Bitcoin Forum

I was going through the bounty session and saw this campaign https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5254541 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5254541), on the signature campaign, it says you should give 4hrs gap between post, I feel this is not too good for signture campaigners who have always been use to freedom to posting and spreading across 3-5 days. However, with the WhaleHavens rule of 4hrs gap to post, one can still make 6 post per day. Reducing it to 3 post per day spread over 12hrs is still very possible and viable but limits one freedom to make meaningful contribution on the forum. I feel the clause of only 4hrs post gap will be eligible for stakes count should have been specified. A look at the signature spreadsheet shows that about 90 percent of applicants were rejected.

What do you think of the rules of the BM? I understand he is trying to curtain burst posting and spam.

https://i.imgur.com/NPhBfc5.jpg

It's free for him to apply such rules to the participants as the campaign was going on its own way.
This is something that can be done by any managers as they have made their own rules for the campaign as the participants and you can do nothing for sure.

Not a good rules for me , there are campaigns that make 60 post per week and we cannot call that user's is just making  spam post.

It is  easy to kNow if a  persons is just creating spam  post base on the post  history of poster and we don't need to have 4 hours interval to make a post unless you are given a good amount of payment that they can give their time as normal job to your campaign.

think for it you need to use your 12 hours time  per day just to create a 3 post  and we are not all active here for that long time. users some times just give 4 hour of their time or less to visit to this forum .

OP, a gap between posts is not a bad thing. We have spammers in this forum who tend to burst post that is post at very short intervals. This reduced the amount spreading of posts in between 24hours and probably that is the reason why some bounty managers dont accept burst posters. I know this might seem bad for the hunters but it is done to make sure the signatures get enough views.

If you dont like it, dont participate in it. No use complaining because if it is in the rules you have to follow it or if you are desperate for money you should look for a better job.

It is not a new style, but already an old style, maybe you noticed it late. ::)

Shouldn't be a problem for you if you don't like rules, just find another Signature campaign that suits your taste, I don't have all that time to post every 4hours, I made three to four posts everyday and the difference is just minutes, I have other things to do

Well it seems like it is intended for those who do bounties full-time but I don't think that even bounty hunters would fully cover their day with just staying here in forum.
But it is the bounty rules so people participating with it must follow the rules.

Oh boy, I've seen worse of the rules back in 2017 wherein, the stakes are counted through "threads"  made not "replies".  I left the bounty that time because aside from stress to create a topic, it encourages spam and nobody likes that.

Normally reputed managers don't have any restrictions between post game timing but they will kickout participants if they were postbursting so its all subjective.Restricting people from paid posts in that time period maybe acceptable but if they are rejecting everyone who is having small time gap between their posts will result in rejection of quality posters as well.

Many bounty managers don't put restrictions on when to make posts but this one is knew, even if this is a high quality bounty project it will be very hard for me to join the bounty, post only every 4hrs is too much, I have business I'm running in real life and other things to look after

That is mostly intended to restrict users from burst posting. But it may not be suitable for all as some people are online for a short period of time while some have the habit of posting a large number of posts everyday. It would be suitable for users like me who are online 18+ hours and loves seeing other talk and participate only when need to.
There are choices in bounty in altcoin section so it would not make a huge difference.

It's their bounty it's their rule, they want the best to their campaign when it comes to signature bounty campaign, but 4 hours is not right for me what if you have a job offline and you have limited time online, one hour is already good, but there are many bounty campaign that offer a different rules,if you cannot keep up better not join.

Its a long duration actually but this rule could avoid spammers doing a lot of post in multiple threads just to reach their quota for signature. But for a talker this is not good, cause you are restricted to posting with long duration. Bettet not joined this campaign if you are an active poster it would dissapoint you not allowing to post again if you found a good topic to reply on.

Also why bothered to complain about this? Are you participants on this campaign?

Limits must be established to prevent spam. Participants participate in signature campaigns and publish more than 20 posts within one or two days.
I saw some accounts post about 25 posts in two or three days and disappear for the rest of the week.

4 hours between participation and the other is a long period of time, and it is probably best to place restrictions such as 10 posts that will be paid during the day and more than that will not be paid.
Or 4 posts per hour, and posts will not be paid for more.

