Bitcoin Forum

Masulum is one bounty manager that handles good projects without doubt and make due diligence in stakes calculations and he is always detailed to the later. Here is his profile link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1283017, he handled ShengWorld, SPYCE https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231395.0  and others nice project. I have been trading SPYCE on BW before they had their bounty project. Nevertheless he seems to be too tough on his community who participates on his bounty program which is something not too good. For example, in his rules, he demands signature campaigners to make a minimum of 15post per week and a maximum of 3 post count per week, a good bitcointalker should be through with his post in 5 days at 3 per day, although if mode deletes one post at a dead hour without one been aware, one will loss reward for that week. And his social media campaigns like the Linkedin is 6 post per week and a maximum of 1 share per day, one really need to on a high alert in other not to work for free.  Some of my friends had to back out because of the strict and tasky rules, while some will have to lost their reward due tasky work.

I want you to share your experience working with this BM as regards the rules and task, do you equally think he should review his rules? I hope he sees this and read it. He is a good manager though who never fails to resolve issues and very detailed.

Yes i think rules should not be that strict and i suggest following rules with reference to signature campaigna nd similar rules can be applied to other campaigns.
1) Daily post limit should be 4 and not 3 it makes hunters job tougher.
2) Maximum weekly post requirement for signature campaign should be 10 to 12. More posts requirement will result in useless/spam posts that will decrease the quality of the content.
Alao if some ones post is deleted by the moderator at eleventh hour the bounty management team should be kind enough to give hunter the stakes. I mean if he has done his job why would you deprive him of his reward? Also 1 less post does not make any difference, you should pay him for 14 posts right that is already way more than 10 posts requirement by 9o% of the campaigns.
 
Similarly social media should require 4 to 5 posts weekly with 1 post daily limit.

His rules are so strict because many hunters abuse lenient rules.
For example, hunter will come on monday, do his 6 linkedin likes and end it. That kind of burst liking only damages the project.
Same goes for signature, most hunters will burstpost in offtopic and that's it. And that's not how bounty should work

I think in my honest opinion that rules are good and it guides participants greatly.

I want to comment on your aspect that says 3 post for per day and to be frank, it is an honest rules and guidelines for participants, It helps the bounty manager to avoid unnecessary complains from hunters, and also, hunters reading rules won't have such problems following simple rules.

Here is a copy of the signature rules:

https://i.postimg.cc/3JkDj4bv/Screenshot-129.png (https://postimages.org/)pichost (https://postimages.org/)

I will advise that even when we are not enrolled in any campaign, we should continue to contribute to the forum because it aids our chances alot.

He did that so that the news is always there every day so that all new also see it. in my opinion the rules he made are not too strict because there are only 15 posts every week and 3 posts every day, if you really feel this tight then don't follow his campaign, it's easy, right

Hei boy, have you contacted @masulum before you made this thread?
In my opinion, the best way to solve this problem is by communicating with him and directly send your suggestion to him. Then, you can create such a thread like this if you get no responses at all. As you said he is a good manager, so I am pretty sure that he will listen and take attention to every problem, suggestion, or feedback from the participants. Anyway, related to the rules, sometimes it is not only the bounty manager's decision. The team of the project can ask for a specific target related to the bounty program, including the number of posts daily (/day) in the signature campaign.

Happy to see your comment, I understand how sad it can be as for the manger and for the success of the project. There can be a maximum of 4 post count per day, and a minimum of 4 days post for signature. Not maximum of  3post count per day, sanction will be meted out on violators as a way of outright removal and loss of reward. 

Maybe the mentioned posting guidelines are there for a reason, Masulum is known as one of the best bounty managers here. The post restriction is used for preventing the abuse of the bounty campaign,if the bounty hunter feels uncomfortable moving to another bounty campaign the best choice, IMHO. 3 posts per day is not acceptable because a minimum of 5 days in a week should be a target without considering the deleted post problem.

to be honest the strict rules in the bounty project are a good step to anticipate fraudulent actions such as multiple accounts in the campaign. problems regarding postal rules etc. I think it's worth it if the project you are participating in is really good, as far as I know, for example projects that pay participants using BTC are much more stringent in all aspects, be it in terms of number of posts / quality of posts, number of participants and must also have 5 merits in the last 120 days.

