|
Title: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Gollom resurrected on July 18, 2020, 06:48:09 PM A friendly great to all
When I researched the numberous usernames of Patrick John Ennis aka Sollog aka Sol Adoni today, I found a sensitive list of bitcointalk users on the internet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview) So go there right now and find out if your usernames are on the published list. For any case I secured this document, you should do also. To the admin Cyrus: Don't delete my postings... I wasn't finish with this Ennis. And you're wrong, his last acitivity here wasn't in 2014 but in 2018. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704320.40 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704320.40) Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: logfiles on July 18, 2020, 07:41:57 PM Sensitive?
It's a bounty response spreadsheet... what is sensitive about it? I mean the bounty hunters were not forced to fill the Google response form on gun point. They did it willingly. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: LFC_Bitcoin on July 18, 2020, 07:46:22 PM Sensitive? It's a bounty response spreadsheet... what is sensitive about it? I mean the bounty hunters were not forced to fill the Google response form on gun point. They did it willingly. Largely full of shit posters too who mostly don’t have a pot to piss in any way. Nothing to see here. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: actmyname on July 18, 2020, 08:41:39 PM Largely full of shit posters too who mostly don’t have a pot to piss in any way. Nothing to see here. Let's not forget about those fallen bounty warriors that had to give up their KYC just so they could claim their $5 worth of shit tokens when they spent months advertising for a scam that the owners were going to dump as soon as they hit the exchanges.Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Gollom resurrected on July 18, 2020, 08:46:38 PM Ok, if you think the free availability of data would not be a problem, then people should know where to look. Here is another list with over
13000 bitcointalker users from 2019. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YfMiqd37buZfMnQgtBtHakYyVc0mawpt6Ldo93mVvaA/htmlview We will see what reactions that will cause. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Twentyonepaylots on July 18, 2020, 08:55:14 PM Sensitive? Sensitive? (2)It's a bounty response spreadsheet... what is sensitive about it? I mean the bounty hunters were not forced to fill the Google response form on gun point. They did it willingly. Basically a compilation of spreadsheet on every bounty, what's so sensitive about it? Can't even use to get into someone's dm in telegram. But the fact that someone is collecting it up is against the will of a bounty hunter, they don't fill those bounty forms just to be included in here, this is what I find wrong about the sheet. Nonetheless, I can't see anything more here, nothing to worry about 8)Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Gollom resurrected on July 18, 2020, 08:58:32 PM But the fact that someone is collecting it up is against the will of a bounty hunter
Exactly... Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Pffrt on July 18, 2020, 09:06:19 PM But the fact that someone is collecting it up is against the will of a bounty hunter Collecting what? Their KYC data? Most of the bounty hunters don't give any importance to their identity. So, they never bother to share their documents. However, what's the security risk with KYC related to bitcointalk account?Exactly... Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: actmyname on July 18, 2020, 09:07:03 PM But the fact that someone is collecting it up is against the will of a bounty hunter Most of these are for report services in a bounty. I suppose you could say something to the tune of, "poor bounty hunters," but really this is not unexpected. Many signature campaign spreadsheets are open to the public and users can easily harvest the links between users and their addresses, along with whatever additional details they provide for the spreadsheet. If you really have a problem with this, perhaps you want to start a revolution in the Bounties section... then again, staying away from that fetid mess is your best call.Exactly... Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: electronicash on July 18, 2020, 09:36:19 PM those are garbage information in there. so what if they know about their telegram account? these data are available in every bounty threads in the forum. he can collect it for whatever he wanna use it. there is no sensitive information to that file. they could even be fake data. cheaters had been submitting someone else telegram. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: actmyname on July 18, 2020, 09:41:47 PM The Bitcoin currency will be history in a short time. Another unexpected global factor like Corona What is going on? Has it turned into a shitpost now, or are you reading into things way more deeply than needed? No problem with altcoins, but the bounty section is absolutely terrible and plagued with scams and spam. Do you disagree?will finish it off. So what? I sold my Bitcoins before.... All the useless reports, authentication posts, and other egregious uses of bandwidth... :/ Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Gollom resurrected on July 18, 2020, 09:46:16 PM 1. If you guys read the headline of this thread, then you would also see the question mark behind!