Study was done for social media to know whether you are publishing extensively or is it regular posts.




I will link your rank with the number of posts. The higher your rank, the more bad your number will be, it reflects your experience.
beginners, it is best to participate with a maximum of 4 posts per day.

Intense participation and responding to any topic without choosing which aspects you are good on will prompt you to be banned because of spam.

study can be applied to the forum.

Three to four posts per day is more than enough on this forum, more than that can be considered as spamming but it still depends on the quality of the posts, if a member posts more than four posts per day and those posts are very good how is that a spam? Anyways, if any bounty hunter wants to join the bounty then following the rules is a must

It's not a lot of people can comply with the rules that has already made by him. It's free for everyone who can deal with the rules to join in this campaign and this is also not a new rules. I have seen some projects have already putted the same rules too.

I see there are campaign that also have  a maximum post per day but the interval is the main issue of that rules  . I mean not all of people here can wait for 4 hours before they can make another post why this things need to required ?

4 post a day is acceptable but you need to understand also that we are in different time zone and different use of our time.

But honestly if the user's know that they can't fulfill the requirements  then it's better for them to find other campaigns.

This isn't a problem for those who have nothing to do, the kinda perfect bounty Campaign for this lock down period lol, you have all the time but not everyone, the choice is for the bounty hunters to make, if it's good enough for you then why the wait? If it's not then find other bounty project

In my personal opinion, I don't think the rule was too harsh.  Even for a bounty campaign that requested for 15 posts per week. If three posts are made everyday then it will spread across just five days out of six which is good for me.  Every campaign has its rules. If one cannot abide by it, then one should not embark on it.  The rule is not from the BCT moderator but from the bounty, then there is need to abide by it for the sake of the bounty.  For example, some bounties requires that your shares+like on FB should have minimum of 10hrs in between.  For me I don't a problem with that rule.

Bounty managers have every right to make any rules for their Campaigns, I don't see how this is surprising for you OP because it's not new at all, if you don't like the rules just leave the Campaign and find another one

Correctly said. No one is forcing you to join this bounty. If this doesn't fit you, try a different one.
In my opinion, it's a better strategy to reduce spam and keep the conversation in the forum healthy.
Many people seems to be making posts just to complete their post requirements in a short amount of time.
This restriction would place a cooling period where the users would go through posts and decides what and where would they be involved in discussion increasing healthy conversation.

I think there was no need for this rule because already some high-rank members are working against spam. If they get any spam post, they report it, and that post gets deleted. Maybe the bounty manager wants to take some lazy people in his campaign.  :D just joking.

 However, it is his campaign, he knows better how to run it, believe me, this rule is beyond my understanding.


Edit: There is also a scam accusation against this project.
[SCAM] WhalesHeaven (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5254832.0)

It sounds like a good rule at first but should not all people be just required to act normally as they would at any regular activity without doing different? And everyone who uses social media has patterns, but all platforms view burst posting as spam, even Twitter and FB will block you for doing that. But counting between hours? That is already quite difficult and very unnatural to do.

Their campaign, their rules. As long as it is align with the forum's rules and regulations, there's no problem with that. So it is up to the bounty participant if he will join or not, given those requirements. One should not complain about being strict as this is their project. They have the privilege to choose their participants. Also, being in a campaign is a privilege as well, because this is not the main goal of the forum. To share knowledge and have meaningful discussions are just few objectives of this forum. Campaign and bounty programs are just perks.

This is often done to reduce burst posting, many participants usually post more within seconds although I know it seem a bit strict kind of rules to apply on a campaign, because often someone can just make 2-3 post within 4 hours, I think it would have been better if the bm make it an hour each, 4hrs in between post is just too much in my opinion, but again the bm have the final say on how best to run his campaign.

This bounty rule is too strict, this isn't a way to avoid spamming, I've seen bounty campaigns that ask hunters to make 15 posts per week which can be completed doing 3 posts per day but forcing 4 hours per posts every day isn't good, an hour between posts is still better, many members on here have other things to do than spending hours on the forum everyday, they make posts on here with their spare times

I think this isn't bad it seems since the only post required to be eligible for the stake is just 10 posts weekly, you can even finish that by just posting at least twice daily. This is to avoid spamming. In regards to bounty rules and even accepting participants, it all depends on the manager since they have the discretion to do so just like any bounty managers.