My experience in joining a bounty campaign handled by masulum: very fun.

The rules set are indeed strict, with the aim of reducing spammers and cheaters. So that the purpose of holding the bounty campaign can be obtained maximally and fairly. After all, the two bounties mentioned by TS are Sheng and Spyce, both are fixed payments, so I think it's worth the challenge.

NB: IMO, there are no rules to change because it is very effective in selecting participants. After all, it's the full authority of the bounty manager and the dev team. As bounty hunters, we must understand that. If we feel unable, then don't join :)

This is the first time i am coming across this user as i am not a big time alt coin enthusiast and i do not remember the last time i enrolled in an alt coins campaign, but if he is having a strict rules regarding the number of points counted per day and if you are not able to comply then you have the option to avoid joining the campaign, 3 posts per day counted is challenging if you are going to the office as you might miss posting every now and then depending on your workload.

Why do you complain and whine all the time?
It is not enough that people run farms and have multiple accounts so you want to make their work easier,
or maybe you are part of something like that?

Same view here. If you can't comply with the rules, better not join and look for other bounty programs. Actually, reading his sig campaign rules, it is already lenient, 15 posts/week and 3 posts max/day. If you will post quality comments, you will have no problem of worrying that your post will be deleted. But if you feel that one or more of your posts might be deleted, just post more than what is required. You are not here in the forum just for this bounty but a lot more than that. And also, visit and comment on threads that are really worth visiting to, which means maybe less spammers. sorry, but I don't see his requirements as too demanding. if you will look at other sig campaigns, they have more requirements than this.

Why do you think like this? There is no concrete evidence about the account farming and this guy just shared his opinion here. It is ok to show respect for the reputable bounty managers. Masulum has done an awesome job with managing the legit Spyce bounty campaigns and I will not hesitate to join the future campaign of the Masulum. BTW, if account farming is the case you can open a new scam accusation thread with all the proofs about the linked accounts. Surely, other scam busters will help you on your way.

If you think you can not post 15 per week, why you think about joining masulum's campaign? I would only join to campaigns which I can maintain, no matter which project it is. Do not be forced to post, do it at yout interest.

Probably because they are used to seeing bounties of 10 post a week wherein they can post burst in one day, easy peasy for them. And now comes @masulum, changing how everything works in bounties and those hunters says, "WTF is going on, I have a lot of alts to maintain, can't do 15 posts a weeks', LMAO.

Move on, if @masulum is making life hard for you to maintain your accounts instead of bitching around and trying to portray him to be the bad guy here.

Hello @OP, thank you for some feedback on this thread, at least from this thread i can give an explanation to anyone.

signature campaign
3 post a day: actually you can make a post 4 per day if you want in case 1 post deleted by mod, you have backup for deleted post. Many member creating up to 20 post/week, so, if 3 posts deleted by mod, this member has 17 posts left, and it will safe to get rewards. Except you are make a post in 1 thread and before stake counted the thread deleted so you lost all of your post.

Social Media
I know 6 posts per week and 6 share per week for social media campaign will be hard to member to create original post, so i change it and accepted copy & paste post, so you don't need to thinking about your own word. You just need 30 second to copy & paste text from white paper and 30 second to share post from spyce socmed account. As you know, i always says to participant if there no post from team, you just need create a post by self. So it just need 30 second to do the task.

In my view, to do all social media campaign, you just need to give 5 minutes from 24 hours. I always says to anyone if you can't continue to work, tell me, and i will keep the stake even just 2 week. What you need just talk with me directly, and i will try to give a solution if i can.

I always follow the projects that he handles, in my opinion the rules are not too strict but it's fair enough because many bounty hunters who spam posts either on social media or others (eg 4 posts in 1 day) so they can complete the task only 1- 2 days only.
maybe that's the consideration

Huh!

Cribbing for 15 post under signature campaign is just appauling. Creating a thread without discussing the issue with the bounty manager gives him a bad reputation. This shows how uncomfortable bounty hunters are under  his management.

You should have discussed this issue with him first. Hunters like you have to given a bad reputation to bounty hunting.

