Bitcoin Forum

If they care about building a reputation more and not just accumulating any possible bounties that comes their way for the money, then should be very strict with the kind of bounty they accept, P2pb2b is known for it's shady activities and no responsible project would want to have anything to do with such exchange, when you see a project in partnership with that exchange should be placed under proper observation.

it was not the fault of the bounty detective, they did their best, moreover they already had tokens, and were ready to be distributed to participants, but unfortunately the Kingcasino project really made everyone disappointed

It should go for all the bounty managers though not just for bounty detective. There are lots of them and it didn't just happen to bounty detective.

Bounty managers, I guess should just not engage in projects that aren't just not really making the whole crypto look good. Looking at the list of projects having a bounty campaign today nothing in them has the quality that will make it to an exchange. Unless going thru p2pb2b IEO which is often going to end scam.

No need to bold the whole thing just to make it look intense. But what you are saying is applicable to all of the managers and they should be meticulous for most projects that they will work in the future or with any project that they are negotiating with lately.
It's a good reminder for them because it's their reputation that are being put into stake and if they are not careful with their decisions, it will affect them, their reputation.

Selecting the exchange depends upon the amount of money a team can spend to get listed and the teams who are not planning to spend much might list in exchanges that offers less amount to get listed, i am not a huge fan of all these token projects as it is hard to find any sustainable projects that made a ton of change in the market after collecting millions, so the risk is always there for the investors and if a team has a great project they will succeed irrespective of the struggles they encounter in the beginning. As for bounty managers it is hard to blame them if a projects runs away fooling him but it is happening consistently then he needs to think twice about knowing the team before advertising them.

p2pb2b is a shady exchange that has been talked about for a long time, even many people don't recommend this exchange, of course many projects end up scamer in their hands, so it is clear that p2pb2b often manipulates and it is possible that the volume there is only a bot that runs.

I'm sure a manager will think of this kind of thing.

Pointing it out here might be a public way of calling him out but chances are, he might not see this, he might see this and ignore as he is not directly affected reason being he is paid for his management services. Most people blindly jump into different bounties promising huge sum of USD but later turn out to be crumbs. With due diligence know your onions and choose them wisely.

I don't think you or anyone can blame the paypective detective manager or the P2pb2b exchange after the failure of the KingCasino project managed by him, and I'm not a party to anyone, but I also agree with your opinion, that to be more selective before managing a bounty project and no longer trusts with projects listed on shady exchanges.

I made a mistake choosing the Kingcasino campaign. Actually this isn't a mistake because Kingcasino isn't a scam project as we think. They will refund the investors, we know scam projects mean something different. That was my fault, I didn't notice all comments about Kingcasino. We shouldn't follow all announcements from the project as I followed from Kingcasino project.

With what's presently going on with p2pb2b exchange it will be good if bounty managers starts avoiding projects that plan to raise fund on p2pb2b exchange, this exchange is more like intentionally sponsoring scam projects or shit projects, exchange like p2pb2b or vindax and others need to be abandoned

Bounty detective still don't know how to do good research on new projects before allowing their offers, it's easily to figure out that kingcasino team are all fake, the pictures are washed out like photo edited versions

I'm not surprised, shady projects will always use shady exchanges because it will be way more easier for their strategy to work out, criminals always know criminals like themselves, p2pb2b exchange and others like it will soon be flushed out, that I can assure you

I don't blame them because kingcasino is not the only project that didn't make it. there are lots of projects that failed to get their funds and Bountydetective is still willing to send the tokens to the bounty participants even it is worthless

I don't think that it's the fault of bounty detective, I'm sure that they did the necessary research before accepting that project, p2pb2b has been known as a scam exchange, what I feel is that any project conducting ieo on that exchange should not be considered to list such project on their bounty list

Not only p2pb2p, there a lot of exchanges which are doing the IEO and dump the price after listing. This is really bad for the projects as well as for the whole community. So, we can't blame Bounty Managers for this, they try to do their best and bountydetective also escrow the funds for distribution to ensure that every bounty hunters get their payments. Imo, kingcasino's price was so high as a casino/gambling projects and they just try to make hype of it and everything don't go accroding to their plans. That's why they show the reason of covid-19 and run away.