Maybe thats too much for him. Actually they are lucky to post minimal in forum and still they got awarded stake. The campaign manager seems to hate the spammers on this forum thats why he created this kind of rules. I dont know if this was implemented before but I dony agree with the span of posting its too long. They limited it to 4hrs, what if there is an idea and you should post but you forgot since you need to post before you post again.

That's true, this rule can really reduce burst posting. The campaign only required 10 posts per week so I think the rules are quite suitable for the campaign. Just like what others say here, only the bounty managers have the right to create/change the rules in the campaign. Being a bounty hunter, we are obliged to follow the rules in order to earn the rewards. And I agree with @VDraci, it's better to find another campaign if you are not satisfied with the rules of the campaign.

Some of the people here hate seeing spam post and they even report it. That's why having that kind of rule is quite good for me. Who knows if the bounty manager will change the rules.

10 posts a week that's roughly 2 posts daily I think it's manageable you can do it in the morning then do it again the evening , just be sure that you are posting with substance, not just posting for the sake of posting, I prefer this in bounty campaign on ICO.

I am okay with this rule on signature campaign to avoid spam post which is a very effective by the way. You can reach 10 post per week if you post 2 times a day on morning and evening. In my opinion it's effective measures for assurance of spam free in the forum.  I observed that deletion of some post due to outburst posting that really triggered the moderators, so it's okay that to have gap per post to maintain the organic conversation in the forum.

That's not new style, there are already bounty using rules like that, it is the prerogative of the bounty manager. I think easy, if you dont like rules like that, dont join in champaign, still many champaign not using that rules

I see you join in HOMT signature champaign, so why did you take care of that?? Just focus in your champaign

it is a rule that should compromise spam posting, but it could not do it
meaningful posts could be written with less than 4 hours between posts, and you can use timer to write posts every four hours, and those posts could not be worth anything

while one should consider the rule before entering campaign, bounty managers should also read the feedback from hunters, to improve rules and post quality in next campaigns, but you can not see that with managers on btt

Yes, that's right, actually it is not a problem to be debated about, moreover the rules in each campaign are clearly different, so if the rules of the campaign are very burdensome for us, then it is better to find others according to the tastes that we want, besides everyone also have their respective activities which are more important than posting.

It all depends on our personal judgment, others might not like it because of the very long duration of posts, and you like those rules for reasons that are easier to manage, so every campaign hunter besides adhering to campaign rules must also be good at set the time, because everyone also has another job besides this forum.

I think it depends on the bounty campaign project rules and it depends on the bounty manager who put the rules. The freedom is still there but hunters should foollow whatever rules a bounty manager  imposed either they need to post with 4hours gap or 10post a day with 2hours gap limit or whatever rules is it.As long as it will not broke the rules of the forum.

But it also takes out the freedom of having an idea and you just don't want to forget it.  ;D
Anyone could come up with new ideas and opinions anytime.

IMO, I don't like that rule.
This is a forum and you are supposed to read and input your opinion.
Also, there are members who cannot access the forum anytime they want and there is also the timezone.

As long as it is a quality post then, there is no problem with it.

The rules are reasonable because they want their applicants to not spam different threads and campaigns are always aiming for quality content and not just the amount of posts that their applicant can do. Every campaign wants to have their applicants to post quality content because of the fact that Quality is better than Quantity in the aspect of posting.

Some past campaigns already did that but not a lot of Campaign Managers implemented this rules.

maybe it is an effort to reduce spammers. but in my opinion it is personally too long. because 4 hours post distance allows anyone to only make 2 posts each day. whereas if the target is 10 posts, it will not be achieved. and I'm also sure that the participants here don't just work for the bounty campaign, there must be others. and worse, it's still unclear whether the project will be a big success or not. if yes, the price of the token reaches 0.1 - 1 eth, I think it will be a suitable reward.