It does not matter if the regulations are made as stringent, if indeed the project offered is not a scam. in my opinion it is better than easy rules, but it turns out the project is a scam, or a small reward because many people are able to follow it. wouldn't that actually hurt you?
but my suggestion the normal size for the number of posts / week is 10-12. in one day make a maximum of 3 posts.

if you are not able to follow the rules made, please look for the bounty according to your current ability and do not force the bounty manager to follow your wishes.
My advice is just follow the bounty that you are good at, because there will be differences in results between bounty that have strict rules and not.

If you find his rules too demanding or very strict, then don't join in his campaign.

For me, his rules are just fair, it is to lessen the bounty abusers to participate in his campaign. If you are worried about things such as the post requirement/limit that is 3 per day and one or two of your posts might be deleted, you can still post 4-5 posts a day, the rules only say that "maximum 3 posts per day to be count" and not exactly limiting you to post more than that.

Also, there are 7 days in a week, by doing 3 posts a day it gives you 21 posts in a week, this should be enough to cover for possible posts to be deleted.

I don't have any experience yet working with this bounty manager, but I am not new to the rules the same as he is implementing with the campaigns he handles. If his campaign is always succeeding and avoids bounty cheaters, then there is no point to review his rules.

I see that the rules are pretty strict, but that is a good thing, and I think it's natural that he does that. however, he has his own standards in running and handling a bounty. other than that, there is no compulsion in this matter, so if some people do not agree with the rules that he made, then you should avoid projects that he runs. it's very simple.

SPYCE bounty is worth the strict modes and rules because
1. It's fixed allocation
2. Only limited participants can join

These two points makes me joined the campaign without thinking too hard about the 15 posts per week, it's not an issue for me because this is a quality bounty campaign

The rules arent unfair in my opinion. Some of the bounty campaign requirements are harder than this. Also why you will complain for an easy task online? If you think giving out tokens with valuable is easy to achieve then find one that has an easy way for you to acquire. I doubt you can find one that will works for you.

15post a week is not that many, as long you can do regular posting. Also imposing the 3 post count is a safe measure as what @masulum explained there are chances that mod might delete your post so having extra post is always wise to do. Posting isnt hard so why complain and even create a thread for this? That's an exaggeration reaction OP!

The rules aren't bad at all unless you are lazy, posting 15 posts a week is not a big issue at all, just post 3 per day and you are good, quality bounty projects comes with a price sometimes, spyce bounty is not bad at all

Agree, buddy. Rules may became strict for you if you can't comply. It may be sophisticated for you on complying but if you don't think of getting the reward completely I guess you won't have a hard time here. Beside as mentioned, this forum isn't for bounty alone, you must explore and you'll see things differently on how it works it is really fun and enjoying, by the way. And anyway, CM made it that way for the sake of avoiding unnecessary post or simply put spam.

It seems OP don't want to sweat before making money, if you don't like the rules you should ignore the bounty, why creating topic about this? Doesn't make any sense, are you expecting your post to make BM have a change of mind? If not I don't see any sense in your move at all

If the projects is good enough to pass out, then I would not mind  those rules is implementing given the fact the the project is good. It for bounty Hunters sake, to avoid any cheating,spams or any kind of   malicious activities bounty hunters are doing  to exploits and earn double rewards knowing how profitable the campaign project could be. Bounty hunters have theirs own rules and some are even worst making changes late minutes of the campaigns which make hunters leave with jaw hanging with disgust. If you love bounty hunting then you must abide with the BM rules and do your job honestly.

Agree with this one, Its not manager fault if you cant follow her rules he is the manager of that campaign so  he know what rules  should be given that might help the campaign he manage.

If you dont like the rules he given the answer  is simple, find other campaign that you think you are suitable to complete not the one he manage. Its not the manager who will follow participants rules, Its you that need to follow her rules since you are the  one want to join to the campaign  he manage.

I think we don't have any right to question, to BM because whatever the things they ask to do us, we have to follow them otherwise they will not provide stakes to us. If we don't like the work, then we shouldn't join those bounties, according to the requirement from the team they will provide the tasks in the bounty thread.

