Bitcoin Forum

Nullius this alt of lauda or pathetic incel hopeful suitor of lauda (believing like a fool lauda is female) wishes to excuse the undeniable scamming of lauda and other willing scam facilitators  for pay.
He posted some wall of word salad on my other thread and i meant to repost it here so i can focus on this nerdy little twat and pull him to pieces..
The copy and paste seems to have failed. Post your lauda defense here scammer supporter not on my nutildah thread.

Only nullius the scammer supporter can post here

Keep the walls of excuses and ass munching directly on topic. I don't want to hear your latin or claasics rehearsed dinner party crap.
Come here self taught malnourished peasant dreg.

Allia or whatever young slapper you failed with before will be laughing with me at your public humiliation.
Bet the pathetic sad asslicking weasel  will flee from this thread.
Nothing you post nullius will be moderated  here.

Glad this sad specimen has slimed out of its shell at last.
I get the picture that you are either the alt of lauda or some sad washed up old loser that actually believes lauda is female and like qwk will do anything to aid the fantasy you would have a chance with a real female as you masturbate over your latin and java manuals
Self taught peasant pleb virgin spouting off memorized boring garbage he thinks makes him appear smart.
What a mess.

Let me be the cure. i will humble you so hard in public that you can forget about pretending to be smart.

Come here you moronic twat. Start your excuses for me to shred. Keep it relevant.


Lol look at this pathetic incel scammer supporter nullius now.
I make this thread inviting him here to face me in debate and the chicken shit nerd runs to another thread and bans me from posting in it

What a chickenshit weasel....totally afraid to be crushed and humbled by me here.
I said he can post and none of his posts would be moderated...he then runs to another thread and bans me from responding.


These are the posts he seeks to excuse

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231720.0


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0

His retarded attempt at excusing them is hilarious perhaps why i am not allowed to reply on his thread


Lol at his assumptions

Nutildah account didnt sell ?? Lol no way to prove and doesnt matter.. nutildah is convinced selling accounts facilitates scamming and says others should be punished for it, he then either sells or attempts to sell his account which he is sure will facilitate scamming

He is a willing scam facilitator for pay

That account was for sale for over 6 months then when he was busted nutildah removed the evidence.
Maybe it sold maybe it did not irrelevant.

The lauda excuse is even more funny. Lauda just changed his mind after dumping his bags does not cut it.  He claimed he was on the launch and that no premine took place. Read  the lauda scammer thread above the details are there.
It was proven all along and only dark bag holders denied until they could not any longer and decided to offer compensation for the premine that certainly took place.
Scammers do change their minds about what they have claimed frequently when it suits them financially.
Nullius is a moron. His hilarous refutations are embarrassing even for him.

Come here nullius stop hiding you moronic incel. Lauda is a not allia or even female. Stop debasing and humiliating yourself in the hope of some sexual contact.

I offer you free open debate nullius stop hiding away. Why run like this?
Let us work through the lauda and nutildah scamming  willing scam facilitating for pay together.
I challenge you self taught peasant pleb. You can even have a small paragraph of Latin or classics dinner party show piece to sound really well read and super smart before i cause your skull to imploded such is the public crushing you will receive.
Come old man stop wanking over the thought of the young beautiful lauda. I just told you it is an ugly eastern euro trash Male.

You can sound extra smart by correcting my spelling errors and everything. A buffet to dine on and try to sound smart about.

What ya waiting for scammer supporter?

Where is that word salad laced with latin dressing and some classics celery sticks. I am salivating  at the lack of substance i will find.

Reserved

I'm certain he said ass munchers can post here.

If we get to choose, I'd start with (in no particular order): Audrey Hollander, Dee Williams, Viktoria from 666GooGirls... Roxy Raye, Proxy Paige and that other slightly older woman they socialise with to name a few.  :P  ;D  8)

---

---

I've go no idea what the thread's about, but the OP should have read that recent post concerning starting threads about others - it should be pinned to the top of the section.

Is this in the correct thread? Do you mean you would like to start ass munching those females listed above?

What thread do you mean? I would very much doubt the forum would discourage threads being created to warn about scammers or scamming.

Since you are a apparently an objective scam hunter. I find is strange that you lack commenting on clear evidence of scamming presented about lauda and the undeniable self defined willingness to facilitate scamming for a fee by nutildah and his subsequent attempted deletion of the evidence once busted.

You seem to be avoiding tackling scammers in DT? There is nothing to be afraid of. I will hold your hand.
I'm more of a zafira fan myself. Well perhaps before she was younger she is a little tarnished now.
But lets keep on topic here.

Can if you like ;)


I've started a thread about Lauda creating up to ~85% Fake Flags.  It looks like people are starting to take serious notice of his Trolling.


I'll be sure to check her work out.