This isn't new style because previously there was a campaign that implemented such rules before and it is true that projects that implement such rules not interest hunter because most hunters don't have enough time to wait 4 hours, they still have jobs out there that are clearly producing money (their real job)

It can be done easily and there was no problem with this kind of rules. As long as the hunters can deal with it and it's free for anyone to follow it when they were participating in the blueheaven bounty campaign.

Every Bounty manager had also freedom to make his own sets of rules. But I don't think 4 hours in a gap is really reasonable for a reason that we are not all been in the forum in 24 hours or to find yourself getting online every 4hours just to make a post. Even though we think that it could help to combat spammers and burst posting but it was too long to have it. I'm not sure if there is a mistake but something like that.

Anyways, that's the call of the manager. I believe the manager isn't pushing everyone to participate in the campaign but just yourself who've brought on there. Everyone has also a freedom to leave or just ignore and find another one. Nothing to urge yourself if you are not comfortable with the said rule.

i didnt check the actual campaign yet but yes their goal is to control spam and burst posting with that rule they have .

its fine because over 60 percent or over 70 percent of the users here on this forum are working on a bounty campaigns  and also post from time to time   . not just thier time post gap rule are strict but also few of thier rules too  . its fine if thier campaign was a high paying but if not , they will only recieve bashes at the end   .

The bounty manager created the rule so he can set the rules for doing signature tasks like posting. I agree this would be too time-consuming for the participants but I think its the way the bounty manager limits spamming in forum threads. But if youre a bounty participant who likes free posting, then you can always look for other signature campaign that is to your liking. There's a lot.

seems like it reduces spammers. but that won't reduce bounty hunters who cheat. I guess posting restrictions are not that important. The manager can see the posts made in the discussion. not the number of posts but the quality.

I don't know the name of the bounty manager that's in charge of whalesheaven bounty campaign but I can say he or she is a pro, doing this will neutralize spammers, well rules are rules, if you don't like the rules don't bother joining the bounty campaign

The bounty manager has the right to manage it all. some managers even manage the number of participants who can join. it also makes the competition better. when they are not competent and cannot follow the rules they cannot join.

I have to say the truth, since my day one on this forum I haven't seen a bounty manager putting gaps between when to make posts per day, I've seen bounties that request more than 10posts per week but when to post? Nah! This is definitely new, anyways it's easy to avoid this is you can't cope, joining any bounty means you are ready to abide by the rules, the choice is yours

There are regular companies who do something like that as well, they do not put a certain amount of hour in between them but the usual one is that you should not rapid fire your posts, I think the reason for this is not to limit how much you can make, but to limit useless posts. When you can post as much as you want, you can probably write 100 posts a day that makes no sense at all, not contributing to anything, doing that just to make money.

However, when you write one post every 4 hours you are actually making a good post because you have more to say about it and you got the time to say it as well. I would say it is logical for companies, but for coin offering I would imagine more posts everywhere constantly and endlessly without a limit would work more because they want to get attention of absolutely every single person.

This is only good for those who have all day or who work online every day but for someone like me, I can't keep coming back online every four hours to complete my posts, bounty manager can't be blame for this, I'm sure he have his reasons, find another bounty if you can't follow the rules, simple as ABC

Bounty Manager don't have to put hours in between posts to limit spams or to make people post less shit posts, that's the work of moderators, all your posts must be good and reasonable enough or moderators will remove them, even if you make posts in minutes just make sure they are good enough, since the bounty manager decide to make use of this rule there is nothing you can do about it, if you like the Campaign and the rules then go ahead, if not then opt out

If I have interest in whalesheaven bounty campaign I will definitely join without the rules ruining the fun, I don't see any big deal making posts every 4 hours a day, it's a good way to make safe many from posting shit posts, why the hell not?

What's so alarming about this bounty rules? 10 posts per week with four hours difference in posting is nothing big, 2 posts per day is enough, just create a post and come back later to create another, in five days you've complete your work for the week, the reason why I don't join the bounty Campaign is because of lack of interest, the project use case is not good enough

Earlier it was 12 hours gap requirement after complains and low participants they have reduced time but i think if the purpose is to stop burst posting then 1 hour gap between each post was more than enough. It is quite tough to follow such harsh rules when you know reward is going to be low so encourage people to join and ease participation for them rather than discouraging them with dictator like rules.