No. Strict rules help avoid having cheaters on the campaign which in turn is good for you (the participant), the bounty manager and the project owners.
No offense to any bounty hunter here, but, there are plenty out there who would not think twice in exploiting any loopholes in the rules and tasks on any bounty campaign just to be able to gain a little advantage.
Having these strict rules and tasks would mean only those who are sincere and serious in promoting the project will remain.
Also, as long as the rewards are up to the standards or even higher, I don't see why it isn't appropriate to make harder and a bit more complicated tasks.  ;)

well everything has been mentioned in detail by BM so you don't need to complain about anything else on the project he is handling, if with this post you are still complaining then please go and sleep or just join another bounty campaign

Before you start the bounty campaign the rules are in the bounty thread, it's easier to read and leave if it's not fair enough for you, bounty manager is not at fault here, accept the rules or leave

Humans cannot be the same and that is to tell you that bounty managers cannot be the same. Having such rule is meant to guide against making meaningless posts and perhaps guide against some odds, such as spamming and the likes.
I still like his style, because it helps to keep bounty hunters on guard and make them realise that they are here for serious business. Although, not everyone is here for bounty and to make money through bounty, but if that is what you have come to do, then you should be ready to abide by the rules.

It is pretty simple and straightforward, if the OP can't fulfil the requirements, then don't join. Like others have said here, his requirements are actually not hard to accomplish. If you want to achieve something, you need to work hard for it and not complain about it. And if it is too demanding from your point of view, then you are always free not to participate their program. Joining bounty is not compulsory here, actually one of the benefits in the forum where you can earn something for yourself, which we should be thankful about.

You know what? You are very fortunate on that state already because you are only required to make 15 posts compare to 25-30 post quota of sig campaign participants. In my honest opinion, the rule sounds good. Your manager is just too strict implementing it which is normal and understandable.
if so then it's not the manager's fault, its the participant's negligence. I've encountered such scenario couple of times ago and it served as a strong lesson for me. From now on I make extra posts every time I join a campaign (around 2 to 4 posts) so that I have no worries when the payday comes :).

Edited: fix the code

Masulum is a trusted bounty manager, don't go around saying unnecessary claims about him, be grateful that we still have few bounty managers who are willing to take their job very seriously, rules are rules, it's either you get satisfied with it or take your leave

I think I can understand why he has such strict rules. Because you need to check your account on high alert. For example, if you make enough posts but somehow one of your posts got deleted then you need to make sure to have 15 posts back when the week end. This actually intends to remove multi account since if one have too many accounts on their hand, it will harder for them to micro each account like that.

I joined Spyce bounty and it's one of the best I like so far this year after alchemy, what matters most to me is the quality of a bounty project, if it's good enough I won't mind the task

if you want not to have problems with deleted posts by moderators, you need to check the number of messages a few days before the reporting week. this is not a big deal. I think that the rules that the bounty manager sets are normal. also, you can write more than 15 posts

Well since I'm not much of an altcoin bounty participant, I haven't encountered the managerial pattern of the said manager in the person of Masulum. Although from your explantation I don't think it's quite demanding of him to request for just 15posts per week. I haven been privilege to be a bitcoin paying signature participants for almost one and the half years and during my participating in those different signature campaign the weekly post count has been as high as 50 and currently it's 20 post per week.

A good bitcointalk users should not consider contributing in quality discussion on the forum as a job instead it should be an enjoyable/educating experience. When you choose to contribute 3 posts daily just to meet the weekly post count you might end up spamming the forum as a result of contributing to discuss you have no interest contributing to.

Every bounty manager wants to set rules that will benefit the genuine bounty hunters and if possible to make sure that there will be no bot that can participate and get stakes at the end that is why they are setting rules. But sometimes there are also rules that are too much as what you have mentioned and I am hoping that they will also listen to bounty participants and make adjustments to it in order to be fair also.

But for the bounty participants, if we see that we are participating in a genuine project that has a potential to have a value at the end of the campaign then it will be better if we are going to put our effort also because a work with an effort will give you a better value of what you have earned using your time and effort.

I don't have any experience with any of those BMs you mentioned, but in my opinion I can respect those rules at least if I am one of their participants.
Do you mean by 3 posts per day at your post?
I think that's quite fine for a rule to avoid spamming and burst post because it is surely common to people these days like one would even make 10 posts within an hour which is kinda insane.
I can't say what's the standard for social media campaign, but from signature campaign, it is quite okay for me to have those rules. You have the choice anyway to join or not.
I think you should be at least okay with those because some would even be more restricted by making minimum merits which is also nice to filter out spammers.

