|
Title: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: mineshop.eu on May 06, 2020, 09:51:27 AM https://mineshop.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Screenshot_1-600x330.png
Here are some hashrate after testing few of the GPU on NEW Ravencoin Kapow testnet which will switch to main net today 06.05 Gpu prices per hash are calculated from GPU prices from amazon. Of course this is not very accurate , as not everyone pays the same price for GPUs. This is just to have an idea which GPU might be the best to use at these prices. https://mineshop.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/kapow-ravencoin-600x330.png Here is the ling to excel spreadsheet numbers : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LRkuwtx2g7WkgelB64TC5MlzQlaACtLhCPZvpIHrRQI/edit?usp=sharing (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LRkuwtx2g7WkgelB64TC5MlzQlaACtLhCPZvpIHrRQI/edit?usp=sharing) One more link from RedPanda mining with more benchmark testing : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_d-BzXjpIUS8zUoQrxGQW90v-zCap7VKMfpZ4sQ2Gqg/edit#gid=0 (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_d-BzXjpIUS8zUoQrxGQW90v-zCap7VKMfpZ4sQ2Gqg/edit#gid=0) Video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjKdNIuNZEU&t (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjKdNIuNZEU&t) It's good to See AMD performing so well on this Algorithm , as there was no other top coin to mine as efficient as Nvidia other then ethash coins. Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: Marvell2 on May 06, 2020, 10:58:59 AM i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video
not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: mineshop.eu on May 06, 2020, 01:02:25 PM i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video sorry didnt realize spreadsheet needs password, i think i have fixed it now.not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol You are welcome for the benchmarks, what are you getting? Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: Xazax310 on May 06, 2020, 07:34:23 PM RTX 2070 (Non Super) Achieve about 18Mhs~ @ 140w (80% power).
Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: Marvell2 on May 06, 2020, 11:30:29 PM i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video sorry didnt realize spreadsheet needs password, i think i have fixed it now.not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol You are welcome for the benchmarks, what are you getting? i did watch the video btw lol so it worked 😉 Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: adaseb on May 07, 2020, 05:40:42 AM The numbers for RX series look a little odd to me, basically they are
RX 480 8GB 9.2mh 99 watt RX 570 4GB 10.5mh 133 watt RX 580 8GB 12mh 133 watt The RX 480 and RX 580 8GB is pretty much the exact same GPU. Why is the RX580 almost 30% faster and using 33% more power. Also how can the RX 570 4GB be faster than the RX 480GB? The power wattage also is a bit off. The 480/580 8GB are identical cards but the wattage is different, I guess because the 580 8GB hashes more however if thats the case why does ther RX 570 4GB which is slower also use the same wattage? Maybe run these benchmarks and tests again. Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: Vispilio on May 07, 2020, 06:41:41 AM Great data, very helpful thanks,
are there also any values included for 1080 TI ? It would be interesting to see if it has a significant advantage over 1080, which is way too expensive / hashrate... For previous RVN algorithms, 1080 TI was the boss in terms of efficiency. edit: on the 2nd spreadsheet I'm glad to see 1080 TI's are performing very robustly for this algo with minor modifications. Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: mineshop.eu on May 07, 2020, 09:08:36 AM The numbers for RX series look a little odd to me, basically they are RX 480 8GB 9.2mh 99 watt RX 570 4GB 10.5mh 133 watt RX 580 8GB 12mh 133 watt The RX 480 and RX 580 8GB is pretty much the exact same GPU. Why is the RX580 almost 30% faster and using 33% more power. Also how can the RX 570 4GB be faster than the RX 480GB? The power wattage also is a bit off. The 480/580 8GB are identical cards but the wattage is different, I guess because the 580 8GB hashes more however if thats the case why does ther RX 570 4GB which is slower also use the same wattage? Maybe run these benchmarks and tests again. Different brand has different stock clocks also different memories, as these tests where done on stock settings. Also mining software can affect certain series of graphic cards performance. Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: mineshop.eu on May 07, 2020, 09:14:22 AM Great data, very helpful thanks, are there also any values included for 1080 TI ? It would be interesting to see if it has a significant advantage over 1080, which is way too expensive / hashrate... For previous RVN algorithms, 1080 TI was the boss in terms of efficiency. edit: on the 2nd spreadsheet I'm glad to see 1080 TI's are performing very robustly for this algo with minor modifications. Seen Red Panda mining was running these at 24-25mh/s Profit has been great first few hours of mining with 7x1080 mined so far in first 15hours just over 530 RVN http://prntscr.com/scgnnz (http://prntscr.com/scgnnz) But the mining has slowed down as many miners seen opportunity. With the same mining rig mined 300 RVN in first 30minutes. But its good to see that AMD also performing so good on this mining algorithm. Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: rdluffy on May 07, 2020, 12:52:58 PM I'm mining RVN with 2 cards:
RX 570 MSI 4gb - 8.5Mhs - 120w at the wall Bios mod - memory @1950 - Core Clock @1100 GTX 1660 Gigabyte 6GB - 11.6 Mhs - 70w at the wall Overclocked +160Core Clock - @960 Memory It's incredible how Nvidia performs well and with low consumption I'm trying to refine the power consumption of RX 570, any ideas? Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: sxemini on May 07, 2020, 01:17:46 PM I'm mining RVN with 2 cards: RX 570 MSI 4gb - 8.5Mhs - 120w at the wall Bios mod - memory @1950 - Core Clock @1100 GTX 1660 Gigabyte 6GB - 11.6 Mhs - 70w at the wall Overclocked +160Core Clock - @960 Memory It's incredible how Nvidia performs well and with low consumption I'm trying to refine the power consumption of RX 570, any ideas? RX 570 4GB 9.5 - 9.7 @ 110w GTX 1060 3GB 9.5 - 10 @ 90w GTX 1060 6GB 10 - 10.5 @ 90w Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: rdluffy on May 07, 2020, 01:30:07 PM I'm mining RVN with 2 cards: RX 570 MSI 4gb - 8.5Mhs - 120w at the wall Bios mod - memory @1950 - Core Clock @1100 GTX 1660 Gigabyte 6GB - 11.6 Mhs - 70w at the wall Overclocked +160Core Clock - @960 Memory It's incredible how Nvidia performs well and with low consumption I'm trying to refine the power consumption of RX 570, any ideas? RX 570 4GB 9.5 - 9.7 @ 110w GTX 1060 3GB 9.5 - 10 @ 90w GTX 1060 6GB 10 - 10.5 @ 90w Your RX 570 do 1mhs more and consumes 10w less than mine Can you share your parameters to achieve this hashrate? I only hit 9.5 with more than 140w Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: VoskCoin on May 07, 2020, 01:57:12 PM i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video lol that vosk dude is the worst man! not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol Is this where I should shameless plug my video and written guide? ??? https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49865041696_c9fc0064cc_b.jpg (https://flic.kr/p/2iYpnCd)GPU Mining Ravencoin 2020 KAWPOW algorithm (https://flic.kr/p/2iYpnCd) by Drew Vosk (https://www.flickr.com/photos/154629903@N05/), on Flickr Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: cirlama on May 07, 2020, 03:09:41 PM Hi all, FYI info:
GTX 1080 TI @+100 core +450 mem and 80%power load: 24MH/s on TTminer (206 W) GTX 1070 @+170 core +550 mem and 80%power load: 14MH/s on TTminer (120 W) and very similar with zenemy Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: Psychopathic on May 07, 2020, 09:22:24 PM EVGA RTX 2070 BLACK OC'd through PrecisionX1 Core Clock +200 Memory Clock +1000 Power 114% 195W ~23.1 MH/s GMiner 2.0.4
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 6GB GDDR6 OC'd through PrecisionX1 Core Clock +50 Memory Clock +310 Power 95% 118W ~14.8 MH/s GMiner 2.0.4 My NVidia cards both got about 1MH/s more with GMiner than with TRex 0.15.3 XFX RX 580 8GB No OC ~9-10MH/s 121W NBMine Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: cjwallsg on May 07, 2020, 09:31:30 PM Hi, I've tested my three AMD R9 390 with the nanominer 1.9.2, the hashrate is between 12.5 - 13.5 MH/s
https://imgur.com/a/EVoZ5iT Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: nsummy on May 07, 2020, 10:31:41 PM i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video lol that vosk dude is the worst man! not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol Is this where I should shameless plug my video and written guide? ??? https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49865041696_c9fc0064cc_b.jpg (https://flic.kr/p/2iYpnCd)GPU Mining Ravencoin 2020 KAWPOW algorithm (https://flic.kr/p/2iYpnCd) by Drew Vosk (https://www.flickr.com/photos/154629903@N05/), on Flickr I never knew your name was Drew. Learned something new today ;D Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: NCarter84 on May 09, 2020, 12:48:24 PM Anyone seeing any numbers on the 5600 / 5600 xt?
Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: VoskCoin on May 09, 2020, 11:38:54 PM i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video lol that vosk dude is the worst man! not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol Is this where I should shameless plug my video and written guide? ??? https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49865041696_c9fc0064cc_b.jpg (https://flic.kr/p/2iYpnCd)GPU Mining Ravencoin 2020 KAWPOW algorithm (https://flic.kr/p/2iYpnCd) by Drew Vosk (https://www.flickr.com/photos/154629903@N05/), on Flickr I never knew your name was Drew. Learned something new today ;D Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: mineshop.eu on May 11, 2020, 10:16:39 AM i get it upload a blurry image and spreadsheets that require permission to access to drive people to your video lol that vosk dude is the worst man! not even vosk will stoop this low and that’s saying something lol Is this where I should shameless plug my video and written guide? ??? https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49865041696_c9fc0064cc_b.jpg (https://flic.kr/p/2iYpnCd)GPU Mining Ravencoin 2020 KAWPOW algorithm (https://flic.kr/p/2iYpnCd) by Drew Vosk (https://www.flickr.com/photos/154629903@N05/), on Flickr I never knew your name was Drew. Learned something new today ;D Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: ummasek on May 11, 2020, 05:16:06 PM Hi all
RTX2060 GPU-1550, MEM 7700, PL-78%, 15,5Mhash/125Wat. GTX1660Ti GPU-1340, MEM-6680, PL-58% , 10,5Mhash/70Wat P106 GPU- 1290, MEM-4551 , PL-73% , 9,5Mhash/85W I`m using Nicehash and mostly i`m mining daggerhasimoto on it. Few days ago, after Vosk`s YT i`ve spend night to settle kawpow on my rig (2060, 4x1660ti, 2xp106). Settings are ready for moning both with no change in OC needed. Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: Juggar on February 21, 2021, 10:23:58 PM Just thought id toss in the hash rate of 2 cards that are not very popular (for mining at least).
GTX 1650 Super - 12.45 MH/s ( +150 core / + 1500 memory) @ 100 watts power consumption (VBIOS limit). GTX 1650 Ti (laptop) - 9.4 MH/s (+ 200 core / +225 memory) @ 50 watts power consumption (VBIOS limit). 1650 Ti laptop is extremely efficient. Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: carbonjawed on March 16, 2021, 01:43:57 AM XFX RX480 8GB stock bios
Core Freq running at 936 Voltage 1150 Clock VRAM Speed 1800 Power limit -18% Fans set to 75% min acoustic limit 1057 7.8-8.5mh/s @83.5 watts. gpu temp 75c If I remove all these settings in radeon software I get 10mh/s at 115 watts Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: shiftoshi on March 16, 2021, 03:52:03 PM Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: sxemini on March 24, 2021, 02:14:19 PM XFX RX480 8GB stock bios Core Freq running at 936 Voltage 1150 Clock VRAM Speed 1800 Power limit -18% Fans set to 75% min acoustic limit 1057 7.8-8.5mh/s @83.5 watts. gpu temp 75c If I remove all these settings in radeon software I get 10mh/s at 115 watts Use another miner, normal hashrate for RX470 - RX 580 are around 12,5 to 14mh with teamredminer. I don´t know why you have so low hashrates. Title: Re: KAPOW Ravencoin Benchmark testing, price per hash which GPU to choose Post by: mineshop.eu on March 29, 2021, 11:27:54 AM XFX RX480 8GB stock bios Core Freq running at 936 Voltage 1150 Clock VRAM Speed 1800 Power limit -18% Fans set to 75% min acoustic limit 1057 7.8-8.5mh/s @83.5 watts. gpu temp 75c If I remove all these settings in radeon software I get 10mh/s at 115 watts Use another miner, normal hashrate for RX470 - RX 580 are around 12,5 to 14mh with teamredminer. I don´t know why you have so low hashrates. I have heard a lot that guys on windows get 7mh.s, most likely related to drivers i guess. |