---

---

Notice how the DT1 Troll is repeating his post over and over again.  Getting $5 - $6 per post and then rinse and repeating?  OP You should (if I can be so bold as to make a suggestion) delete these posts as soon as they appear - it'll lower his post to deleted ratio.  It might make him think twice before trolling this thread.

Regards.

I'm too lazy to make a list, but nullius being lauda's asslicker and member of the circlejerk group is known, just as nutildah suchmoon and many others.

moony moon denying your group defending scammers? Not saying you taking bitcoin for it but still defending scammers.

Very observative btw,

FTFY!

Any proofs to back up this statement?

Lol ..try to read the full sentence marlboroza, you will find the word  'or'  very interesting I think once you master it. It's a complex little beast take your time    
Please get people to help you read and reply on the internet

Also there is no proof required to say a member is an alt or refer to them as an alt is there?
Or are you claiming now there must be irrefutable proof like the video evidence you claimed QS would need to provide to prove you were zorrobeck or whatever your alt is?

Anyway from further reading back over the pervy old incel nullius dealings and flirtation with alia the presumed female scammer although for sure her crimes are nothing like nullius's new tasty little cybersex bunny lauda he has in his sights.. or are they?

This post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225450.msg53957372#msg53957372

Its quite a rerun of nullius private messaging with alia. Some PM flirting, pressuring for gender info ( hmm wasn't vod frustrated at not knowing laudas gender? Young girls you say) and private details she would not give out knowing this dirty old sex pest is likely dangerous? or was alia just some guy (lauda) cock teasing blatant mark ( nullius)


Do you and lauda sit there together cybersexing this old pervert nullius? He only likes verbal. That's lucky for you ugly eastern euro trash males. You won't get him slobbering around inventing retard level excuses for laudas scamming when he sees what he's really pumping his pillow over.

It is funny how angry nullius gets with timelord when timelord states he thinks lauda is a male lol
Nòoooooooooooooooooooo  screams the phantom of the opera. His mask slipping off in public.
Spitting venom at timelord for killing his lauda boner.

Be fucking brilliant if alia turned out to be lauda. I mean atriz ( of all people)somehow was embroiled in part of it and we know they are best pals to the point many suspect alts.
How excellent would it  be if lauda is giving the old perv the blue balls treatment twice.
Actually I like this theory.

Ha I think lauda the crafty cat has pulled this hot young techno every nerds wet dream babe act on the " genius " nullius twice now.
Brilliant work lauda.


Therefore I prefer now to simply go with the pattern that exists for anyone to review. Nullius believes lauda to be like alia, some hot young babe who he can squeeze some free cybersex (verbal only) out of (because he does not have 1.2 btc) by spewing all his memorized boring latin and classics crap to her mixed with some flirting and fatherly advise, then some public shows of following them around and supporting everything they say and do including scamming. Whilst trying to show off his flowery irrelevant waffle and memorized neeechy or other crap he thinks sounds impressive. Trying to be all macho and strong with their critics (failing obviously)

Best part about it all is ..in seeking to defend and support the sexy young techno babe he is obsessed about, and wanking over ( lauda) ... well as often as an old impotent creep can, he simply gives other members more opportunities to blast the conniving cat.

Nullius is a bit like the phantom of the opera. Lol I watched a bit to see if it would inspire some empathy for the poor ugly horny old fool. Then I remembered that nullius red tags for empathy. Neeechy told him it has a bad vibe.

Lauda will need to put him off eventually when the dumb shit realizes the old perv nullius is not as useful as lauda had imagined.

Bit like you marlboroza. An imbecile that wants to help and support lauda. but just present countless more opportunities to show further insights into laudas scamming past. Double standards and hilarious excuses.

Without you and nullius being so helpful there would be way less openings.
Well done marlboroza.

Would you mind waiting until the thread is almost going to page 2 before replying?
I will then decide whether to delete or reply.

I already have suchmoon helping with bumps. It's smart play from suchmoon because he can pretend to be irritating me whilst actually enjoying keeping this bumped because even suchmoon secretly cant stand this gobshite  nullius.

It is nice to collaborate with suchmoon on certain matters.

Btw suchmoon I was disappointed to see you allow nullius talk to you as he did in that thread in meta. That was an uncharacteristic back down after he was so harsh on you.  Suchmoon You don't  fear this pathetic old creep do you?
If you wish that I stand up to TPOTO for you in future just PM me.

Great to be on the same side at last. I knew you wouldn't spoil your legacy and end up a scammer supporter and protector really. Just a few months of kidding around.

When I delete your post again ...repost yet again for at least 20x more as a sign you want to join the good guys. Let's exhaust malboroza first though
He will likely reply with all the possible permutations of the obviously impossible theories I have just mentioned to demonstrate just how ridiculous they dont happen to be.
I like it when he works all of that out.