With all the rules and rejections surrounding whalesheaven bounty campaign it shows that the bounty manager is too strict, moreover the bounty allocation is even low, I don't see reason that can make me to join a bounty as this one, would be better if I will get paid in BTC or stable USD coins

With the little spare time I have everyday I don't think I can meet up with such strict rules, all I have per day to come in this forum is not even up to 6hours, making posts every 4-4 hours can't work for me, well just like many posts says, it's better to ignore and find other project that are good for your convenience

A bounty hunter will have to wake up every 4 hours to post so the post can be counted. Seem the worse rules, they don't even know if the project will be a success in the future. I wonder if it finds more investors this way. This is the first campaign that does have the kind of rules. But I would definitely stay away from this campaign.

The project even has a scam accusation in this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5254832.0

One hour or two hours is enough or ok, important is the posts is ok and not spamming I have not seen a bounty campaign that has this kind of rule, I'm not saying it's not ok but the gap is quite long and Whalesheaven has a bad report in the scam section I wonder if bounty hunters knows this or aware of it.

AFAIK, there was a campaign manager who always wanted to have 45 minutes gap between each of the posts but having 4 hours is insane and highly not possible for any legit member to participate on it because everyone needs to have a real life job so they can't allocate all their day just for getting tokens.So this campaign is created for bounty hunters. who is doing bounty shits all the time.

its their own rules, if you dont like their rules you can ignore them, theirs so many campaigns in this forum, not every campaign has the same rules, although you are sharing your own opinion.

For a dedicated signature campaigner that rule is manageable and can be done and much easier than the one I've participated where we participants are obligated to create 2 unique thread in one particular section, glad that the manager because of the urging of the participants agreed to one thread but this is indeed a new style of campaign but it can be done.

Dont understand why so much noise because 4h gap between posts. Bounty hunter must make only 10 posts during a week. That is not much. Many write 10 posts per day. Some individuals manage to write all necessary signature posts in one day, which is not good for promotion.

Time gap between posts is a useful rule. Hope that their BM follow the rules he set and this is not just a dust in the eyes. 

Same here but I haven't seen people making all 10 posts  in a single day, that's definitely something else, I'm satisfied with the bounty manager rules on this one but won't be good for many others, I work online 24/7 so it's not a big deal for me

I do not think that this and similar rules like you can check in the social media campaigns of same campaign are ethical because i mean how can one spare all his day, remember each and every minute and hour of his last post and then comeback and post again after the suggested gap, i think this is unethical requirement, these people who promote a project are not hired and are not slaves to follow such brutal rules in the end to earn few bucks.

I don't see anything wrong it the bounty rule. The fact that there's grace of making a new post after 4hours does not mean signature hunters will spend there whole day to just finish the work in just 1 or two days. Me I see it as grace to  allow the hunters complete there weekly tasks within few days

I feel like the bm is trying to curtail spam or shit posts by requesting you to think and summarize or give a clear suggestion to every topic you choose to comment on in the forum. But i do not agree with him for some reasons. Always remember that in every Bounty, the bm has the say, makes the rules and awards the stakes, so any Bounty you join, read the rules and stick with it

No one is forcing anyone to join a particular bounty campaign I guess, if that's it then it's left for any bounty hunter to choose if the rules are good enough for them or not, it's not by force to join promotions, take your leave or stay and abide by the rules

Yelp definitely this BM knows how to weed out spammers and burst posting in his campaign, it is very rare to see such rules especially in a ats campaign, such rules are usually applied to btc paying campaign because quality post is a major emphasis, but seeing this in an alts campaign only tells me that this BM sure knows how to run a campaign, he cares more about quality than quantity which is very good in a way.

This shows that the bounty manager is a professional BM who takes no nonsense from any spammers, this move will definitely work on spammers who goes around posting too many posts In a single day, another bounty manager who is as capable as this is julerz12

Rules as rules. Many bounty managers have their own vision of running a bounty campaign. And the hunters need to read the rules more carefully before entering the signature campaign, and then everything will be OK.

Although it is the right of the project teama and bounty manager to devise rules for each camapign but they need to be very careful because there is a very fine line where a hunter will accept or decline such a campaign so it can be counter productive resulting in low number of participants but yes in the end it is their project and campaign so upto them how to manage it.