2. Quote they could even be fake data. cheaters had been submitting someone else telegram. So just open one of the provided documents and click "Forum Profile ID". Yeah, I love fast acting people... Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: philipma1957 on July 18, 2020, 11:28:52 PM Quote ...then again, staying away from that fetid mess is your best call. The Bitcoin currency will be history in a short time. Another unexpected global factor like Corona will finish it off. So what? I sold my Bitcoins before.... I smell a troll. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Little Mouse on July 19, 2020, 03:55:13 AM 1. If you guys read the headline of this thread, then you would also see the question mark behind! Did you mean people are using fake data like fake bitcointalk profile? It is not a new issue. Most of the telegram campaign and airdrop campaigns are full of such scammers. 2. Quote they could even be fake data. cheaters had been submitting someone else telegram. So just open one of the provided documents and click "Forum Profile ID". Yeah, I love fast acting people... I smell a troll. Seems like.Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: PrimeNumber7 on July 19, 2020, 05:27:37 AM Most likely this spreadsheet is one of two things:
1) A collection of responses that bounty hunters provided in a google forms survey. The title of the document seems to imply this is the case. 2) Someone scraped various google docs sheets that did the above and complied them into a single google docs spreadsheet. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: pooya87 on July 19, 2020, 05:45:34 AM But the fact that someone is collecting it up is against the will of a bounty hunter Exactly... when you sell something then you no longer have any claims to it. that would be like saying the person buying my house is now living in it against my will. when bounty hunters sold their information to obvious scammers to receive a worthless token that was created out of thin air without any cost they should have expected things like this to happen. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: YOSHIE on July 19, 2020, 06:34:09 AM https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview) oh my god, i really don't understand what you mean...!So go there right now and find out if your usernames are on the published list. For any case I secured this document, you should do also. What list...! What case...! What document...! And what does that have to do with us here and the name you mentioned. I don't see the name you mentioned and in the spreadsheet. Too much, you say a pseudonym. Are we here doing something for you, so you told us to go and do it. You're not partying alcohol, are you? Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: cryptoaddictchie on July 19, 2020, 06:54:24 AM Bounty case? Possible scammer? Should be on scam section, wrong section dude.
I feel this thread will be deleted soon. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: LoyceV on July 19, 2020, 07:01:41 AM 13000 bitcointalker users from 2019. You got me!https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YfMiqd37buZfMnQgtBtHakYyVc0mawpt6Ldo93mVvaA/htmlview We will see what reactions that will cause. Code: 2/13/2019 9:15:04 LoyceV @ragz07 0x65841a528F1a6417cb835F9eb19211dd4c0e9dbB What if I told you I have a list of all Bitcointalk users (https://loyce.club/usernames/usernames.txt)? Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: UmerIdrees on July 19, 2020, 08:04:04 AM A friendly great to all When I researched the numberous usernames of Patrick John Ennis aka Sollog aka Sol Adoni today, I found a sensitive list of bitcointalk users on the internet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview) So go there right now and find out if your usernames are on the published list. For any case I secured this document, you should do also. To the admin Cyrus: Don't delete my postings... I wasn't finish with this Ennis. And you're wrong, his last acitivity here wasn't in 2014 but in 2018. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704320.40 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704320.40) I searched the whole list and my name was not found in it. Even if my name was included in it , what harm would i have ? It only contains the telegram name and Eth address. You cannot hack anyone's account by knowing the Etherum or telegram address. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Mrengage on July 19, 2020, 08:01:51 PM A friendly great to all When I researched the numberous usernames of Patrick John Ennis aka Sollog aka Sol Adoni today, I found a sensitive list of bitcointalk users on the internet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview) So go there right now and find out if your usernames are on the published list. For any case I secured this document, you should do also. To the admin Cyrus: Don't delete my postings... I wasn't finish with this Ennis. And you're wrong, his last acitivity here wasn't in 2014 but in 2018. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704320.40 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704320.40) My name it's not in the list and please my apologies look back to your word above I bet you didn't look up your sentence before posting you were to say A friendly greeting to all am I correct? Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: philipma1957 on July 20, 2020, 03:53:18 PM 13000 bitcointalker users from 2019. You got me!https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YfMiqd37buZfMnQgtBtHakYyVc0mawpt6Ldo93mVvaA/htmlview We will see what reactions that will cause. Code: 2/13/2019 9:15:04 LoyceV @ragz07 0x65841a528F1a6417cb835F9eb19211dd4c0e9dbB What if I told you I have a list of all Bitcointalk users (https://loyce.club/usernames/usernames.txt)? that is why i smell a troll. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: hacker1001101001 on July 20, 2020, 04:11:49 PM It only contains the telegram name and Eth address. Even the telegram name and the ETH address are random or fake in the below quoted spreadsheet. I can see my name is included in this spreadsheet, but the ETH address and telegram ID is never seen by me before, I mean it's not mine. The telegram id doesn't exist at all. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview) Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Philipma1957cellphone on July 20, 2020, 06:47:43 PM It only contains the telegram name and Eth address. Even the telegram name and the ETH address are random or fake in the below quoted spreadsheet. I can see my name is included in this spreadsheet, but the ETH address and telegram ID is never seen by me before, I mean it's not mine. The telegram id doesn't exist at all. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview) Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Pmalek on July 20, 2020, 06:59:57 PM Lol, someone used my name to sign up for that Artcoin telegram bounty. It is in the 2nd spreadsheet that OP posted. Some UnoDeiTanti (telegram id) guy. But what is the difference to what you posted and any other campaign that has publicly available spreadsheets?
