Bitcoin Forum

Do you agree on this periodic table?

https://i.imgur.com/7y3PWOs.png

https://jes.al/crypto-table/

Although I would say that perhaps half of it as either shitcoin or dead coins or probably be a scam in the future.  :)

half of it as 99% of it are either shitcoins or dead coins or probably be a scam in the future.  :)

There. Fixed it for you. :P

If anything, I only see this as something we look back to in 5 years, with us saying "damn, we sure had a lot of shitcoins back then". In fact, I'd say most of them are already half dead as we speak.

Yota is gold...yeah...and Neo oxigen...and whatever this POWR shitcoin is, it is replacing copper.
On the bright side, bitcoincash is sodium, which is a bit fitting for pickled vegetables, and I like this universe where there is no BSV.
Oh, and doge, much calcium, good bones, such milk, wow!  ;D

But I can't shake the same feeling I had in chemistry class, way too many things in that table that nobody gives a damn about!

The basis for the idea's pretty cool. But you might want to put some really deep thought into it, although that would make it more nerdy than it already is, kinda like how stompix says it's about as pointless to the rest of us as the actual periodic table was -- I still remember the first 14 though through this acronym:

Hi! Hey! Let's Be Buddies Cause No One's Friends Need Natural Magnets on Aluminium Sinks

I love the idea about it. I agree with Bitcoin being the #1 in the periodic table because it's #1. The periodic table is arranged by increasing the number of electrons on its shells. As the element number increases, the electrons also increases. Maybe, rearranging it just by the number of total blocks generated or the year it was created or something similar to that. Also, they could be arranged in the most practical or most applications in the real world? In that way, people can realize the most essential crypto of them all.

What's next? A table on who invented which cryptocurrencies? Making Bitcoin stand out because of the creator? Maybe ???

It's a nice idea, but we should restrict it to elements. BCH should not be on there as it is not an element, its a waste product.

Seriously though, I do kind of like it. It might be better to arrange by marketcap as the crypto equivalent of atomic number, and then apply the groups and periods from there. Could get messy, but would certainly be interesting.

Good to see we have that, back when I was in high school, our teacher let us memorize the periodic table of Elements, I'm hoping one day if there will be a crypto schools, students will be to study and memorize it. The only difference is that this list will grow and grow over time, you know adoption will increase.

The only difference they have with the original periodic table of elements is that they have been most of them are discovered whilst the one listed on that crypto periodic table are invention. I wish she listed the one on the gasses part the shitcoin that will be gone out of thin air.

All money will be circulated from Bitcoin to altcoins, shitcoins, stable coins and then back to Bitcoin. It is reasonable to put Bitcoin at the first cell in the Crypto periodic table. Back in 2017, I joined the crypto market when people talked about Ethereum, and the big question that it will take over Bitcoin, months later the Ripple, but yeah now after 3 years, I realized the fact that all capital will be concentrated in Bitcoin.

Investors should focus on bitcoin if they don't want to see their balance falls deeply.

With the periodic table, my knowledge is enough because with this table I can better know the purpose of the actual coins, well maybe this is only taken from some of the better coins because it is true that there are also many shitcoin scams in the future. this periodic table will know its purpose.

On platforms and payment / currency, many are interested. maybe

Indeed, interesting idea, but quite bad implementation - I think that maybe it just cannot be done right with only 2 dimensions.

I don't agree on the stable coins idea though. Afaik most stable coins are acting as tokens on various platforms, so they should not get a different "root", most should just stay with the rest of the tokens.

Maybe i do not agree with the selection of coins and tokens for it, but the idea is just awesome, and the feature to see the price as the molecular weight is awesome. I like the project, maybe if they make it opensource some of us would love to take our hands on that table.

There is no point in making such tables, since the "elements" in it will change too often.

I want to print this on A1 paper and put somethere on the wall

I think the table is missing a lot so I made my own version of it and I think it should be really looking like this

https://i.postimg.cc/2Sk6sfSg/table.jpg

I just change the usual information for the element

Atomic number = Market rank
Electron configuration = Market Cap.
Atomic Weight = Price
 and so on....

If I were going to make a full version of periodic table it would be just a small one, I will not include the shitcoins and it would not look like the real periodic table of elements.
 

Haha, the table is fun and we do agree that many of those coins are really useless and just like what we did when we're memorizing that table during high school days, we don't care about them.

Whoever did that has a great sense of creativity.

Let's just appreciate the guy who made that cryptocurrency periodic table.

The concept is good but I could not agree to the arrangement of coins. They should have been done by their nature. Though he tried to group privacy focused coins at a place, a popular and advocated as a privacy coin, DASH is not on the list. Even the first column order of BCH, NANO and DASH seems so different.