If you as a participant don't like any rule for a certain bounty campaign then you are very much free to exit the campaign without any query. The bounty campaign managers understand the problems on this forum and apply such rules as not to get burst posting is fine. I have been here on this forum and not all signature campaign I do participate in because of their various rules. The forum is now standing against those who are found with burst posting and someone start complaining, this is not right.

This is a fresh rules for Signature Bounty Campaign, I haven't seen such before but it's definitely better because this will make people to post high quality posts which is better, I know not everyone will agree but that's probably what the bounty manager wants, to see only less participants on his spreadsheet maybe, either you will join or not that's left for you to decide

Define burst posting. According to this campaign every poster who does more than 1 post in 4 hours is burst posting. I feel like this requirement was added on purpose to reject almost all candidates from the start.

They can have any requirements they want but we can criticize it. A 4 hour gap between posts is far too long and the reward is extremely low. It doesn't look like it's worth the wffort they require.

Too strict for my liking, the gap between post is too long and some approved bounty hunters are getting rejected because of this rules, assuming I joined this signature campaign and I made a post so I can't make another post until 4hours later? What if I have other reasons to reply to a topic on the forum?

The rules should be that posts made after 4 hours only will be counted by BM, bounties is not the only reason why people posts on this forum

As a manager then you do have all the rights to alter out on what should campaign rules do had and its up to you if you do make that 4 hour posting gap thats why as you
applied into this campaign then you are basically agreeing into the terms which should be followed.Each manager do had its own jurisdiction and if you dont like its rule
then you are free to find another one and with this kind set of rules i can say that this one does really fight off some spam but it will still vary if those post created
on 4 hour gaps will be relevant or would still be a spam.

I spend most of my time online so I'm fine with the 4hours gap per post from this bounty campaign but not all members on here works online, some hardly spend hours online per day, these are the type of people that won't accept this rules, it's nothing to fight over, it's better to find what suits you

Correct!

They can set all the rules that they do like and if you dont like it then better leave and dont make any complaints since this is the way
they do handle out on the campaign that they are managing.

Post should really be scattered out on the entire week rather than completing it in a matter of few days which should really be done by most campaigners.

If 90% of applicants were rejected then its up to his own standards that havent been met.

To be honest I would agree. It does seem a lot to ask for from posters. A 1hour posting gap is good in my opinion but a 4hour gap means that they would have to wake up in the middle of the night to make a post before posting in the morning.

Again there was a scam accusation against the project posted by another user here against this project. I would suggest bounty hunters to be careful again. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5260728.msg54752751#msg54752751

Why? Make one post in the morning, during lunchtime or when drinking morning coffee. Make second post in the evening or when you about to leave work. Repeat this 5 working days and your weekly task is complete. Make one extra post during weekend, just to be sure if one of your posts gets deleted, you will still meet minimum required.

This post is actually unnecessary because that's the style of management the manager's want to adopt to reduce spam even though it's 10 posts per week. Now, it's seems this post made the BM reduce the posting gap to 1 hour which in my opinion would turn to spam if the minimum post requirement is alot. The better word I would have used was "do not make all ten posts in a day".
It's not bad if a participants makes 30 posts even if 10 is required but making all the minimum in a day and no post afterward should be a disqualification.

Its just actually a matter of time management and having 5 post per day with 4 hours gap isnt really that hard to do.Its not really necessary to be exact on 4 hours but you can do it even less.
Just be sure you are still in line of campaign rules to make it sure that it would really be counted and if manager is really that too strict on implementing rules then you should follow that 4 hour thing.
1 post per 4 hours wont really cost that much effort.This isnt something that someone can be shooked of because managers can make their own style on handling out their campaign.

I don't think that the idea of 4hrs posting gap is too much, it's good because it will curtail spammers from posting within a short time frame, if anyone is not happy about their rules then you join the campaign that suites you, I think this new rule is a welcome idea, the bounty manager knew what's happening before introducing such rule

They don't have to wake up in the middle of the night. They would simply not be paid for most of their posts. It's a good way to make users earn money for only 2 posts a day because that's what it would come down to in the end.