I dont know on whats that Bounty detective you've been talking on but to talk about to those projects that are listed out on not well known exchange doesnt mean that they are scam.
This is just like a typical stuff that most projects are just being listed and then dumped hard to the floor neither via by its investors itself or by the coin or project owner itself.
Dealing up with shady exchange like p2b will surely make any guarantees that your project would be in a good path but to think even if your listed on popular exchange doesnt mean
that you would be successful also.It all matters with the demand of the coin but to talk about good ones which is mostly listed on several exchangers in the market.

That exchange already flagged 2x here so I don't think it is safe to advertise any project making their IEO in that exchange . In the first place bounty detective have idea about the flag of that exchange so in the first day offering that job they should not accept it  .

I am glad you finally figured that out. There are two big scammer platforms that actually accept outright scam ICO/IEO and this is P2pb2b together with LAtoken.

The problem is some good projects do not know this,,, but you should also blame them for not doing their right Due Diligence.

My advice to bounty hunters though is different. Stop doing bounties willy nilly. Find a project you love. Stick with them.

It all depends on them, but you also need to research yourself and choose the bounty in your opinion. Never be too dependent on others because there are many factors affecting them.

Most projects wont really care that much initially when they are trying out to list their token on said platforms and of course the main priority is to be recognized which one of them and they would really be first dealing with
these low key exchange which do mostly have scam issues.Some might consider on able to have some initial search but most of the time they wouldnt care.

Ico/Ieo is already a shit way on dealing with new project nowadays.It isnt even worth for your time and money since most of them doesnt really even give out new usage

and just keeping copying other projects ideas and the cycle continues.

Not only bounty detective but also bounty hunters, there are a lot of instances that bounty hunters and those outsides of the campaign caught the project as being dubious, it is the responsibility of everyone if they see something wrong to post it and give his opinion, so everybody here can give their opinion and come out with the results of the investigation.

p2pb2b, vindax, sistemkoin this are some of the known scam exchange sites. I did not know that bounty detective brought such a project. He seems to not have enough experience on such exchanges. Any IEO helding on this exchanges are scam without any doubt.
It is not only fault of Bounty Detective. The participants should also know the basic.

It's not bounty detective fault for bringing kingcasino to Bounty Hunters, remember, it's always bounty hunters responsibility to join Campaigns at their own risks, bounty detective never knew the project is scam and they've already hold KCT token to pay hunters until the project turn out scam

I have heard so many times not very good about P2pb2b, now I go around all the projects with his mention. Many projects boast of P2pb2b, although such statements repel a huge number of investors.

I think bountydetective will be more careful about choosing their project to promote. But I agree on not to promote project that are planning to list on a shitty exchange not just p2pb2b but other shitty exchange

Bounty Detective should be more careful when choosing bounties next time or they go down the rail like other bounty managements. They should be strict about this.
And I think same thing is going to happen with the recent bounty they just added. Huge allocation for a four weeks bounty, shitty price on exchange, no much. What's the guarantee the price won't be more worthless if it's distributed to hunters?. I wouldn't even sign up for such bounty.

I hope Bounty Detective can learn from that bad experience...
king casino is fucked off many people, especially investors and bounty hunters who have sacrificed many things. king casino only makes p2pb2b's bad reputation + but we must realize that this is not entirely the fault of the Bounty detective.

But the decision is still with you, you can participate in it according to the research and that is your choice. No one forces you to join their bounty, and you should remember that you should never trust the bounty manager, choose your bounty according to your own research.

I'm sure that he is really doing his best in terms of screening the project. The problem was the project that looks legit from the start are turning to exit scam once they know that they will not reach the target amount to raise. There are a lot of successful IEO that launch on p2pb2b and I think it's not the main problem. It's very hard to hand pick a project and guarantee if the project is legit or not.

I think he needs to stop accepting more campaigns and focus to one or two at the same time. He should also decline all gambling casino IEO because the market for that project was already saturated and has a slim chance of success.