Bitcoin Forum

What makes a bounty manager better? It's not about the success of the projects they introduce, it's about

1. How the handle the campaign
2. It's about fulfilling what was promised to bounty hunters
3. It's about fighting the fair fights for bounty hunters

The success of a bounty project is not in the hand of a bounty manager, the ball is in your courts, you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Always remember this.

It doesn't make sense to blame bounty managers for the failure of a project, it's on the team, the only bounty managers worth putting blame on is bounty managers like kakatua, anyone remember this guy? He is not just a bad bounty manager but a cheater too

Although it could be a factor how the manager chooses the project he'll work for but, it's a true thing that the hands go to the bounty hunters. They're all responsible for choosing the bounty which they think is fair and promising. And that's possible through setting some factors from your own view. The bounty manager's job is to manage the bounty but success actually depends on the developers and how responsible they are for the project.

Correct, some people are blaming bounty detective for kingcasino failure when the red flag was detected by some members on here and still so many bounty hunters keep promoting the project, who is to be blame? This ain't on bounty detective team

KCT is not totally failed project as it has been doing refund to the investors, the team itself has already stated if the ico has already cancelled caused by the team didn't meet the softcap but the hunters were given a very non sense response for that by spreading it's an exit scam.

Are you sure about this? because I read somewhere on this forum where someone shared a screenshot about the real culprits behind Kingcasino saying their farewell messages about how they successfully scam investors

To avoid all this not getting paid issue you need a depending bounty manager like bubbalex, projects from this guy can turn garbage but not getting paid? I have friends who introduced me into bounty hunting and I've been hearing bubbalex name before entering this forum, projects from him always fulfill their promises

I don't think the project failed because of the bounty hunters.  I have been doing my job very well, I often create the best articles and sometimes participate in telegram groups to promote my project.  I have tried hard in project marketing but still a lot of projects are failures and scams.  The important thing is whether the project has a good idea or not, whether or not they take good care of their project.  The majority of failed projects will often not create a thriving community, they just wait for investor money and do nothing.  The problem is still with the project team.

no, what makes a famous bounty manager a successful project, look at what happened when the Bounty Detective was attacked by FUD by the bounty hunter community, because the project they handled was recently hit by a Scam, so project success was number 1 for become famous bounty manager  ;D

Yes, indeed campaign participants also have the responsibility to make the project a success. This means they must continue to promote the project.
The manager also has the responsibility, that after completing the current campaign they are required to complete the wages they promised to the campaign. Because the bounty participant did not make an agreement with the project team, but the bounty participant made an agreement with the manager. And this agreement was not born from the participants, but was born from the bounty manager.
Bounty.
Reward.
Wage.
Which is the exact third of these words?

Bounty Manager can easily lose trust and reputation if the project he or she manages failed to pay after bounty campaign ends, bounty managers should be able to make projects pay up what they owe bounty hunters and that's why we have bounty managers

So you expect it was bounty hunters's fault if somehow, a bounty projects fail? Not because of bounty manager in their way handle how bounty projects roll out of even the quality of projects itself? Sorry, I've to disagree with you.

the risk is clear as a bounty hunter must accept if the project fails and has no value, I have participated in Kingcasino and the project failed? Do I blame the bounty manager? Of course it's stupid  :), the risk is always risk

True, bounty managers have different set of skills and some are better than the other, some who cares about reputations will learn from their mistakes and those who cares about how much they make won't give a fuck, it's always bounty hunters responsibility to pick projects accordingly to their tastes..

Bounty managers responsibility is to make sure that all bounty hunters received their tokens as registered on spreadsheet after bounty ends but sometimes team handled the distribution themselves but still bounty manay must stand up if team plan to do any injustice

Yes it's all on the choices that bounty hunters made, there are many reasons why a new project can fail and bounty managers aren't great seer or future readers to know what will happen to any project tomorrow, it's part of the risk a bounty hunter must always consider

Okey let me put it this way for more clarification,  the success of a bounty campaign and the success of a project are different, the former depend largely on the bounty manager because when you have an unexperience or lazy bm to handle a campaign, their attitude can ruin that campaign even if the project itself where to be successful, there are some few cases where as a result of the bm misconduct ruin the bounty to some extent,

While on the other hand, the success of the project itself depends largely on the team, this has nothing to do with the bm, only the team are responsible for the outcome of the project, so both need to be successful to have a completely successful campaign.