If you make a constructive post then don't worry about the post being deleted by moderator but if you feel concern about the post you made then you can make 20 or more posts for a week so that you don't lose stake.

I don't see anything wrong with the rules. The rules were placed so that people don't spam the forum with shitty posts. If a mod deletes your post and you get an alert on your PM, this means that you made a "shit post", you really want to get paid for that post?
Though the manager should change the rule from "maximum 3 post per day" to "and only maximum of 3 post per day will be counted". This won't restrict you to only 3 post per day rule. So if a thread gets removed, your 4th post might save you.

It's simply laziness if you complain about 3posts for 5-6 days, moreover that SPYCE bounty is worth the hassle, I you can't cope with this you should just ignore, I bet 99% of bounty hunters accept the rules wholeheartedly

My opinion is this: whatever his rules said, you must obey because he made that rule in his bounties. My sugguestion. is the demanding task worth it? we have seen highly demanding bounties here that paid hunters pennies and some refused to pay( digibit) and so many of them. if you wish to partake in his bounty, please do at your own disgrestion. it was your choice. I Learnt this opinion here. invest at your own choice.

Maybe he is very strict and tight to his project work but I think he is very good at it and also helpful. I also participated in SPYCE bounty and his way to manage a project is very clean and helpful to anticipate bot. He was also very helpful. Every time I contact him for some problem he responds quickly and nicely. Also his project looks pretty strong and legit too. I think we need more bounty managers like him.

I like strict bounty managers, they take their job seriously, masulum is not bad either and also respect to Julerz12 and others like bubbalex, get used to their rules and care more about your pay day

Hey, mate, I know what you are going through because I'm also experienced that feeling before. If the signature campaign rules and requirements are too much for you to handle. first, you should ask the Bounty manager about it. and after the bounty manager responds and still, you didn't agree in the rules and requirements then it is better to leave and do not join in that particular campaign or maybe the entire bounty campaign as well thats what i am doing and it is not hard to do since no one can force us if we join or not.

There is always another project if you cannot live with it.

The thing is, you have a choice. If you are having a hard time to obey the rules then the decision is still up to you.
You can go joining other shitty projects out there with no posts per week. ;D

What if suddenly you make $10k out of it? Will it still be a strict rule? I bet not. Right?

As long as you create articles that are constructive and don't spam. I believe that your posts will never be deleted, and in addition I recommend writing more than 15 posts to be safe in case the topic is deleted and you will not lose stake.

These rules is something strict but i think he made such rules for genuine bounty hunters. Who's will be capable to work regularly. In social campaign almost hunters completing all of task within one or two days. 15 post is not too much for signature participants, if daily 3 post is require than you can relax another two days. Even though 6 post on LinkedIn it’s not a big deal because will never to delete your social platform post.                    

Money don't grow on trees, as a bounty Hunter you must be ready for the most tasking campaigns to earn good reward, if SPYCE is not a good project it would have been another case but SPYCE is very good enough

Yes, I have seen his bounty projects and rules. I liked Spyce and Sheng Global bounties very much and wanted to do them. But by seeing his strict rules, I did not bother to join! Therefore, I have never seen a signature rule like his bounties! 3 posts limit for a day seems very hard, he should have increased to at least 4 posts per day! And making 6 LinkedIn posts another rough decision I think. But he has the right to make any kind of rules, if you don't like, then you have options to leave those bounties and move on!

I have participated in his campaigns BAL, Sheng , and SPYCE. Yes rules are strict and tough to follow. I missed entire one week stakes because of it. I will be happy seeing some ease in the rules.
But if we see other side of it, it is very much important to avoid spamming in this thread as well as social media accounts. Also since it needs very much dedication to do it, spam or multiple accounts are almost not possible to work.
Apart from this, the biggest thing is, his bounties are really good and legit.

That's right though! Many participants abuse social bounties, and their links/retweets are not helpful for any project! That's why I want to see more bounties with 1 post limited per day and 4-5 for per week! But yet he made some rules which weren't familiar to any bounty participant before like I did not see any bounty that demands 6 Linkedin posts for a week, that's why it looks very hard rules for a part time bounty hunter!

Bounty itself is a very demanding task, with bounties dying, and altcoins struggling since 2019, it made the terms for bounty participation even harder; leaving open bounty slots for the fittest and most qualified.

