Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Reputation => Topic started by: Pffrt on May 28, 2020, 01:54:33 PM



Title: Alt account of smartmixer
Post by: Pffrt on May 28, 2020, 01:54:33 PM
Alternative thread of smartmixer- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5172400.0
Alt account which isn't tagged yet- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2659590
Smartmixer is a proved scam bitcoin mixer, their main account has been tagged but this one get out of the tag. Please negative tag the account.
Link to the previous scam accusation thread- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5227899.0
Also, please support the flag here- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1926


Title: Re: Alt account of smartmixer
Post by: Jawhead999 on May 28, 2020, 02:13:58 PM
I think this user has not been tagged yet since he's only active on 2019 and never active again till now. Maybe if @sounoyukio didn't bump that's thread... we can't know if smartmixer.io have alt account. Anyway, nothing wrong about your suggestion and I supported the flag


Edit : Thanks @bob123 for tagged this account


Title: Re: Alt account of smartmixer
Post by: TryNinja on May 28, 2020, 03:04:18 PM
I believe he isn't even an alt, but someone who created an account to try earning some money with SmartMixer's referral system by pretending to be them. His link leads to https://www.smartmixer.io/ref/Hp1Qd4Tl < SCAM


Title: Re: Alt account of smartmixer
Post by: bob123 on May 28, 2020, 03:34:54 PM
I believe he isn't even an alt, but someone who created an account to try earning some money with SmartMixer's referral system by pretending to be them.

Still doesn't change the fact that a tag and warning flag indeed is appropriate.
If we were talking about a type #3 flag against this user, i'd agree with you. But a warning flag is definitely necessary.
We don't want additional user to see this thread and potentially even lose money by using this scam mixer.


Title: Re: Alt account of smartmixer
Post by: TryNinja on May 28, 2020, 03:37:33 PM
Still doesn't change the fact that a tag and warning flag indeed is appropriate.
I agree, thus I supported the flag. I'm only giving some context to what is this account for any future reference.