When lauda comes on stage here, and you know nullius gets the alert and instantly logs on or rushes to her thread ...the organ music part of phantom of the opera must play. I heard lauda has that set up as nullius tone on incoming cam chat request. Jokes ( marlboroza) aside what a great play that is.

So no proof?

Lol poor malboroza.

Try reading it all again slowly or getting help.

My cat got hit by a train or a bus.

Idiot asks.... do you have proof it got hit by a train. Lol

Thanks. Always a pleasure. Stop asking silly questions that have clearly been addressed.
As I have said there is nò proof of alt unless the marlboroza standard ( video evidence) is met.

Now again. Please wait to bump until it is nearer the bottom of the page.

Marlboroza why don't you like nullius either?

Ok, so baseless accusation.

1. The word or being there means there is no such accusation there in that quote.Do you understand this ?

2. Do you or the others have video evidence to back up your prior claims of a person being an alt? Or have you been making lots of baseless accusations?

Just to be clear accusation of alt lacking proof (video evidence)  is a baseless accusation?

Nullius, laudas alt or laudas obsessive horny cybersex pervy old stalker. Read the sentence again.

The sentence tells you the answer to your question. I'm leaning towards the second scenario more.

I will be quoting this thread a lot more now that I have you clear statement that you recognize that without "proof" ( which you have already defined as video evidence of the same person posting from both accounts) that it is a baseless accusation. 

Thanks for clearing up how you see this habit of making baseless accusations of alt account lacking video evidence.
I will be using your clearly stated views when I feel it is appropriate.

1) so no proofs, so baseless accusation.
2) can you please show me proof where I said that you need video evidence of someone being alt account? Looks like another baseless accusation.

---

You've been running around meta and reputation for months weeks  :) accusing me that I said that "you need video evidence for alt accounts", please quote me post where I specifically said that. Or maybe I said something else? Maybe it was a joke? You are pretty much dumb, you know...

There is no spoon.

Can some help malboroza with the word  "or"

It was not a joke
Are you denying that when quickseller accused you of being zorrobeck that you asked him if he had video evidence?

Maybe you are saying people only need video evidence to prove your alt.

I have been running around for months?  Sounds like it could be a baseless accusation to me . Do you have proof?
Lol. 

Are you making baseless accusations.
Show me the proof of me doing the it for months?

I will need your proof first. I. Cant have you making baseless accusations. 
Months ? Joined 28th Feb??

Account not even months old lol :)

Always good for a laugh moronbozo hehe. The guys that gave you this name surely knew you well.

Ok, so no proofs.
Can you quote me my post where I said that I want video evidence of alt account?

I ask the questions here. You answer mine first.

I have proven you make baseless accusations already.
This account is not months old.

Show me the evidence now where I have been saying this for months first.
Then I may look for your post that you want to see.

Ok, so no proofs and no quotation. Can you please stay on topic? If you want discuss about "video", create new topic for that. Lets just stick to first accusation "Nullius this alt of lauda" and please provide evidence for this. I know you want me to break forum rules and go off topic but I just can't do that.

Please stay on topic and provide evidence of "lauda and nullius are alt accounts"

Admit you made a baseless accusation then I will provide the post where you claim video evidence is required for demonstration of control of account.

I have proven you have made a baseless accusation. This account is not months old is it ?

Admit it. Lol

Silly boy.

There is proof this account is not months old.   Admit you are making baseless accusations.
Do they send you here for comedy value?

You are changing your story now, original story was:

Lol. I got you there, didn't I? I just let you to act dumb. For months weeks! That's priceless! :D

---

Can you please stick to topic and post proofs of "nullius alt of lauda"? If you can't provide evidence, edit topic and remove that part and then we shall maybe discuss other things from topic.

Sorry I don't see you confessing you just made a baseless accusation?


Yes or no?

I don't  understand what your first part even means about changing the story.?
That looks like I was asking you a question? We can address this zorobek thing after you admit you just made a baseless accusation


Keep going, i will permit it for now

Until your nurse helps you with the word 'or' I shall not address the "lack of proof " for the statement you are referring to,  that does not state what you think it states :)  unless you think you can be a person and the sex stalker of that same person also?

You need assistance when posting. I want to help you.

I will delete all of malborozas posts until he can admit he made a baseless accusation.
When he admits it we can discuss further.

I admit that I made baseless accusation because I messed up with dates, it wasn't for months, it was weeks. I am really sorry for that :)

This account is censoring me now and doesn't want to talk about things from topic AKA nullius==lauda.

That's much better

Now if you look on quicksellers merit source application on meta
Page 3

You are saying there that for him to demonstrate or prove you have control of zorobek account then he needs video evidence?

I will not quote that entire thing here because it off topic but that is the discussion I am talking about.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5127540.msg50571141#msg50571141

But the posts above are relevant. 