I think we should not worry about the demands from bounty hunting, because many hunters do not follow procedures, then attack project as scam.
Before you participate in any bounty, read clearly the rules and guild-lines and decide if you can met up to the standard before participation

Bounty is more complex than airdrop, which demand a lot of work and the work is to be done base on procedures. But any procedure that need to  be involve should be moderate.

The reason behind why SPYCE bounty ask 6 post per week already mentioned on first page. You don't need to create original post, just creating a copy & paste post for all social media campaign (fb/tw/li).

The second reason why i consider to create 6 post when campaign started, IEO will be start just in few days. So i want spreading content trough social media to make this campaign can bring investor or IEO participants.

Hard? No, you can make a schedule post for Facebook/Twitter/Linkedin using free social media tools, i already giving this tips for member at begining for their own post. Working few minutes for automatic post, after that, that was very easy, so you just need 1 minutes a day to RT/Share for fb/tw/li. But that my view, anyone can feel hard and difficult, but in other side will be fine. That will always be Pro & Cons for every rules made by BM. :)

In fact, I personally see nothing wrong in what the manager has done, as regards the tasks.
my major reservation about things like this is the reward. i cannot imagine someone who is only a participant of an airdrop, gaining more than a bounty hunter.
Bounty is one of the toughest works to do in the crypto space. So, the participants should be well compensated.

This is not a complain but an observation and the BM already responded with sound points and reason and have even relax some rules on the social media campaign. I can see you wanted to quickly rush post and you just post trash by writing whine instead of while. Please could you point to any post I have complained before? or you use a google translator?


Your allegation are as a result of not knowing what to post, you erroneously accuse a good mind of thought just because you want to make a post to complete your weekly signature post. You should learn to be objective and not subjective okay?

Thanks for your sincere response, this post was never done in bad light as some members are commenting. I admire your leadership style and for not taking offense on this post as some members already insulting the hell out of me. I will be locking this thread in 24hrs from this post to avoid a repetition of post. I love handwork and I detest easy task too. For the avoidance of doubt, here is a post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5232349.msg54015567#msg54015567 I appreciated Julerz12 for his innovative way of fighting scammers and spammers. I love good work. Thank you.

Almost has 60 percent probably that good campaign has very strict rules and then bounty manager also strict because their serious about everything. I had several conversations with this Masulum person,  I think he is ok with this strict rules. I'm also believe that only strong rules could bring our trust back.

True with very strict rules this will certainly reduce cheating by using multiple accounts but I am sure the masculins managing this campaign work very well and also the response is very fast so their own rules are good to do in some bounties.
But I think every manager always has his own rules so we just need to follow them and not break those rules.

Well, his rules on his signature campaign are to avoid participants from spamming. Never the less, people can post more than 3 each day but he will only count it like 3 posts since it will exceed the rule stipulated. Participants can post more than 3 just to ensure if something gets deleted it can cover. And by the way, there are 7 days per week, so of you will religiously post 3 times a day by the end of the week you will have 21 posts.

Moderate, yeah like how most of the bounty campaign participants was flooding nonsense specifically in this altcoin section. At least that's, what I have noticed. Some bounty managers might wanna consider tight selection of participants to avoid being cheated on.
Also, most of the bounty campaign participants we're doing a lot of work because of the demand from the project only to get tons of shitcoins lol. That's the reality of it and it hurts the community because of the number of flood posts.

Nothing wrong with this thread, anyone can make a thread to critized BM, i'm hired by team to solve any problem and do the job as i need. Of course i appreciate any feedback good or bad without any problem. As far as it will be good for me, of course i will take it.

Thank you :)

This simple and no need complain granted about her rules, because campaign rules their own think. So if you can't like their rules then never participated her campaign it's will be better. Therefore, personally i have not participate her campaign but still he/she managed some good campaign.

It's not easy to make good rewards out of bounties today maybe that's why OP was completed tired about high tasking campaigns, if bounty projects are successful no one will complain about bounty tasks, I understand you OMONE 1

If you aren't aware in bounty campaigns, there are stupid bounty hunters who are burstposting. There are some hunters who can finish 15 posts in just one hours if they want to finish it since they aren't that strict enough. A strict campaign manager = a good campaign manager in my opinion. Right now, there are many burstposters signature campaign participants because they are using many alt accounts just to have a higher profit.