The first priority here is the project turning successful either by raising the hardcap fund or using top exchanges to raise funds successfully, even if the bounty manager is very good at his job but project failed to raise fund it won't mean anything, it's all still zero

Its always about our own choice there are so many project that is runing now on crypto and as a bounty hunter we need to choose tbe good project to avoid wasting of time, because there are so many scam project that also run in crypto and if we choose the wrong project maybe we cannot earn. The bounty manager is liable by our choice they only play or work thier part so choose wisely.

You have stated it just as it is, no matter the reviews everywhere on the forum or the red flags of the project's, it is your call to decide if you will join a Bounty or not, you decide if to trade or not, you decide for yourself.

It is always your call, your choice

I think bringing in good projects is part of what makes a bounty manager a better one, many bounty managers have lose their reputations because they kept bringing bad projects that failed too many times, once this happens you will see people avoiding their Campaigns

Are you not aware when writing this. The success of a project is very dependent on the project manager. In fact, many projects managed by trusted managers are successful, see project history starting in 2017, and compare with now.
In the past the project was not managed by just anyone, and now everyone manages the project, even relying on newbie accounts to manage the project, and there is no community manager.
The newbie account does not have the slightest risk if the project fails, even the project is his own, just create a website with wordpress and promote it in this forum. Is this what is called a project? How it works. Everyone has responsibilities, managers have a big responsibility for the projects they manage. Do not just manage, the ending, scams.

The only power that bounty managers can build for themselves is using escrow, getting control over bounty rewards is the perfect tool for bounty managers and presently only bounty detective team are using escrow that's why they guarantee bounty payments

You should not blame the Bounty manager for all mortal sins, he is not guilty of the failure of the project. Only the team is responsible for the project itself and its development. The manager is responsible for promoting it. His honesty and responsibility to bounty hunters are worth a lot.

I agree that projects fail is not the fault bounty manager, but we ourselves as bounty hunters who must be more careful in choosing projects.
But bounty managers have an obligation to fight for bounty hunters rights, because the only link between bounty hunters and the developer
team projects is a bounty manager. If in the end the project fails, and the price of tokens dump after distribution to bounty hunters indeed
not the fault of the bounty manager.

There are times that a project might look very promising, but the outcome of the bounty might be very bad. Bounty managers are meant to fight the course of the bounty hunters.
If the team of a project decides not to pay or delay payment for no reason, some bounty managers keep mute and allow the team to have their way. Meanwhile, we have seen bounty managers that fought the course of their hunters till the end and always giving updates on the progress of things. I have been privileged to witness these two sides.

Can you specify the how the success of a project depends on the bm? How is it the responsibility of the bm if the project succeed or not! Other than managing the campaign by keeping records of all participants and their activities during the bounty campaign and handing over the comprehensive list of participants to the team what else you think the bm will do make a project a success! I can disagree on this because the power of a bm ended in the campaign and there is nothing more he would do.

That only scratches the surface of the matter. It was our call, our choice but when team or bounty manager start to take abruptly turn and try to scam others. Don't talk about red flags when someone decides to f other because they can and there is nothing help you to foresee it. No, sometimes it wasn't because of our wrong call.

Does it really matter for the manager if the project succeeds or not? He will get paid anyway and most managers get much better deals than the people they later hire for the campaign.

Usuallyt if someone gets the short straw it's the member of the campaign. The manager will get on top anyway, regardless of what you do.

yes I also know about every consequence of joining a bounty project, I mean the risk is in ourselves because we choose the project, join in it, and not the fault of the project manager itself. but the problem is that all of us or even project managers will not know that the projects they manage can actually end in fraud or succeed in the market.

true sometimes as good as any bounty. if we are unlucky all are in the project itself because they are distributing rewards to bounty participants and if they are fair they will certainly distribute 100% of the promised allocations but if not I think they will cut back or maybe refuse to pay bounty rewards.

Very few bounty managers think of their participants. Yahoo62278, Hhampuz. julerz12 used to make agreement to make sure that hunters will get the payment. All the campaign manager should follow the above mamagers and not allow scam project or shit project to evaluate.

Something as important is to always have credible project but If you are not sure they could always deliver, bounty manager could request for bitcoin or ethereum as payment. It wont be good if a manager has 40% or more of scam in his record. They should spend as more time doing research on project also reduce the number of bounty at a time. Bounty detective does too many projects at a time even when there are few IEO or ICO in the space.

