|
Title: Top reporters! Post by: snipie on April 29, 2020, 01:24:16 PM Hi theymos, can you update the top reporters table, it was long time since you did so tho.
I know this will not be considered probably but maybe top reporters by section too? And what about the snitch badge? :P Thanks :) Here are the top 50 reporters by total good reports. Thanks to everyone who reports! Even one good report is helpful. But massive thanks to those in this list: without you, moderation would be basically impossible. Although most people in this list have very high accuracies, in general there's no need to worry about accuracy too much. Code: +--------------------+------+-----+-----------+----------+ Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: mocacinno on April 29, 2020, 01:31:09 PM I want that snitch badge... I'd report even more if i could get one ;D
Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: LoyceV on April 29, 2020, 02:23:12 PM The snitch badge turned out to be "a can of worms (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4742257.msg49490704#msg49490704)". I made it to 5000+ a while ago, but now I'm no longer reporting hundreds of posts per month. As long as I stay away from the altcoin boards, spam isn't that bad.
Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: snipie on April 29, 2020, 02:29:54 PM The snitch badge turned out to be "a can of worms (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4742257.msg49490704#msg49490704)". I missed / forgot that post from theymos, i no longer remember. Thanks Loyce for pointing it out and let's say that a yearly update from theymos is welcome ;)Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: suchmoon on April 29, 2020, 02:46:46 PM Oh man... 87%
I clearly had no clue about forum rules back then. I'm shocked I didn't get banned for something or other. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: Lafu on April 29, 2020, 03:51:44 PM Would be nice and intresting to see a overworked list and how the reports have changed and some updates with new reporters!
And if there is chance to add it and that is possible for Vod i guess he can implement it to Bpip so theymos dont have to update the list in the future. Just an idea if that is possible , would be great for the statisic fans. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: LeGaulois on April 29, 2020, 04:00:05 PM I would like my name removed if a new list is posted.
thanks Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: TheBeardedBaby on April 29, 2020, 08:55:12 PM This is the latest stats you can find in the forum.↓
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170441.0 I also was trying to get some fresh data but nothing until now. I passed 5000 a few months ago, but these days my life is busy with different (and more important) things. I'll be bsck on the spam front soon :) Quote Let it be anonymous, just give us the numbers of those between 1 and 300 reports, those with reports from 300 to 1000, from 1000 to 2000, 2k to 3k, 3k to 5k and above 5k, or something like this. Counts of members with good reports in the last year: 1-10: 5028 10-25: 399 25-50: 179 50-100: 82 100-200: 90 300-400: 35 400-500: 14 500-750: 20 750-1000: 12 1000-1500: 15 1500-2000: 7 2000-3000: 5 3000-5000: 5 >5000: 8 Thanks to all reporters; we couldn't do it without you! Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: rhomelmabini on April 29, 2020, 09:13:46 PM I'm just on my way to 3k and has been a casual reporter since the implementation of bumping system, I mostly report the one on Altcoin Announcement way back but since it changed I casually do it. Well, I think even if a list is laid out I doubt I can make it compared to those who have thousands of reports made, let's see. Hoping theymos drop by here.
Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: hd49728 on April 30, 2020, 01:00:23 AM Because you brought it back, I would like to bring the badge report back to life. Around 2 years ago, Seeking reporter badge images (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4742257.0). I know theymos stated that he does not want to make a rainbow user badges on the forum so it is certainly not his priority.
Now, we have some kind of badges: Admin, moderators, bitcoin developers, donators/VIPs, and artists (only 5 or 10 artists in the Art contest). Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on April 30, 2020, 01:12:21 AM The snitch badge turned out to be "a can of worms (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4742257.msg49490704#msg49490704)". I made it to 5000+ a while ago, but now I'm no longer reporting hundreds of posts per month. As long as I stay away from the altcoin boards, spam isn't that bad. Same here, except that I haven't broken the 5k mark (but I'm pretty close I think). After all the reporting that everyone's done, sections like the altcoin ones are still a complete mess, so I figured I'd stop wasting my time reporting posts that were only a drop in the bucket even if the reports were acted on. I was never that enthusiastic about Theymos creating a reporter badge, and I've seen much better suggestions that I wish he'd implement--but he apparently doesn't like making many changes, even cosmetic ones. Title: Re: Top reporters! 222 posts with 95% accuracy (142 good, 8 bad, 72 unhandled) Post by: Timelord2067 on April 30, 2020, 05:00:52 AM My current scores are:
Quote You have reported 222 posts with 95% accuracy (142 good, 8 bad, 72 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports. I'm just wondering why so many reported posts continue to remain "unhandled"?? I mean no disrespect asking this (and I certainly offer no offence either) but I'm curious why you would ask this of yourself: I would like my name removed if a new list is posted. thanks What about BPIP.org ?? Would you like your profile details (https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=507856) removed from there too? Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: so98nn on April 30, 2020, 05:17:38 AM Oh man... 87% I clearly had no clue about forum rules back then. I'm shocked I didn't get banned for something or other. I don't think your accuracy matters when you are reporting. I am pretty sure you might have read the instruction line while reporting any thread which says : Quote Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports. The thing is at least you are taking an effort to report to moderators. For that matter 87% is amazing. No one will ban you for that. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: libert19 on April 30, 2020, 05:44:10 AM ...and here I thought my total 300 reported posts were good, people have this much just as unhandled
Title: Re: Top reporters! 222 posts with 95% accuracy (142 good, 8 bad, 72 unhandled) Post by: LoyceV on April 30, 2020, 05:53:51 AM I'm just wondering why so many reported posts continue to remain "unhandled"?? From my own experience: reports in Meta often remain unhandled. Clear spam is quickly removed.And once in a while a report is marked bad, I think my last bad report was a post that I thought was off-topic in Services. You'll need to have 300+ good reports to see the result of your reports in the last 30 days. Title: Re: Top reporters! 222 posts with 95% accuracy (142 good, 8 bad, 72 unhandled) Post by: Rikafip on April 30, 2020, 06:13:18 AM My current scores are: That's quite a few unhandled reports. Unless those are new, they might stay like that for quite some time. Here is the explanation from post history, veru useful feature that you will get after reaching 300 good reports (something that would be very helpful to have from the beginning).Quote You have reported 222 posts with 95% accuracy (142 good, 8 bad, 72 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports. I'm just wondering why so many reported posts continue to remain "unhandled"?? Quote Reports start out unhandled, and are then either marked good, marked bad, or no moderator ever handles them and they stay unhandled. When a report stays unhandled, this does not mean that no moderators were available to look at it; rather, it means that several moderators looked at it, but none of them was sure whether it should be acted upon or not. A report that stays unhandled can be thought of as "soft-bad", since no moderator positively thought that it warranted action. Title: Re: Top reporters! 222 posts with 95% accuracy (142 good, 8 bad, 72 unhandled) Post by: Timelord2067 on April 30, 2020, 01:17:35 PM You'll need to have 300+ good reports to see the result of your reports in the last 30 days. I'm guessing that they are on the reporting page itself? I'll have to get cracking reporting more posts then. ;) ... Hi and yes, quite a few of the unhandled ones are fairly new, but are identical to the ones that were acted upon, so it's hard to say whether the person doing the reviews just ran out of time, or something else. Title: Re: Top reporters! 222 posts with 95% accuracy (142 good, 8 bad, 72 unhandled) Post by: o_e_l_e_o on April 30, 2020, 01:57:08 PM That's quite a few unhandled reports. Unless those are new, they might stay like that for quite some time. Meh, the more you report, the more you will collect unhandled reports. If they aren't handled within a week or two, then they will never be handled, and will be on your statistics forever. I have more than double that unhandled - I suspect most of them are from me being a bit harsh on what I am reporting as "spam" and moderators being a bit more lenient. If you are getting hundreds and hundreds unhandled then it suggests you are reporting things incorrectly, but other than that they are not worth worrying about.I'm guessing that they are on the reporting page itself? Yes, they show up here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reportlist;mineTitle: Re: Top reporters! Post by: UserU on April 30, 2020, 02:48:18 PM Yes, they show up here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=reportlist;mine Thanks, I didn't even know that. Usually I'd have to "fake" report a post just to see the overview. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: gentlemand on April 30, 2020, 03:49:11 PM I would like my name removed if a new list is posted. thanks Why? It shows you're a good little soldier. I report plenty of things but only gibberish shitpots, necro shitposts, google translate shitposts, shitty shitposts or blatant scams. It would be interesting to hear from mods as to how many reports are down to some sort of beef between members rather than straightforward moronic piss taking. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: Chikito on May 01, 2020, 12:37:39 AM Only table of counts, Let it be the name of the reporter not visible/Anonymous.
by the way, sometimes I have good status but the posts aren't deleted and still standing in?. Title: Re: Top reporters! 222 posts with 92% accuracy (184 good, 16 bad, 22 unhandled) Post by: Timelord2067 on May 01, 2020, 01:26:58 AM Looks like the mods just ran out of time the other days:
Quote You have reported 222 posts with 92% accuracy (184 good, 16 bad, 22 unhandled). When a post is deleted, reports for it will sometimes stay in unhandled status for some time before moving to handled status. Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports. It'll be interesting to read what some of the "soft-bad" posts are. ::) Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: Bitlover10 on May 01, 2020, 01:32:34 AM My report history. 728 posts reported with 100% accuracy. Why my name is not in the top 50 reporters list?
https://i.imgur.com/3e6YWqC.jpg Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: gentlemand on May 01, 2020, 01:34:58 AM What a teacher's pet.
