everything is promising with intelligent development Activity. A real project always want more investors clients then they look how increase project developing identify. Therefore, investors people never avoid those projects where have must good profitable chance.

Good projects needs good community, transparent team and a working team with good product. A team with good mindset and team that understands what Cryptocurrency is and also have team growth in mind and investors funds in Mind. A good team with enthusiasm usually excel than those pump and dump projects. With a working products, investors will look for you.

Follow that road and you will get scammed. A project leader only is a puppet in reality. The control lies in the hands of the investors if they have voting rights making it all a redundant shitshow if the price goes down and they decide to rebel. The team comes secondary to the project's inherent ability to create a market if not marketing on an already open market. It is rarely seen that they are creating something that garners a market on its own and that is the reason of failure of all these projects setting aside the vaporware projects which are complete pump and dumps.

Surely, but how many actually develop anything working?

This is a question that has been repeated severally in the crypto sphere and it is easy.

Hype aside, a good project needs a quality product, that fits a particular problem and solves it; and also enough to drive demand for such product token.
Also, a project needs a large reliable community (to achieve this project devs must build trust amongst their community). Then a bit of luck.

A good project needs a team with technical and technological knowledge
A transparent Team, good funds, a very good exchange.
A good project needs Also  large reliable community which to achieve this project devs must build trust amongst their community members

Right now good projects are very rare to find, even if there are one or two good ones but not completely good and exactly as you say it, for more details you try to trace little by little projects that were born this year, and then you make it as a good and bad percentage.

Agree.. and don't forget about Community trust, because this is important when nobody never trust your project anymore.. well in my opinion the project will fail.

mostly good developers team that have good technical and technological knowledge already joined in existing projects or even be core team in major coins. and now dev team has same quality with them, so they dont know how to developt project and sell it to investors and community.

Project is a temporary, unique and progressive attempt or endeavor made to produce some kind of a tangible or intangible resuIt. A good project required Team (which means Together Each Achieve More), A good manager who can take decision as at when due because timing is required in every thing one engage in. A well constructive white paper and also need to engage bounty Hunters to make the project easlly accessible for investor and the likes, because fund is required in any project.

And that community has to be really quality. If the community is built from airdrop or bounty, I think they will not help too much for the project. For me, investors are the most important to the project. Because if they don't trust the project anymore, the price will always go down

Smart team and money. That is actually all you need for a project to be great. If you have people at every position that are good at what they do, like a coder that is really an awesome coder, a designer that is awesome designer etc etc, and you give them like 5 more people under them so they could get sufficient help as well, plus you get funded fully and even some more on top of that, beyond what you could imagine, that project will be successful.

I mean think about it, why does many projects fail? Lack of money, lack of interest, lack of talent. These are the only reasons why they fail and if you have awesome team, they will know what to do in order to be good. I personally have worked with so many failed projects that I have seen a million ways they can fail, but there is only one way to be good.

Good funds and smart team to manage the project perfectly, every other things comes next, team are the main reason why a project succeed or fail to succeed

Let us say, team are part of the reasons why project succeeds or fail.
But when it comes to the project as a whole, a viable and real community makes s projects succeed.

How? A project product can only thrive when the product is employed and used to effects to drive demand and command increase in price

In my opinion, some successful projects have credible teams and great consultants. In addition to having attractive products that are not less important, they have the cash to enter large markets and make businesses run, for example, holding courses to present products and attract investors. So don't expect too much if the dev project doesn't have the rules above because it's likely that what happened ended in disappointment.

Most project developers are the cause of the lack of trust in their projects.
A project that does not deliver on time or never even deliver cannot be trusted.
A project team that lies to her community cannot be trusted.
A project team that hides relevant information that needs to be shared cannot be trusted.
A project with a fake team or a team that is anonymous cannot be trusted.
And the list goes on and on like that...

Only one thing is needed to have a good project which is to have also a hardworking and dedicated team , they are known because of thier conribution in crypto, a team that can solve every problem that will come on thier project.