Well you're right about your points but managing a good project is one of the factor to say the manager is trusted because its part of his job to only manage a not scam campaign, its just a plus point. I know thats its hard to determine if the project is good or not and its bounty hunters job to conduct their own research to know how good the project is but other hunters are also relying to the manager itself for being reputable so they will join because the manager is popular here.

If a project fails it is not the fault of a bounty manager but if you are planning to market a project then you should understand what they are trying to develop and whether the team members are genuine and they have the knowledge to make things work rather than the aim of just making money in the name of projects. We have seen managers who scam investors by providing false information about the amount of money collected in the name of marketing.

Even how that project going to be successful, we don't know how long the community survives. Same with the popular coins during 2017-2018, some of them got zero value all over after bearish market resulted to huge market downfalls. Bounty managers has nothing to do with it, they're only working in the beginning but has no contribution after project launch.

Humans love to blame others but themselves. I have seen people blame bounty managers for things the bounty manager had no power over, then I think, ‘'Do these bounty hunters know that the bounty managers are not part of the project team?’' Yes, good bounty managers make research to try and promote potential projects. But then again, it’s up to bounty bunter to do their own research too.

That was sincerely agreeable and I think this will end up the issue roaming around about some people blaming bounty managers whenever a campaign fails. The job the bounty manager accepted is to maintain the organization of the whole promotion process. The fate of the campaign relies on the team behind the project and the effort of the participants to promote the project which can lead it to the success.

It is indeed that bounty managers have a very good reputation that becomes one of the factor why people choose to get into that project but they have no control on what will be the outcome of the project. Also, at the first place, no one forces you to join the project he manages and it is also your job as a participant to check the background of the project. Your own choice and your own will brought you into joining the project so no one must be blamed especially the bounty managers who were just working on the task given to them and the reason why they are getting paid off.

I believe everyone has a part to play, the bounty manager did his by vetting the project well enough to manage their campaign, it is also hunter's job to which whether to promote the project. Just like you said, the manager can however come in handy by ensuring both the hunters and the team delivers their end of the bargain because is the one that stands as a mediator between the hunters and the project team.

Only useless brains will be think that (MB's fault). If i'm not wrong then every bounty manager disclaimed their self that "they are not part of that specific bounty projects (depends). They are just running that project as a bounty manager. It's hunters own risk to join any bounty projects (about success and payments)." So their is no point to drag them for payment or success that project. You can not earn huge amount money from a single bounty project and not even every projects will be success that you promoted. It's the reality at this moment so it's better be deal with it.

that's true and there were some trusted managers were getting fooled by the scam projects and this is not the fault that has already made by the managers. He must try to think if everything is not controlled by the manager. The manager is only doing what already ordered by the team beside try to DYOR before managing the project.

I think a trusted bounty manager can be seen now from how they do their work and the more bounties handled by them are enough to show that they have a very good trust and become a trusted bounty manager such as a detective bounty manager.

If you don't get paid or your payment is incomplete then you can blame bounty hunters for that but if a project failed and not succeed that's not bounty managers fault because team are the one in charge of their projects, getting paid is why we have bounty managers

I won't even blame the bounty hunters who kept promoting king casino project after it's been called scam in scam accusation section on the forum because HEX was called scam too and they launch bounty campaign this year, so left after the rumour and those who don't are very lucky because HEX shoot for the moon after few weeks

The success of the project is in the hands of their project CEO who makes the project run smoothly or not. it is true that this is our choice to follow it or not, because with a large nominal lot of interests that we follow and do not match our expectations.
Also wrong if we are angry at the bounty manager because they feel in vain to follow their campaign. so go back to our choices. DYOR

the task of the gift manager is to manage the project in their own way, but the high and low success of the gifts they manage increases the reputation for themselves.

Each has its own responsibilities, both from the manager can present potential projects so that bounty hunters can be comfortable working because they do not promote projects that can end up being fraudulent, of course this will be of added value to the future if they succeed in promoting potential projects namely a good trust in this forum. Whereas for the crew they are responsible for doing the work given by the manager according to the provisions given and providing maximum quality and not cheating.

when participating in a bounty campaign I feel free to want from any rank it's just that for a minimum signature campaign now it must be Jr. Member, if it has a very small ranking then you should participate in all bounty campaigns such as social media, Content / Blog / Youtube Campaign and others, so there is no need to use a signature campaign.