A campaign member would post for about 4-6 hours and produce maybe 10 good posts in that time maybe more but he'd be only paid for 2 making it cheap for the manager.

A lot of people had made complain on the rule for the bounty even in the telegram page, some of the complain led to the change of duration from 12 hours to 4 hour. I feel the 4 hrs difference is very good compare to previous, the campaign have very few signature participant and they seem satisfied. Spam post in this period does not deprive in any form

Three posts a day imo is still possible, I guess it just depends on how frequent you can browse the forum but anyway if you check the replies above the gap was reduced once again by the manager. And if they fail to meet the requirements they still receive a portion of the said reward so overall the campaign rule for posting gap is less punishing.

If the rule is stated at the beginning of the bounty I see no problem, it is the same as kyc, it is each hunter own right to join or not... and the same applies to the manager, they are within their own right to impose the rules they think are best fit for their campaign...
I would not subscribe a bounty like that because it seriously limit one's freedom... I agree that there should be rules in place to avoid brust spamming, but limiting the number os counted posts per day is enough, I think

Exactly, trying to keep a healthy post among participants is necessary but it is equally important not to over stretch it,  maybe this method will prevent spam posters not to find the campaign interesting enough to join, 4 hours in between post is a bit much imo, it will seem the participants will have to come back every 4hrs to make a post.

It is actually not a precise method to prevent spam because it all varies on the content on such post.Even i myself do make out post  that had interval of 1 minute but doesnt

mean that im already spamming out.As long your post are on point and relevant then theres no problem with that. Durations are just having that kind of misconception that it do tags out most of the time
to be part of spam activity but in general sense it doesnt really matter much but since this rules had been set out by the manager then theres nothing you can do but to follow or deal with it.


Manager is just too strict to have these set of rules and yes it do remove or limit out someones freedom of posting which i cant really deal of in that case if i were a hunter.

People can make their own choice and as long no one forces you out to join it out then you do have lots of options to take that you do saw that will surely fit you.

I guess bounty managers wants a good quality of campaign and put more work for hunters to produce a good quality post

yeah right, there are many other campaigns with the same rules as usual, and I also do the same as you bro 3 posts every day of the week and well because it seems to me that the singnature campaign is just a side now because you already know it is not easy to find projects being honest now can't be certain, but yes, you have to be more careful not to waste time and not to be careless, right.

I don't think maintaining 4 hours gap between each posts doesn't reproduce good quality posts. ::)

Manager have to check the bounty participants post history and accepting will be more effective than any other type of campaign in bounties but unfortunately bounty team doesn't want that type of selection.

as I thought it might not be easy to make quality posts, but if we follow the rules stated in the BTT and in the project, I am very confident that it will be accepted by the manager, of course it cannot be haphazard or careless in posting enough to understand the topic of discussion and give each of our responses, although there are mistakes I'm sure the masters here will tell our mistakes to make it more valid.

Do you think it is possible for anyone to spend 4 hours for a post who have a real job, I don't see anywhere in bitcointalk rules about post gaps all we need to do is to make posts which gives some value to the discussion which may not take longer than 30 minutes no matter how much good quality posts we are going to make.

yeah right also because everyone has a real job and also different, and also maybe I started to understand what you explained so more or less the point is we only reinforce what we know to give value to a post so that those who don't understand understand know about that, so thank you bro

^Surely you can make quality posts when you takes time to read the discussions not OP or title alone,I believe these kind of strategy used by the campaign manager to stop burst posting from hunters and also they want to stay away from the name with the long time gap between each posts.

You can even post on 1 minute gap depending on how fast you do type on said conversation or discussion among other users on this forum. Post relevance doesnt really count or matter much on how long or short the post was made or having that timeframe on when you should post. 4 hours gap is really strict as a rule because not all would really have the time for them to wait up for such duration
but talking about convenience then having this one isnt a bad idea and as other guys been saying above that if you dont agree with the terms then you can simply skip and find for another one
which where you do see the rules are just fine for you to join.

I think that is true, too, so when working everyone usually only focuses on their work and forgets about this 4 hour gap, but sometimes the network connection is also necessary, right? being discussed because maybe sometimes forget