Here, took me 20 seconds to find. From a random ongoing bounty right now: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1iNKSOVT9-8wvLwOJp9H8NbNqPET5rpRe7ZCyPng6rgg/edit#gid=194578416 Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Murren Cathain on July 20, 2020, 08:46:31 PM It took me 10 sec to get all "docs.google bitcointalk spreadsheets" listed - there're 272! results.
So the first two lists are only the peak of an iceberg. Type in Google search: site:docs.google.com spreadsheet bitcointalk In order to creat more transparency, Bitcointalk should now invastigate that phenomena and publish the results. Control ist better than trust... Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: actmyname on July 20, 2020, 09:02:35 PM In order to creat more transparency, Bitcointalk should now invastigate that phenomena and publish the results. Did you read that these are all from bounty campaigns, where you can probably find most of them in the Bounties (Altcoin) section on-forum? They are publicly available, and the bounty hunters don't give a shit.Hell, they signed up for it! Willingly providing the details to a public spreadsheet. ::) Lol, someone used my name to sign up for that Artcoin telegram bounty. I can see my name is included in this spreadsheet anyone can enter my Bitcointalk username with his Telegram and HardforkEther address to spam bounties. This has been going on for years, all it shows is that bounty spam "managers" don't care. I'm pretty unpopular, then, huh? Out of the cool club :(Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Murren Cathain on July 20, 2020, 09:20:06 PM Quote probably find most of them in the Bounties (Altcoin) section on-forum? Probably?? Then show me where exactly! Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: actmyname on July 20, 2020, 09:52:04 PM Probably?? Then show me where exactly! No need to be pedantic about the word "probably". The intention of its use was to mitigate the severity of the generalization, as I cannot be absolutely certain that these Telegram spreadsheets are exclusively found in the Bounties section. Here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5254541.0) is an example of a bounty thread, and its spreadsheet filled with Telegram names: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MydpoygVAXh6Z3nqUWjKAgnbnlwt_DsvXM9nCBnoupM/edit#gid=0This is just one of many bounties. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Murren Cathain on July 20, 2020, 10:22:09 PM No need to be pedantic about the word "probably". I expected such a childish answer... All 272 bitcointalk spreadsheets from docs.google you can't find on-forum like you claimed. Bitcointalk has definitly to explain the mass publication of these so-called "public spreadsheets" on docs.google. And of course there're ways to abuse them. But because you shit on everything anyway, I'm not going to disclose that. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: pakhitheboss on July 22, 2020, 10:06:55 AM In order to creat more transparency, Bitcointalk should now invastigate that phenomena and publish the results. Did you read that these are all from bounty campaigns, where you can probably find most of them in the Bounties (Altcoin) section on-forum? They are publicly available, and the bounty hunters don't give a shit.Hell, they signed up for it! Willingly providing the details to a public spreadsheet. ::) Lol, someone used my name to sign up for that Artcoin telegram bounty. I can see my name is included in this spreadsheet anyone can enter my Bitcointalk username with his Telegram and HardforkEther address to spam bounties. This has been going on for years, all it shows is that bounty spam "managers" don't care. I'm pretty unpopular, then, huh? Out of the cool club :(It is just a list with ETH address and Telegram username half of it are nonexistent. They were created just for bounty purposes. Bounty hunters are aware that these kind of list are available on public forums therefore they generally create new identity whenever they join a new campaign. I still do not understand how can ETH address and Telegram user name be a security risk? Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Lucius on July 22, 2020, 10:29:15 AM I still do not understand how can ETH address and Telegram user name be a security risk? Coin address can only pose a risk in terms of privacy (if you use same address many times), but Telegram is a very popular place for scammers, and the crypto user base (mostly beginners) is something they will definitely use. I was only once in the signature campaign where Telegram was one of the conditions, and since that information was public, I received quite a number of strange messages. I think there is a risk, but not to the extent that the OP wants to emphasize - and the only way for such information not to be public is to spreadsheets become only for managers eyes, which again did not go well with some campaigns in the past. Maybe only Telegram data should be hidden from the public eye? Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Harlot on July 22, 2020, 02:13:58 PM But the fact that someone is collecting it up is against the will of a bounty hunter Exactly... The spreadsheet file/link is publicly made available for everyone to see at least so I doubt that there is really something to complain about even if you know someone can make a copy of it since it is publicly made available. Plus the information collected from this users aren't really that alarming since there are no real names involved and no personal date given. Someone might have collected a list of bounty hunters in the forum as this might be their way of seeing their target market for an upcoming project. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: philipma1957 on July 22, 2020, 03:10:59 PM anyone can make a list of names from BitcoinTalk
anyone can make a list of eth or ltc or doge or btc addresses or any other address. anyone can deposit 10 usd worth of coin into each and every address on the list. anyone can say I am philipma1957 of BitcoinTalk check me out on this list. anyone can move coin into and out of the address they control and link to my name. or anyone's name from BitcoinTalk they placed on a fake list. Everyone's forum name is already available. On BitcoinTalk.org on https://bpip.org/ It is easy peasy to make a list up and you can even link a different address to each name on the list. You could use the list to cause grief in various ways. below is the most trusted list from BPIP minerjones DT2 1087 Hhampuz DT2 751 OgNasty DT1 738 krogothmanhattan DT1 693 Blazed DT2 570 DarkStar_ DT2 495 BitcoinPenny DT1 453 greenplastic DT2 438 Lesbian Cow DT1 438 owlcatz DT1 426 chronicsky DT2 411 Mitchell DT1 389 wheelz1200 DT2 375 Kryptowerk DT1 358 anonymousminer DT1 350 TECSHARE 346 digicoinuser DT2 340 Lutpin DT2 340 vizique DT1 338 Zepher DT2 320 Lauda DT2 315 satoshi DT2 310 comit DT2 310 bavicrypto DT1 307 dozerz DT2 306 CanaryInTheMine 300 monbux DT2 300 dazedfool DT2 300 bithalo DT2 286 yogg DT1 283 monkeynuts DT2 281 buckrogers DT1 279 TMAN DT2 275 smoothie DT2 270 Vod DT1 270 AT101ET DT2 270 The Pharmacist DT2 269 Agrawas DT2 266 theymos DT1 262 ChiBitCTy DT2 262 LoyceV DT2 261 Stunna DT2 260 Ticked DT2 260 TookDk DT2 250 Rmcdermott927 DT1 248 iluvbitcoins 242 squall1066 DT2 240 philipma1957 DT1 240 zazarb 240 SaltySpitoon DT2 235 SebastianJu DT2 230 hedgy73 230 ezeminer DT2 225 Pistachio 220 ICOEthics DT2 220 bigtimespaghetti DT2 218 Zeroxal 210 cryptoheadd DT2 208 El duderino_ DT1 207 hybridsole DT2 205 hilariousandco DT1 205 devthedev 202 yahoo62278 DT1 202 TheNewAnon135246 DT2 200 CryptoImperator 199 willi9974 DT1 195 frankbitcoin DT2 193 miffman DT2 190 actmyname DT1 190 FiniteByDesign DT2 180 snarlpill 180 shasan DT2 179 DaveF DT1 178 DireWolfM14 DT1 174 Anduck DT2 173 EcuaMobi DT2 170 shorena 168 elianite 163 John (John K.) DT2 160 Fortify 160 Kialara DT2 160 Xprim777 DT2 160 zekoroger 160 Tomatocage 158 Corrosive DT1 156 OneNattyLitecoin DT2 154 tothemoonsands DT2 153 dooglus DT2 150 wttbs DT2 150 Eodguy149 150 qwk DT1 149 mindtrip 148 JanEmil DT2 146 coblee DT2 144 jeremypwr DT2 143 BG4 DT2 141 SFR10 DT1 141 Lincoln6Echo DT2 140 DannyHamilton DT2 140 Carra23 I can pick any ten you want from the list above I can make 10 addresses one for each I can publish a list saying why did these ten trusted members accept 1 ltc or any coin from a known scammer? Meanwhile the addresses are all under my control. And I made them all look bad. BTW this could be done to try to say theymos or myself or anyone is associated to scammers or for that matter to a good project. Think of a project looking for investors with thermos myself loyce listed as participants and being paid coin. You may join it yourself. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Pmalek on July 22, 2020, 03:26:19 PM Probably?? Then show me where exactly! Did you read my previous reply? I posted a spreadsheet from one currently active bounty campaign that shows similar data. Just open the bounty section and check for yourself. You got all kinds of data there. Some campaigns even include email lists, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram profiles, etc. It's got nothing to do with the forum making those available, the bounty managers running those campaigns do so for transparency reasons. Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: DdmrDdmr on July 22, 2020, 04:25:37 PM <...> If there is no non-public displayed information on that list, then it is a non-issue (*). All the information on the list is a simple recompilation of self-declared or impersonated bounty related information, derivable from a compilation of bounty spreadsheets and posts. (*) Further than the fact that some information has been placed on the forum or a spreadsheet willingly, which may become a nuisance at some stage for a few (i.e. someone could see the balance on a given address and decide to try to pester/scam the Telegram profile somehow – that is nothing that can’t be done without the list, simply browsing related information in posts and bounty sheets). Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: actmyname on July 23, 2020, 12:47:17 AM All 272 bitcointalk spreadsheets from docs.google you can't find on-forum like you claimed. What are you saying? I just gave you an example of one. If you seriously expect me to bring about a list of the threads that link to these Google Sheets pages, then we can simply discontinue this discussion. Don't act in bad faith.Bitcointalk has definitly to explain the mass publication of these so-called "public spreadsheets" on docs.google. The explanation is that these are from bounty campaigns and are maintained by bounty campaign managers. Go talk to them about it, not Bitcointalk.And of course there're ways to abuse them. Bounty hunters are aware of that when they sign away their details, or at least they should be.But because you shit on everything anyway, I'm not going to disclose that. Damn, look at the smart boy with his smart knowledge that he won't disclose.Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Mrengage on July 23, 2020, 07:50:26 AM A friendly great to all When I researched the numberous usernames of Patrick John Ennis aka Sollog aka Sol Adoni today, I found a sensitive list of bitcointalk users on the internet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g7hz04V8A0B3kN5GQiWR-uxPkbtUybL2-MyJ7SyvACc/htmlview) So go there right now and find out if your usernames are on the published list. For any case I secured this document, you should do also. To the admin Cyrus: Don't delete my postings... I wasn't finish with this Ennis. And you're wrong, his last acitivity here wasn't in 2014 but in 2018. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704320.40 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704320.40) I searched the whole list and my name was not found in it. Even if my name was included in it , what harm would i have ? It only contains the telegram name and Eth address. You cannot hack anyone's account by knowing the Etherum or telegram address. I just wonder how possible that will be hacking someone's Bitcointalk Account with just the Telegram name and the ETH WALLET ADDRESS...🤔🤦 Title: Re: Security risk for more than 7300 bitcointalk users? Post by: Murren Cathain on July 23, 2020, 10:50:04 AM https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704320.40 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=704320.40) Quote I just wonder how possible that will be hacking someone's Bitcointalk Account with just the Telegram name and the ETH WALLET ADDRESS...🤔🤦 Why hacking Bitcointalk accounts with Telegram names and ETH adresses? That is'nt the point at all! By the way: I made a countercheck with other Bitcoin fora. The result: Bitcointalk is an exceptional case and therefore a black sheep. |