So it's not the same between campaigns and products. in the market for example:
a promotion manager manages to promote his goods until it is very in demand in the market = then the manager manages to do his job.
but after the item is received many customers protest and are not happy with the product = the product fails.
so even though BM is already well-known, reliable, and experienced, but if it turns out the product (Coin / Token) is a scam then the BM error is not 100% but half. because he is also responsible for his decision which for what reason he wants to become the project campaign team .... I'm afraid they will work together. may be

At the end of the day, bounty managers are only there to manage the bounty campaign. To aid in the marketing of the project and promote it in crypto space. What happens to the development of the project is more on the admin team running it. To think of it bounty managers are like bounty participants to, only that they more control of the bounty campaign.

Yes. I have witnessed several projects that became successful during those years and many started to die during 2018. It's the job of the developers how they will maintain their community and how they will make the project active. I've said the job of bounty managers, they're all for the bounty but regards to the whole project concept, they have no contribution to it.

that's right because the gift manager has tried his best to manage the project if later the project turned out to be a scam, then it wasn't the fault of the bounty manager.

I can say that I have always performed tasks correctly in projects. And many projects simply did not fulfill their obligations. And after the end of the project, I always waited for me to receive my rewards. But always, as a result, the rules change and I simply did not receive payments. And now it is very difficult to understand the project, because you can do the work again and get nothing for it. I wanted all future projects to faithfully fulfill their duties and be honest with bounty hunters.

so actually here is about the attitude of the manager with the project being promoted, as well as the response to participation that joins, because the failure or success of the project is not too dependent on the manager, more precisely the manager who behaves well will get a good response from the participants.
all that remains is to select the project to be promoted.

Well said! for every successful bounty, all the credit goes to the community team which is work behind the project and helps to implement the project among all the community which is working in the cryptocurrency field. But after all the hard work innocent communities get nothing as a reward.

agree its not totally their fault, but atleast they must do best effort to analize and filtered which campaign that launched by real project and which campaign that come from fake dev team. bounty manager take important role with their campaign, if they just take all campaign without any criteria that must fullfilled i am sure we will easily trapped in fake campaign.

According to me, a good bounty manager is who verify projects before accepting the proposal. Bounty manager has to deliver those promises which are made before starting the campaign. Also, the bounty manager has to solve the issues regarding Hunter's problem. Most importantly BM has to deliver distribution on the given date. All these things matter most to become a good bounty manger. 

Sometimes the project team determines what will happen. Even though the bounty manager wants the best for the hunters, if you dosent want to pay then that's the end. But also some Bounty manager won't play their role well to make sure the hunters get paid. If a project is good and the Bounty Manager is also good. Then it's a win-win for everyone.

Most of the time I guess, as they are the one who can really control after promoting the project.


Precisely, if developers won't pay BM can't do nothing for the hunters.


BM who are not concerned about anything, just trying to get some bucks from their works and nothing else for the hunters.


Exactly. if both are good then a good sign for every bounty hunters to expect great outcomes.

if you ask about the reputation of the project manager, then the step to do is always be on time in delivering what you promised, always answer if someone asks something.
then be honest and firm in making decisions. I believe managers who have the above criteria will be popular and well known to others.

Wrong.

Bounty managers are just supposed to look out if the hunters are doing their jobs.
But when it comes to the payment that will happen then he cannot handle that anymore.
It will still depend on the owner of the campaign.

They are also just also employees of the company. They don't handle the financial method of them.

I agree that we should not blame the bounty managers for the failures of the project since they're only also an appointee and paid to guide and manage the campaign. But there's also a bounty manager that are abusing their power to compromise staking of the bounty hunters or something they're making a multiple accounts for the campaign and the saddest part of that they are the one checking the reports. Absolutely 100% they will give stake to that account fully. That's the two faces of the bounty manager so in the end time it only matters of your choice.

I agree with you... people tend to blame the bounty manager and usually if the project fails they'll be loosing way more than any bounty hunter... they are doing their job which is managing the bounty and the hunters and make the bridge between the project owners and the bounty hunters... if the project fails it makes a lot more sense in blaming the hunters as they are not doing their advertisement job correctly...
The choice of the project is more important than anything these days

Agree, especially at this point "you are responsible for the bounty projects you choose, if they fail it's never bounty managers fault. Because sometimes, i see bounty participants blame bounty manager, you must to remember that manager never force hunters to join with them, all decisions it's from yours, so take responsibility for your choices

But, there are people who are choosing a bounty program is just a because of its managers. I mean they are just leading off the responsibility of finding the right bounty programs into its managers. Because managers are highly reputed people of this forum and when you are following them for working for good projects in the past, then people are usually is aiming like they will choose only right project to work with. This is the reason people are blindly start working into a project which is managed by highly reputed people of this forum.