A good project needs good teams, teams must be tech savvy, they must have past experience with blockchain technology and they must be willing to drive along with the community because belief me community have a part to play, a big one

That is true, there is no such project that has a complete package for a project. Both should work on their end, the team and the community.  The team to focus on project development, marketing and keeping the community informed of development, and for the community to be patient and to have faith on the team.

solid team, responsible for the roadmap about future projects.real development.
and more,some projects focus only on fundraising where the points I mentioned above are actually more important.
as well as anything that makes the continuity of the project survive or stronger such as events and other activities.

A good project which wants to thrive in this industry needs to have use cases that would produce working products for real world use. Also, the team should endeavour to market their project so that investors can get to know about it. Lastly, listing on a better exchange would further increase the exposure to bring in more investors.

Everyone think that any project can be good with the strong team/community , roadmap, huge investors. But i think, only those project can be good enough which will introduce the new innovation in their own category/type. If there is 10 or more projects in a specific category, than all projects will be good at the beginning. But all those project will become a shity one in the near futures as there are more competitions and every projects are researching for the same outcomes. So only that project will be good or successfull which will be able to do any innovation in first place.

a really good project certainly has a large community and developers who are professional in their fields. related to the product is an important role in a project, if the project has a real product then it is likely that investors will take part in it. but currently there are many good projects but the product is not developing in the market.

The major tactic used by most of these lame projects with hype as stated is a supportive community. The team usually do a form of airdrop to community members who vote on several exchanges for free listing, and most likely get listed on several shitty exchanges thereby driving in new community members. Some good teams with renowned project neglect power of community which is a very big mistake to begin with, hence leading to failed project in no time. When doing research on which coin to hold for long term, one of the things I consider whether the project is community centric or not, and I believe many other crypto enthusiasts do same. In my opinion, a good project needs good marketing, a strong community and of course a good team and product.

Well, there are many things that can help a project to be good in this market. The project needs to be created by people with experience in blockchain, and that project must have a working product. In addition, the project must be supported by investors and everyone in this market

wonderful conditions but there are no such projects. Maybe you want to say that the project should be created by Satoshi Nakomoto himself in order to be successful? Now there are many good projects that are not created by the strongest teams but they achieving very good results.

Don't you think it has to be beyond experience?
Experience without the right attitude to work, means that the project will not succeed.
Recent projects have shown us that it involves sleek and fair attitudes to triumph in the space today; also the ability to make proper decisions guide too.

The most important thing for both project devs and followers is to do a concrete research, which ensures that there are proper lay out of decisions and consequent growth of the platform.

If I think the success of a project is very dependent on the team that manages the project because of their hard work then the project will have a positive impact for investors who are monitoring the project, and also they should be able to give the best for the followers so that the value of tokens will be increased due to the big dormen in the investors.

All started from request by owner, when he proposed to be willing to fund a project and set limits on the team that was used to advance a project that would be carried out. certainly the owner does not want the investment value is not worth.

If that was running like what you are saying right now and everything will be fine. The problem is when it comes to the owner that doesn't even wanna waste the fund that raised from the crowdsale and it may become a boomerang. There was a lot of projects that have bad owners.
The owner must also be a competent person to be able to maintain the project in right way.

Clearly l can say, success of any project. There should be hard working staff & good  management. First of all honesty is needed must.

You have mentioned rightly 2 valid points, but do you know that having a good team and funds is not enough to determine if a project will succeed or fail ?
Every projects needs the right community, the one that keeps it on the edges and promotes its product genuinely.

Another important aspect is when to list, no project must list wrongly, it will not succeed regardless of efforts put in place.

For any project to see a huge success in regard to their project solely depends on the team behind the said project. Many have forgotten that, some project had enough funds to finance their project but because there is a lack in the team the project remains stagnant without a great. I have seen numerous projects that heard good team without good finance and at the end of the project they explore revenant strategies to make the project a huge success. As for me, the project team is one if my criteria.

To my understanding, most projects who remain stagnant despite several wealth, and crowdfunding funds are that way intentionally, they chose not to further develop the project.
And if you observe deeper, you will realize that such team always postpone product launch with zero to non excuses.