It also said "MINIMUM of 15 posts per week" so if you are aware of deletion of your posts then at least make at least 20-23 posts per week so you can meet the requirements and even though there is a deletion in your post it will not go below minimum.

Social media campaigns can be made by a child or even though a person who isn't computer techy.
What I'm saying is it is very easy to finish so putting a daily limit will be better for the campaign.

---

Is this the reason why you are saying that the bounty tasks are very demanding?? Then don't join in his campaign :D. Simple as that and tell to your friends that they and you also must stop bounty hunting already ;)

He selects only quality participants, so he has his own rules for selecting quality people. And I find his rules are not really that difficult, as long as you are active every day and create constructive posts. You will be fine with him and this forum

In my opinion, signature campaigns make a minimum of 15 posts a week, or about 3 posts per day, still light. So for me no problems
with these rules, the most important is the payment of projects in accordance with what has been done by bounty hunters. Sometimes
the pay that is given is very small, not worth the time already spent in promoting the projects.

When I was active in bounty campaign, I see to it that I have extra post so if mods deleted one or three of my post I am still safe and qualified, it's not good to only give what you are ask to just, some bounty managers wants results that they can give to their clients so they give a lot of task, but it still goes on how the good the project and not on the hype.

You are right, 15 posts per week is a perfect fit for us. But we need to choose carefully because many projects put very low budgets on the work we do every week. Previously I have participated in Yobit's campaign, they can allow 35 posts per week and offer great salaries for participants, It's hard for us to see campaigns like that

Yobit is the best campaign I had maybe in the future we can see another one like that, or Yobit launch another one but if you are good in analyzing and participating in gambling discussion this is a good campaign to get in weekly payment,many are offering a good rate and there are campaigns that are long terms like Bitvest and 777 coin 

I already hear his reputation as bounty manager. He is a good bounty manager & next signature project i will joins his bounty. I like strict rules like that 15 post per weeks on signature is quite easy. I hope other bounty manager can apply his rules.

It's true, it's not that hard to make 15 posts per week where you just have to create 3 or more posts a day. As far as I know, spyce project is a good project, so, 15 posts a week is already a good deal for participants. The rules are only for the good of the project, and it is nice to have a strict rules to avoid bounty cheaters.

His rules also strict to the social bounty hunters. You can see spreadsheet in social campaign, they have to activate 6 days in a week even same to others bounty. This means social hunters can't scam in Masulum project, this way he is becoming more popular in this forum.

I won't deny any good bounty projects like Spyce just because of 15 posts per week, even if it's twenty posts per week I will gladly join, bounty manager did this on purpose, the result is lesser spammers

Making post more than 15 posts is always alright, but what's important for all of participants is the reward of their hardwork and efforts. Nowadays, we can't be certain on different projects because there were so many scammers. Even the greatest managers here in the forum, also became their preys and yet failed on every project that they've been involved.

There is no need for him to review his rules, and upon checking, it is not demanding. The one I see who's demanding is you, no criticism or what but I am just stating the truth. 15 post per week is an easy task, he just added the rule of limiting the counted post to three to avoid his participants to spam in this forum.

its normal to be strict in rules of the campaign otherwise , all are qualified and there will be no exception if the applicant meet the requirement, its like an employee looking for staff they will choose the best or the one that is fit for the job, mostly all the applicant are qualified but he choose who is good for the campaign, because some are just posting none stop just to meet the qualification, what he is doing is no different from other bounty managers its good.

When we see such rules, let us not forget the activities of some hunters who never obeys any instructions because they're too lazy or they don't take their hunting seriously. Imagine a rule of making 7 posts weekly, a hunter makes these posts in a day in social media campaigns who is to be blamed. Rules are to discipline everyone. Hunters should see themselves as workers and should keep the company rules.

actually the rules for signature campaign 15 post have been around a long time ago and because the reward rules are not using stake, but based on tokens per week I think it's very reasonable if he does the rules like this, and for social media like linked I don't know whether rules are same, because I'm not interested in following social media campaign.