I agree it is still responsible of bounty hunter and definitely not into the shoulders of managers. But, this can change case to case regardless of reputed manager managing project or not. I have seen even good manager handled project had gone scam after some time of being successful in exchange. So, believing into a project just because it is being manged by highly reputed manager also may lead to disappointment.

I would understand that bounty managers have some sort of responsibility outside of "check work, pay work" type of mundane tasks, of course they have to make sure that everything is going smooth however sometimes it is not in their hands.

Let's take a look at on all three and how it could be above bounty managers issues. First of all knowing how they handle the campaign, well if the team gave the bounty manager position to some newbie that they know from some place or whatever, that person might be horrible yet still be tasked with something they don't know.

Secondly fulfilling the promises, what if the team doesn't pay? Bounty manager can't pay from his own pocket after all? What about the third? You can fight as much as you want but there is a sweet spot of the team not wanting it or they might even fire you and the fact that you might be pushing the team too hard?

I believe every bounty hunters know very much about this except for the newbies. Everyone certainly has some responsibility to own up and the failure of a project shouldn't be blame on the manager unless if the manager is part of the team. Everyone hunter needs to do personal research before joining any campaign and also have it at the back of his/her mind that not all projects will pay up

I totally agree with you on that.It is all about our individual choices that determine how far we can enjoy the benefit embedded in crypto.A lot of good opportunities are very much available in crypto so how much of the opportunities we enjoy we depend on far we can get into some good projects and they take advantage of them. Also, ones ability to hold some rewardable coins for long will also determine later the regards and benefit that one stands to enjoy.Hence ,everyone has a choice to make as pertaing to which area to divert much investment into. So, everyone has got a choice to make.

If the bounty hunter is really smart, he will just follow all the reputable BMs here handling bitcoin paying campaigns. Because most projects in bounties section paying their respective tokens or coins have no assurance of getting paid on time and if they will ever reach in exchanges. So whatever you choose as a hunter has nothing to do with the BM. They can only do so much to protect their participants but the last call is still on the project team.

Honestly, I do like this statement. Some hunters just do any Bounty that comes their way, without even looking deep into the project before doing the Bounty. Some won't read disclaimers, but yet blame managers at the end. However, a good Manager also need to be selective in the bounties they choose to manage, and also try to escrow funds to ensure hunters get rewarded.

Some of these trusted bounty managers had made names for themselves that is why hunters are always participating in their campaigns there is an assurance that they will get paid at the end of the project thus another reason for newbies to make a thorough research in choosing the right bounty rather than choosing any campaign without assurance of payment.

The first point is one of my important reasons for joining a campaign. Communicative, friendly, conscientious and fair bounty managers are my favourite, even though not all of the criteria are in one person or team. We must also pay attention to BM's commitment to select participants, especially since there are many cheaters and spammers today.
The second and third points are equally important, so BMs that use escrow will usually be more trusted. Especially now that there are many dramas related to distribution delays and reduced allocations.
Communication, cooperation, and good planning between the BM and the dev team will definitely result in a structured bounty campaign, all of which will certainly get their respective goals fairly. That's just the name of mutualism symbiosis, don't be like a parasite that only uses others without giving feedback.

By definition a bounty manager's main responsibility is the bounty hunters and how these people work to promote and advertise the project so in some respect I agree that bounty managers are there to mainly fight for the bounty hunters to ensure that their efforts are being paid for.

I do however disagree that they're completely not related to the success of the project. Instead, I think there's a fine thread, where in some cases the manager can be held responsible if the bounty hunters haven't done a proper job as a direct close supervision failure from the manager itself. The level of responsibility though is and should be set clearly prior to committing to the role - but overall I think there's room of liability for 'some' managers

It will be a great fool to evaluate a campaign manager based on the success of the project he has managed. We know that many campaign managers do not have anything to do with the projects, although rarely some campaign managers are associated with the project. According to my personal opinion, in order for a good campaign manager to do his job correctly, he should constantly check all the participants, be able to identify single people with multiple memberships and continue the campaign he is managing without any problems. In addition, a good campaign manager should treat all members equally and never racist behavior.