I think my accuracy is about 98 or 99 per cent. I only report risible dross so would like to know where the virtues of that 2 per cent were hidden. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: actmyname on May 01, 2020, 01:49:07 AM I think my accuracy is about 98 or 99 per cent. Up to 3% you could be erring, due to the ceil function of the accuracy rating.I only report risible dross so would like to know where the virtues of that 2 per cent were hidden. I want to say that most "bad" reports are due to duplicates, unhandled ones (surrounding spam) are in relevance to "sort-of on-topic" posts, which merely pass or rest on the edge of substance. My report history. 728 posts reported with 100% accuracy. Why my name is not in the top 50 reporters list? The quote was from 2016. And even with new data, you're just outside of the top 50:Counts of members with good reports in the last year: 750-1000: 12 1000-1500: 15 1500-2000: 7 2000-3000: 5 3000-5000: 5 >5000: 8 Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: snipie on May 01, 2020, 01:51:25 AM My report history. 728 posts reported with 100% accuracy. Why my name is not in the top 50 reporters list? The list in my first post, which contains the names, was quoted from theymos post ~4 years ago, ~3 years before your registration ;)https://i.imgur.com/3e6YWqC.jpg (https://i.imgur.com/3e6YWqC.jpg) Iasenko has quoted a newer list, without names, posted ~1 year ago, which I found sufficient but not interesting. BTW I don't see why someone would like to hide his name for something that should be proud of it but personally I respect his wish. Edit: actmyname :) Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: suchmoon on May 01, 2020, 02:03:47 AM I only report risible dross so would like to know where the virtues of that 2 per cent were hidden. Sounds like you didn't sacrifice the goat during the second full moon of February. You can't get to 100% by making rookie mistakes like that. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: wwzsocki on May 01, 2020, 03:09:21 AM My report history. 728 posts reported with 100% accuracy. Why my name is not in the top 50 reporters list? You have to read the opening post one more time to understand why you are not on the list ;). The purpose of this thread is to update the top reporter list because it has not been done from 2019. I would like to use this opportunity to share my snitch statistics also :D https://i.imgur.com/HisfSzW.png Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: Lafu on May 01, 2020, 04:38:45 AM I would like to use this opportunity to share my snitch statistics also :D https://i.imgur.com/HisfSzW.png Feel free to post this in this thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5058163.0 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5058163.0) I would be welcome more Users to post in this thread and share there reports. No need for hide or be shy to post there. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: InvoKing on May 01, 2020, 01:14:06 PM I believe most of my reports were in the press sub. Nowadays there is less spammers and necro bumpers to bust, doesn't worth the effort to maintain an eye there as i used to do :-\
Code: You have reported 1257 posts with 99% accuracy (1223 good, 14 bad, 20 unhandled). Do not worry about your accuracy too much; one accurate report is worth many inaccurate reports. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: Welsh on May 01, 2020, 11:37:03 PM Reports may be left unhandled recently due to events happening in real life with current events. I know I've been somewhat inactive handling reports (I have a 100+ backlog right now), and other moderators have stepped in, but I'm assuming several other staff users are in similar situations, and have reduced activity on the forum as a result. However, we will get onto them eventually. Reports don't seem to disappear if left for a couple of days, and therefore a unhandled report may be handled several days after the fact. Also, unhandled reports doesn't mean it hasn't been seen that just may be the most appropriate action to take on it.
As for the reporting statistics, it would be nice to see an updated list. I know I've had my ass handed to me in the reporting statistics now, and I estimate there's at least 3 other users with 50k, and above. For the very little I do report these days, they are usually handled within an hour or so. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: snipie on May 01, 2020, 11:58:05 PM Good, bad, unhandled and somehow "classified" (no action taken which is usually the case), of course adding such thing will just put more unnecessary pressure on staff. Just said something come to my mind and realised its consequences while writing!
Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: Timelord2067 on May 11, 2020, 10:42:15 AM Good, bad, unhandled and somehow "classified" (no action taken which is usually the case), of course adding such thing will just put more unnecessary pressure on staff. Just said something come to my mind and realised its consequences while writing! That could explain why mods are suddenly marking everything "bad" Vs a week ago the exact same style posts were being marked "good" ::) Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: snipie on May 21, 2020, 10:31:33 PM Ok seriously reporting? and deleting a "bump" posted once in this topic, few days ago, without posting any other bump after it!
Do i miss something here? Did i broke any rule to get my "bump" post deleted? BTW I didn't consider bumping this topic anymore after i posted my bump several days ago since I am pretty sure theymos is aware of it. However this post bumped it, unfortunately, so report this post maybe too? Thanks. Edit Ok seriously reporting? and deleting a "bump" posted once in this topic, few days ago, without posting any other bump after it! maybe your "bump" has response (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5244510.msg54408040#msg54408040), then it's not necessary still standing. this my assume and I don't report.Do i miss something here? Did i broke any rule to get my "bump" post deleted? AFAIK It is only theymos or maybe Cyrus who could provide such data, if he/they want to update it. Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: blue Snow on May 21, 2020, 11:12:06 PM Ok seriously reporting? and deleting a "bump" posted once in this topic, few days ago, without posting any other bump after it! maybe your "bump" has response (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5244510.msg54408040#msg54408040), then it's not necessary still standing. this my assume and I don't report.Do i miss something here? Did i broke any rule to get my "bump" post deleted? Title: Re: Top reporters! Post by: shorena on May 22, 2020, 07:42:17 AM Hi theymos, can you update the top reporters table, it was long time since you did so tho. I know this will not be considered probably but maybe top reporters by section too? -snip- Yeah, would be nice to finally get kicked of the #1 spot officially ;) |