I care more about making money from bounties so I can't complain about tasks, what I want is payment, I never expected anything to be easier cos money don't fall from trees, if 15posts is too much for you to handle then go for other bounties

Yes, i agree to you because 15 post is required in as usually projects. So that's no matter for legit hunters i think. Definitely yobit signature is different, it’s provided rewards in yobit exchange even handsome payments. Firstly count 20 post a day but when some greedy members made spam then post is reduced. Don't comparison in btc campaign with another, all of the btc campaign required minimum 15 to 30 post.                            

what made him [the masulum] make this rule, it was likely because of the demands of the project owner. but this is only my opinion. indeed, if participants want to take part in a program that has a minimum masculine, they must have a jr member rank. even though we all know that if a newbie is not allowed to take part in a campaign program, then the campaign will be less attractive
 

I believe that it's important to work for a trusted manager even when their rules are strict. At least you know everything from the start and if you fail it will be due to your own negligence or bad luck but you won't get scammed.

Start to rely on yourself and be thorough in what you do and you will make money.

One more thing. If you don't like the manager or don't trust him or don't like the rules choose another campaign. There's really no point in complaining! You get what you sign up for.

We bounty hunters do not wish to work, we want to be paid for doing nothing. Project pay us to promote their services we should obey the rules. A successful hunter is one who pays attention to every detail in campaign rules.

I am still surprised to see people complain about what they already signed in for.
It's like a project owner who has his personal specifications and needs a contractor to execute the project. A lot of contractors come to bid for it because they are okay with the specifications of the job, else they would not even bother to come near it.
I believe that those who left did that because they knew they could not meet up with the demands and the truth of the matter is, making three posts each for six days in a week should be fine.

I don't care about what the rule and we have read before joining some bounty campaign project rule, but I am not happy with bounty mange by him because check with distribution too long and waiting long time to get reward from his campaign, what for joining bounty campaign but reward received three months laters.

Thank you for your feedback,

I'm not handle the payment, any payment by team, I'm not escrowing any payment atm, if i can do it, of course i can pay reward weekly basis. But it was not possible since all payment under team management. I wish i can handle bounty reward by my self in the future so all member can get the payment after bounty end without waiting so long like SPYCE, BAL or SHENG. Need more time for me to learn about anything since I'm very new in this business. But this feedback can be implemented if possible.

And, i already mentioned very clear on rules because I don't want my bounty participants don't know when distribution will start. like SHENG, i always try to ask team to give rewards ASAP, but they can't change that, so all participants need to wait after all IEO round finished.

Based from what OP have said, I doubt that a participant is only allowed to complete the requirrd number of posts within 5 days, given that is was stated (15 posts per week, maximum of 3 posts a day). With that being mentioned, I think a participant would be able to make 21 posts (including those which could be deleted), and I think it would be enough for a participant to comply with the requirements. I do understand why some bounty managers are implementing strict rules, more likely to improve the quality of the posts in this forum. If it is true that a participant should only post five days of a week, then that would be unfair. But I doubt that it is because many participant would complain.

I remember making 25 posts per week before in a single campaign and saw other campaigns which requires more. Basically, the number of posts to be made depends on the bounty manager, that is his way to make a betterment for the project. Also a participant is not required to join,thus making it not a problem for the manager if there will be participants who would want to join, who cannot comply with the requirements. Participants will always make the adjustment and not the managers because there will be other participants who would be able to do it.

You can do extra post just to make sure that if a mod deleted one of you posts you still will have the 3 which is actually the require and counted posts per day of the BM. One extra post from you wouldn't really hurt.

The social media campaign are the most demanding of all for me. I have been participating with my social media back 2017 but its getting worse when they need users to report on bounty threads. It messes up the discussions in the board.

So you had Admitted that you are Only Posting in this Forum for Bounty rewards?

remember that Rewards here are just a Bonus because we are here to Help and contribute together to learn as well and not to be PAID.and also if you cannot follow the Campaign rules then Dont Join at all simple as that.

and also Don't forget that the Manager only follow the Company Rules,They are not the one who is creating the demand but the team who hires them.
manager don't need to review their rules(Unless there are mistakes or error) what must happen here?that is  You review your terms,if you cant comply with the rules then Dont participate thats it.


@masulum you are doing a Great Job just continue that Way and don't mind thread like this as long as you are not cheating anyone from your Bounties.

Spyce bounty deserves all attention you can give unless you are too blind to see, the token is trading on exchange already, why won't you want to join? There is assurance that everyone will get paid, better than most new projects with impossible rewards