All parties involved have some form of responsibility but being self aware and researching properly before taking a decision would surely make your chances of not getting paid lower.
Bounty manager still have a role to play, they are the ones with direct contact with the team and they can better predict the legitimacy of the project. They can ask for an escrow as an insurance. They can let users know about the situation of the project and stop it if they found any red flags on the project.

There is always a choice that you don't have to do anything. Cryptocurrencies are risky, ICOs are extremely risky, so you can't expect that you constantly earn a nice sum of money. :)

Please also note that the project is fully in the hands of the project development team. the task of the manager in this case is to manage the bounties in this forum, such as signatures, twitter and others. the manager introduces and explains in detail, and every question will be answered properly. after that, managing the bounty goes from beginning to end, if it is finished then the manager's task can be considered good. for the final results regarding the price of tokens or distribution of tokens, it becomes the task and part of the development team.

   Timmers I think what you can expect depends on the work you are doing, and your researching! You can earn constantly,
but you need to have skills and patience, and to choose where will you invest carefully, and for whom you will work.
   As in the headline, it's always about your choice, if you are making good choices you will earn all the time, if you have more
bad choices than you need to work and find another approach.

That's why diversification and risk management exists and allows smart investors to risk with a small amount of money, but not all of their money

Bounty Managers that don't value bounty hunters can be a real pain in the ass, they can make the campaign a very frustrating one and unenjoyable for bounty hunters but who cares? It's always about the reward isn't it? Life itself is not a straight forward road, whatever you see as a bounty hunter always know it's about risks

You have found it right but can't just blame BM of what it happens to the campaign because they are also relying on the project developers. However, it is big factor that BM how will run the campaign and how they care for their participants.

We can't deny that even reputed Bounty Managers are carefull in choosing bounty offering but its like to see that they can't make it perfect and all will run smoothly. And that makes them sounded harsh when people put a blame with them because in the first place, they don't want it to happen. It is the project owners who have a huge control.

but before accepting the project, the manager should first research the project that he will promote.
so at least he made an effort to reduce the scam project that was hanging around.
managers will always be indirectly responsible for the failure or success of the project they run.

I agree with that statement. however, all project power lies with the team. Good bounty managers are those who struggle to get their participants paid for it. however, there are currently several bounty managers like that, who struggle to get their participants paid on time and have clear pay time.

the role of the bounty manager is indeed very influential for the bounty hunter, if a manager has handled the project to the maximum but instead ends up with a scam, then that is not his fault, because he is also governed by the ICO / IEO team.

You're very right about your points but I don't totally agree with them.  While a good bounty manager is respected for doing those three points you mentioned, you cannot be saying it is not the responsibility of the BM to bring in good bounties, I don't agree with that point at all.  Fine, it is the responsibility of the hunters or investors to do enough findings before taking step, however, BM that also brings in successful projects are highly respected.  What is the essence of a useless token/coin paid into my wallet.  To me, BMs that manage "LOTS" of unsuccessful projects are neither good nor reliable.

Most of the time, you wouldn't consider #2.
Those types of promises like the distribution of tokens are mostly handled by the devs.
Bounty managers are mostly the ones in charge of their participants weekly post counts/ shares in social media, as well as counting the stakes weekly.
It would be plus of a point for me if they're even validating each participant, in case someone claims to be another account just to get to the highest rank with higher stakes of course.

Success of the bounty isn't fully dependent on the success of the project.
There are some successful scams and tend to disappear in thin air, leaving bounty hunters complaining.

If bounty manager is not in team member of project then it's totally useless to blame bounty manager for project fail. If project fails somehow it's because of team management nothing else. And this is bounty hunters duty to check out how much reliable project they are going to work. I totally agree with OP's point. If you didn't find those point in bounty manager then you should be careful from that manager. A good quality bounty manager always make right decision and stand their word no matter which kinda problem he/she facing.

Sometimes its not entirely the fault of those campaign managers no matter how you see it, but like you mentioned some don't value hunters, and are just interested in their pay from the team. I stopped doing bounties for a campaign manager (name withheld) who never escrow funds, always allows hunters to be at the mercy of the project's team after campaign no matter how people complain in the Bounty group. We just need to analyze properly before joining any campaign.