Tell me what you mean if you are not saying video evidence is a requirement of account control?
Or just in your case?

No, no no. You said I asked for video evidence that zorrobek is my alt account. This post proofs that I didn't ask for evidence that zorrobek is my alt account, it shows proof that I asked QS to provide me proof that I deleted post. As I said, I let you play for...."weeks"  ;D

"alt accounts" to "controlling account", that is pretty much changing the story on your end.


Stop changing subject, provide proofs from topic! Lauda==nullius is what you claim, either edit topic so we could discuss other relevant things from topic or provide proofs to back up you claim!

Please be sensible and read this link

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5127540.msg50571141#msg50571141

And the preceding posts above it where qs is saying zorrobek is yout alt.

Let's first answer this.  Is zorrobek your alt. Do you or have you controlled that account

Yes or no?

We can move to the statement that doesnt state what you think it states after this is sorted out.

I mean he quickseller is clearly in that thread saying you are zorrobek. To me it is highly highly probable from watching this alt that you are zorrobek. I dont really care if you are you can have an alt. There is no way to prove it is anyway.

To delete the posts content so they are empty posts and he says 80% were deleted by you.
Then clearly he saying zorrobek is your alt or you had control over it?  You cant delete other members posts and leave them empty.

You tell him he needs video evidence of you having deleted those posts. Why else asking the question?
You tell him show the proof  the video proof of you doing it.

You are clearly starting he needs video evidence to demonstrate zorrobek is your alt. Who else could delete this except zorrobek.

What else could it mean?
You require video evidence to demonstrate control of account.

Is zorrobek your alt? Yes or no?

Anyway I will continue to say what I have previously, until you offer a credible alternative meaning.

Once you answer this I will explain further how " or " means the first part of the sentence is a possible not a statement of certainty.

Also since investigating more deeply into the history of creepy pervy old nullius I am leaning to the part of the sentence that continues after the " or "

But let's do the zorrobek if you must explain how you were not requiring video evidence for proof of account control.

It appears you only think video evidence is required to prove you controlled or control an account.

If you offer sensible credible  alternative explanation of what you meant,  then fine.

Cannot change things later and say you meant something those words clearly are saying.
If you claim others have control over other accounts they can say where is the video evidence to you.

Anyway let's hear your alternative explanation of that requirement

Then can get back to your other point you think you have.

So let me get this straight (can't read the CH garbage but I'm assuming he's insisting that QS is right) - the dipshit in his own self-moderated thread is refusing to accept the possibility that a moderator or a self-mod OP could delete someone else's posts?

Yes, but that's not the case here.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1472668.0

Moderators would just trash up the thread or even if they edit it, the same would be notified as an edited by mod. It would not be wrong to assume he deleted many more of his posts from there.

I think marlboroza looked liked a faucets hunter with his alt.

Dont make this too obvious suchmoon .

Let's take a look at this post.

1. Look at the correlation between zorrobek and marlboroza
I mean look how zorrobek shows up. Look at the threads read them, then in Jan he marlboroza is told he cant post on that thread and who shows up? Zorrobek?


2. Mods just removing the text and not posts?
Mods deleting removing 80% (according to qs )of posts but leaving it active?


3. Those don't even matter. It is clear that malboroza making video proof a requirement
Where is your video proof I deleted them? Demonstrates he feels that is the required level of evidence to show someone controls accounts

Anyone else ( not part of the gang)suchmoon would just start calling marlboroza zorrobek...

Anyway there is no marlboroza proof aka video proof
I actually agree with him. However I still think it highly highly probable that is marlborozas alt.


So until I get a more credible and reasonable explanation for video proof being the requirement for account control. This will be the standard required.

Now suchmoon usually does this. He hides away afraid to speak pretending to ignore.
Then when suchmoon " thinks" he sees an opportunity to jump in with some smart put down it will jump in trying to look cool
Only to be bitch slapped back out of the thread looking like a foolish scammer supporting imbecile. Either self debunking his earlier claimed beliefs or just making outrageous crazy statements in anger.

Stick to helping with repeating your deletes.

Hold on that reminds me. Let me just delete the text of  of your posts first but leave it there for a bit of fun. Oh hmm seems I cant do that without having control of your account suchmoon. Lol

Keep em coming dummies.

Ok, I stand corrected, this sounds very criminal. What do you reckon, should he get a type 3 flag for the theft of posts? I take it you have the elusive video evidence.

Stop switching arguments to avoid looking silly.

You admit you were wrong, and needed to be corrected , that is enough.

Now back to hiding away.

Good to see you too are supporting the malboroza standard of video proof for control of account.

The marlboroza and suchmoon standard of video proof requirement for account control.

Nice!  That will get some mileage.

Until marlboroza answers if he is zorrobek then he will not be allowed to post further here on this thread
Also all derailing away from nullius will be deleted as I see fit.