Here are some qualities a good project has :

- Projects that aim to solve a real world problem
- Projects which can realistically solve that problem
- Projects that are proven to not be scams
- Projects that have a good and active (GITHUB) team that can actually deliver on those promises

A  good project needs serious teams who are ready for anything, they must be professionals too to avoid any bad results, few dead projects once had a good utility but the team aren't experts that's what kill many old dead projects

So, what do you prefer ? Devs with good project but lacks community or Devs with good community but have good project ?
It will be hard to obtain those 2 things for new project, except the project has some great figures backing the project.
For me, devs with good project is better because they can create the community if they actively engaging with social medias.

good team performance and development or according to the roadmap is a project that can get the attention of many people so that it is easy to register on large exchanges of course demand will be large and the price of tokens will definitely rise significantly

The only thing that makes a project a better one is the team, no matter what a project possessed if the team aren't hardworking and brilliant the project will fail, team professionalism are the more important

It takes a whole lot of effort for a project to remain relevant and be seen as a good project. Most cryptocurrency enthusiast are concerned about the returns they get from the project, so a project who gives a good return can be said to be a good one, but there's much more that is required to maintain the title as a good project. The most important criteria for a good project is project development and real use case. This should be the major factor every project should aim at accomplishing and listing on a good cryptocurrency exchange is another great quality.

On another view, the seriousness and the hardwork of a crypto currency project team have no effects on the project being a good project; A good project for me is judged on how valuable the product is, how widely acceptable it can become and finally how promotional the team is. A good project, with good product must take marketing very seriously.

even if the team is a little behind the roadmap but it is constantly developing, this is normal, because now is a very unstable time on the market. everyone needs everything to be fast and successful, but this will not happen. everything happens step by step

Determined team with seriousness mind, I believe the real backbone of a successful project is the team, without a proper team work a crypto project will end up in a dustbin, apart from a very good utility teams must be very ready to take the project to higher step

So true 👍. A very good team, focused and determined to achieve the project aim with very good strategies put in place is truly what a good project needs. If a team has all it got, then they will understand that community interest is essential, hence they will strive to build a great supportive community. Also product development and marketing are not left out, these are vital areas a good team will also focus on.

Community really promotes project but another factor is the team being transparent which is another reason for a project to grow and wax strong so it's not about one party but once an investor comes to any group and sees it active next investigation is to check the team and project use case before investing so active community matters alot.

Community driven projects will be successful in short term for sure because it is going to be listed on many exchanges so it will bring trading volume to the project but in long term that project has no use so investors will lose interest and find new projects.While the project with good idea will be struggling to get their coin on any exchange but if they keep developing their project one day it will be acknowledged by the community.

The project needs all of things that can push the project into the next level. It should be the combination between the team, community, exchange site product and many more. Exchange site is also something that can be forgot by the dev as it make the platform gets more adoption.

For me a good project needs a stable, thorough, attainable goal or goals and a supportive following. Its crucial to have a following that believes in the project, your following can be the very people that would market you, and what better way to keep a following but to provide them a solid platform.

The project must consist of good use case, this is the only way that the project can see huge demand from investors and again after use case another thing you must worry about is the team capability on the project, how they take things serious with the project will determine the results from developments in future

As far as I know, there has been no compensation or at least an official guarantee from the developer for investors who have already invested their money into a project, but ultimately failed or for other reasons that the project did not go to the exchange market, so there is no guarantee for money back . That is why at the beginning of a project, the team must provide a clear picture of the compensation to investors, and more so to the participants who share the project on social media and forums. if not, at least there is a guarantee that the token from the project already exists and is already listed on the exchange market and it is real. so, potential investors already know the token and how to take the next stance.

It is step by step process some times it will take time and some time they will develop which are not listed in the roadmap, that's we should choose the project which are actively working in the background and following their roadmap, firstly, the company shouldn't not forget their community because they will always help to drive the price whenever there is an update from the company.

Community!

People behind it are the most important part imo. After the 2017 this shilling and promoting tokens is gone out. People are more careful now and with a steady community of happy traders you can acquire more into your base.

I see a lot people say community is what good project needs, but no one explains how to build one.
Imho, to build a good community, the project need to stand out somehow, be generous and creative by themselves. The idea is not so important,  as community will hype it.

Name few good projects and communities. Lets try to figure out what lead to success together.

The power of community is incredible indeed, they can make the hype around the project, and pump the price.
But the dev should have a good project too. Lacking quality of the project can causing other people thinks they are some pump and dump project.