I think that bounty managers can not influence the time of payment. it's all about the team. no matter how good the manager is, he will not be able to make the team pay if the team does not want to do it

The responsible BM will definitely consider it well before choosing to work with the project. There are a number of bounty managers who prefer hiatus because there are no promising projects on offer. That's better, if the project he handled was problematic, it would definitely affect his reputation.
Well, the bounty manager (who is not part of the internal team) only manages the bounty, all technical matters and the final decision are based on the agreement of the devil. We as bounty hunters must also understand the position of BM, understand all the risks we have to face, be patient and be ready to get the worst possible. There is always a choice not to choose, so if you are in doubt then don't join, it's a simple choice.

Agree with all of these, as long as the bounty manager is professional, then things would work professionally regardless of the result of the project being promoted.



There are a lot of things to consider, first we need to consider the bounty manager as they are the bridge to us to the team, without them, there will be no bounty, so choosing a reputable one would really help. Some bounty hunters are just lazy, they just look who will manage and they just joined blindly or maybe they have already a full trust to the bounty manager as the reputation says a lot already about the work, but then, it still does not guarantee a success, so we need to accept if the project will fail and we would not get anything for our effort.

As long as you were choosing the right project and then you can even earn a lot of bucks instantly. In fact, this has already proven by so many people who have already invested through use the good platform like IEO platform that launched by the binance exchange site.

Success of the project comes to those who have good working team between the bounty manager and the bounty hunters. It's not only the bounty manager that is responsible for the outcome of the project but it also depends more on how the bounty hunters promote the project. So if the project also fails, bounty managers and its participating team are also reliable for it.

Shit campaign and projects are inevitable because even campaign manager is trusted, there is still a high chance that the project is shit and most likely a scam. I do not participate anymore in bounties because for me it is now a waste of time and effort. I allocate now most of time in trading because for me there are more opportunities on it. For those bounty hunters out there, be sure that you will pick bounties wisely because there are some that are scam so always caveat!

I couldn't participate in the running "Bubbalex" campaign. Bounty hunters are getting paid as Bubbalex promised to hunters. If bounty hunters want to, they can do it easily. By escrow or taking early payment, bounty managers can keep their promises. Only for a few bounty hunters, one project can't die or fail. Bounty hunters help with promoting, development team work is different.

yes for some reason you are right if the project that was followed failed it is definitely a mistake of choice and the lack of information obtained on yourself, but it's not like it's easy to choose it doesn't matter if it hasn't been long after following, but if you know that the project is not as predicted in some time we can leave the project and look for another but when the project is almost complete can only follow until it is finished no matter the project will fail because it is already over,

Don't you see that there are currently many successful projects in the hands of trusted bounty managers. If indeed BM's role is very small for the success of the project, why should the team pay BM to promote their project? Why didn't the team directly promote the project itself thereby saving their pockets? At a minimum, after the project is successful and the allocation token for the bounty participant is handed over to the BM, the BM does not disappear.

Lol bounty hunters has no power over the payments, they can demand but still it is the managers to push but the team/owner will decide .

payments even made sometimes with their shitcoins that will never enter exchange after the payments,

One of the risk of being a bounty hunter is that you wouldnt know if those coins you had gained through bounty would ever had the chance for it to hit on exchangers which simply means that you cant still be sure

that you had successfully able to make profits even though the said project had paid you out some coins.Everything will still vary on the potential or with the end game of such coin whether it do get some value

or would just simply add up on the pile of shit coins in the market which had been always the usual case for all bounty hunters and its part of the risk.

1. Its always been a good thing on how they would handle the campaign well.
2. Not that really an accurate thing because in terms of pay which the project owners would be still in decision.
3. Fight is a good initiative but everything will still vary on teams decision.Manager cant do anything if they wont be paying up.

Don't rely that much but its good that you would be sticking into those managers which are known and good on handling out the community
in terms of bounties.

Bounty managers are the trusted face of a project marketing its token for public attention. That's why hunters are often disappointed if the project refuses to pay and they end up blaming the manager for managing such a dishonest project.

I believe empathy, communication, on-time processing of work submissions are also part of what makes a great bounty manager. I have participated in bounties in which the manager has disappeared from the group almost 3 months ago leaving everyone in limbo despite claims he's doing fine.

Actually in some other points you are right, but I think at this point of time here happening in the ecosystem of Cryptocurrency the majority of the managers don't care about the feelings of the bounty hunters. They always skip every time there is problem happen in the projects in which they managed. I repeat not all BM is like that there are some that's what I am trying to emphasize here.